Bounty and too many participants

[deepakg2m]

I like the way Bountyhive manages the participants. Their way makes it more transparent whih part of the bounty is shared for each tier.

I agree.I am also favoring BOUNTYHIVE much and the reasons for this are:~
Firstly, it explains each and every detail about the project .The beginning and ending dates ,the way the work is to be done ,etc.
Secondly,the projects are managed and portrayed in a very convenient way.
Thirdly, the way the stakes are to be distributed is already given along with the project and it is not equal for everyone rather it depends on the work one chooses to do.

[1715320782]

1715320782

[De_nis]

Yes, I've already seen that some bounty campaign administrators apply restrictions on rank, I think the quality of campaigns from this only improves!

[Stimah23]

The issue of many participants joining bounties nowadays is getting too much, the rewards for each participant is getting slim and slim, the only solution I can suggest is that the bounty manager should introduce a strict bounty that would limit the amount of participants just like bountyhive... That can limit the slim fit of bounty rewards.

[sneakycoin]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

It depends on the model used. If there are stakes, than the  more participants, the less is your profit. But they may also assign a predefined number of tokens.

Too many bounty hunters, you're right.  If by choosing the best participants  you mean filtering out those with Twitter and FB accounts dedicated to bounties only, than almost no one will be eligible for stakes. Good for increasing your profits, but bad for the community opinion 

[Xclusive5]

Well, I could remember when I started last year the spreadsheet isn't that crowded but a lot of people are into bounty campaign now. What I feel is bounty still pays of you are strategic with the way you choose the campaigns you intend participating.

[huzun]

more people learn about cryptoworld, and opportunities to earn money. It is normal process that number of participants in bounty campaigns grows.

[lhadygreen]

Bounty is very popular. Most people are in bounty though its quite tough.
The law of supply and demand should apply to this. Because, the more the member or applicants there is, the more the bounty profit lessen or decrease. It is also one way for people to earn crypto for free.

It must be limited by the administrators.

[oludare1]

Bounty and too many participants! That is one of the major challenges of bounty campaign now. However, many of these participants are nor serious and dedicated to the campaign thereby making the spreadsheet unnecessarily filled up. The moment some people notice large number on the spreadsheet, the are discouraged in participating in such campaign because they believe that the tokens will be shares among multitude rather than little people.

[changemabika]

some ICO and bounty campaign limit they user to join. so maybe the reward can split fairly. and many manager now see the profile of user in bitcointalk, to know they can join the bounty or not.

[faceoff97]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

This actually made me stop buying coins during ICO, I feel like Im raising fund and just giving it to those people who are joining the Bounty campaign, though advertisements really matter. The only problem I see is that the people who just get the coin for free gets greatwr profit tgan those who really produced fund. Im now getting into an ICO whuch has low percentage allotted for the campaigns, most who join bounty campaign are just a dumper which causes the price to go down.

[1kings]

To me, it's a good indication that more people are becoming aware of cryptos and are ready to have an early slice.

There'd continue to be a corresponding increase in bounty hunters for every growth and ICO release.

[Zalfa_mui]

Maybe for bounty participants should be limited, in order to get maximum results, if not limited participants will booming and the results are very little.Hopefully the future will be many rules like that.

[hahay]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

With many bounty participants it will not affect the tokens you get from bounty, because usually bounty managers or their teams have set up tokens to be allocated for bounty campaigns.

[standards]

I am not worried about it.
If you find the reward not good enough, choose another one.
There are more than 100 bounties out there, you can always find the good one, as long as you don't expect too much.

[kryptogunner]

I dont know what others are thinking or replied before me, but if a project is legitimate and has a reasoanble roadmap with team working hard to achieve it, more bounty hunters shall increase the outreach and thus bringing in more investments.

So you may though get lesser tokens/ coins, eventually those shall be more worthier as well.

Just my interpretation. 

[DanielRR1997]

Look the Official DIW ICO Program

Ann Thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2682890.0

Website : https://diwtoken.com/

Is a good project .......It's an honest rewards program and it's paying well.

[DPrillio]

I am not worried about it.
If you find the reward not good enough, choose another one.
There are more than 100 bounties out there, you can always find the good one, as long as you don't expect too much.

Yes, in every campaign there is always a percentage of bounty allocation and if there are many participants then it only mean that there is a lot of dividend out of the allocated budget, but i think there is no need to be worry of, because there is a lots of ICO offering new campaign and this is what the world's gonna be, because we are marching into full digital era.

[vastmast]

The more people involved in a campaign, the less money is being earned. Very popular campaigns are very slow to pay and you can take your money after months. The amount of stake that you will also receive is also very low

[endlasuresh]

Nowadays, nobody distributing awards properly because of a lot of ICO's and most of them almost are scams. I would suggest you to take lightly while participating in these ICO's bounties.

[tuvic01]

You are very right,there seems to be too many participants now joining the bounty campaign  and it's definitely affecting the reward because the more the people participating the less the reward per participant. I think there should be rules that can regulate the type of participants that can join bounty.