cryptrol
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 08:28:04 AM |
|
Anybody know how to run more than one instance in Linux(without GUI)? Thanks in advance. 6-core here, how do I run more than one process in Win7?
Thank you
1. protoshares-qt -port=25550 -datadir=<dir1> 2. protoshares-qt -port=25551 -datadir=<dir2> Replace dir1 and dir2 with the respective data directories. Then, in each go to debug console and do "setgenerate true 3". Set the affinity of first process to the first 3 cores and the second process to next 3 cores. Just run the setgenerate true [Number of processess] No need for more than one instance.
|
|
|
|
Sy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1003
Bounty Detective
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 08:29:44 AM |
|
Anybody know how to run more than one instance in Linux(without GUI)? Thanks in advance. 6-core here, how do I run more than one process in Win7?
Thank you
1. protoshares-qt -port=25550 -datadir=<dir1> 2. protoshares-qt -port=25551 -datadir=<dir2> Replace dir1 and dir2 with the respective data directories. Then, in each go to debug console and do "setgenerate true 3". Set the affinity of first process to the first 3 cores and the second process to next 3 cores. Just run the setgenerate true [Number of processess] No need for more than one instance. 32 Bit Windows binary is limited to 3.2 gb ram -> max 3 threads.
|
|
|
|
cryptrol
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 08:31:56 AM |
|
Anybody know how to run more than one instance in Linux(without GUI)?
32 Bit Windows binary is limited to 3.2 gb ram -> max 3 threads.
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 08:41:12 AM |
|
Here's another
2013-11-06 08:37:01 received block 000a1f6692b2a78e89ab3e82bd04fead89e240774ef9203e9c293825133f485f 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a
2013-11-06 08:37:37 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1225 2013-11-06 08:37:37 Running ProtoSharesMiner with 2 transactions in block (421 bytes) 2013-11-06 08:37:37 testHash 000f8536079f4f9368e295a1a4552fb27687ddd872444b07467dc86ca724d9b2 2013-11-06 08:37:37 Hash Target 000fff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 2013-11-06 08:37:37 Found Hash 000f8536079f4f9368e295a1a4552fb27687ddd872444b07467dc86ca724d9b2 2013-11-06 08:37:37 hash 000f8536079f4f9368e295a1a4552fb27687ddd872444b07467dc86ca724d9b2 2013-11-06 08:37:37 hash2 000f8536079f4f9368e295a1a4552fb27687ddd872444b07467dc86ca724d9b2 2013-11-06 08:37:37 ProtoSharesMiner: 2013-11-06 08:37:37 proof-of-work found hash: 000f8536079f4f9368e295a1a4552fb27687ddd872444b07467dc86ca724d9b2 target: 000fff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 2013-11-06 08:37:37 CBlock(hash=000f8536079f4f9368e295a1a4552fb27687ddd872444b07467dc86ca724d9b2, ver=2, hashPrevBlock=000a1f6692b2a78e89ab3e82bd04fead89e240774ef9203e9c293825133f485f, hashMerkleRoot=fc1c23eed0a5f6c77b1a2d34247c6dc0f34de96c4ae416f8227d1e33e93440b5, nTime=1383727041, nBits=20000fff, nNonce=2, vtx=1, birthdayA=55398462, birthdayB=64046174) 2013-11-06 08:37:37 CTransaction(hash=fc1c23eed0a5f6c77b1a2d34247c6dc0f34de96c4ae416f8227d1e33e93440b5, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=1, nLockTime=0) CTxIn(COutPoint(0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000, 4294967295), coinbase 0240090102062f503253482f) CTxOut(nValue=47.50000000, scriptPubKey=029f877979dca68b5ee46e6f103ea8) vMerkleTree: fc1c23eed0a5f6c77b1a2d34247c6dc0f34de96c4ae416f8227d1e33e93440b5 2013-11-06 08:37:37 generated 47.50 2013-11-06 08:37:37 ERROR: ProtoSharesMiner : generated block is stale
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 08:46:06 AM |
|
I'm getting about 100 hashes per minute in total between all my machines, but so far they've only generated 4 stales.
Is the crap in the git messed up?
|
|
|
|
FreeTrade (OP)
Legendary
Online
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1030
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 08:49:57 AM |
|
There's a lot of orphans right now because the difficultly is still low and we're getting new blocks every 30 seconds. This was unexpected and should be considered atypical conditions. This will become much less of an issue after difficulty adjustment at block 4032.
|
RepNet is a reputational social network blockchain for uncensored Twitter/Reddit style discussion. 10% Interest On All Balances. 100% Distributed to Users and Developers.
