Evil-Knievel
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1168
|
 |
February 16, 2015, 04:09:06 PM
Last edit: April 17, 2016, 07:52:49 PM by Evil-Knievel |
|
This message was too old and has been purged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
|
|
February 16, 2015, 04:52:58 PM |
|
More interesting is the huge price decrease of XCP. The price is falling like a stone ... if this continues not only my investment in XCP turns out to be the worst of my life but also the future of XCP is highly questionable.  Why do you think that the price is relevant to the future? |
|
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
February 16, 2015, 04:55:01 PM |
|
Hello! This is Robert with FoldingCoin Inc. If you haven’t heard it , myself and our lead dev James had a 3.5 hour interview on the Dogedcoindark radio show. You can find the embedded audio on our webpage http://foldingcoin.net/the-coin/Rick the host over there is really interested in Counterparty and loves what we are all doing. He runs a 24/7 radio found here http://dogecoindark.net/radio/He asked me to come back on the show to discus more about Counterparty in general. I suggested that we find some other Counterparty devs from various projects to come join in on the discussion and he enjoyed that idea. I was wondering if any of you would be interested in going on the show with me to discus how counterparty can help shape the future of digital assets and currency. It could be a long one, so prepare for a long show (the live casts are also at night beginning around 10pm EST). Rick gets some pretty good guests on there and i recommend you see who has gone on his show in the past https://www.mixcloud.com/dogedradio/No time is set in stone yet, we are just trying to get a headcount of who is interested. You can email me rross@foldingcoin.net Thanks You could ping mtbitcoin at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=31979He's the dev for blockscan.com Thank you! Just sent him a message  I think the best person for this would be "Chris Derose" :-) He's a natural |
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
February 16, 2015, 04:58:40 PM |
|
I don't think it should be too difficult but I have not looked at the Trezor API. Does it support offline raw transaction signing ?
The reply I got: Anybody know any tool for signing raw TX using Trezor?
Hmm, maybe electrum can do this. I use python-trezor for this. You have to write a small python program, as the example program cmdtr.py does not support signing transactions. If you use the Python API you have to supply the inputs and outputs of the raw transaction manually. devices = HidTransport.enumerate()
transport = HidTransport(devices[0])
client = TrezorClient(transport)
client.set_tx_api(TXAPIBitcoin())
(signatures, serialized_tx) = client.sign_tx('Bitcoin', [proto_types.TxInputType(address_n=client.expand_path("44'/0'/0'/0/1"), prev_hash=binascii.unhexlify("6cd0..."), prev_index=0)], [proto_types.TxOutputType(amount=100000, script_type=proto_types.PAYTOADDRESS, address="12dR...")])
print binascii.hexlify(serialized_tx)
Look into cmdtr.py/Helloworld.py for examples that use python-trezor. -MZ I think the easiest way to do this is to build the raw transaction using counterparty-lib, sign the raw tx with trezor and then broadcast the signed hex tx using blockchain.info |
|
|
|
Evil-Knievel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1168
|
|
February 16, 2015, 06:05:48 PM
Last edit: April 17, 2016, 07:52:42 PM by Evil-Knievel |
|
This message was too old and has been purged
|
|
|
|
|
|
relm9
|
|
February 16, 2015, 08:48:09 PM |
|
More interesting is the huge price decrease of XCP. The price is falling like a stone ... if this continues not only my investment in XCP turns out to be the worst of my life but also the future of XCP is highly questionable. Part of this is due to people wanting to get out of crypto entirely. These BTC pumps and dumps put a lot of downward pressure on alts when the dumping comes. The BTER hack also probably added some uncertainty considering they hold around 59K XCP, which is still safe if you believe them. Not worried really, price hasn't went through the previous floor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matt Y
|
|
February 17, 2015, 11:30:55 PM |
|
http://www.spellsofgenesis.com/users/token_system?lang=enBitCrystals are Counterparty assets acting as both the game-fuel and the premium in-game currency. There is a limited supply of BitCrystals which can be used (burned) to create new card packs or traded with other players in Spells of Genesis.
|
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 18, 2015, 12:10:32 AM |
|
We really need some kind of counterparty wallet which supports offline signing with a TREZOR or something.
