Bounty and too many participants

[gulagguh]

we can not deny the development of the world, especially on bitcoin world, we can not deny and the more who knows the existence of bitcoin, the more newcomers in this crypto world, in fact we have to share with others, fortune in the hands of God, we must be able to accept reality happened

[Jizel]

In general, I agree that the bounty must accept a limited number of participants so that those who take part can get a good profit, and not a trifle because of the large crowd.
Although, now, due to the fact that bitcoin is extremely unstable, many participants have stopped dealing with bounty companies.

[cerahb01]

Very happy if you can join bounty. But almost all the requirements to participate bounty is minimal junior member. Too bad I'm still a newbie. I can not join it. still waiting.

[crampus]

My opinion is to divide the bounty campaign into sublevels, depending on the rank on the forum. And newcomers do not give the right to participate.

[petir.bay]

Yes, the popularity of bounty is growing, a simple way to make good money. I now own 3 months ago did not participate in the campaigns and didn't know about them

[Loran Lann]

More participants joins bounty campaign because those rewards too high and everyone want it. Lots of programs have hard rules and most of people can't follow those rules and we still have high paying with those campaign. So i think we don't need to care about number of participants and we just need to follow the rules to get high rewards.

[BZingerB]

I think it's impossible to realize.
Participants in bounty companies are really very many, but ICO who spend bounty is also very much.
Therefore, I am sure that eventually everything will normalize by itself.
Nothing to worry about.

[Ethan Becker]

It's hard time now for bounty-hunters. So many people try bounty and ICO-projects pay less every months. But you can still earn good money if you will choice good bounty/project.

[markieeeloy]

When you see that there are many participants in a bounty campaign like facebook and twitter, it is a good sign that the ico bounty campaign you are joining with is a hype one. If the bounty allocation for facebook and twitter is so low, and no control in many participants, then you have no choice but to endure it. Next time, its best to join a bounty campaign that sets max allocation to bounty hunters in order for you to get more and more bounty campaign rewards.

[rhythm005]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Yeah, there are many new participants joining bounties, since they need money too. Even those who make those bounties work for it. I think there will be a lot more participants that will do bounties in the future. There are bounty campaigns that have strict rules and it will be hard to find those "best participants".

[RemBlanc]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Well bounty campaigns are popular to new participants, but you started from being that "new participant" and do bounty campaigns. Regarding to that more strict in rules  there are bount campaigns that have rule that are strict but still there are joining, choosing only the best participant is questionable since what do you mean by that best participants

[ichanjay]

Bounty will be more profitable if it has a lesser participants. Imagine you have a total 1000 coins bounty allocation to be given to 1000 particpants. Ratio is 1:1. If you joined a bounty with lesser participants for example 10. Then you'll get a higher stake. Ratio is 1:100

[hani1929]

there are many bounties today and we have many participants too. it means the popularity of bounty is remarkable. if there are too many participants the  rewards will get lesser of course because its depend on the allocation of the bounty.  some bounty hunters also joined in all campaign to get more stakes like Facebook,  twitter and telegram and signature campaign. but you need to work for it to earn  stakes and in signature campaign in depends on your rank to earn higher stakes.

[logangbit]

Bounty is pretty much famous now.and it is playing a great roll to publish the crypto coins.now every where number of bounty hunters is increasing than any other time and specially people love to do facebook and twitter bounty.i think its a good news for the coin launchers that people are now increasing in crypto sector.and as much number of it increase they will able to published it very well and can reach their goal though profit amount is becoming less untill i am satisfied and loved with it.

[asongotan]

it really does not matter even bounty players especially facebook and twitter, everyone has a fortune each, but if we want to get more than others, we must add or follow other bounty, for example you tube, articles, translate etc., we have to be always on positive thinking that if it is our livelihood, it will not move to another person

[bundjoie02]

it really does not matter even bounty players especially facebook and twitter, everyone has a fortune each, but if we want to get more than others, we must add or follow other bounty, for example you tube, articles, translate etc., we have to be always on positive thinking that if it is our livelihood, it will not move to another person

I think even if there are too many participants, it will not affect the distribution of tokens, because the manager is the accountable in distribution of it. So I think its ok, everyone still can get a token no matter how many participants it has.

[yatogami]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I've never participated in FB and twitter campaigns (hate social media), but I've seen many signature campaigns that reject the participants writing low quality or irrelevant posts.
And that's a good sign - it means that bounty managers indeed monitor the community that is involved in the project.

[progladko]

I advise you not to waste time on such companies.  It is better to find a bounty where there is a limit on the number of participants.

[Kseniya17]

Now there are few good bounty projects, it is difficult to find with good awards, and many participants do not fulfill the requirements of managers qualitatively, therefore payments will still be normal despite the number of participants.

[neontro]

Now bounties have become very popular.  And it's very difficult to make money on Twitter / Facebook.  I advise you to participate in the signatures of the company.