Reddit’s science forum banned climate deniers.

[Wilikon]

UN Report Claims Moles Could Topple Stonehenge Unless We Stop Global Warming…

    Stonehenge could be toppled by moles if the climate change continues apace, a United Nations report claimed yesterday.

    The world heritage site is one of many that is under threat, with other famous sites facing oblivion including the Statue of Liberty, Venice, Easter Island and the Galapagos Islands.

    The report was produced by the Union of Concerned Scientists, the UN Heritage body Unesco and the United Nations Environment Programme who warned that warmer winters in the UK are likely to boost populations of moles, rabbits and badgers. As a result of their increased burrowing, they could disturb the prehistoric monuments in Wiltshire, some of which weigh more than 40 tonnes.

    Stonehenge was one of 31 natural and cultural World Heritage sites in 29 countries in the report that are said to be vulnerable to increasing temperatures, melting glaciers, rising seas, more intense weather, worsening droughts and longer wildfire seasons.

    Mechtild Rossler, director of Unesco’s World Heritage Centre, said: ‘Globally, we need to better understand, monitor and address climate change threats to World Heritage sites.’



http://www.iol.co.za/scitech/science/environment/stonehenge-under-threat-from-moles-2027053

[Spendulus]

Global Warming Is Blamed For Record Number Of Shark Attacks In America…

Frickin' Laser!

As the summer beach season opens across the United States, experts are warning beach goers to take extra precautions as they predict a record number of shark attacks this year.

George Burgess, director of the International Shark Attack File at the University of Florida, warned that the United States could expect more than 100 attacks this year – thanks, in part, to global warming.

‘We should have more bites this year than last,’ Burgess, said in an interview shortly before the Memorial Day holiday weekend that signals the unofficial start of America’s summer vacation – and beach – season.

In 2015, there were 98 shark attacks, including six fatalities, according to Burgess.

But this year could surpass the number as shark populations recover from historic lows in the 1990s, while the world’s human population has grown and rising temperatures are leading more people to go swimming, Burgess said.

Still, the university notes that fatal shark attacks, while undeniably graphic, are so infrequent that beachgoers face a higher risk of being killed by sand collapsing as the result of over achieving sand castle builders.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3615110/Shark-attacks-United-States-soar-record-high-year-experts-say-global-warming-blame.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailus#ixzz4A3RLnqsm

Although classified by the Warmer Elite as a Denier, I have now officially found something related to Global Warming to be alarmed about.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/328284/global-warming-and-shrinking-manhood-mark-steyn

[Wilikon]

Global Warming Is Blamed For Record Number Of Shark Attacks In America…

Frickin' Laser!

As the summer beach season opens across the United States, experts are warning beach goers to take extra precautions as they predict a record number of shark attacks this year.

George Burgess, director of the International Shark Attack File at the University of Florida, warned that the United States could expect more than 100 attacks this year – thanks, in part, to global warming.

‘We should have more bites this year than last,’ Burgess, said in an interview shortly before the Memorial Day holiday weekend that signals the unofficial start of America’s summer vacation – and beach – season.

In 2015, there were 98 shark attacks, including six fatalities, according to Burgess.

But this year could surpass the number as shark populations recover from historic lows in the 1990s, while the world’s human population has grown and rising temperatures are leading more people to go swimming, Burgess said.

Still, the university notes that fatal shark attacks, while undeniably graphic, are so infrequent that beachgoers face a higher risk of being killed by sand collapsing as the result of over achieving sand castle builders.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3615110/Shark-attacks-United-States-soar-record-high-year-experts-say-global-warming-blame.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailus#ixzz4A3RLnqsm

Although classified by the Warmer Elite as a Denier, I have now officially found something related to Global Warming to be alarmed about.

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/328284/global-warming-and-shrinking-manhood-mark-steyn

[Spendulus]

THIS IS GOOD.  If only one could smoke it....

http://www.memecenter.com/search/global%20warming

This is five hundred posts. 

Something to...

...to... HODL.

[hdbuck]

THIS IS GOOD.  If only one could smoke it....

http://www.memecenter.com/search/global%20warming

This is five hundred posts.  

Something to...

