morningtime
|
|
January 16, 2014, 08:22:24 PM |
|
The 0.5.8 Jean-Luc posted doesn't work for me. [2014-01-16 21:21:08.958] Loading blocks... [2014-01-16 21:21:16.137] ...Done [2014-01-16 21:21:16.138] Scanning blockchain... [2014-01-16 21:21:16.181] Error initializing Nxt servlet java.lang.NullPointerException at Nxt$Block.analyze(Nxt.java:979) at Nxt.init(Nxt.java:6085) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.initServlet(ServletHolder.jav a:561) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.initialize(ServletHolder.java :351) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.initialize(ServletHandler.ja va:840) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler.startContext(ServletC ontextHandler.java:300) at org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.startContext(WebAppContext.jav a:1347) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doStart(ContextHandle r.java:743) at org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.doStart(WebAppContext.java:492 ) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife Cycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLi feCycle.java:117) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.addBean(Container LifeCycle.java:281) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.addBean(Container LifeCycle.java:213) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.updateBeans(Conta inerLifeCycle.java:763) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.setHandlers(Handle rCollection.java:89) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.setHandlers (ContextHandlerCollection.java:144) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.addHandler(Handler Collection.java:155) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.bindings.StandardDeployer.processBinding(Sta ndardDeployer.java:41) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.AppLifeCycle.runBindings(AppLifeCycle.java:1 86) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.requestAppGoal(DeploymentM anager.java:498) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.addApp(DeploymentManager.j ava:146) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.providers.ScanningAppProvider.fileAdded(Scan ningAppProvider.java:180) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.providers.ScanningAppProvider$1.fileAdded(Sc anningAppProvider.java:64) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.reportAddition(Scanner.java:605) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.reportDifferences(Scanner.java:528) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.scan(Scanner.java:391) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.doStart(Scanner.java:313) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife Cycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.providers.ScanningAppProvider.doStart(Scanni ngAppProvider.java:150) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife Cycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.startAppProvider(Deploymen tManager.java:560) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.doStart(DeploymentManager. java:235) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife Cycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLi feCycle.java:117) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.start(Server.java:355) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.doStart(Container LifeCycle.java:99) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.AbstractHandler.doStart(AbstractHand ler.java:60) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:324) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife Cycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:12 50) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:117 4) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:724) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103)
|
|
|
|
wesleyh
|
|
January 16, 2014, 08:23:27 PM |
|
The 0.5.8 Jean-Luc posted doesn't work for me. [2014-01-16 21:21:08.958] Loading blocks... [2014-01-16 21:21:16.137] ...Done [2014-01-16 21:21:16.138] Scanning blockchain... [2014-01-16 21:21:16.181] Error initializing Nxt servlet java.lang.NullPointerException at Nxt$Block.analyze(Nxt.java:979) at Nxt.init(Nxt.java:6085) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.initServlet(ServletHolder.jav a:561) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.initialize(ServletHolder.java :351) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.initialize(ServletHandler.ja va:840) at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler.startContext(ServletC ontextHandler.java:300) at org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.startContext(WebAppContext.jav a:1347) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doStart(ContextHandle r.java:743) at org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.doStart(WebAppContext.java:492 ) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife Cycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLi feCycle.java:117) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.addBean(Container LifeCycle.java:281) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.addBean(Container LifeCycle.java:213) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.updateBeans(Conta inerLifeCycle.java:763) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.setHandlers(Handle rCollection.java:89) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.setHandlers (ContextHandlerCollection.java:144) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.addHandler(Handler Collection.java:155) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.bindings.StandardDeployer.processBinding(Sta ndardDeployer.java:41) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.AppLifeCycle.runBindings(AppLifeCycle.java:1 86) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.requestAppGoal(DeploymentM anager.java:498) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.addApp(DeploymentManager.j ava:146) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.providers.ScanningAppProvider.fileAdded(Scan ningAppProvider.java:180) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.providers.ScanningAppProvider$1.fileAdded(Sc anningAppProvider.java:64) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.reportAddition(Scanner.java:605) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.reportDifferences(Scanner.java:528) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.scan(Scanner.java:391) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.doStart(Scanner.java:313) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife Cycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.providers.ScanningAppProvider.doStart(Scanni ngAppProvider.java:150) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife Cycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.startAppProvider(Deploymen tManager.java:560) at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.doStart(DeploymentManager. java:235) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife Cycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLi feCycle.java:117) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.start(Server.java:355) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.doStart(Container LifeCycle.java:99) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.AbstractHandler.doStart(AbstractHand ler.java:60) at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:324) at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife Cycle.java:69) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:12 50) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:117 4) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:724) at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103)
Thanks jean-luc, but I wonder if it wouldn't be better if every new version was released as an experimental first?
