Bounty and too many participants

[gerkuless]

I advise you not to participate in such bounty, because you will get very few coins.  It is better to find a bounty where there is a limit on the number of participants.

[1714131976]

1714131976

[1714131976]

1714131976

[1714131976]

1714131976

[1714131976]

1714131976

[1714131976]

1714131976

[Dmcuibap]

Its just normal. When you got much from bounty you will invite your friends earn up some also. Bounty Manager and Dev Manager thanks for this very much. More participants more affective more big community. Bounty nowaday not like its was before

[Shaminyue]

The purpose of bounty campaign is broadcasting the project and its coin, thus, they would try to catch as much as bounty participants they can to spread their information to the community. We should work harder or try to participant in translation campaign if we want to get great rewards.

[gilad215]

I don't think that matters as long as the motive of the campaign is getting achieved. In fact, more number of participants will help in the promotion of the ICO. The distribution amount is already decided and at the start of the campaign, only a handful are selected to take part in the bounty programme. As new ICOs are coming up more and more bounty campaigns are coming up, I think everyone gets a fair share to participate in the campaigns if they are quick enough.

[Schovgurov]

Last time so many info on youtube about bounty . So many people look for free money, that is why so many participants join generosity.
and the campaign of bounties is popular because even we will wait several months, we will receive an award.
I see that good managers gives participant limit for camp and its nice

[richman3451]

yes of course bounty participants became very much because of this, it became less profitable and the deadlines for receiving rewards increased

[warkop121]

In fact, there are bounty campaigns that limit their participants. And that's not a big deal. Investors will tend to invest and, can, at the same time join the bounty. They know very well that if they believe in the project it is better to throw away your money rather than catch some free small partitioned money in different campaigns to many participants. then give me a bonus bet, because I'm pretty sure it does not sacrifice them to distribute their own coins in exchange for advertising. The idea now is to join as many good people as you can.

[matedrink24]

Currently, the twitter and facobook campain participants are very much . The rewards I receive are too few . I think the program managers should limit the number of participants. BTC rankings and higher social media account follow

[jherenz]

In my opinion this is not a threat if so many participants in bounty campaigns bitcoin is a popular now and some of people are interested what bitcoin can do to their lives. It depends on the management you will be the member of the group or not.

[Asgar 9]

And a very big problem is that it is no longer possible to increase the rank of your account. The incentive system (merit) on the forum does not work. I think that a large number of participants is not such a big problem like what I said.

[iaxakov]

Actually 50% of bounty participant turn out to be investors in the project and help the project to achieve It's soft and hard cap! The remaining of the hunters would likely become traders and give the project's token liquidity in the market! Large participant is a big plus fir any project!

In addition, many countries limit the cryptocurrency, in connection with which KYC was introduced in order not to pay tokens to people in whose countries it is prohibited. I think this niche is already well filtered.

[Litzki1990]

Too many bounty campaign participant maybe it was a big help for the project to promote on what they have inside of their project and so many investor be encourage to invest of the project but the bounty ill think it will be going to divided.

[Old Bindu]

How do you propose to solve this problem? In my opinion, several months ago an attempt was made to solve this problem - a merit system was introduced. Can you suggest something new?

[Bitknick]

Yes, that's for sure.  A lot of people have been added to bounty companies lately, but there are more companies!

[Natsuu]

And a very big problem is that it is no longer possible to increase the rank of your account. The incentive system (merit) on the forum does not work. I think that a large number of participants is not such a big problem like what I said.

But for me it's fine even I don't rank up because of the merit system as I know moderators just want to clean this forum away from shitposters. And believe it or not, it worked. I can see less high rank members posting a non sense thing in a one liner post.

People are having their interest in cryptos and they see forum as a stepping stone to make a move in crypto trading and it's fine as long as people are sharing their thoughts that can help others to grow.

[^BuTcH^]

I don't know what measures should be taken to prevent such a big flow of bounty hunters. On the one hand participants gain less and less, but on the other hand for ICO it is profitable when more and more hunters take part in bounty because they receive more result for the same money

[BeEvil]

Indeed, there are a lot of participants in the campaigns now. However, if you look at social campaigns with more than 3000 people, you can notice a huge number of bots / multi-accounts, which make it difficult for managers to process such a volume of reports (> 400 pages usually), and often even do not follow the campaign rules. This number comes to 2/3 of the participants.

[Umuoji]

I noticed it too that there are many participants in bounty unlike before and the more the number of participants the lesser the reward. People are now running from airdrops for bounties because it is more rewarding

[MiChaeng]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

yes it is true if more and more participants then the less reward received. but usually projects that have few participants after the completion of the project will be extended again because they have not met the targets set by the project. but there are also projects that already meet the quota will reject new participants to follow the project.

[Patadong]

I'm not agree bounty with too many participants. Because there bounty participants I think have limits.
So many peoples like to join bounty campaign because bounty is good option to earn more coin.