testz
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1018
|
 |
November 21, 2013, 05:47:51 PM |
|
bitsharestalk.org is waaay down .
Working for me |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
digitalindustry
|
|
November 21, 2013, 05:50:56 PM |
|
oh yeah cool .
|
- Twitter @Kolin_Quark
|
|
|
testz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1018
|
|
November 21, 2013, 05:52:25 PM |
|
Just found this gem, read the white paper and like it a lot!
Edit: I like the memory-hard approach with momentum but would not endorse the blockchain just yet as I briefly read something about a huge pre-mine which is one of the ko criteria for every alt-chain.
PTS is not a normal alt-chain, the value is based on deliverables promised by the company backing it - Invictus Innovations And as far as I know they lost out on the initial difficulty problems, their miners didnt arrive until after the hardfork to correct it so they did not start mining until it was much harder to mine, if they mined at all. Yes, nobody expect that this coin will get amazing hash rate in few hours after launch. It's wasn't pre-mine, probably lot of the peoples read white paper before launch and was impressed by idea. Even today if you look to ypool.net, 56482 workers for ProtoShares and 13046 workers for PrimeCoin |
|
|
|
ruletheworld
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1045
|
|
November 21, 2013, 09:48:09 PM |
|
Just found this gem, read the white paper and like it a lot!
Edit: I like the memory-hard approach with momentum but would not endorse the blockchain just yet as I briefly read something about a huge pre-mine which is one of the ko criteria for every alt-chain.
It wasn't a pre-mine. The whole idea behind ProtoShares was that there would be no need of pre-mine now or in the future. By forking future products from ProtoShares, the people, including devs, who supported the product initially, get their 'payout'. In fact, someone started mining ProtoShares a few hours before the supposed official launch, so Invictus wasn't even the first to mine their own coin! |
|
|
|
|
|
bytemaster
|
|
November 21, 2013, 11:23:38 PM |
|
Just found this gem, read the white paper and like it a lot!
Edit: I like the memory-hard approach with momentum but would not endorse the blockchain just yet as I briefly read something about a huge pre-mine which is one of the ko criteria for every alt-chain.
It wasn't a pre-mine. The whole idea behind ProtoShares was that there would be no need of pre-mine now or in the future. By forking future products from ProtoShares, the people, including devs, who supported the product initially, get their 'payout'. In fact, someone started mining ProtoShares a few hours before the supposed official launch, so Invictus wasn't even the first to mine their own coin! To be fair, it was only about 50 minutes prior to the scheduled genesis time. But I believe Super3 generated the 2nd block and he downloaded it the same as everyone else so no pre-mine at all  |
|
|
|
super3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1094
Merit: 1006
|
|
November 22, 2013, 12:10:51 AM |
|
Just found this gem, read the white paper and like it a lot!
Edit: I like the memory-hard approach with momentum but would not endorse the blockchain just yet as I briefly read something about a huge pre-mine which is one of the ko criteria for every alt-chain.
It wasn't a pre-mine. The whole idea behind ProtoShares was that there would be no need of pre-mine now or in the future. By forking future products from ProtoShares, the people, including devs, who supported the product initially, get their 'payout'. In fact, someone started mining ProtoShares a few hours before the supposed official launch, so Invictus wasn't even the first to mine their own coin! To be fair, it was only about 50 minutes prior to the scheduled genesis time. But I believe Super3 generated the 2nd block and he downloaded it the same as everyone else so no pre-mine at all Yeah that was totally me. Invictus was good about having the ready source before launch, so I actually found the 2nd block before they did. So its safe to say not a single block was premined. |
|
|
|
|
No_2
|
|
November 22, 2013, 12:22:29 PM |
|
What evidence so far is there that botnets have become involved in protoshare mining?
Aside of theoretical analysis of momentum algorithms what tests have been run on Protoshare to test it is AISC proof?
|
|
|
|
|
|
IlyaVak
|
|
November 22, 2013, 02:18:12 PM |
|
Where is information about all exchanges?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BChydro
|
|
November 22, 2013, 08:04:40 PM |
|
When I first installed the wallet the network was on block 6. Unless the first block was a super block I'd call that a fair start!
|
|
|
|
|
|
deodecagone
|
|
November 22, 2013, 08:08:59 PM |
|
When I first installed the wallet the network was on block 6. Unless the first block was a super block I'd call that a fair start!
well, it started one hour ahead "because" some "miner" started earlier ... "Yes, I believe the voice and I follow the voice" We need to hard fork suddenly one hour ahead because of the mining demand, you know ... and not because we just want to lower the money supply and dump all our coins. "Yes, I believe the voice and I follow the voice" We don't sign our downloads, we provide amateur level, unsyncyng software & support and we 'll bullshit you all our forum long with our bitshares, DAC and all our awesome services self referring to our lovely protoshares. "yes, I believe and I'll follow the voice" |
|
|
|
|
super3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1094
Merit: 1006
|
|
November 22, 2013, 08:15:03 PM |
|
What evidence so far is there that botnets have become involved in protoshare mining?
Aside of theoretical analysis of momentum algorithms what tests have been run on Protoshare to test it is AISC proof?
If its a CPU coin there are going to be botnets. No exceptions. Momentum algorithm is very new. Not even a working GPU miner at this point, much less an ASIC. |
|
|
|
grubles
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 180
Merit: 100
mistaken for gribble since 2011
|
|
November 22, 2013, 10:26:02 PM |
|
What evidence so far is there that botnets have become involved in protoshare mining?
Aside of theoretical analysis of momentum algorithms what tests have been run on Protoshare to test it is AISC proof?
If its a CPU coin there are going to be botnets. No exceptions. Momentum algorithm is very new. Not even a working GPU miner at this point, much less an ASIC. |
BM-NBi5PcH8BBqDVp7WSJe2pNgqEVvTjd6T
|
|
|
naturalog
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
November 23, 2013, 06:00:47 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olegcho
|
|
November 24, 2013, 01:40:07 AM |
|
PTS Protoshares now available on Cryptsy.com !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Xer0
|
|
November 24, 2013, 02:07:00 AM |
|
Is there a Benchmark option in any of the Miners? wanna check the HPM of my 2.13Ghz Pentium-M  |
|
|
|
|
|
lajz99
|
|
November 24, 2013, 02:42:38 AM |
|
PTS on CRYPTSY!!!
|
|
|
|
|
omega33
|
|
November 24, 2013, 02:42:51 AM |
|
is it profitable to mine on protoshares
I only got 0.02 pts for two days of mining on ypool.net
|
|
|
|
ninjaboon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1002
|
|
November 24, 2013, 08:27:28 AM |
|
PTS on CRYPTSY!!!
nice. gonna mine PTS starting today. |
|
|
|
|
3ds
|
|
November 25, 2013, 09:36:15 AM |
|
Where can i find SHA hashes of the windows client zip???
For v0.2.0 i get:
sha1: cbf835776aec277e8d466c88e3be63935f12d8e3
md5: b0a313371950036d10c0dae7d9cb080c
|
|
|
|
|
|
