os2sam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3586
Merit: 1098
Think for yourself
|
|
September 17, 2016, 06:27:47 PM |
|
Thank you for the information and very clear
today I again seek pool for mining and would you please provide a link pool atlcaoin
You need to look in the alt coin sub-forum. This is Bitcoin forum.
|
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
September 19, 2016, 10:34:04 PM |
|
Thank you for the information and very clear
today I again seek pool for mining and would you please provide a link pool atlcaoin
You need to look in the alt coin sub-forum. This is Bitcoin forum. "Atlcoin" would be a great name for an Aztec alt-coin
|
|
|
|
DrHaribo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
September 29, 2016, 03:51:28 PM |
|
I just noticed Bitminter is listed as 0.5% fee. Must be an editing error. I'm pretty sure it was correctly listed as 1% before.
Could we get that corrected to 1% ?
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
September 30, 2016, 02:50:45 AM |
|
I just noticed Bitminter is listed as 0.5% fee. Must be an editing error. I'm pretty sure it was correctly listed as 1% before.
Could we get that corrected to 1% ?
Sorry about that, fixed.
|
|
|
|
DrHaribo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1034
Needs more jiggawatts
|
|
September 30, 2016, 11:46:00 AM |
|
Thanks
|
|
|
|
RigPool
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
October 01, 2016, 04:09:21 PM |
|
Please add the following to the list of bitcoin mining pools. I greatly appreciate it! I'm a "Newbie" to this forum so please feel free to reach out to me directly with any questions regarding the pool or any questions regarding bitcoin mining. Pool: RigPool.com - PPLNS Bitcoin BTC Mining Pool Website: http://www.RigPool.comProxy: No Generation address: 1JpKmtspBJQVXK67DJP64eBJcAPhDvJ9Er Coinbase signature: /RigPool/ Payout method: PPLNS Fee: 0.5% Pay Tx Reward: Yes Vardiff: Yes. starts at 8192. Range from 8192 to 1048576. SPM - 4 / Target Time - 4 Shares Per Minute Local Work: stratum Pay Orphans: No Min Withdrawal: 0.001 Merge Mining: No
|
|
|
|
EnacDomains
|
|
October 11, 2016, 02:41:42 PM |
|
are there any reliable pools for the west coat
|
|
|
|
MrKaizerSoze
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
|
|
October 11, 2016, 07:47:24 PM |
|
Please add the following to the list of bitcoin mining pools. I greatly appreciate it! I'm a "Newbie" to this forum so please feel free to reach out to me directly with any questions regarding the pool or any questions regarding bitcoin mining. Pool: RigPool.com - PPLNS Bitcoin BTC Mining Pool Website: http://www.RigPool.comProxy: No Generation address: 1JpKmtspBJQVXK67DJP64eBJcAPhDvJ9Er Coinbase signature: /RigPool/ Payout method: PPLNS Fee: 0.5% Pay Tx Reward: Yes Vardiff: Yes. starts at 8192. Range from 8192 to 1048576. SPM - 4 / Target Time - 4 Shares Per Minute Local Work: stratum Pay Orphans: No Min Withdrawal: 0.001 Merge Mining: No Almost 1 year per round!!!! Why you have a difficulty so high, 8092?
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
October 11, 2016, 10:43:23 PM |
|
are there any reliable pools for the west coat
|
|
|
|
RigPool
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 0
|
|
October 12, 2016, 12:57:44 PM |
|
We are a new BTC mining pool and have not hit our first block yet. The round time will shorten as more hashing power is added to the pool. 8192 difficulty is the starting difficulty and will increase as needed per worker/rig/rental. Please add the following to the list of bitcoin mining pools. I greatly appreciate it! I'm a "Newbie" to this forum so please feel free to reach out to me directly with any questions regarding the pool or any questions regarding bitcoin mining. Pool: RigPool.com - PPLNS Bitcoin BTC Mining Pool Website: http://www.RigPool.comProxy: No Generation address: 1JpKmtspBJQVXK67DJP64eBJcAPhDvJ9Er Coinbase signature: /RigPool/ Payout method: PPLNS Fee: 0.5% Pay Tx Reward: Yes Vardiff: Yes. starts at 8192. Range from 8192 to 1048576. SPM - 4 / Target Time - 4 Shares Per Minute Local Work: stratum Pay Orphans: No Min Withdrawal: 0.001 Merge Mining: No Almost 1 year per round!!!! Why you have a difficulty so high, 8092?
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
October 17, 2016, 10:35:59 AM |
|
We are a new BTC mining pool and have not hit our first block yet. The round time will shorten as more hashing power is added to the pool. 8192 difficulty is the starting difficulty and will increase as needed per worker/rig/rental. Please add the following to the list of bitcoin mining pools. I greatly appreciate it! I'm a "Newbie" to this forum so please feel free to reach out to me directly with any questions regarding the pool or any questions regarding bitcoin mining. Pool: RigPool.com - PPLNS Bitcoin BTC Mining Pool Website: http://www.RigPool.comProxy: No Generation address: 1JpKmtspBJQVXK67DJP64eBJcAPhDvJ9Er Coinbase signature: /RigPool/ Payout method: PPLNS Fee: 0.5% Pay Tx Reward: Yes Vardiff: Yes. starts at 8192. Range from 8192 to 1048576. SPM - 4 / Target Time - 4 Shares Per Minute Local Work: stratum Pay Orphans: No Min Withdrawal: 0.001 Merge Mining: No Almost 1 year per round!!!! Why you have a difficulty so high, 8092? Sorry I missed your post the first time around. Now added.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
October 18, 2016, 06:18:14 AM |
|
Hello World Please add GBMiners to this list. I would love to connect with like-minded people here : Pool: GBMiners Website: Proxy: No Generation address: 1KuWLoZuoJgz3N6sLoAwGth9XGm8YuFTGt Coinbase signature: /mined by gbminers/ Payout method: PPLNS Fee: 0.9% Pay Tx Reward: Yes Vardiff: 18 SPM by default (User can modify it too) Local Work: stratum Pay Orphans: No Min Withdrawal: 0.01 BTC Merge Mining: No By like minded - you mean people who would remove my name from the copyright messages on the CKPool web source code and replace it with theirs? Even though most of the web code there is my code? What sort of 'like minded' is that? Pirate?
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
October 18, 2016, 12:00:22 PM |
|
Hello World Please add GBMiners to this list. I would love to connect with like-minded people here : Pool: GBMiners Website: gbminers.com Proxy: No Generation address: 1KuWLoZuoJgz3N6sLoAwGth9XGm8YuFTGt Coinbase signature: /mined by gbminers/ Payout method: PPLNS Fee: 0.9% Pay Tx Reward: Yes Vardiff: 18 SPM by default (User can modify it too) Local Work: stratum Pay Orphans: No Min Withdrawal: 0.01 BTC Merge Mining: No Done.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
October 25, 2016, 10:33:00 PM Last edit: October 25, 2016, 10:52:03 PM by kano |
|
Since FUPool (Discus) is PPS minus some fee, I'm wondering if your profitability number on your blog isn't a mistake You can't get more than "100%PPS minus the fee" from them no matter how lucky or unlucky they are. Any extra profit is the pool's profit, not the miners. Edit: and anyone using CraPPSRB would be limited to 100% ... ... if the luck ever got above that.
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
October 26, 2016, 02:14:22 AM |
|
Since FUPool (Discus) is PPS minus some fee, I'm wondering if your profitability number on your blog isn't a mistake You can't get more than "100%PPS minus the fee" from them no matter how lucky or unlucky they are. Any extra profit is the pool's profit, not the miners. Edit: and anyone using CraPPSRB would be limited to 100% ... ... if the luck ever got above that. The profitability measurement ignores the reward method. Think of it as how profitable the pool is. Why bother for a PPS pool, you ask? All the dead PPS and PPS variant pools that were killed by bad luck. If a PPS pool has bad luck for a long time I'd want to get out quickly before I got 50BTC'd.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
October 26, 2016, 02:32:24 AM |
|
Since FUPool (Discus) is PPS minus some fee, I'm wondering if your profitability number on your blog isn't a mistake You can't get more than "100%PPS minus the fee" from them no matter how lucky or unlucky they are. Any extra profit is the pool's profit, not the miners. Edit: and anyone using CraPPSRB would be limited to 100% ... ... if the luck ever got above that. The profitability measurement ignores the reward method. Think of it as how profitable the pool is. Why bother for a PPS pool, you ask? All the dead PPS and PPS variant pools that were killed by bad luck. If a PPS pool has bad luck for a long time I'd want to get out quickly before I got 50BTC'd. OK then you probably should word it differently coz it clearly reads as: you get paid more if it's higher: Profitability = Actual reward per share / Theoretical reward per share
Edit: e.g. even with the run in of recent bad luck on my pool, only one month has paid average worse than a 1.5% PPS fee (August) (and that was only 3.16% below no fee PPS) Edit2: heh actually I guess that's actually really very funny, that over 15PHs left coz the payout was only 1.33% below no fee PPS (September)
|
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
October 26, 2016, 05:23:52 AM Last edit: October 26, 2016, 08:45:09 PM by organofcorti |
|
Since FUPool (Discus) is PPS minus some fee, I'm wondering if your profitability number on your blog isn't a mistake You can't get more than "100%PPS minus the fee" from them no matter how lucky or unlucky they are. Any extra profit is the pool's profit, not the miners. Edit: and anyone using CraPPSRB would be limited to 100% ... ... if the luck ever got above that. The profitability measurement ignores the reward method. Think of it as how profitable the pool is. Why bother for a PPS pool, you ask? All the dead PPS and PPS variant pools that were killed by bad luck. If a PPS pool has bad luck for a long time I'd want to get out quickly before I got 50BTC'd. OK then you probably should word it differently coz it clearly reads as: you get paid more if it's higher: Profitability = Actual reward per share / Theoretical reward per share
Yeah, I'll probably change in to something like Pool profitability = Actual reward to pool per share / Theoretical reward to pool per share Edit: e.g. even with the run in of recent bad luck on my pool, only one month has paid average worse than a 1.5% PPS fee (August) (and that was only 3.16% below no fee PPS) Edit2: heh actually I guess that's actually really very funny, that over 15PHs left coz the payout was only 1.33% below no fee PPS (September) I thought your miners had balls of steel? Sheesh, back in my day I stayed on pools that were so unlucky, I had to pay them. If some of you are puzzled by kano's "CrPPSRB" comment, these posts give a bit of back ground and information about SMPPS (a progenitor of CPPSRB): http://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2012/03/31-rise-and-fall-of-arsbitcoincom.htmlhttp://organofcorti.blogspot.com/2012/04/32-risks-of-smpps.html
|
|
|
|
jonnybravo0311
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1024
Mine at Jonny's Pool
|
|
October 26, 2016, 03:56:34 PM |
|
I think the problem with "CrPPSRB" lies in its presentation. People see that they are being paid back shares when the pool is lucky and think they're making out. What is glossed over (and kano clearly points out), is that the absolute theoretical max reward is 100%. You can never, ever go above that value because at its heart, it's a PPS system. With PPLNS, you can "make up" for swings in bad luck by having swings of good luck. Using kano's pool as an example, you can see from the monthly statistics that while August and September were "bad", March, April, May, June, July and October were good. The pool's lifetime is 105.04%. Same holds true with my own pool. Although, with the small hash rate, I'm far more susceptible to swings of variance, to date my pool is running 105.74%. You simply cannot ever achieve that on any PPS variant.
|
Jonny's Pool - Mine with us and help us grow! Support a pool that supports Bitcoin, not a hardware manufacturer's pockets! No SPV cheats. No empty blocks.
|
|
|
organofcorti
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1007
Poor impulse control.
|
|
October 26, 2016, 08:47:59 PM |
|
I think the problem with "CrPPSRB" lies in its presentation. People see that they are being paid back shares when the pool is lucky and think they're making out. What is glossed over (and kano clearly points out), is that the absolute theoretical max reward is 100%. You can never, ever go above that value because at its heart, it's a PPS system. With PPLNS, you can "make up" for swings in bad luck by having swings of good luck. Using kano's pool as an example, you can see from the monthly statistics that while August and September were "bad", March, April, May, June, July and October were good. The pool's lifetime is 105.04%. Same holds true with my own pool. Although, with the small hash rate, I'm far more susceptible to swings of variance, to date my pool is running 105.74%. You simply cannot ever achieve that on any PPS variant.
I agree. A big difference between public perceptions of PPS-var and luck based reward methods is that people expect full payment for shares under PPS-var, whereas people expect that only in the long term for luck based pools.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4620
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
October 27, 2016, 01:43:41 AM Last edit: October 27, 2016, 01:55:29 AM by kano |
|
Actually there's another big factor you left out, that is also by design in bitcoin. Txn Fees. PPS doesn't include them of course - whereas PPLNS pools like mine and Jonny's do include them in the reward. e.g. the last 5 blocks on my pool right now have an average TxnFee of 7% on top of the block reward of 12.5BTC Even for the last 50 blocks it's averaged 4%
(Edit: of course with each halving it becomes more and more important - by design)
That is another major perception mistake on mining in Chinese pools and all PPS pools in general. I say 'Chinese' pools coz almost all of the mining in China is either PPS or PPLNS without transaction fees. Pretty much almost all empty blocks are now produced by Chinese pools also.
|
|
|
|
|