Bounty and too many participants

[rudyrista123]

here a lot of people who need money, all vying to get more. it all happened today, the bounty almost full, but this time with the system merit everyone difficulty to improve the rank her, and it is quite limited to a campaign asked rank higher.

[Papcio77]

Well crypto become popular the users will increase and more users will join in bounty campaign. It would help to grow the economy but in the other hand for bounty hunters this not good. To maintain the high reward so wr have no choice to up our ranks, increase our followers, improve our skills.

[Aimee1993]

I agree, we need to have something new to give bounty hunters equal, if we can't just rank these high ranking personal data will enjoy the bounty movement, like all the lower levels like we do not have such a high gamble? This is unfair, because we publish the same number of posts per week.

[hidingyou]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Because of too much participants of a bounty program its divided by the different ICO project.

[darth_cryptorider]

I agree it's  problem for old hunter with all this shit posters. But I think this will soon change, more and more ICO use platform for bounty instead of forum

[Spifo]

Really participants in fb and tw became too much that attracts decrease in earnings, but as far as it is favorable to bounty companies to limit number of participants, more people - more advertizing, unless isn't present?

[pprun]

I am thinking that those campaigns that have huge numbers of participants are manage by popular manager in this forum. Basically people put their trust to the person that they know not scammer. We choose the person that we know real and not liar.

[ZBer_Cut]

I don't think it's a problem as way too many campaigns popping up everyday, and still many people in the crypto world not fully aware about bounty campaigns.

[anhcuti24]

Now it is not easy like earlier to get big profit, will be must hard working for this.

[Tamilson]

In my opinion I think all ICO's should limit the number of bounty participants but on the other side in one particular ICO its good for them to have many bounty participants to advertise their project and be more successful.Bounty campaigns is very much known nowadays which results to have many participants.Have a nice day

Well actually some bounty campaigns are happy if their bounty is flood by participants and that means it gather a lot of attention from the community and have a good bounty allocation . However, the participants are the one who loss the chance of getting high stakes that's why it's better to put limit in every campaign so all have the chance to get more.

[anggaem]

Yep that's right, there are too many participants in social media campaign and reward less than before. but it's does not matter for me  if we are fair and not cheating. and for investor i think bounty hunter will become investor if they are interested with some project.

[xALEXUSx]

Bounty is popular because it brings profit without investment. To whom it is interesting, pay attention to the TokenGo campaign https://tokengoplatform.com. For the performance of assignments, a fair payment is accrued and everything is visible and convenient in the private office. TokenGo is the platform for the tokenization of business.

[muhdatha]

It depends on campaign. I know campaign with 150 participants for month... and I know that bountyhive collect 5000 participants for just 1 night.

[coinlocket$]

Big part of the problem are people and abusing the bounty with 10+ more accounts, we need to cooperate and report those people and waiting for the ban. Beside this fact the popalarity of bounty manager is also a problem  cause if the payout is low the campaign with no limit/rank/number of people will be very populated no matter what, and you know if no rank requirement is adopted people can easly join with a lot of accounts.

[Denigmatic]

I believe that generosity is based on rates, more participants mean more bets, and own bets versus general bets will decrease when getting smaller tokens.

[markers]

It is quite obvious that FB and TWTR bounty campaigns become overpopulated. My current response is to more actively participate in signature and content creation ones. Agree that we can see the adoption of more stringent rules for bounty participants in the near future.    

[Stasnislav11]

I like the way your thoughts go. But who will vibe these members for the bounty? What to do if you are not there?
In fact, I saw a few bounty managers who tried to choose the best in their opinion, and what do you think they got? of the 500-odd accounts for Twitter have chosen 2. Do you know who these two lucky ones are?) These guys are Newbie who have not made a single retweet about ICO on their Twitter account. I do not think that the manager's choice was the right one. Among those whose accounts have not been accepted, there were really good twitter accounts that could lead the money to his project.

[muhdatha]

Big part of the problem are people and abusing the bounty with 10+ more accounts, we need to cooperate and report those people and waiting for the ban. Beside this fact the popalarity of bounty manager is also a problem  cause if the payout is low the campaign with no limit/rank/number of people will be very populated no matter what, and you know if no rank requirement is adopted people can easly join with a lot of accounts.

I think 10 accs it's not so bad - I've heard recently one bounty campaign kicked-away about 1000 multiple / bot accs  

[coinlocket$]

Big part of the problem are people and abusing the bounty with 10+ more accounts, we need to cooperate and report those people and waiting for the ban. Beside this fact the popalarity of bounty manager is also a problem  cause if the payout is low the campaign with no limit/rank/number of people will be very populated no matter what, and you know if no rank requirement is adopted people can easly join with a lot of accounts.

I think 10 accs it's not so bad - I've heard recently one bounty campaign kicked-away about 1000 multiple / bot accs  

Yeah man, this can be possible. This week I've found a list of telegram with atlease 50 accounts from 1 person but I think noone will ban them, you know they are +1 on telegram.

[Elsonbol]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think that it is worth limiting some companies to the rank and a merit, but not all the rest will be unfair to younger members, I am sure that we need a certain algorithm that to organize everything. I saw that some managers limit propaganda on a rank, and all want to participate in these campaigns.