I believe there's a bounty for this. Just surprised why still nobody claims for it. With the Trezor API, it is not so difficult to add this function. Actually, for personal usage, it is possible to develop a super lightweight wallet to support 'send' function at least. The idea is like this: 1: Check the balance by using Blockscan API (it is safe to skip this step if you are sure you have enough balance in your address. But I don't think BlockScan will mind if we use their API, since it is not so different with we just querying the balance in their website. Correct me if I am wrong, Mtbitcoin. :-) ) 2: Generate the 'send' transaction with the help of counterparty lib (coding it follows the specification in other language is also easy. Recommend to use the OP_RETURN version if you don't mind maybe a little bit longer confirmation time). 3: Sign the transaction with Trezor API. 4: broadcast the transaction in https://blockchain.info/pushtx. This client does not need any bitcoin full node and even counterpartyd running. I just don't have time to implement by myself. If anyone is interested, feel free to implement it to get the bounty. Moreover, I think if Mtbitcoin can implement this in Blockscan, it will be even better. All these can be written in Python and Javascript. Due to the feature of Trezor, nobody needs to worry about leaking the private key when using this function. I don't think it should be too difficult but I have not looked at the Trezor API. Does it support offline raw transaction signing ? The counterparty Dev team is working hard on the desktop client, so once that goes out it resolve most of the "client" issues. Yes, it supports signing raw transactions. |
|
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
February 18, 2015, 05:54:34 AM |
|
When logged in to counterwallet, can you actually locate your address above? |
|
|
|
|
FoldingCoin
|
|
February 18, 2015, 05:56:14 AM |
|
When logged in to counterwallet, can you actually locate your address above? He contacted me via email, I am going to try and help him move his private keys to a new wallet. I have seen something like this before. Here is my response i gave to him wiating for him to answer: To confirm, the 401,700 FLDC that you sent to poloniex, to confirm, that is there in your poloneix account correct? Or did those funds disappear as well? Because looking at this http://blockscan.com/address/15g5TpZ3MfB9wjAFyMDujWe72p4oXaMnQU it shows that poloneix did actually receive them and sent the FLDC to their exchange wallet labelled 1Po1oX..... So if your funds are not in your poloneix wallet, you will need to contact them. If you ask the admin in the troll box, they are very responsive and helpful with issues like this. But this sadly is not something I can help you with, they have to. As for your counterwallet, just to confirm, you cannot see your FLDC in there, is that correct? If so, lets get you a new wallet. Before we do that, do you know how to access your private key in counterwallet? |
|
|
|
|
FoldingCoin
|
|
February 18, 2015, 06:04:44 AM |
|
Oh, but now I see what you mean from the FLDC you tried to send to poloneix recently. hmm....... It appears that blockchain sees a transaction going through but not blockscan. I think this is because blockscan actually hasnt updated for a second. If you look on the front page of blockscan http://blockscan.com/ you will see that the last transaction was about 17 hours ago. This just means blockscan has not caught up yet to the blockchain |
|
|
|
|
FoldingCoin
|
|
February 18, 2015, 06:06:58 AM |
|
When logged in to counterwallet, can you actually locate your address above? I think you did something to fix it, nice job Looks like blockscan is updating. |
|
|
|
qqqq
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1011
|
|
February 18, 2015, 06:58:51 AM |
|
Thank you guys, it's ok now with blockscan. So now i have to wait with Poloniex, but it's their problem right now i guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
February 18, 2015, 07:27:52 AM
Last edit: February 18, 2015, 07:42:50 AM by mtbitcoin |
|
When logged in to counterwallet, can you actually locate your address above? I think you did something to fix it, nice job Looks like blockscan is updating. A Crashed daemon. Looks like some memory leak issues with the cli. The daemon has been restarted and updated . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matt Y
|
|
February 19, 2015, 01:42:21 AM |
|
Are Evan and Robby working for Counterparty again or working on their own side project that was mentioned? Or both?
They never stopped working on Counterparty. |
|
|
|
|
Matt Y
|
|
February 19, 2015, 04:58:11 AM |
|
Are Evan and Robby working for Counterparty again or working on their own side project that was mentioned? Or both?
They never stopped working on Counterparty. They were working full time on Medici. Even if Medici uses XCP I don't see how that can be characterized as working for Counterparty. The amount of time that Robby donated to Counterparty while working on Medici went down, but you can plainly see he was donating his time to Counterparty continuously for a year. https://github.com/robby-dermody?tab=contributions&from=2014-12-09Evan does not code on Counterparty and cannot be looked up on Github, but something similar is probably true for him. While he was not doing as much directly for Counterparty it seems likely that he did not stop donating time to Counterparty completely. I think when you're asking these questions though, the phrasing should be more like... Are they still working "on" Counterparty... Because none of the founders are being paid and that's something worth remembering. |
|
|
|
pankogulo
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 100
Counterparty General Manager
|
|
February 19, 2015, 08:41:26 AM |
|
I'm getting an error trying to login to Counterwallet. I tried all three servers that I know about (cw01-03) but they all gave the same result which was:
"No counterparty servers are currently available. Please try again later. ERROR: The server is not fully caught up to the blockchain. Please logout and try later. (Most likely this message is due to the server being updated.)"
Devs are looking into it. Should be resolved shortly.... |
|
|
|
|
