Invest wisely

[OlinEmerson]

It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.

You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.

This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).

I'll give you a million dollar advice. Instead of looking towards new ICOs (which are mostly shit), look towards existing 5 star coins.

These coins are below ICO price or almost near to ico price and are rock SOLIDDD (but DYOR to satisfy yourself)

TAU (Going to be wordpress of cryptos)

CAN (Going to be fiverr.com and freelancer.com of cryptos)

RPX (Going to be one-window research platform )

[1715103826]

1715103826

[1715103826]

1715103826

[Adunni6758]

It is possible that some people may not know how to do the analysis of projects to participate in or to invest in. Sometimes they depend on most of these sites that list ICO, but which is wrong. It has been found that some of the sites now compromise their standards and go to the extent of listing scam coins, which more reason why self analysis is essential.
Whoever wants to play safe in crypto should take his time to research on the ICO of his/her interest.

[MarlonDamon]

It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.

You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.

This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).

Bought PRG at 20 cents in October, much after its ICO and Sold at 80 cents in Jan. Re-Bought now at 18 cents, today it listed on IDEX, this time I'll sell at $3 atleast

It's always not necessary to buy during ICO. Post purchases like I did are also good.

[AlexOnix]

It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.

You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.

This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).

On the one hand, I agree with this, but on the other hand, we do not know for sure which projects will live in 5-10 years. The same TenX Centra can sink into oblivion during this time. And project before that, unfamiliar to us and in which we had little faith, can become large and working. The market is still young. You can't be sure of anything. My opinion.

[johnyespapa]

Most of the time i am not relying my investments with these shit ICO review websites because most of them are just getting paid by these ICOs that is why these websites are worthless,i have been here long enough to know that these websites are giving shit reviews to hype a certain ICO and most of them are scams so i wont be using these websites.

[HALLASTERA]

Of course if you choose bad ICO then you will lose your money. That justly for any business sphere. I think only 5 % ICO remained in balanse to pair shitcoin / btc

[damiham]

this is a sensational topic,,its good to invest wisely,firstly we must make sure that we know all the business strategy and make a research on which coins to invest on,,secondly we must consult people that are into the system for so long to put us through,,presently now the market is not stable,,that doesn't means that we should invest in any how coins

[steins19]

I agree that Investing should be done wisely and in an appropriate manner to avoid being scammed and tricked by ICOs that appear surprisingly. There is no perfect way in investing because more likely it will fail. In this case one should properly analyse the ICO that the investors should invest in. Because the number of investors decreases as time passed by. This just only proves that a lot investors lost their faith in finding good ICOs.  

[omolabake]

I concur, someone shouldn't be wasting resources both time for bounty hunters and money for investors on any project in the name of buying into ICO. I believe any rating platform could get paid and anyone would be get rated over others even if the project is not up to the hype. I'm not saying they get paid to be hyped but it's better for everyone who is intending to invest on any ICO to do personal research and studies, then invest if you are satisfied with it. My opinion though

[Catch-22]

Honestly, you can see a lot of ICOs now with good team and product/services.  I looked into some of them and made the decision to invest. They are really promising.  Unfortunately, price goes down as soon as they are listed and these projects are having a hard time to recover.  

[Torps1]

True ! .......Investing in any given opportunity  requires a critical decision making process, ratings given by any third party should not be the yardstick to invest without personal due diligence into a project to be invested. The pains and regret of losing money( ICO investors) and time (bounty participants) is much bigger compared to doing a simple research before investing.

[SaoAccel]

Yes, I also agree with you because I think they are paying for the advertisers to raise up the ratings of the ICOs so that it can attract more investors though mostly people like me don't have enough knowledge on making a background check that's why we are relying on reviews of others. Overall, investing in ICOs really take up time and effort so that you're money is guaranteed to grow.

[biskitop]

that's right, we do not have to invest into a lot of coins / tokens, because not necessarily they will rise high. enough to invest into a single coin that has the best price potential, but with a lot of money. eg investing in etherum or bitcoin.

[labake]

This is absolutely a great write up which is one of the best i've come acrossed recently on the platform. It is absolutely for someone to invest time or money in any project based on the level of hype through a platform or social media. The best thing which any investor should do is doing personal research and forget about any hype. Till people start taking that precautions is when people would stop wasting resources. Thanks

[BlackPanda]

It's getting ridiculous here. People are now investing just because of the hype or just from watching the scores given by Icobench, ICOratings etc.

You're doing it wrong. You should look at the team and the experience they have, whether this project exists already (e.g we have Monaco, TenX, Centra, MoxyOne and many others) and none of them actually delivered 100% what they promised etc. so unless you really see the potentials on the project, you really shouldn't invest. Ignore the moon bullshit they are trying to feed you.

This is valid for both bounty hunters (because they are wasting their time) and ICO participants (wasting money).

Yes it should be a personal analysis can make our chances better. Some analysis on the internet in my opinion is a thing that does not have a good accuracy, sometimes they only help projects that only benefit their side. That's a natural thing because they get paid and sponsors who can indeed side with one party. The analysis we do sourced from various information on the internet, we can see a lot of information and then we take decisions that can make us lead to good results or not.

[Waqas vicky]

Thanks for the update.
But you can see as well in the market only those ICO gives us healthy return which have a good hype.
The real projects with the products seems to be not successful as much as the hype ones are.

[zeze18]

really agree with this, i had a friend that was doing bounty snovio.
the ico price was 100x cheaper than the market price.
Not hype project, and very good team. also not very much ads for these project

[MilanaPay]

that's right, we do not have to invest into a lot of coins / tokens, because not necessarily they will rise high. enough to invest into a single coin that has the best price potential, but with a lot of money. eg investing in etherum or bitcoin.

Ethereum and Bitcoin will not bring as much profit as new altcoins can bring. If I were you, I'd rather consider investing in them than bitcoin and ethereum. But here everyone decides, so decide for yourself 

[Lilmon]

The market is currently on the dip end and will probably suffer for a long time, this has opened gates for new investors, but not all coins available cheaply will turn out to be a good one, so research and invest wisely

[gates]

With such a big increasing quantity of ICO it is getting more difficult to trade wisely.