[ANN][MULTI][VARDIFF] TradeMyBit MULTIALGO Profit Swap w/ Optional Auto-exchange

[SavageWS6]

i just noticed my gpus are hotter also. for nist5, I expected them to be cooler than x11. Can't wait for more FRESH coins an low heat coins to become the highest profitable coins.
?
I'm using modded sgminers for my x11,x13,x15,nist5. This new (SGMiner5 Multi-Multi port 4013), will it compare with the speeds of my modded sgminer? I switched to modded versions and i was very impressed with the hash increases. If im going to take a hit in hash moving to sgminer5 i might just keep to manual.
?

SGMiner 'Modded' versions are usually nothing more than standard sgminer compiled under 14.6 Beta (rev 1) Drivers. With some small .cl kernel changes to allow for the 14.6 Beta driver.

So yes SGMiner v5 will offer the same hash increase (if not more) if you use the correct drivers (or at least .bin files built with 14.6 Beta drivers)

On a 280X i get: (using SGMiner v5 -4.2.2-)
4.4MH/s X11
3.3MH/s X13
2.8MH/s X15
13.6MH/s Nist5

All run cool at avg 67.C max 70.C

It amazes me how many people have no idea what they are doing, and just look for other peoples mining compiles/software.
Do a little work, and you can do it yourself. Plus it is a LOT less risky, than downloading miners that are probably doing hidden mining.
I know i am falling on deaf ears, as nearly all you 'miners' are point-and-click warriors, and have no fundamental knowledge on what you are doing. If it wasn't so sad i would laugh. 

My Geforce 660ti (ccminer 1.2)
2.5MH/s X11
2.0MH/s X13
1.8MH/s X15
7.2MH/s Nist5

Nothing is impossible, but if you rely on everyone else to do it for you, you will have no advantage anyway. (as everyone else does the same)

I'm curious myself how you're getting 13.6 MH/s with your 280X, I'm pretty much capping out at 12.86MH/s on my 280X on NIST5

[1714671141]

1714671141

[MobileWill]

merc, I recognised that CSO has never been on TMB, how could you have missed CSO

What the heck? I was a fan too but really a coin. Does it bring anything to the table?

If you are fan, you still can get it cheap, it's growing. I bought today pretty big bunch of them for under 1250.

I meant fan of the game. Idk about the coin. There are too many and everyone wants their own lol. I should make one.

There was a site that would auto make a coin. Idk if it every came out of beta.

[SavageWS6]

i just noticed my gpus are hotter also. for nist5, I expected them to be cooler than x11. Can't wait for more FRESH coins an low heat coins to become the highest profitable coins.
?
I'm using modded sgminers for my x11,x13,x15,nist5. This new (SGMiner5 Multi-Multi port 4013), will it compare with the speeds of my modded sgminer? I switched to modded versions and i was very impressed with the hash increases. If im going to take a hit in hash moving to sgminer5 i might just keep to manual.
?

SGMiner 'Modded' versions are usually nothing more than standard sgminer compiled under 14.6 Beta (rev 1) Drivers. With some small .cl kernel changes to allow for the 14.6 Beta driver.

So yes SGMiner v5 will offer the same hash increase (if not more) if you use the correct drivers (or at least .bin files built with 14.6 Beta drivers)

On a 280X i get: (using SGMiner v5 -4.2.2-)
4.4MH/s X11
3.3MH/s X13
2.8MH/s X15
13.6MH/s Nist5

WHAT IS YOUR OVERCLOCK TO GET THESE RATES?


All run cool at avg 67.C max 70.C

It amazes me how many people have no idea what they are doing, and just look for other peoples mining compiles/software.
Do a little work, and you can do it yourself. Plus it is a LOT less risky, than downloading miners that are probably doing hidden mining.
I know i am falling on deaf ears, as nearly all you 'miners' are point-and-click warriors, and have no fundamental knowledge on what you are doing. If it wasn't so sad i would laugh. 

My Geforce 660ti (ccminer 1.2)
2.5MH/s X11
2.0MH/s X13
1.8MH/s X15
7.2MH/s Nist5

Nothing is impossible, but if you rely on everyone else to do it for you, you will have no advantage anyway. (as everyone else does the same)

I'm curious myself how you're getting 13.6 MH/s with your 280X, I'm pretty much capping out at 12.86MH/s on my 280X on NIST5

Hey, I just tweaked it and I'm ming at 13.12 MH/s right now on my 280X, such a stupid simple tweak, idk why I didn't think of it earlier. Tweak with your worksize. lol

[MobileWill]

Is ~6MH/s okay for a R9 270X?

