Bounty and too many participants

[fivefingers]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

If that will be the case, then there should be an increase in the market value or rates of the bounty campaigns which would most likely be disadvantage to the investors. I think there has to really be some regulation but not to that level.

[Dolapoemmanuel]

Nowadays, there are a lots of participants in bounty campaigns, compare to the old times when their are very low participants in bounty campaigns. If the bounty hunters  are very low, they earn a very high amount of tokens and when they are very high in number,they earn very low.
To get more tokens, you can participate in the signature campaigns, the articles and blog campaigns and reddits which has a very low participants..

[jagaban]

There will be many participants because of bounty rewards but I also believe there will be more bounties coming up as the reach of cryptocurrencies and ICOs keeps expanding. As for investors not preferring to do bounties, this is untrue as most investors are very much too busy to waste time with bounties so they prefer straight up investment at once than undergoing pains of daily tasks that bounty demands. But if icos really want to put value on their tokens and bring in more investors, they should pay hunters in eth or btc instead of their ico tokens

[ILLuzion]

Now in bounty campaigns it is not profitable to participate. Maximum you get 10-100 dollars. Or less.

[Rammygold]

Bounty and too many participants?
 I have noticed that there are lots of bounty participants nowadays which make most bounty hunters to receive small stakes because they will all share the % together the more bounty hunters, the lesser the stakes, but I think project love it that way because it helps them create more awareness about their project

[okeanis]

Now in bounty campaigns it is not profitable to participate. Maximum you get 10-100 dollars. Or less.

This is if you participate in the popular bounty where there are many participants.  But if you find a good bounty where there are few participants, then you will get a lot of coins.

[Carreuh]

Nowadays Bounty participants are so much so that the less paid we get even now also a lot of Bounty scam that makes us lose, I still have better advice now you limit it how many participants may join and also limit Ranking to join in The bounty

[ku4er]

You need to find a bounty company where the number of participants is limited. Then comes a good income. But unfortunately there are very few such companies

[benjamin11]

Yes I agree bounty campaigns become very popular nowadays. In fact everyday more and more people are joining bounty campaigns. The disadvantage of this is that whenever the bounty participants is increasing the amount of rewards per participants is getting smaller and smaller. I think there should be a limit on the number of participants per campaign.

[umar22pk]

It’s correct now we can see a lot of new bounty hunters in all major campaigns, which is also a cause of less bounty reward.
Should be some regulation & we are looking mostly campaigns are limiting number of users for their campaigns, they are striking participants to submit weekly report  as well so only participants will take part who can work hard.

[AzrailBogov]

It seems to me that this process can not be stopped. Recently, crypto-currencies have become more and more popular, and with it a growing number of bounty hunters. People like the opportunity to earn good money. But still I began to notice that in some companies the rules really become stricter

[greenklo]

Yes, now it is difficult to find a good bounty where few participants.  I advise you to find a bounty where there is a limit on the number of participants.

[sevtan74]

Bounties evolve. Now we see an increased number of both ICO and participants of the bounties. The time will come, it will all go to the quality. All that we can do now is to act properly, thus not being subjected to natural selection.

[Jednopivo]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

There are so many people joining campaigns now. In fact, I recently came across what looks like either a syndicate of people joining a campaign, or perhaps it's just one person (I can't tell), but it's clear they aren't 100% legit as they all report the same thing (not even correctly!), and created their accounts the same time. This sort of action really dilutes the stakes, and does nothing to really promote the ICO. So, if everyone worked hard to get rid of these types, then there would be better rewards for everyone who works hard and is honest. 

[NeonFlash]

They need more and more who follow the bounty campaign, because no need to spend capital. But it is not easy also because you have to be diligent to find other profitable projects, you can not rely on one project, but no problem it just takes hard work. Or you should learn the other skill, like making videos, writing content or translating.

[Sangkuni]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I hope next time , Bounty manager  Make limit participant for facebook and twitter participants
So the revenue will awake and not reduced .
because its a good way to  protect cheater for using multi account.

[cryptoasis]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I agree with you that social media bounty, twitter and facebook campaign, is becoming oversaturated.  There are lots and lots of people joining social medial bounty.  I have had recently had one social media bounty where my allocation is 0.05% of total stakes which equals to $7-8 worth of token or something that is equals to working for free.  I hope more and more people will be disappointed with outcome and will leave doing social medial bounties leaving the serious bounty hunter to earn some respectable amount in bounty program.

[IrReAr]

Last year my wife got like 20k in total now she doing even more but got only 400 in 4 months!

wow!! How bad to hear that. I think that it is both the number of participants and the quality of ICO campaigns. 20K is really a good result.

[sonofliberty]

The most said and most obvious thing is that bounty campaigns would not capped that limits. Because it is not good for them to have less participants in the process of spreading out the news about bounty company.

[Angela28]

There are more and more members joining the campaign and they have rules on how to distribute shares, if the number of participants is large, the shares they receive will be reduced to the participants. family