Bounty and too many participants

[Cryptokarl]

You need to work out the maths before jumping on the Bounty train. I mostly do signatures when I do partake in Bounty. I usually try to go for Projects that I find have good metrics but if it is to much participants in the signature campaign

[1714160593]

1714160593

[1714160593]

1714160593

[Xxxurrrad]

Limiting the number of participants in the interests of bounty hunters who want to earn more. But the main thing for the project organizers is to attract more people. Conflict of interest.

[jpnl0006]

there can not be said that there are too many participants in the bounty business as there exists people around the world where the information of the project is to get to and are yet to be related to yet.

[coolon]

Yes, the reward is less and less. There are a lot of newcomers and another problem is that there are many people who are downloading for several accounts.
I do not think if I was a buyer, I would not participate in baunty.

[swam1alyona]

There are a lot of participants, but ICO has become many times bigger, the main thing is that there are fewer failed projects!

[Gabus]

the more that the new course will create more competition and raises the less acceptable results. If the allocation of bounty a lot then it doesn't matter if a little bit is certainly would reduce revenue. indeed currently the more bounty than following the first election policy, participants could follow a bounty is great for applying, so it could make the participants write a quality post.

[vastmast]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think you are very right about that, the number of the bounty campaign participants is rising gradually. I hope we can see more profitable campaigns in the future.

[Zotia]

Yes, it is valid, for the last year participants has considerably increased! Boynty becomes more popular and more popular!

[yohaneshs]

Yeah, we know bounty hunters is a new jobs and have a good prospects now.
Bounty participants increase every day.

[IgniHash]

I afraid that bounty will gone soon. Because the price always drop after the bounty participants sell their rewards.
It happens many times in all my project. I don't know why the reasons.

[Vladique]

I never enter the company of social networks if there are many people there and a small percentage is allocated. I do not understand people who come to such companies because the payment will be very small

[nono_s]

it does not matter if the bounty participant increases, then we must be able to overcome this situation, one of the real solution is to look at opportunities that exist, for example, just join in bounty, like : you tube, articles and others,  that the number of participants is limited or little bit

[vhroen]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

It seems that bounty hunting is trending side job on the internet nowadays especially on social media. I think we can't control people joining the campaign especially more people searching for an extra income online that leads them here on the forum. That is why bounty managers limit the participants so that doing bounty becomes lucrative rather than get frustrated for getting minimal tokens. However, huge participants in the bounty campaigns are definitely good for ICOs because this is the main purpose why "bounty hunting"  exists in the first place.

[Delfintor]

I advise you not to waste time and not participate in such bounty.  You will get very few coins.  It is better to find a bounty where there are few participants.

[xda-developer]

Given that the number of participants in the bounty campaigns is still growing, participation in the bounty is still profitable. When profits will fall, then the number of participants will stop growing.

[supernva]

I  don't like bounties much. But sometimes I'm in. Now I participate only in NagriCoin bounty. I think that you should choose a bounty program to join the same way as you're chosing a project to invest in. Maybe you're not investing money buy you invest your time. Noone wants to spend their time on a skam. And if you are an influencer, you put you reputation under risk. There are lots of bounty hunters, so bounties become not effective, as for me.

[Jochen]

that's really a tough one though! we can't control the people who joins a bounty campaign, some bounty campaign has a limit of participants who will join in that project, but for me you can choose the bounty that only has a small number of participant so you able to earn more.

[edaikuan]

Not every airdrop is worth participating

[alfacentavr]

Yes, there is a great deal of truth in the author's words. But for the organizers, I think this is only good. But all the same regulation is required, only very tidy.

[tranquanghuy]

Well crypto become popular the users will increase and more users will join in bounty campaign. But it's a free market, so as long as there is no spamming , I think it will be okay. This also means more publicity for the coin, thus possibly guaranteeing a better return in the future. Don't worry about this , LIFE IS SHARE !