...to... HODL.

rofl

[Wilikon]

California Senate sidelines bill to prosecute climate change skeptics

A landmark bill allowing for the prosecution of climate change dissent effectively died Thursday after the California Senate failed to take it up before the deadline.

Senate Bill 1161, or the California Climate Science Truth and Accountability Act of 2016, would have authorized prosecutors to sue fossil fuel companies, think tanks and others that have “deceived or misled the public on the risks of climate change.”

The measure, which cleared two Senate committees, provided a four-year window in the statute of limitations on violations of the state’s Unfair Competition Law, allowing legal action to be brought until Jan. 1 on charges of climate change “fraud” extending back indefinitely.

“This bill explicitly authorizes district attorneys and the Attorney General to pursue UCL claims alleging that a business or organization has directly or indirectly engaged in unfair competition with respect to scientific evidence regarding the existence, extent, or current or future impacts of anthropogenic induced climate change,” said the state Senate Rules Committee’s floor analysis of the bill.

Leading the fight against the measure was the Civil Justice Association of California, joined by pro-business groups such as the California Chamber of Commerce and the California Business Roundtable.

Justice association President Kim Stone said she was pleased that the state Senate “realized this bill was extreme.”

“Our concern about the bill is that by eliminating the statute of limitations and reviving claims from forever in the past, it’s fundamentally unfair,” said Ms. Stone.

The statute of limitations under the Unfair Competition Law is now four years. As originally introduced, the bill would have allowed climate “fraud” lawsuits extending back 30 years, but later was amended to provide no time limit, she said.

“This bill would be as if the IRS now said that we could audit you for the first year you filed your taxes, or your parents’ taxes, or even for your grandparents’ taxes. Would you have the documentation required to defend yourself if you were accused of having done something wrong?” Ms. Stone said. “No, nobody would have saved their papers because everyone knows the IRS has three years to audit you.”

The measure was introduced amid a national push by Democrats and activist groups to use the legal system to prosecute climate change “fraud,” prompting a backlash from skeptics who have denounced the campaign as an assault on free speech.

A coalition of 17 state attorneys general, including California Attorney General Kamala Harris, have joined forces to pursue climate change skeptics. At least four prosecutors reportedly have launched investigations into Exxon Mobil for climate change “fraud.”

Introduced by state Sen. Ben Allen, Santa Monica Democrat, S.B. 1161 had strong support from environmental groups, led by the Union of Concerned Scientists.

The group, which had no immediate comment on the bill’s failure, had argued that the measure was needed to challenge efforts to “confuse consumers and fend off competition from lower-carbon energy sources.”

“To be clear, S.B. 1161 does not presume that any fossil fuel company has violated the law. But should the evidence support legal action, S.B. 1161 will give public prosecutors a more powerful tool to pursue it,” Jason Barbose, Western states policy manager of the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a May 16 post.

“It would be an unfortunate contortion of our justice system for a fossil fuel company to escape prosecution for unlawful acts simply because it successfully hid the evidence from public view. S.B. 1161 protects the public from such a risk,” he said.



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/2/calif-bill-prosecutes-climate-change-skeptics/

[Spendulus]

California Senate sidelines bill to prosecute climate change skeptics



A landmark bill allowing for the prosecution of climate change dissent effectively died Thursday after the California Senate failed to take it up before the deadline.
....

Double Plus Good Right Think!

[Wilikon]

California Senate sidelines bill to prosecute climate change skeptics



A landmark bill allowing for the prosecution of climate change dissent effectively died Thursday after the California Senate failed to take it up before the deadline.
....

Double Plus Good Right Think!

This will quietly come back, under a different name in the future. I propose the WilikonGlobalWarming bill...

[Wilikon]

Obama drains $500M From Zika response to U.N. Climate Fund

Difference between Obama and a mosquito? One is a flying bloodsucker, and the other is an insect.

In February, President Obama said we should not “panic over Zika.”

At the same time, he asked Congress for $1.8 billion in funding for the resources to combat the Zika virus, the pathogen spreading rapidly through the Americas that can cause birth defects and neurological problems. In a rare display of fiscal restraint, Congress granted $622 million (mainly from unused Ebola response money).