I am also getting

R7 240 1.6MH
R7 250 353K/s (Which is odd, it should be higher than 240. Maybe Int is too high)


Edit: Int 14 helped a bit instead of 15. But should be higher hmm.

[SavageWS6]

Is ~6MH/s okay for a R9 270X?

I am also getting

R7 240 1.6MH
R7 250 353K/s (Which is odd, it should be higher than 240. Maybe Int is too high)


Edit: Int 14 helped a bit instead of 15. But should be higher hmm.

Which algo on the 270X? I get 8.4 MH/s on NIST5

[MobileWill]

Is ~6MH/s okay for a R9 270X?

I am also getting

R7 240 1.6MH
R7 250 353K/s (Which is odd, it should be higher than 240. Maybe Int is too high)


Edit: Int 14 helped a bit instead of 15. But should be higher hmm.

Which algo on the 270X? I get 8.4 MH/s on NIST5

NIST5, dang really. What settings?

[jammer81]

I'm curious myself how you're getting 13.6 MH/s with your 280X, I'm pretty much capping out at 12.86MH/s on my 280X on NIST5

https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/93497958/Capture.JPG

Am actually getting 13.8MH/s each now. Latest SGMiner v5 with 14.6 Beta (rev.1) drivers. 1X 280X Sapphire Dual-X and 2X Gigabyte 280X OC. I also have a Sapphire Vapor-X running in another machine at similar speeds.

My config (not including my auto switch/pool settings)

Code:

	
"intensity" : "20",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"gpu-engine" : "1120",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500-1500",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"vectors" : "1",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"worksize" : "128",
"shaders" : "2048",
"gpu-fan" : "0-90",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "70",
"auto-fan" : true,
"log" : "5",
"failover-only" : true,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "10",
"expiry" : "120",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "1"
}

[MobileWill]

Got the 250 to 447k/s with Int 12. Should be like 2MH

[SavageWS6]

Is ~6MH/s okay for a R9 270X?

I am also getting

R7 240 1.6MH
R7 250 353K/s (Which is odd, it should be higher than 240. Maybe Int is too high)


Edit: Int 14 helped a bit instead of 15. But should be higher hmm.

Which algo on the 270X? I get 8.4 MH/s on NIST5

NIST5, dang really. What settings?

"intensity" : "18,17,17,17",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192,6401,6401,6401",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "64,64,64,64",
"expiry" : "1",
"queue" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1130,1120,1120,1110",
"gpu-memclock" : "1450,1350,1350,1350",
"gpu-fan" : "80,65,65,65",
"kernel" : "nist5",
"scan-time" : "3"

The last 3 are my 270. I don't have the 270X. The first settings are my 280X so don't use those for the 270X lol

[SavageWS6]

I'm curious myself how you're getting 13.6 MH/s with your 280X, I'm pretty much capping out at 12.86MH/s on my 280X on NIST5

Am actually getting 13.8MH/s each now. Latest SGMiner v5 with 14.6 Beta (rev.1) drivers. 1X 280X Sapphire Dual-X and 2X Gigabyte 280X OC. I also have a Sapphire Vapor-X running in another machine at similar speeds.

My config (not including my auto switch/pool settings)

Code:

	
"intensity" : "20",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"gpu-engine" : "1120",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500-1500",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"vectors" : "1",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"worksize" : "128",
"shaders" : "2048",
"gpu-fan" : "0-90",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-target" : "70",
"auto-fan" : true,
"log" : "5",
"failover-only" : true,
"failover-switch-delay" : "30",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "1",
"scan-time" : "10",
"expiry" : "120",
"hamsi-expand-big" : "1"
}

Ahdamn okay. Only real difference then is that I'm running 4.1.2 of SGminer. I can't get 4.2.2 running on my rig, Keep getting compiling error when it tries to build the .bin for the cards, then in the log posts up the .cl error in Appdata/Local/temp

[MobileWill]

Is ~6MH/s okay for a R9 270X?

I am also getting

R7 240 1.6MH
R7 250 353K/s (Which is odd, it should be higher than 240. Maybe Int is too high)


Edit: Int 14 helped a bit instead of 15. But should be higher hmm.

Which algo on the 270X? I get 8.4 MH/s on NIST5

NIST5, dang really. What settings?

"intensity" : "18,17,17,17",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192,6401,6401,6401",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "64,64,64,64",
"expiry" : "1",
"queue" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1130,1120,1120,1110",
"gpu-memclock" : "1450,1350,1350,1350",
"gpu-fan" : "80,65,65,65",
"kernel" : "nist5",
"scan-time" : "3"

The last 3 are my 270. I don't have the 270X. The first settings are my 280X so don't use those for the 270X lol

Wow, tiny worksize. I was trying 256 right now and it helped, trying your settings now.

