freedomfighter
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 06:11:45 AM |
|
When do we expect a simple non-technical person's GUI that will allow access to the burned XCPs without having to run a command line?
|
|
|
|
ddink7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 06:13:19 AM |
|
When do we expect a simple non-technical person's GUI that will allow access to the burned XCPs without having to run a command line?
I was just wondering the same thing. I think you and I may have to wait for the web wallet =(
|
|
|
|
metraX
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 06:18:25 AM |
|
The amount of BTC owed to people is recorded, and I will pay it off gradually, starting with the 35 BTC left behind by the hacker.
busoni, an idea, for transparency, Please publish a list of users with stolen BTC and how much they are missing! So we can verify you are "on the same page" and everyone know what is going on. To protect privacy you can post SHA256 of their email along with Amount BTC lost, So for example my email was " test@example.com" I could go to www.xorbin.com/tools/sha256-hash-calculatorand figure out my hash, then find on list: user hash / amount btc missing due to hacker: 973dfe463ec85785f5f95af5ba3906eedb2d931c24e69824a89ea65dba4e813b 3.2 BTC Again, so we see you have us listed, how much is lost. And also everyone sees progress, maybe post weekly update. it is "too abstract" now not transparent enough. Thank you. I know you are frustrated and trying your best, you have all my sympathy!
|
|
|
|
ddink7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 07:10:28 AM |
|
Just did a test transaction...sell of 5.75 XCP...works like a charm! Awesome work devs and Busoni!
|
|
|
|
gitinahang
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 30
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 07:10:45 AM |
|
someone explain why and when a normal person off the street will use counterparty.
Thanks.
They won't. This isn't dogecoin. Nobody will be able to buy a sandwich with xcp. XCP is used for decentralized trading, DACs, Betting, Contracts, IPOs, