Bitcoin Forum
November 04, 2024, 07:04:40 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 [989] 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 ... 2557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2761602 times)
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010

Newbie


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:14:50 AM
 #19761

I'm launching a cryptocoin based on Nxt AM technology. It will be a PoW coin, but it will be protected against 51% attacks by Nxt PoS algo. If this coin becomes popular then we will see a lot of forks. Any ideas if this will make Nxt more or less popular? Such coins require to have an Nxt wallet, coz transactions a made by paying 1 NXT fee.
swartzfeger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:14:55 AM
 #19762

What is something happens with Annon?

We could place Anon in stasis inside the blockchain until technology is sufficiently advanced to resuscitate him. Do we have a cryogenics API yet?

I dunno, it's a valid question. What if? I don't know. Consider it a future mining possibility 10 years down the road?

If something happened (G*d forbid), at least the NXT wouldn't permanently be lost (or any change made to the code).
NxtChoice
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:15:58 AM
 #19763


I suggest to send those Nxt to the genesis account. What we care is Nxt itself whether Nxt idea is valuable and worth to develop and invest in. If yes, the community doesn't lack those Nxt. So many stakeholders have more than 10 M, and if they care Nxt they know how to do it. If yes, we know how to earn Nxt if we don't have Nxt through our development, marketing and any kinds of work. If not, send anyone those Nxt means nothing.



Why is it that realism evades so many here?
Yes we all have ideologies and want NXT to succeed based on it's own merits, but without PR nxt is nothing.
The best paintings have never been seen and the best music never been heard and the best codes has never been ran.
PR is the key that unlocks NXT's potential, not the other way around.

We are a semi-small team of people who do 90% of the promotional and activist work surounding NXT and we don't get paid for it, we do it because we believe in NXT, but would it help TREMEDNOUSLY if these 10M got put into our work? Obviously.

And if you truly want NXT to succeed you will see that marketing and promotion is necessary.

Yes, we do it because we believe in Nxt. If Nxt is a profound innovation, the believer doesn't care about the short term ROI of our investment of money, time, development, PR, marketing. Marketing and promotion is important, but I don't think it is so important for us to consider how to deal with the community's money for a better success of Nxt. "A world with the money can not be perfect." , so I suggest throw it to be anit coins and don't wast time on it.

Take Bitcoin for example, Satoshi and other developers, early adopters, developed and mined more than 2 Million without any PR, marketing in the first 2 years. Bitcoin's success is not on the early marketing and PR, but their profound innovation, infrastructure and their believes in their innovation. If there are not so many users adoption in Nxt, OK, the price goes down, and buy in and just do our work and accumulate the infrastructure, and we can get the success in the middle and long term. If there are so many adoption due to Nxt is so attractive right now, OK, more and more users will join the community and work together, and everyone's work is more valuable in money right now.

So if you believe in Nxt's innovation, buy in Nxt for the investment and work for Nxt. Don't depend on those 10 M Nxt. Depend on your own investment and your own work. Someone may find it is very risky and just want to earn in short term for their investment in time, money and development work. It's the real market, and we also need those users, or we can't buy in so many to get a lot return for our consistent work.





swartzfeger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:18:54 AM
 #19764

I'm launching a cryptocoin based on Nxt AM technology. It will be a PoW coin, but it will be protected against 51% attacks by Nxt PoS algo. If this coin becomes popular then we will see a lot of forks. Any ideas if this will make Nxt more or less popular? Such coins require to have an Nxt wallet, coz transactions a made by paying 1 NXT fee.

If it requires a Nxt account, and costs 1 NXT, I don't see how it would make Nxt less popular. Just a quick reaction before I fall asleep (and the valerian is kicking in...)
MadCow
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 655
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:19:09 AM
 #19765

put it on one account with three people that know the password

the community decides by vote when to send money.

one of the three is sending

Pin

Yes, that could work!
landomata
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
January 18, 2014, 11:22:01 AM
 #19766

put it on one account with three people that know the password

the community decides by vote when to send money.

one of the three is sending

Pin

Yes, that could work!

I say....Anon, CFB & Klee....manage the account.

Edit : Its a long shot all three will disappear at the same time

pinarello
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


NXT is the future


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:24:24 AM
 #19767

put it on one account with three people that know the password

the community decides by vote when to send money.

one of the three is sending

Pin

Yes, that could work!

I say....Anon, CFB & Klee....manage the account.

Edit : Its a long shot all three will disappear at the same time

The three should have the intention to support NXT in the long term, and have time to be there for the community.

So CfB is out Grin

Pin

l8orre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1181
Merit: 1018


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:29:28 AM
 #19768

NRS question -

maybe someone who knows (probably one of the core edevelopers) can give me a liitle hint here in respect to the blockchain operations:

as I understand the blockchain is an implementain of a Merkle tree, as is with Bitcoin.
Am I right with the assumption that the blockchain of NXT works in a similar manner as the blockchain of Bitcoin (hence the quick appearance of NXT blockchain explorers, etc),
and that the the difference between NXT and bitcoin lies in the crypto (curve25519, incl PoS & transparent forging) BEHIND the blockchain?

So that if I want to get a grip on the internals of NXT, I could start out by getting a grip on the blockchain operations, which I could do by consulting Bitcoin blockchain documentation?  Grin

Cheers,
l8orre

[ or is there a special thread for this that I may have missed?   Huh ]
gimre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 866
Merit: 1002



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2014, 11:29:34 AM
 #19769

Regarding 10M thingy, what do you think about using one of Secret Sharing schemes?

There are schemes, that allow dividing the secret into ROLES, i.e. BCNext would be general, and let's say 18 soldiers.

To "vote" (make transfer) there would be needed vote of general and k out of n soldiers.

General is not able to do generate Shared Secret by himself.
If there would be conspiracy of soldiers, they wouldn't be able to retrieve Shared Secret without general.


NemusExMāchinā
Catapult docs: https://docs.symbol.dev
github: https://github.com/symbol
landomata
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000


View Profile WWW
January 18, 2014, 11:31:03 AM
 #19770

put it on one account with three people that know the password

the community decides by vote when to send money.

one of the three is sending

Pin

Yes, that could work!

I say....Anon, CFB & Klee....manage the account.

Edit : Its a long shot all three will disappear at the same time

The three should have the intention to support NXT in the long term, and have time to be there for the community.

So CfB is out Grin

Pin

Pouncer

swartzfeger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:31:24 AM
 #19771

So if you believe in Nxt's innovation, buy in Nxt for the investment and work for Nxt. Don't depend on those 10 M Nxt. Depend on your own investment and your own work. Someone may find it is very risky and just want to earn in short term for their investment in time, money and development work. It's the real market, and we also need those users, or we can't buy in so many to get a lot return for our consistent work.

I could spend $50 of my own fiat @ istockphoto (or wherever) to complete some upcoming brochures. Or I could spend $50 on buying more NXT. A few hundred NXT tossed to the people working on projects won't break the bank and will probably keep team members on projects.

personally, I'm done paying out of pocket... it's not that I'm mad, stamping my feet demanding ransom (volunteering free time is exactly that -- FREE)... it's just that the lack of NXT received by Uniqueorn et al indicates to me there's zero interest by the stakeholders, community etc. I think that's the issue the PR people are facing.

If there's zero interest, why am I paying $ out of pocket for projects when I can just head to dgex with my fiat? More time for reading this monster thread. Cheesy

pinarello
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


NXT is the future


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:31:44 AM
 #19772

Regarding 10M thingy, what do you think about using one of Secret Sharing schemes?

There are schemes, that allow dividing the secret into ROLES, i.e. BCNext would be general, and let's say 18 soldiers.

To "vote" (make transfer) there would be needed vote of general and k out of n soldiers.