|
|
|
|
morningtime
|
|
January 16, 2014, 08:23:34 PM |
|
The 0.5.8 Jean-Luc posted doesn't work for me.
Ok it works, after deleting the .nxt files
|
|
|
|
vanea84
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
January 16, 2014, 08:23:50 PM |
|
Why vote makes no unfair social media. You call a couple of people that the community is all about?
That decide for everyone
Why not conduct a fair vote social media?
Unfortunately creating a Facebook page and paying for fake 'Likes' doesn't really help the community at all. I bought a coupon promotion FacebookI understand, but if I create a poll why not fair?https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418838.msg4547740#msg4547740I wish the community is not honest, not surprisingly but the price falls to the nxt, unfair to the community
Community will pay for marketing, why can not I pay for Facebook?
I do not require rewards me hurt why not create a valid vote
|
|
|
|
Damelon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010
|
|
January 16, 2014, 08:27:00 PM |
|
Why vote makes no unfair social media. You call a couple of people that the community is all about?
That decide for everyone
Why not conduct a fair vote social media?
Unfortunately creating a Facebook page and paying for fake 'Likes' doesn't really help the community at all. I bought a coupon promotion FacebookI understand, but if I create a poll why not fair?https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418838.msg4547740#msg4547740I wish the community is not honest, not surprisingly but the price falls to the nxt, unfair to the community
Community will pay for marketing, why can not I pay for Facebook?
I do not require rewards me hurt why not create a valid voteI'll try to explain once, in case you truly do not understand. "Bought" likes means "likes" that have not chosen to see the messages. It's basically a kind of "facebook spam" People dislike spam and when they see Nxt on their timeline they will be much more likely to think that Nxt is a spamming coin and not join. Even if you thought you were really helping, you were not. The thought is appreciated, the way you did it was, well, just not good. As to the vote: only sites that have been around for a while (before 3 january) were put in. I'm sorry if you feel that is unfair, but those are the reasons that I see.
|
|
|
|
wesleyh
|
|
January 16, 2014, 08:29:36 PM |
|
Thank u for the link. Unfortunatelly, it doesn't contain an implementation of EC-KCDSA. PS: BCNext modified original version of EC-KCDSA to increase requirements to hardware implementations of an Nxt wallet. This was supposed to increase protection of end users. But this also has some disadvantages, like inability to find other source code that does the same thing. I'm not even sure that the original contained such the code. I don't even know what that means, but the guy just replied to me and I have his code. It seems to be the same as the source linked to, only it adds sign25519 and verify25519 methods. and there is another archive included by Michele Bini. Should I email it to you? what's your email? Never mind, I've uploaded them to copy.com: https://copy.com/uOipoZkrpqO6https://copy.com/sC8yYDyhhLmoLet me know if this helps? I haven't asked the guy yet, he may also be appropriate to do a code review? Should I ask him CFB? Edit: Oh, actually, this was the guy that ported from C to Java - dmitry skiba - not the guy that wrote the C implementation - haven't heard back from him yet.
|
|
|
|
vanea84
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
January 16, 2014, 08:31:22 PM |
|
Why vote makes no unfair social media. You call a couple of people that the community is all about?
That decide for everyone
Why not conduct a fair vote social media?
Unfortunately creating a Facebook page and paying for fake 'Likes' doesn't really help the community at all. I bought a coupon promotion FacebookI understand, but if I create a poll why not fair?https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418838.msg4547740#msg4547740I wish the community is not honest, not surprisingly but the price falls to the nxt, unfair to the community
Community will pay for marketing, why can not I pay for Facebook?
I do not require rewards me hurt why not create a valid voteI'll try to explain once, in case you truly do not understand. "Bought" likes means "likes" that have not chosen to see the messages. It's basically a kind of "facebook spam" People dislike spam and when they see Nxt on their timeline they will be much more likely to think that Nxt is a spamming coin and not join. Even if you thought you were really helping, you were not. The thought is appreciated, the way you did it was, well, just not good. As to the vote: only sites that have been around for a while (before 3 january) were put in. I'm sorry if you feel that is unfair, but those are the reasons that I see. Stepping through the advertising platform Facebook, brings good results
|
|
|
|
mthcl
|
|
January 16, 2014, 08:58:44 PM |
|
We need to spend all 9Mil on development
I do agree with that.
|
|
|
|
salsacz
|
|
January 16, 2014, 09:01:46 PM |
|
What could a PR commitee do with the funds, just a quick idea, feel free to comment: 60 articles, 50 infographics, conferences fees, tournaments, videos, translations.... We can always give less to the giveaways and more to the articles.. However it is important to have the right infographics before any giveaway I think anything between 2-3M should be fine
|
|
|
|
Conurtrol
|
|
January 16, 2014, 09:08:19 PM |
|
I just opened my account and there are two transactions of 0+1 sent to 8450504352895951699. This account has an alias-NXTSolaristestaccount. I didn't make these transactions. How is this possible?
|
|
|
|
Uniqueorn
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
NXT.org
|
|
January 16, 2014, 09:10:44 PM |
|
I just opened my account and there are two transactions of 0+1 sent to 8450504352895951699. This account has an alias-NXTSolaristestaccount. I didn't make these transactions. How is this possible?
Did you use a very simple password?
|
|
|
|
|
Conurtrol
|
|
January 16, 2014, 09:11:21 PM |
|
I just opened my account and there are two transactions of 0+1 sent to 8450504352895951699. This account has an alias-NXTSolaristestaccount. I didn't make these transactions. How is this possible?
Did you use a very simple password? No. 100 characters.
|
|
|
|
instacalm
|
|
January 16, 2014, 09:11:50 PM |
|
I just opened my account and there are two transactions of 0+1 sent to 8450504352895951699. This account has an alias-NXTSolaristestaccount. I didn't make these transactions. How is this possible?
---> This is my entry for the AM contest: Project Wake-Up Call :-) The idea is, that sooner or later account holders will use software (clients, BC Explorer, etc.) that will show the plain text messages received on their account. Thus, I sent out plain text messages to all accounts with more than 50.000 NXT in it that have no public key (204 accounts in total). The message says: The link in the message goes to http://nxtsolaris.wordpress.com/nxt-no-public-key-landing-page/ which gives a short explanation on how to secure an account by doing an outgoing transaction.
|
|
|
|
notsoshifty
|
|
January 16, 2014, 09:14:26 PM |
|
requestType=getAccountBlockIds&account=2449360251152267661×tamp=0 returns non-empty list of forged blocks.
Now I also get non-empty responses to both of these requests. But for a while (including after you made your posts) I was still getting empty responses, even though the two "getBlock" calls were showing that my NRS believed those two blocks were indeed generated by that account. Odd. Oh well.
|
|
|
|
Conurtrol
|
|
January 16, 2014, 09:15:35 PM |
|
So my account sent these transactions without my approval?
|
|
|
|
instacalm
|
|
January 16, 2014, 09:16:22 PM |
|
So my account sent these transactions without my approval? No, you received a message that says "Your NXT account is not fully protected! Please visit http://goo.gl/7vvRJl to learn more."
|
|
|
|
marcus03
|
|
January 16, 2014, 09:20:07 PM |
|
So my account sent these transactions without my approval? No, you received a message that says "Your NXT account is not fully protected! Please visit http://goo.gl/7vvRJl to learn more." The red and green arrows for in and out really do not work...
|
|
|
|
salsacz
|
|
January 16, 2014, 09:20:22 PM |
|
Thus, I sent out plain text messages to all accounts with more than 50.000 NXT in it that have no public key (204 accounts in total).
you could also buy an alias with short explanation and link to the explanation
|
|
|
|
Conurtrol
|
|
January 16, 2014, 09:21:08 PM |
|
So my account sent these transactions without my approval? No, you received a message that says "Your NXT account is not fully protected! Please visit http://goo.gl/7vvRJl to learn more." I never saw that message, I never visited that page, and I never sent any transactions. Wth is going on?
|
|
|
|
|