Bounty and too many participants

[alexford]

yeah. because of too many participants in bounty campaigns. This will great impact on the rewards for each participants. The more the lower you will get. So practically, you will be more rewards if theres a limit for participant counts.

[1714985482]

1714985482

[1714985482]

1714985482

[1714985482]

1714985482

[1714985482]

1714985482

[1714985482]

1714985482

[farukahmed]

Day by day maney people are including bounty campaign. That's the very easy campaign in bounty. I like Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, YouTube video marketing campaign. Also signature campaign its a very difficult buy i can do it. I have more experience in bounty. I like bounty because it's a very easy sector and also some people in the campaign in this sector.

[bestluck]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Regulations as in getting governments involved or do you mean just more strict rules?

Competition can be good. Everybody should be given a fair chance to participate - there are enough obstacles as it is. Early bird catches the worm. And yes, it takes more effort to earn the same income as was previously the case. The free market will push those who cannot afford to participate out at the end of the day. The best ones will remain. My two satoshis.

yes the ICO starters do not impose any hard rules for them as they want more people to participate in their bounty program as they know the more people participate in their bounty the more will it increase in the public.
It is the right of every person to share what they want and if the ICO starter want to pay them for it then it is not bad for anyone.

[Duallimit]

Many, the so-called "new" members, are multi-accounts of already existing people. And the biggest problem, in my opinion, is when the project stretches the campaign for several months. During this time, the campaign fill with a huge number of bounty hunters and payments become simply ridiculous.

[kittybabe@06]

I think it would be unfair to have this regulations in bounty programs. New members just wanted to have an extra income like us, so let them join bounty campaigns too.

[linkHA]

The ICO team has no hard and fast requirements for the number of participants in each reward thread.
Most of the time, the more people are involved, the happier the team will be, because the more people help to promote it.

[h31s3nb3rg]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Actually I get your point but I think it is really hard to organize or to maintain because some bounties takes almost a month just to post updates in stake and what if they also choose the better participants in their campaign ? It would really take some time.

[Sithara007]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

One option would be to restrict the bounty participants to Senior Members and higher up. But then, it will affect the growth in user-base for the crypto-currencies. But for starters, we could ban the Newbies and Junior Members from participating in the bounties.

[crypto2k180]

It makes sense to take part in companies where a limited number of people from the very beginning!

[mimota154]

I think all the Bounty campaigns must have a participants limit in order to provide a good reward for everyone. It is also a good idea to make a rating of bountyhunters to let the project select only the best for their companies

[Lora_ng15]

the growth of participants is the biggest problem in the bounty, I think that because of this bounty will cease to be relevant and profitable.

[thecoder2017]

Yes too many participants in one ico just because bitcoin is becoming popular and lots of people especially those who have no permanent job and they find that in joining bitcoin they can become rich.

[RebekittaH]

There are a number of programes out there and a number of bounty participants too

[CyNotes]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Nice sharing your ideas here. More participants in a campaign, less rewards you can earn. You can earn just a peny or maybe less than that. Other participants were cheating, they used fake accounts or joining more campaigns without doing their work.

[daicavung]

Today we participate in bonuses we will receive very little tokens, not offset the effort we have spent. So I think now finding another lucrative market to make money is justified. Future bonuses will no longer worth the effort we spend.

[Irkytsk38rus]

Yes, the popularity of such earnings is growing constantly. Therefore, it is necessary to wait only for the fall in profits and soon it will be difficult at all to earn

[avatar54321]

This is disaster. Having lots of participants in bounty campaign. It would make smaller the reward.

[HatDen]

Everything ends, even the bounty theme render itself obsolete.
Make your business now and don't have to cry then.

[13ex07]

One option would be to restrict the bounty participants to Senior Members and higher up. But then, it will affect the growth in user-base for the crypto-currencies. But for starters, we could ban the Newbies and Junior Members from participating in the bounties.

One option would be to limit the members of generosity to full members and lower. This will greatly affect the growth of the user base of crypto-currencies. Senior members will not engage in meaningless participation in generosity, but will use their invaluable experience to develop crypto, create new projects and attract new users. Invaluable experience and knowledge of senior members should not be spent on meaningless making money. Senior members should devote themselves only to the development of to crypto! And the lower ranks are allowed to participate in the bounty, this is an excellent motivation for attracting newcomers.

[Alexishugh7]

There is nothing can be done about it since you aint the bounty manager. It will make a whole lot of sense if limit number of particioants are introduced tho.