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 08:55:46 AM |
|
There's a lot of orphans right now because the difficultly is still low and we're getting new blocks every 30 seconds. This was unexpected and should be considered atypical conditions. This will become much less of an issue after difficulty adjustment at block 4032.
They aren't even orphans though, they're coming up stale. I'm receiving the blocks, but it's working on the block prior The latest one happened with 3 cores being used out of 8 on a xeon 1270v3
|
|
|
|
FreeTrade (OP)
Legendary
Online
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1030
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 09:03:51 AM |
|
They aren't even orphans though, they're coming up stale. I'm receiving the blocks, but it's working on the block prior
The latest one happened with 3 cores being used out of 8 on a xeon 1270v3
It's a similar issue - the code only checks for new transactions at the start of the hash, and doesn't interrupt ongoing hashes when new blocks come in. The code is not optimized and not designed to gracefully deal with these conditions.
|
RepNet is a reputational social network blockchain for uncensored Twitter/Reddit style discussion. 10% Interest On All Balances. 100% Distributed to Users and Developers.
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 09:09:50 AM |
|
They aren't even orphans though, they're coming up stale. I'm receiving the blocks, but it's working on the block prior
The latest one happened with 3 cores being used out of 8 on a xeon 1270v3
It's a similar issue - the code only checks for new transactions at the start of the hash, and doesn't interrupt ongoing hashes when new blocks come in. The code is not optimized and not designed to gracefully deal with these conditions. 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a 2013-11-06 08:37:32 Committing 2 changed transactions to coin database... 2013-11-06 08:37:32 SetBestChain: new best=0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a height=2368 log2_work=23.210415 tx=2670 date=2013-11-06 08:37:06 progress=0.000053 2013-11-06 08:37:32 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:33 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:33 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:33 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:33 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:33 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:33 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:33 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:33 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:34 received getdata for: block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a limit 500 2013-11-06 08:37:37 testHash 80a9a8e430a940eab285ee66cf7e358cb39bf822ae03ab316cb2bb743f7dc411 2013-11-06 08:37:37 Hash Target 000fff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 2013-11-06 08:37:37 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1225 2013-11-06 08:37:37 Running ProtoSharesMiner with 2 transactions in block (421 bytes) 2013-11-06 08:37:37 testHash 000f8536079f4f9368e295a1a4552fb27687ddd872444b07467dc86ca724d9b2 2013-11-06 08:37:37 Hash Target 000fff0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 2013-11-06 08:37:37 Found Hash 000f8536079f4f9368e295a1a4552fb27687ddd872444b07467dc86ca724d9b2 2013-11-06 08:37:37 hash 000f8536079f4f9368e295a1a4552fb27687ddd872444b07467dc86ca724d9b2 2013-11-06 08:37:37 hash2 000f8536079f4f9368e295a1a4552fb27687ddd872444b07467dc86ca724d9b2 2013-11-06 08:37:37 ProtoSharesMiner: 2013-11-06 08:37:37 proof-of-work found 2013-11-06 08:37:37 CBlock(hash=000f8536079f4f9368e295a1a4552fb27687ddd872444b07467dc86ca724d9b2, ver=2, hashPrevBlock=000a1f6692b2a78e89ab3e82bd04fead89e240774ef9203e9c293825133f485f, hashMerkleRoot=fc1c23eed0a5f6c77b1a2d34247c6dc0f34de96c4ae416f8227d1e33e93440b5, nTime=1383727041, nBits=20000fff, nNonce=2, vtx=1, birthdayA=55398462, birthdayB=64046174) 2013-11-06 08:37:37 CTransaction(hash=fc1c23eed0a5f6c77b1a2d34247c6dc0f34de96c4ae416f8227d1e33e93440b5, ver=1, vin.size=1, vout.size=1, nLockTime=0) 2013-11-06 08:37:37 generated 47.50 2013-11-06 08:37:37 ERROR: ProtoSharesMiner : generated block is stale ... but then wouldn't that be a new hash? ed: Oh, I see. There's one going for each thread. I guess that means it's probably better to disable hyperthreading
|
|
|
|
FreeTrade (OP)
Legendary
Online
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1030
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 09:19:08 AM |
|
... but then wouldn't that be a new hash?
