Bounty and too many participants

[Andrej Peiboski]

It is true that there are more and more participants, on the other hand there are also many more bounties. The real problem is that their duration has increased enormously, and often the participants are not rewarded, so we work for nothing.

[1713516067]

1713516067

[1713516067]

1713516067

[1713516067]

1713516067

[AgentZero23]

That's the problem now to many participants and in some ICO's telegram groups have many members and 90 percent of them are bounty hunters which will not invest and only there for the campaign. I appreciate the initiative of some bounty managers to limit the bounty participants in order to keep the rewards high.

[B{o}T]

Everyone can participate in tv and fb, so there are so many wishing and a small payment. In more qualified companies, such as translation, you can earn more.

[Yana_1]

Everything goes to the point of limiting the participants in the company, on the one hand it is correct that it will be possible to get more profits. But with another it can negatively affect all companies. That just people turn their back on this if it is very difficult to get coins.

[Nisansala]

Today there are so many people are participate to bounty.
In Earlier day we can earn huge profit from it. but today we can get huge profit. because of the so many paticipent join to bounty.
But some good bounty managers adding to there bounty paticipent limite.

[reidel21]

I think the more bounties the better, that means bounty campaigns succeed with more participants then more and more will know about altcoin so in my opinion that is a good thing, no need to be tightened.

[harunhabib]

Bounty in addition to a great number of players should have a rivalry with ICO initiatives for getting add-ons. Thus, ICO challenge players need beneficial expertise in addition to they should be showcase this model within a constructive in addition to useful technique. While doing so, ICO challenge players require different thoughts which might be best for this challenge in addition to promote this progress on the challenge.

[BigBoy89]

Everything goes to the point of limiting the participants in the company, on the one hand it is correct that it will be possible to get more profits. But with another it can negatively affect all companies. That just people turn their back on this if it is very difficult to get coins.

Why limit the participants? What will the project benefit from limiting the participants?
The bounty manager want more people to promote the project. How is the rewards split is not so important for the manager.

[lamfod]

I agree too many members. and I agree that companies need to tighten some rules.

[Retinol]

I also agree that companies need to tighten some rules. It is necessary to make limits for participants in the bounty and remove bots and multiaccounts!

[orisbar]

According to my observation if one campaign limit the number of bounty hunters that able to participate the loses is not for the bounty hunters but for them. Bounty hunters play some major roles to promote the project effectively.

[ZEIIMAN]

Each campaign recruited 3000+ participants. In the Bounty, it makes no sense to participate if the rewards are not fixed, or there is no limit on the number of participants.

[Lemayilleur]

Yes, unfortunately this problem is very common! But there is a way out of this situation. You should find such projects that are not very well known, but very promising! In such projects there will not be many participants, which will allow you to earn more!

[coin_1122]

Yes, unfortunately this problem is very common! But there is a way out of this situation. You should find such projects that are not very well known, but very promising! In such projects there will not be many participants, which will allow you to earn more!

Yes, we don't know whether the project has potential to reach the audience because there are many projects. Choosing is always the best option even though there are many participants but the company has ability to increase its price.

[drippx]

it is true ,the reward will be much less then before ,there should be some strict rules to select outstanding participants. There are too many people to participate in the bounty at present.

[gcbjk]

I agree with your point of view that there should indeed be some requirements and restrictions on participants. I think more and more participants, there will be a variety of requirements and restrictions to choose participants.

[Man91]

Too many participants ? I must disagree with you , we are no yet on the mainstream of bounties , ICO's and so on. After we gonna reach this stage , we are gonna see some really awesome bounty programs with a lot of participants in all the bounties.

[denbagoes]

I also realize that Bounty participants are very much current.
Many are enrolled, and the more participants will be less money allocation for each account.
But I think everyone is entitled to follow it because Bounty opened in general and have rules such as must Junior Member for the Signature.
Actually to follow the Bounty program already has the rules.

[NineBall]

Why limit the participants? What will the project benefit from limiting the participants?
The bounty manager want more people to promote the project. How is the rewards split is not so important for the manager.

maybe he thinks if the participants are limited then paricipant will get a very large part, but different from the bounty manager's way of thinking, bounty manager just looking for participant as much as possible

[kololo]

Now bounty champaign is a famous thing for a ico to build its community. But I don't think there are too many people join the bounty but too many bountys are waiting peoples to join.

But there are most of them are scams or weath nothing, it is important to choose a bounty.