General is not able to do generate Shared Secret by himself.
If there would be conspiracy of soldiers, they wouldn't be able to retrieve Shared Secret without general.



a general with VETO power?

pinarello
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


NXT is the future


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:35:23 AM
 #19773

put it on one account with three people that know the password

the community decides by vote when to send money.

one of the three is sending

Pin

Yes, that could work!

I say....Anon, CFB & Klee....manage the account.

Edit : Its a long shot all three will disappear at the same time

The three should have the intention to support NXT in the long term, and have time to be there for the community.

So CfB is out Grin

Pin

Pouncer

BCNext decides or community votes and recrute candidates.?

Pin

dzarmush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1001


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:36:32 AM
 #19774

put it on one account with three people that know the password

the community decides by vote when to send money.

one of the three is sending

Pin

One account + three people knows passphrase = less secure

Ten accounts + ten anonymous separate people = super secure

BCNext should pick the people

pinarello
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100


NXT is the future


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:41:07 AM
 #19775

put it on one account with three people that know the password

the community decides by vote when to send money.

one of the three is sending

Pin

One account + three people knows passphrase = less secure

Ten accounts + ten anonymous separate people = super secure

BCNext should pick the people

Case:

Community decided to pay 10,000 NXT to X

Who of the 10 accounts will pay?

Pin

gimre
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 866
Merit: 1002



View Profile WWW
January 18, 2014, 11:41:34 AM
 #19776

Regarding 10M thingy, what do you think about using one of Secret Sharing schemes?

There are schemes, that allow dividing the secret into ROLES, i.e. BCNext would be general, and let's say 18 soldiers.

To "vote" (make transfer) there would be needed vote of general and k out of n soldiers.

General is not able to do generate Shared Secret by himself.
If there would be conspiracy of soldiers, they wouldn't be able to retrieve Shared Secret without general.



a general with VETO power?

yups exactly

NemusExMāchinā
Catapult docs: https://docs.symbol.dev
github: https://github.com/symbol
swartzfeger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:41:38 AM
 #19777

put it on one account with three people that know the password

the community decides by vote when to send money.

one of the three is sending

Pin

One account + three people knows passphrase = less secure

Ten accounts + ten anonymous separate people = super secure

BCNext should pick the people

While you zig, I'm going to zag -- I don't think BCNext should pick. The whole cult of BCNext needs to die, I think.

BCNext wants a say? Then he should come here and post names and quit acting like an Aspergian flake with middle men speaking for him (with all respect to CfB).

Seriously, if he wants to pick, start interacting with the community like the rest of us and get a bloody nose from time to time. Smiley
swartzfeger
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:43:59 AM
 #19778

BCNext decides or community votes and recrute candidates.?

Pin

Community. If BCNext wants a say, maybe he should decloak from time to time and drop in.
dzarmush
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1001


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:47:13 AM
 #19779

put it on one account with three people that know the password

the community decides by vote when to send money.

one of the three is sending

Pin

One account + three people knows passphrase = less secure

Ten accounts + ten anonymous separate people = super secure

BCNext should pick the people

Case:

Community decided to pay 10,000 NXT to X

Who of the 10 accounts will pay?

Pin

Every of them 1/10 part. Or every account may have a number from 1 to 10, so account 1 pays until it's empty. Lots of options. Security should be the main concern.

wesleyh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 18, 2014, 11:51:42 AM
 #19780

1 account, 10 million.

9 anonymous people are chosen.

3 get the first part of the password.
3 get the second part of the password.
3 get the last part of the password.

So to send money, we just need to contact 1 of every group.  This needs to be a diverse group so that no one can figure out other people that might be in the group of chosen ones.

Make a script that allows input of the password parts and then executes it.

Or better yet, use some sort of screen sharing where each person then enters their password phrase. Everyone can view at the same time.
Pages: « 1 ... 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 [989] 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 ... 2557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!