I think this is probably what happened -> 2013-11-06 08:37:30 (Approximate start time of hash) 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a 2013-11-06 08:37:37 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1225 (probably from a different thread) 2013-11-06 08:37:37 Found Hash 000f8536079f4f9368e295a1a4552fb27687ddd872444b07467dc86ca724d9b2
|
RepNet is a reputational social network blockchain for uncensored Twitter/Reddit style discussion. 10% Interest On All Balances. 100% Distributed to Users and Developers.
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 09:22:35 AM |
|
... but then wouldn't that be a new hash?
I think this is probably what happened -> 2013-11-06 08:37:30 (Approximate start time of hash) 2013-11-06 08:37:32 received block 0008685bf909d5316ac79e1b2f0f40f09af0c45219cd2f1776979acf8af8d30a 2013-11-06 08:37:37 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1225 (probably from a different thread) 2013-11-06 08:37:37 Found Hash 000f8536079f4f9368e295a1a4552fb27687ddd872444b07467dc86ca724d9b2 Yeah, I had forgotten about that. I've disabled hyperthreading on the machines I could & the rest are just running 4 now. Don't get a huge performance difference from the hyperthreaded *cores anyway
|
|
|
|
cryptrol
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 09:30:37 AM |
|
Can anyone that tested the AWS cluster instance with 32 cores and 60G RAM care to share the results ? I tested them and got some bad results. With 32 threads memory load is around 24G , but it seems the memory is slow as hell. I couldn't get any instance to hash.
|
|
|
|
sumantso
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 09:58:43 AM |
|
Mined 2 blocks, and the price is around 0.01 BTC/ PTC - which means I have a BTC!! woot ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 10:12:09 AM |
|
You may have noticed the block difficulty hasn't adjusted as expected at block 2016. I made a mistake with the parameters, and the block difficultly adjustment is set to 2 weeks rather than 1. I've had a quick discussion with ByteMaster, and we've decided the course of action is to leave difficultly adjustment at 2 weeks for now, and consider releasing a patch later to bring the difficulty adjustment back down to 1 week.
What this means is a further 24 hours or so of low-difficulty mining before the difficultly adjusts at block 4032.
I really don't see an issue , Re adjustment. It's untested , so it won't be exposed to anything like possible swings that an sCrypt or SHA256 would. There is really no problem.
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
Buratino
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1151
Merit: 1003
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 10:18:15 AM |
|
Mined 2 blocks, and the price is around 0.01 BTC/ PTC - which means I have a BTC!! woot ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Firstly try to sell them ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) . Everybody wants to sell PTS, but nobody wants to buy. It seems that price 0.01 BTC per PTS is overvalued.
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 10:21:40 AM |
|
I'm done after half a dozen or so stales and 2 orphans
good luck =p
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 11:11:05 AM |
|
Definitely needs some sort of pool now that team digitalOcean has joined hard.
otherwise this could effect dispersion, and thus in a slight way the principals of the new algorithm.
definitely not a game changer , but a pool wouldn't hurt at this stage.
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
ripper234
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1003
Ron Gross
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 11:15:31 AM |
|
I ran the client like 15 minutes ago, and it still can't connect to the network. I'm working on Windows 7, enabled all the firewall exceptions it asked me to, and have never had similar problems with bitcoin-qt / litecoin-qt etc.
I'm just seeing zero peers.
|
|
|
|
skaffen
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 11:16:34 AM |
|
Mined 2 blocks, and the price is around 0.01 BTC/ PTC - which means I have a BTC!! woot ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Firstly try to sell them ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) . Everybody wants to sell PTS, but nobody wants to buy. It seems that price 0.01 BTC per PTS is overvalued. Indeed, where did you pluck this price from?
|
BTC: 1PwXSJnmnCMKTEw8JqtjdDVoRUhtMExiNP XPM: ANREvGk6CJYM5YWuW3eNankjGKS1ZYmAzP
|
|
|
markm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1090
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 06, 2013, 11:21:26 AM |
|
The price maybe dates back to before the feeding frenzy of the usual pump and dump folks got underway with all the rented by the hour servers and such, likely most miners over the next 20 hours or whatever will be the usual folk who are only here for a quick dump...
-MarkM-
|
|
|
|
|