Wish I had the kill-a-watt still connected, its on my Fury rack.

Edit: Thanks!!!  So much better! Wish I had spent the time playing with it sooner but I probably would of never tried 64.

Code:

"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-engine" : "1200,950,950,1000",
"gpu-fan" : "45",
"gpu-memclock" : "1350,1000,1000,1400",
"gpu-powertune" : "10,10,10,20",
"intensity" : "17,14,14,17",
"temp-target" : "75",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"worksize" : "64,64,64,64",

Strange that the 240's do better than the 250. Which makes them more efficient since they use hardly any power.

 

[jammer81]

Ahdamn okay. Only real difference then is that I'm running 4.1.2 of SGminer. I can't get 4.2.2 running on my rig, Keep getting compiling error when it tries to build the .bin for the cards, then in the log posts up the .cl error in Appdata/Local/temp

I am not sure...

Make sure you are using the correct kernel. I am using 'talkcoin-mod.cl' kernel. I believe SGMiner 4.1.2 uses 'nist5.cl' correct?

Just a stab in the dark.

[SavageWS6]

Is ~6MH/s okay for a R9 270X?

I am also getting

R7 240 1.6MH
R7 250 353K/s (Which is odd, it should be higher than 240. Maybe Int is too high)


Edit: Int 14 helped a bit instead of 15. But should be higher hmm.

Which algo on the 270X? I get 8.4 MH/s on NIST5

NIST5, dang really. What settings?

"intensity" : "18,17,17,17",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192,6401,6401,6401",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"worksize" : "64,64,64,64",
"expiry" : "1",
"queue" : "1",
"gpu-engine" : "1130,1120,1120,1110",
"gpu-memclock" : "1450,1350,1350,1350",
"gpu-fan" : "80,65,65,65",
"kernel" : "nist5",
"scan-time" : "3"

The last 3 are my 270. I don't have the 270X. The first settings are my 280X so don't use those for the 270X lol

Wow, tiny worksize. I was trying 256 right now and it helped, trying your settings now.

Wish I had the kill-a-watt still connected, its on my Fury rack.

Edit: Thanks!!!  So much better! Wish I had spent the time playing with it sooner but I probably would of never tried 64.

Code:

"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-engine" : "1200,950,950,1000",
"gpu-fan" : "45",
"gpu-memclock" : "1350,1000,1000,1400",
"gpu-powertune" : "10,10,10,20",
"intensity" : "17,14,14,17",
"temp-target" : "75",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"worksize" : "64,64,64,64",

Strange that the 240's do better than the 250. Which makes them more efficient since they use hardly any power.

 

You can definitely set your core clock to 1100 on the 270X and get much higher hash rate too.

[MobileWill]

Thanks, that was left over from x15 i think because it wasn't stable.

This is also my main desktop so yeah.

I set both engine and memory up 100mhz and that did it. ~8.37Mh/s

At first I did just engine but driver crashed pretty quicky. I get a lot of driver crashes with auto switch.

[SavageWS6]

Ahdamn okay. Only real difference then is that I'm running 4.1.2 of SGminer. I can't get 4.2.2 running on my rig, Keep getting compiling error when it tries to build the .bin for the cards, then in the log posts up the .cl error in Appdata/Local/temp

I am not sure...

Make sure you are using the correct kernel. I am using 'talkcoin-mod.cl' kernel. I believe SGMiner 4.1.2 uses 'nist5.cl' correct?

Just a stab in the dark.

Hey buddy, sgminer 4.1.2 does use nist5.cl and 4.2.2 does use talkcoin-mod.cl

For some odd reason it didn't want to work 1.5 hours ago, now I just did the SAME exact thing, and downloaded the same exact build from nicehash and its running now. Sometimes I wanna throw my ATi cards into a lava pit

[jammer81]

Hey buddy, sgminer 4.1.2 does use nist5.cl and 4.2.2 does use talkcoin-mod.cl

For some odd reason it didn't want to work 1.5 hours ago, now I just did the SAME exact thing, and downloaded the same exact build from nicehash and its running now. Sometimes I wanna throw my ATi cards into a lava pit

Gremlins eh?  Glad its working for you.

[MobileWill]

TMB needs no-extranonce true right?

[RoyalSands]

TMB needs no-extranonce true right?

"extranonce-subscription" : true

I think

[jkminkov]

https://github.com/sgminer-dev/sgminer/blob/v5_0/doc/configuration.md

no such option exists

"no-extranonce":false - by default

[MobileWill]

TMB needs no-extranonce true right?

"extranonce-subscription" : true

I think

Oh so TMB supports it? It was something NichHash has.