Bounty and too many participants

[mercer007]

There are many bounty campaigns that limit the amount of bounty hunters from the very beginning. Typically, this is 200-500 participants. Try to view the forum more often to be among these lucky ones.

[1714686464]

1714686464

[1714686464]

1714686464

[1714686464]

1714686464

[1714686464]

1714686464

[Red Ron]

A lot of bots. They are very well seen when they write reports for weeks after the end of the company. Programs automatically send reports to the topics of the bounty

[automaticmoney]

yes we have too many participants for bounty and this is due to lot of competition in market we can see new projects coming up every days and new members are also increasing every day

[L1looker]

Don’t worried about many participant at bounty campaign, there are many kind of bounty campaign could we joined and participated, we have many option for joined the bounty campaign and many kind of bounty campaign always have everyday.

[lolxxxx]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Well if you think that more and more users will make you earn less then you are wrong, The bounty and the ICO work together if there is a lot of users who are promoting the bounty then it can be successful if the ICO don't get success then if you earn more tokens and the bounty is not succeeded then where will you use the tokens?

[backspace jejel]

Yes, more and more peple getting known about bounty. I see in Twitter there are about 4-5 thousands people. Its crazy. But if you join, everybody can do the same. Seems like in half a year we gonna have maximum 20$ payment haha. But for sure its not funny

[Michail.]

Yes, now we need to strain all forces to find a worthy project, where participants were few or go to another type of activity, for example, articles for writing.

[Sonofshmidt]

I think that ICO projects should strict the number of participants in there Bounty campaign cause effectiveness of it is very low...

[a_t_e_e_b]

yes it is the current problem as there are too many people and less good projects and getting m=bounty is really tough but still it is worth the hardwork and time if it is a good project and can be helpful for those who want to enter in this industry

[Rakesh_alejandro]

But there are more ICO nowadays so its okay if there are more participants, they have right to earn more from ICO. Its better because when they have money from ICO, they will invest in ICO. So this industry will be huge.

I think if you can not make enough money, people will move on. And this is no different, balance will be found constantly, and will always evolve to find a new equilibrium.
It will never happen, but what will happen is that those who are in an area with a higher cost of living will stop doing it.

[abramovich]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Yes you are right, indeed more and more participating the less the rewards are also in the can. Many people participate because in my opinion, bounty is the easiest way to make money by following some rules and of course make a lot of people want to participate in bounty.

[DeKingCrypto]

I think that bounty hunters are multiplying on daily basis. They are so many that you won't even earn anything after the bounty program.

[grknondr]

I think this is a big problem. More participants mean less reward. For some time, I check spreadsheet and if there are too many participant, I dont participate. But ı noticed that each bounty has too many participants. The bounty managers should limit the participan number. There must be a First comes first serve method.

[HaekalZ]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Yes, there are already too many participants in the bounty campaign, i really agree with that, but we just need to work hard to get paid for our work. all we can do now is keep support and promote the ICO we're participated even there are too many participants out there, it's still very worth to do.

[asyakashi]

Since there are merit rules the participant of the signature campaign has been reduced, and other campaigns such as videos and blogs become alternatives.
very lucky person who has a high account right now she is not thinking of anything to get merit.

[texas23]

that is the way to keep everything running well, with the rules also don't limit us even become better in the search bounty now because it isn't only sought spam but has begun to be demanded our quality also in posting that is good a rule and for the future even better and the rewards will be more and the needs of investors are also guaranteed.

[JanuaryStars]

Since there are merit rules the participant of the signature campaign has been reduced, and other campaigns such as videos and blogs become alternatives.
very lucky person who has a high account right now she is not thinking of anything to get merit.

Aside form being reduced, all thanks to merit system, the quality of posts from each participant are now improving.
Merit system has it's own strengths with positive impacts, but also has its drawbacks. Trade-offs if we put it.
Number of participants can be a measure of legitimacy of project and trust. So having a lot of participants is not always a problem, but not always a good thing. But we should not limit participants wishing to promote the project.

[Man From The Future]

The rules of bounty campaigns are now getting tighter. There are also restrictions on participants and using self-identity. Not everyone can follow bounty campaigns, because they spend time and thoughts. To get a lot of money, it will certainly choose to invest rather than follow bounty campaigns, because time is very valuable. The rewards of the bounty campaigns are not many, and we should be able to respond with a graceful chest. Because we do not need capital to make a profit.

[Ycekezuv]

A good option would be to limit places for bounty participants.  If they set limits, then it will be possible to forecast payments in a particular company.

[JasonCroper]

Yes, in my opinion now this is really a serious problem! I think that some projects should introduce restrictions on the number of participants, which will help participants earn more!