Bounty and too many participants

[Hopeliza]

Bounty campaigns has a lot of.participants nowadays because of its popularity to the crowd. That's why the more people in that project the less you will get in your profit I think.

[JustQueen]

If there was a lot of bounty gunters in every campaign there was a big chance that you will only get few amount of profit because of many participants but it's okay as long as the project is legit.

[nikay12]

I think there will be no problem if the ICO project has a lot of participants because actually it is also a big help for the project to become a successful project at the end. That was also the purpose of having a lot of participants, to help the project become successful.

[ggh0stt1]

I am categorically against the introduction of any additional restrictions for participation in the ICO signature campaign in this forum. In my opinion, we still have enough last restriction with the introduction of a system of merit, which actually blocked further movement at ranks. If someone seems to have too many participants in the campaign, he has the right not to join this campaign. There are a lot of different ICO projects at the forum and you can choose one where there are only one and a half to two dozen participants.

[imopogicute]

Yes, that's right.
For those who are usually involved in bounty are people with little money. They know in the bounty campaign they will try to join them and receive tokens and sell for the money. then they buy a token to hold you out for months to sell them for their money. should be smart in trading.

[standards]

Of course, the number of bounty participants is really growing very fast.
It is understandable since more people are getting to know ICO and bounty campaigns is a good way to get tokens without investing your money.

[idex100]

There are far more projects in the market that are even looking for bounty hunters especially  content creators and hunters with high ranks signatures. It seem the only campaigns  that seem to be saturated are twitter and facebook

[clarise123]

I think they just do not invest. since the exchange rate in the market is low.
They know that they're losing money when they invest so they need to be smart when they're out of money because they're struggling.
If I let you know the times when it comes out of money. if the exchange rate is low then hold a bounty so more tokens will be received for when you sell more money you can receive

[Enochian]

Yes, the bounties are very popular now and I advise you to participate in the bounty where there are few participants to get more coins.

Thank you for your recommendation. Usually there are many participants in a good ICOs and bounty campaigns. It's almost impossible to find a good bounty without  "too many participants".

[hxtxlcb]

Most of the bounties do not limit the number of participants. I think this is the most fundamental reason. If every bounty can limit the number of participants, then I think it can more evenly divide all participants into different bounties.

[democity]

Now there are too many bounty people, and as the market goes down, earnings are getting worse and worse. Most projects are half dead.

[EiKaGlaShPriSAThWEl]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

For me it is already normal to have so many participants in twitter and facebook campaigns. What I do not like is signature campaign with so many participants and the application for signature campaign is still open for everybody. But I saw an improvement. There are bounties in altcoins that limits the number of participants especially with low ranks.

[mstfprcn]

Actually all bounty campaigns must have a participant limit to provide a good reward for everyone. You might be better off reviewing campaigns and content because they need broad exposure, so that the campaign is well known and used. Campaigns are becoming more and more popular as it attracts many bounty hunters, as it is a good source of income for everyone.

[AzuraBWZ]

Actually all bounty campaigns must have a participant limit to provide a good reward for everyone. You might be better off reviewing campaigns and content because they need broad exposure, so that the campaign is well known and used. Campaigns are becoming more and more popular as it attracts many bounty hunters, as it is a good source of income for everyone.

it would be good for every bounty hunters if every campaign has a participant limit, but it allows bad things for the project with a few participants, this allows their projects not to be widely disseminated
Of course if a project does not reach its target it will be difficult for the bounty hunters to get the prizes they have

[BlackWidow]

many people want to get paid without working. for them, various bounty companies are the ideal means of earning. so now many companies are overheated due to the number of participants. but this is the main law of the market more demand more supply.

[verita1]

We must consider the activity of bounty hunter that we do not win free rewards, we invest time and knowledge and it is valuable.
The bounty hunter to win a reward does not invest fiat or crypto but if we 're invested in time, ability to write, followers, popularity. There we have to gather all the rules of the game to be able to participate and that is valuable too.

The bounty hunter must also quickly study the mission of a project (problems, solutions, viability, and transparency) to be able to give an opinion. I studied social media marketing and I can identify that bounty hunter activity allows building the social community by the passion of what they believe, they are also the first to support a product and spread the word in this case the ICO projects.

[Lavatein]

I'd prefer to participate in those bounties where the number of participants is limited and rewards are calculated in token and not in stakes like it was in IndaHASH bounty. In such case you'll always know your rewards beforehand. Though nowadays it's very diffecult to find such bounty.

[int226]

I have also started taking part in several campaigns. When doing some math calculations of my shares I am really disappointed when there are too many involved. But okay, I will increase the number of campaigns! Good luck.

[restoklo]

Now it's harder to find a good bounty with few participants.  I think it will soon be very difficult to make money on the bounty.

[xdtiagonzhar]

find increase not only the number of people participating in the bounty, but also the number of bounty themselves. every day there are more and more projects that allow a huge number of people to earn money. it's beautiful .if earlier only people who have been doing it for a long time and understand it perfectly could earn, now there are more chances for beginners.