However, as negotiations continue for even more Zika funding between these two branches of government, it seems that $500 million of those taxpayer dollars initially allotted now sits in the coffers of the United Nations.

The Obama administration siphoned $500 million that could have gone toward combating the Zika virus into a United Nations effort aimed at mitigating climate change.

Sen. James Lankford (R., Okla.) wrote in an op-ed published in the Daily Signal that the Senate last year granted Obama the authority to pay for a response to Zika, but his administration chose instead to allocate those funds toward the U.N.’s Green Climate Fund.


http://legalinsurrection.com/2016/06/obama-drains-500m-from-zika-response-to-u-n-climate-fund/

[SgtMoth]

GOP AGs warn Dems that if climate skeptics can be prosecuted for ‘fraud,’ so can alarmists



http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/16/gop-ags-dems-climate-alarmists-can-be-prosecuted/

[SgtMoth]

...this one might take awhile to get through.  Global warming was even blamed on Hitler.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/climategate.php#axzz4BxGIrB4L

[Wilikon]

...this one might take awhile to get through.  Global warming was even blamed on Hitler.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/climategate.php#axzz4BxGIrB4L

What gold mine.

[Wilikon]

Iranian Cleric: ‘Improperly’ Dressed Iranian Women Cause Global Warming…

A senior Iranian cleric from Isfahan, Iran, said “immorality” among young Iranian women, stemming from dressing “improperly,” is resulting in climate change and causing the rivers and dams in Iran to run dry.

During his weekly Friday sermon, Imam Seyyed Youssef Tabatabi-nejad said, “My office has received photos of women next to the dry Zayandeh-rud River pictured as if they are in Europe.” Tabatabi-nejad added, “It is these sorts of acts that cause the river to dry up even further,” according to the Iranian Student News Agency.

He added that “improper veiling” also contributed to this unnatural phenomenon. Just last month, the Iranian regime arrested eight Instagram models for “promoting immoral and un-Islamic culture and promiscuity” by appearing on the social media platform without wearing the mandatory hijab, a head covering that is often required under Islamic Sharia law.

The Islamic cleric’s comments arrive at a time when the regime is increasing its crackdown on youth for espousing Western values through their social media accounts and attire.

Tabatabi-nejad also called for Iran’s morality police to crack down on this “improper veiling” and urged Iran’s parliamentary Hezbollahi forces to “carry out operations to root out vice” in these women. (Iran’s Hezbollahi forces were created at the founding of the Iranian revolution to help the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in his quest to consolidate power. In their current capacity, they act as a sort of morality police force and an extension of the regime.)



http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/06/17/iranian-cleric-improperly-dressed-iranian-women-cause-climate-change/

[SgtMoth]

WTH...Did the warmers all go home after finding out that the global warming agenda has been pushed for the last 100 years?

[Spendulus]

...this one might take awhile to get through.  Global warming was even blamed on Hitler.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/climategate.php#axzz4BxGIrB4L

What gold mine.

What?   You didn't KNOW?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGdbHW9Nlds

[SgtMoth]

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/27/michael-mann-climate-scientist-data-increasingly-u/


Michael Mann, scientist: Data ‘increasingly unnecessary’ because ‘we can see climate change’

[SgtMoth]

Hillary Clinton has vowed to prosecute climate change deniers if she is elected President of the United States.


http://investmentwatchblog.com/hillary-clinton-vows-to-prosecute-all-climate-change-deniers/


Democrats force Clinton’s hand on prosecution of climate skeptics

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/28/dems-force-clinton-prosecution-climate-skeptics/

[iCEBREAKER]

Britain closes down global warming bureaucracy

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/07/britain_closes_down_global_warming_bureaucracy.html

Michael Mann 

[hdbuck]

Climate change is potentially a $7 Trillion dollar money making venture (for bankers)

The current “green” industry is already around $1.5 Trillion a year. Mark Carney, the Governor of the Bank of England said he expects this to grow to $5-7 trillion.

http://business.financialpost.com/investing/climate-change-initiatives-a-7-trillion-funding-opportunity-for-capital-markets-carney





Follow the money heh.

[dwma]

https://science.slashdot.org/story/16/08/02/0124236/climate-change-contrarians-lose-big-betting-against-global-warming