Bounty and too many participants

[tracyhayley]

Yes, i agree. there are too many participants in one campaign nowadays, especially for social media campaign. I don't know if they are the same person with fake accounts or the different person in some participants. That's why i prefer to join bounty campaign that has limit on it. But, it's rare to find it now.

[1714818698]

1714818698

[viperzero]

The number of participants in bounty companies of social networks can exceed several thousand. The profit from participating in the social campaign of Tweeter and Facebook is getting smaller every day.

[ItsZeroLimit]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

It strongly depends on the campaign manager. Some managers set a limit. But you must understand that for the projects, the more participants, the more profitable. Therefore, I believe that setting limits, you can not wait in large numbers.

[Scambusterz]

Yes I agree. There were too many participants. But there's nothing to be done, everyone wants to work and earn. Maybe to solve this problem, you need to tighten the terms of the campaigns or limit the number of participants.

[Catmurs]

I agree , a lot of them are now involved parties need to take a lot of projects to spend money now on the bounty

[Tapyaks72]

I am confident that the number of participants will increase every day, which will further exacerbate the situation. In my opinion, the only solution to this problem is to limit the number of participants to the project!

We cannot stop participants to join  ICO’s campaign because they also  wanted to earn as what  we did, it the prerogative to the campaign manager to select there participants.

[cepot9]

many bounty managers limit the minimum ranking of btt as well as the number of followers and the number of participants, this is a very good rule to apply because we have to work harder by waking up early to get a bounty slot just present, restricted bounty participants to make the reward stable and I think bounty managers are now good and smart to handle the large number of new participants who are not eligible for bounty campaigns

[Byakuya]

I think, that is really a problem! Projects should put restrictions on the number of participants, which will help participants earn more! I know some projects do that and I join these kind of projects. Also, merit system is good for this problem.

[thenameisjay]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think so too. I think stricter rules should be implemented with bounty campaigns, the substance of the replies, grammar, and the abolishment of multiple accounts. It's also good to note that campaigns and campaign manager should pay on the right time and check stakes on the right time.

[sebinator]

It is normal for exciting business like this to grow more saturated. The campaigns get what they want, their promotion - and the people who do the bounty hunting get what they deserve, their payment. It seems pretty fair to me.

[oneidentity]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

It strongly depends on the campaign manager. Some managers set a limit. But you must understand that for the projects, the more participants, the more profitable. Therefore, I believe that setting limits, you can not wait in large numbers.

Of course, the more participants, the better the campaign, but not the hunters for generosity. Therefore, I believe that we need reasonable limits on the number of participants. Or increase in the pool of the pool.

[Dyanggok]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

It really depend on the developer or project owner. On how many token will be allocated, cause if its a lot that could change a thing. And second of all, they should set a limit to the participants. I know the feeling, kinda tiring being rewarded less than you deserve though. Specially if you work almost a year or half.

[mary0919]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Yes many participabts to bounties who are very popular and many paeticipants will have less rewards. There are also bounties with less participants and that they will earn more rewards and if this project will hit in the market how lucky they are because they have much of profit.

[777Jolami]

I don't think it's a problem as way too many campaigns popping up everyday, and still many people in the crypto world not fully aware about bounty campaigns. Probably it's better to look into translation and content campaigns as they require more work.

The Bounty campaign has many categories for us to do. But in fact the most engaged are facebook, twitter, telegram .... and so on. Signature campaigns are now popular and many are involved. So in my opinion, we should choose the campaigns with the least attendees. so will be better, tokens we will get more. I used to do Bounty campaign for 7 weeks. but only 78 tokens. The amount is too little compared to the effort I put out

[NoPlanB]

the world of bounty is big.You cant join differen campaigns,you can have different numbers of followers,you can choose right companies,you can choose different ways.

[boy130]

Bounties are becoming over saturated now, this is because the bounty managers are letting people get away with doing absolutely nothing for their rewards. The problem is bounty campaigns are being completely spammed up by participants from third world countries, when in reality, bounty managers want applicants from high net worth countries. I think there needs to be a crackdown as it's becoming ridiculous.

[annajewel100]

Bounty is meanly used for promotions for an ICO’s. There are many bounties to grab, the opportunity is huge. Slelect the good bounty and participant in promotional activities. No need to worry about the huge participants. There will sure Returns if it’s an good bounty.

[1DC]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

That's a good idea actually , regulating the participants before they join a campaign but I don't think that it will work for some bounties because bounty campaigns used to advertise or promote a particular project so every bounty manager need more people to advertise their project so the idea of reducing the participants is contrary to the original purpose of campaign .

[pelumi20]

A lot of people are joining cryptocurrency every day especially the bounty hunters, this has made the rewards a little bit low compared to before.
That is why I prefer signature to every other bounty, you can only do one at a time. This still makes bounty worth it.

[bayupermana]

A lot of people are joining cryptocurrency every day especially the bounty hunters, this has made the rewards a little bit low compared to before.
That is why I prefer signature to every other bounty, you can only do one at a time. This still makes bounty worth it.

Yes, the number of participants in bounty is increasing isn't a weird thing because there are more people know about this and this is absolutely a good way to earn money and why they don't participate it? IF they don't, then it's the problem.