Bitcoin Forum
November 16, 2024, 08:46:59 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 [954] 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 ... 2557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2761606 times)
morningtime
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 08:22:24 PM
 #19061

The 0.5.8 Jean-Luc posted doesn't work for me.

Code:
[2014-01-16 21:21:08.958] Loading blocks...
[2014-01-16 21:21:16.137] ...Done
[2014-01-16 21:21:16.138] Scanning blockchain...
[2014-01-16 21:21:16.181] Error initializing Nxt servlet
java.lang.NullPointerException
        at Nxt$Block.analyze(Nxt.java:979)
        at Nxt.init(Nxt.java:6085)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.initServlet(ServletHolder.jav
a:561)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.initialize(ServletHolder.java
:351)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.initialize(ServletHandler.ja
va:840)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler.startContext(ServletC
ontextHandler.java:300)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.startContext(WebAppContext.jav
a:1347)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doStart(ContextHandle
r.java:743)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.doStart(WebAppContext.java:492
)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife
Cycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLi
feCycle.java:117)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.addBean(Container
LifeCycle.java:281)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.addBean(Container
LifeCycle.java:213)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.updateBeans(Conta
inerLifeCycle.java:763)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.setHandlers(Handle
rCollection.java:89)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.setHandlers
(ContextHandlerCollection.java:144)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.addHandler(Handler
Collection.java:155)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.bindings.StandardDeployer.processBinding(Sta
ndardDeployer.java:41)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.AppLifeCycle.runBindings(AppLifeCycle.java:1
86)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.requestAppGoal(DeploymentM
anager.java:498)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.addApp(DeploymentManager.j
ava:146)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.providers.ScanningAppProvider.fileAdded(Scan
ningAppProvider.java:180)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.providers.ScanningAppProvider$1.fileAdded(Sc
anningAppProvider.java:64)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.reportAddition(Scanner.java:605)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.reportDifferences(Scanner.java:528)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.scan(Scanner.java:391)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.doStart(Scanner.java:313)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife
Cycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.providers.ScanningAppProvider.doStart(Scanni
ngAppProvider.java:150)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife
Cycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.startAppProvider(Deploymen
tManager.java:560)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.doStart(DeploymentManager.
java:235)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife
Cycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLi
feCycle.java:117)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.start(Server.java:355)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.doStart(Container
LifeCycle.java:99)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.AbstractHandler.doStart(AbstractHand
ler.java:60)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:324)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife
Cycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:12
50)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:117
4)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:724)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103)
wesleyh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 08:23:27 PM
 #19062

The 0.5.8 Jean-Luc posted doesn't work for me.

Code:
[2014-01-16 21:21:08.958] Loading blocks...
[2014-01-16 21:21:16.137] ...Done
[2014-01-16 21:21:16.138] Scanning blockchain...
[2014-01-16 21:21:16.181] Error initializing Nxt servlet
java.lang.NullPointerException
        at Nxt$Block.analyze(Nxt.java:979)
        at Nxt.init(Nxt.java:6085)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.initServlet(ServletHolder.jav
a:561)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHolder.initialize(ServletHolder.java
:351)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler.initialize(ServletHandler.ja
va:840)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletContextHandler.startContext(ServletC
ontextHandler.java:300)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.startContext(WebAppContext.jav
a:1347)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandler.doStart(ContextHandle
r.java:743)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.webapp.WebAppContext.doStart(WebAppContext.java:492
)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife
Cycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLi
feCycle.java:117)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.addBean(Container
LifeCycle.java:281)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.addBean(Container
LifeCycle.java:213)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.updateBeans(Conta
inerLifeCycle.java:763)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.setHandlers(Handle
rCollection.java:89)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.ContextHandlerCollection.setHandlers
(ContextHandlerCollection.java:144)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.HandlerCollection.addHandler(Handler
Collection.java:155)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.bindings.StandardDeployer.processBinding(Sta
ndardDeployer.java:41)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.AppLifeCycle.runBindings(AppLifeCycle.java:1
86)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.requestAppGoal(DeploymentM
anager.java:498)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.addApp(DeploymentManager.j
ava:146)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.providers.ScanningAppProvider.fileAdded(Scan
ningAppProvider.java:180)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.providers.ScanningAppProvider$1.fileAdded(Sc
anningAppProvider.java:64)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.reportAddition(Scanner.java:605)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.reportDifferences(Scanner.java:528)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.scan(Scanner.java:391)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.Scanner.doStart(Scanner.java:313)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife
Cycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.providers.ScanningAppProvider.doStart(Scanni
ngAppProvider.java:150)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife
Cycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.startAppProvider(Deploymen
tManager.java:560)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.deploy.DeploymentManager.doStart(DeploymentManager.
java:235)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife
Cycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.start(ContainerLi
feCycle.java:117)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.start(Server.java:355)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.ContainerLifeCycle.doStart(Container
LifeCycle.java:99)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.AbstractHandler.doStart(AbstractHand
ler.java:60)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.server.Server.doStart(Server.java:324)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.util.component.AbstractLifeCycle.start(AbstractLife
Cycle.java:69)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration$1.run(XmlConfiguration.java:12
50)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.xml.XmlConfiguration.main(XmlConfiguration.java:117
4)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
        at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
        at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
        at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.invokeMain(Main.java:297)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.start(Main.java:724)
        at org.eclipse.jetty.start.Main.main(Main.java:103)

Thanks jean-luc, but I wonder if it wouldn't be better if every new version was released as an experimental first?
morningtime
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 160
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 08:23:34 PM
 #19063

The 0.5.8 Jean-Luc posted doesn't work for me.

