Bounty and too many participants

[wowprolol]

I think this is logical, the number of people in the community is increasing every day . therefore, the number of participants in the bounty is growing

[1715289289]

1715289289

[1715289289]

1715289289

[digol]

I participate of the bounty campaigns on Twitter, but recently it has become much less profitable.  Now I prefer to participate in the company's signature

[mayasari]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Perhaps we should be more smart choose the bounty with the project is good, and also more selective in choosing bounty because a lot of bounty scam, and to dev more selective in choosing participants.

[roglopolo]

And every day worse and worse , more and more participants come every day

[theblack_cat]

Bounty compaign is very popular because it can be followed by jr member or new member, so many jr members who follow bounty to get profit

[jackjones53]

Yes, in my opinion now this is really a serious problem! I think that some projects should introduce restrictions on the number of participants, which will help participants earn more!

[Borisb52]

Nothing lasts forever in this world. The theme of the bounty was already too much satiated with the participants. It seems to me that over time the conditions for participation in bounty companies will change (this is already happening).

[Cryptokarl]

Generally speaking, bounty campaigns are good for the development of cryptocurrency.
Lots of people get to know cryptocurrency because of it.
When google and facebook banned crypto ads, bounty campaigns become more important.

[nev1d]

I do not think that this is a problem. There are other services where rivalry is much more than 5000 people in the campaign. Therefore, it is very good that there are not so many participants as could be

[Harlen.t]

I'm sure it's not a problem for the marketers of ico. Of course, many of the participants are very good at promoting their brand, product. And they usually do youtube, signature, article and other difficult companies

[zhpool]

Nothing lasts forever in this world. The theme of the bounty was already too much satiated with the participants. It seems to me that over time the conditions for participation in bounty companies will change (this is already happening).

Yes i agree and its really very sad...i think with so many ico going around there is still a lot of opportunity just some good management is required and limitation is seriously required specially in social media campaigns

[Mr.ZODIAC]

Nothing lasts forever in this world. The theme of the bounty was already too much satiated with the participants. It seems to me that over time the conditions for participation in bounty companies will change (this is already happening).

Yes i agree and its really very sad...i think with so many ico going around there is still a lot of opportunity just some good management is required and limitation is seriously required specially in social media campaigns

On the social networks Bounty companies always allocate a small percentage of the total pool, so the number of participants always affects the amount of money earned.

[StLucifer]

Nothing lasts forever in this world. The theme of the bounty was already too much satiated with the participants. It seems to me that over time the conditions for participation in bounty companies will change (this is already happening).

Yes i agree and its really very sad...i think with so many ico going around there is still a lot of opportunity just some good management is required and limitation is seriously required specially in social media campaigns

On the social networks Bounty companies always allocate a small percentage of the total pool, so the number of participants always affects the amount of money earned.

Ya the allocation is less there and the number of participants are largest in social media campaigns because a user can participate in many social media campaigns at the same time...limiting the number of participants is necessary otherwise it has become totally useless these days

[JohnMacZeppelin]

The number of participants today can show the interest of the community to the project, it may be that today it is possible to check the quality of the project and the guarantees of payments in this way, think if suddenly such a large number of people can not get honestly earned tokens from the bounty, what will happen next?

[Sevaev]

At present, there are a lot of facebook and twitter bounty participants, so there is less rewards. That's why, I have not been participating facebook and twitter bounty for some time.

[mobilestrike]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think it is not better to restrict more people to join bounty but have to allow to join more and more people as these people will then invite other people to join the project and they will invite investors to invest in the project and so the community of that project will be much wider and the project will then get the required success and your coins will bring worth for you.

[highscore]

this topic attracts all: both developers and scammers .. so every month there are hundreds of new ICO (and this is only visible in the information field projects), and it becomes extremely difficult to choose those startups that will be successful.

[paulmaritz]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Regulations as in getting governments involved or do you mean just more strict rules?

Competition can be good. Everybody should be given a fair chance to participate - there are enough obstacles as it is. Early bird catches the worm. And yes, it takes more effort to earn the same income as was previously the case. The free market will push those who cannot afford to participate out at the end of the day. The best ones will remain. My two satoshis.

[MoneyCrafter]

A lot of participants is good for the project because they want to spread the news as far as possible and having a lot of participants can certainly help. It's different though for the participant because they will get less reward than before.

[iigor]

Yes, in my opinion now this is really a serious problem! I think that some projects should introduce restrictions on the number of participants, which will help participants earn more!

Why would the projects limit the number of participants?
Who is the main concern of the project manager? The project or the bounty hunters?
More participants means a lot better coverage and better chance to reach hard cap.
I don't think that is OK to limit the participants. This is not in the best interest of the projects.