Bounty and too many participants

[jrrhnjco]

That is an extreme one; it's unquestionably an early appropriation display for benefit, yet what kind of directions can be set up? How might you characterize the "Best" members? Likely any framework would just make it reasonable for long haul members/individuals from some gathering and just serve to dishearten any individual who is simply entering the network.

[krinvat77]

There's nothing you can do about it. When people hear stories about earnings in the bounty, they also want to repeat it.

[arde13]

Some social networks have already ceased to be so profitable and participate in them do not see the point, it is due to the fact that there are very simple conditions, well, to make retweet or repost much effort is not necessary, for this much will not be paid. Now the most lucrative, personally behaved, I allocate subscription companies, usually it is allocated the most tokens and the system of rates allows to earn so well. Another subscription does not exceed 300 participants, which pleases.

[nano77]

following the bounty campaign is very profitable because it can get the token and then can use it to trade or sell it for our needs but the tokens that we get depends on the number of participants from bounty, the more participants then the tokens that we can also be less

[IrReAr]

find increase not only the number of people participating in the bounty, but also the number of bounty themselves. every day there are more and more projects that allow a huge number of people to earn money. it's beautiful .if earlier only people who have been doing it for a long time and understand it perfectly could earn, now there are more chances for beginners.

Yes, the number of bounties increases, but the number of good bounties does not increase proportionally. This is a serious problem at the moment.

[peterpeterpeter]

Well as one of thousands who are also joining in any bounty campaigns.

Majority here are also expecting to earn more 💰 money so the best way to do is to reduce the participants by making a rules that can limit the no.of participant.

[bibitao69]

it's not good for us when there are a lot of participants in the company's bounty and especially in the company of signatures. and investors as they were and will be and less of them will not be because it is a faster payroll.

[HongKong]

Well as one of thousands who are also joining in any bounty campaigns.

Majority here are also expecting to earn more 💰 money so the best way to do is to reduce the participants by making a rules that can limit the no.of participant.

Even with thousands of Bounty participants wanting to get a reward for their work it doesn't mean that the price of the reward is going to be small.

[Dortira]

More participants is a problem. But do not forget that even in this situation, we must work conscientiously to make a profit.

[maxiimallist]

There should be some short of limit to the campaings really and some of the best ones had a limited list of participants to protect the bounty hunters.

That's right, the bounty market will regulate itself, new rules will appear that will limit the large flow of bounty campaign participants. Bounty campaigns will be able to get the very best participants.

[TGD]

There should be some short of limit to the campaings really and some of the best ones had a limited list of participants to protect the bounty hunters.

That's right, the bounty market will regulate itself, new rules will appear that will limit the large flow of bounty campaign participants. Bounty campaigns will be able to get the very best participants.

Yes exactly and this is actually been take for that some of the campaign starting this too or existing this for that they choose the best participants to be.

[Aponkye1]

Well you have a point but have you also noticed that in most campaigns that are highly participated by bounty hunters most of them are disqualified due to failure of confirming to rules and regulations. And i think sometimes most bounty hunters also think that the high number of people that participate in bounties the higher the chance of getting paid. Whatever be the case i suggest you do your best and conform to rules and regulations in a bounty campaign and you will get your rewards.

[Miles123]

Yes, I agree that bounties should have regulations about that because they are many fake accounts now. But there are some bounties that have a limited participant so that everyone can receive a bigger tokens.

[Guli]

The number of participants is growing every day. But this is not bad at all. In the end, if they were not, then the campaign would not be successful at the expense of their promotion in social networks.

[drogba773]

Last year my wife got like 20k in total now she doing even more but got only 400 in 4 months!

[lkcoindaddy]

Yes, bounty camapigns are more and more popular. But now it is not easy like earlier to get big profit. So if new people will be want achieve satisfact profit, will be must hard working for this. In my opinion it will not be problematic for us

[Cubanlinx81]

Yes, I totally agree. Some bounty program accept anybody even if they can barely write an intelligible sentence. Bounty managers should implement so kind of test to see if the participants have the appropriate abilities.

[stynos]

Yes there are a lot of participants and that brings about less reward but then again, that is the aim of bounty for as much people as possible to partake and be aware of the project. You can participate in a bounty and still participate in the ICO.

[CAPTEZECC]

Setting a qualification standard will be a very good idea so that if you did not qualify for the bounty you can check the next bounty rather than doing it and getting very little for big work.

[pelipurlara]

one of the most trusted companies and businesses in the industry to be part of them because they are the best and I still believe in ICO ratings because this is a good foundation in terms of knowing whether they are trusted or not