Ok it works, after deleting the .nxt files
vanea84
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 08:23:50 PM
 #19064

Why vote makes no unfair social media.
You call a couple of people that the community is all about?

That decide for everyone

Why not conduct a fair vote social media?


Unfortunately creating a Facebook page and paying for fake 'Likes' doesn't really help the community at all.

I bought a coupon promotion Facebook

I understand, but if I create a poll why not fair?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418838.msg4547740#msg4547740

I wish the community is not honest, not surprisingly but the price falls to the nxt, unfair to the community



Community will pay for marketing, why can not I pay for Facebook?

I do not require rewards me hurt why not create a valid vote
Damelon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010



View Profile
January 16, 2014, 08:27:00 PM
 #19065

Why vote makes no unfair social media.
You call a couple of people that the community is all about?

That decide for everyone

Why not conduct a fair vote social media?


Unfortunately creating a Facebook page and paying for fake 'Likes' doesn't really help the community at all.

I bought a coupon promotion Facebook

I understand, but if I create a poll why not fair?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418838.msg4547740#msg4547740

I wish the community is not honest, not surprisingly but the price falls to the nxt, unfair to the community



Community will pay for marketing, why can not I pay for Facebook?

I do not require rewards me hurt why not create a valid vote


I'll try to explain once, in case you truly do not understand.

"Bought" likes means "likes" that have not chosen to see the messages.
It's basically a kind of "facebook spam"

People dislike spam and when they see Nxt on their timeline they will be much more likely to think that Nxt is a spamming coin and not join.

Even if you thought you were really helping, you were not. The thought is appreciated, the way you did it was, well, just not good.

As to the vote: only sites that have been around for a while (before 3 january) were put in.

I'm sorry if you feel that is unfair, but those are the reasons that I see.

Member of the Nxt Foundation | Donations: NXT-D6K7-MLY6-98FM-FLL5T
Join Nxt Slack! https://nxtchat.herokuapp.com/
Founder of Blockchain Workspace | Personal Site & Blog
wesleyh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 08:29:36 PM
 #19066


Thank u for the link. Unfortunatelly, it doesn't contain an implementation of EC-KCDSA.

PS: BCNext modified original version of EC-KCDSA to increase requirements to hardware implementations of an Nxt wallet. This was supposed to increase protection of end users. But this also has some disadvantages, like inability to find other source code that does the same thing. I'm not even sure that the original contained such the code.

I don't even know what that means, but the guy just replied to me and I have his code. It seems to be the same as the source linked to, only it adds sign25519 and verify25519 methods. and there is another archive included by Michele Bini. Should I email it to you? what's your email?

Never mind, I've uploaded them to copy.com:

https://copy.com/uOipoZkrpqO6
https://copy.com/sC8yYDyhhLmo

Let me know if this helps?

I haven't asked the guy yet, he may also be appropriate to do a code review? Should I ask him CFB?

Edit: Oh, actually, this was the guy that ported from C to Java - dmitry skiba - not the guy that wrote the C implementation - haven't heard back from him yet.
vanea84
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 08:31:22 PM
 #19067

Why vote makes no unfair social media.
You call a couple of people that the community is all about?

That decide for everyone

Why not conduct a fair vote social media?


Unfortunately creating a Facebook page and paying for fake 'Likes' doesn't really help the community at all.

I bought a coupon promotion Facebook

I understand, but if I create a poll why not fair?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418838.msg4547740#msg4547740

I wish the community is not honest, not surprisingly but the price falls to the nxt, unfair to the community



Community will pay for marketing, why can not I pay for Facebook?

I do not require rewards me hurt why not create a valid vote


I'll try to explain once, in case you truly do not understand.

"Bought" likes means "likes" that have not chosen to see the messages.
It's basically a kind of "facebook spam"

People dislike spam and when they see Nxt on their timeline they will be much more likely to think that Nxt is a spamming coin and not join.

Even if you thought you were really helping, you were not. The thought is appreciated, the way you did it was, well, just not good.

As to the vote: only sites that have been around for a while (before 3 january) were put in.

I'm sorry if you feel that is unfair, but those are the reasons that I see.

Stepping through the advertising platform Facebook, brings good results
mthcl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 376
Merit: 300


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 08:58:44 PM
 #19068

Quote from: msin
  We need to spend all 9Mil on development
I do agree with that.
salsacz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 504


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 09:01:46 PM
 #19069

What could a PR commitee do with the funds, just a quick idea, feel free to comment:
60 articles, 50 infographics, conferences fees, tournaments, videos, translations....

We can always give less to the giveaways and more to the articles.. However it is important to have the right infographics before any giveaway

I think anything between 2-3M should be fine
Conurtrol
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 478
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 09:08:19 PM
 #19070

I just opened my account and there are two transactions of 0+1 sent to 8450504352895951699. This account has an alias-NXTSolaristestaccount. I didn't make these transactions. How is this possible?
Uniqueorn
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100

NXT.org


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 09:10:44 PM
 #19071

I just opened my account and there are two transactions of 0+1 sent to 8450504352895951699. This account has an alias-NXTSolaristestaccount. I didn't make these transactions. How is this possible?

Did you use a very simple password?
salsacz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 504


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 09:11:04 PM
 #19072

I just opened my account and there are two transactions of 0+1 sent to 8450504352895951699. This account has an alias-NXTSolaristestaccount. I didn't make these transactions. How is this possible?
Marcus
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg4546497#msg4546497
Conurtrol
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 478
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 09:11:21 PM
 #19073

I just opened my account and there are two transactions of 0+1 sent to 8450504352895951699. This account has an alias-NXTSolaristestaccount. I didn't make these transactions. How is this possible?

Did you use a very simple password?

No. 100 characters.
instacalm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 16, 2014, 09:11:50 PM
 #19074

I just opened my account and there are two transactions of 0+1 sent to 8450504352895951699. This account has an alias-NXTSolaristestaccount. I didn't make these transactions. How is this possible?

--->

This is my entry for the AM contest: Project Wake-Up Call :-)

The idea is, that sooner or later account holders will use software (clients, BC Explorer, etc.) that will show the plain text messages received on their account.

Thus, I sent out plain text messages to all accounts with more than 50.000 NXT in it that have no public key (204 accounts in total).

The message says:

Quote
Your NXT account is not fully protected! Please visit http://goo.gl/7vvRJl to learn more.

The link in the message goes to http://nxtsolaris.wordpress.com/nxt-no-public-key-landing-page/ which gives a short explanation on how to secure an account by doing an outgoing transaction.
notsoshifty
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 09:14:26 PM
 #19075

For me

https://192.168.178.55:7875/nxt?requestType=getAccountPublicKey&account=2449360251152267661

returns

{"publicKey":"49ed84f9ed7b2a8a555ced4b07de61b5d666f2d0b6186414882136d72a911719"}

requestType=getAccountBlockIds&account=2449360251152267661&timestamp=0 returns non-empty list of forged blocks.

Now I also get non-empty responses to both of these requests. But for a while (including after you made your posts) I was still getting empty responses, even though the two "getBlock" calls were showing that my NRS believed those two blocks were indeed generated by that account. Odd. Oh well.
Conurtrol
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 478
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 09:15:35 PM
 #19076

I just opened my account and there are two transactions of 0+1 sent to 8450504352895951699. This account has an alias-NXTSolaristestaccount. I didn't make these transactions. How is this possible?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg4546497#msg4546497

So my account sent these transactions without my approval?
instacalm
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 16, 2014, 09:16:22 PM
 #19077

I just opened my account and there are two transactions of 0+1 sent to 8450504352895951699. This account has an alias-NXTSolaristestaccount. I didn't make these transactions. How is this possible?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg4546497#msg4546497

So my account sent these transactions without my approval?

No, you received a message that says
"Your NXT account is not fully protected! Please visit http://goo.gl/7vvRJl to learn more."
marcus03
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 09:20:07 PM
 #19078

I just opened my account and there are two transactions of 0+1 sent to 8450504352895951699. This account has an alias-NXTSolaristestaccount. I didn't make these transactions. How is this possible?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg4546497#msg4546497

So my account sent these transactions without my approval?

No, you received a message that says
"Your NXT account is not fully protected! Please visit http://goo.gl/7vvRJl to learn more."

The red and green arrows for in and out really do not work...
salsacz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 504


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 09:20:22 PM
 #19079

Thus, I sent out plain text messages to all accounts with more than 50.000 NXT in it that have no public key (204 accounts in total).

you could also buy an alias with short explanation and link to the explanation
Conurtrol
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 478
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 09:21:08 PM
 #19080

I just opened my account and there are two transactions of 0+1 sent to 8450504352895951699. This account has an alias-NXTSolaristestaccount. I didn't make these transactions. How is this possible?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg4546497#msg4546497

So my account sent these transactions without my approval?

No, you received a message that says
"Your NXT account is not fully protected! Please visit http://goo.gl/7vvRJl to learn more."

I never saw that message, I never visited that page, and I never sent any transactions. Wth is going on?
Pages: « 1 ... 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 [954] 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 ... 2557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!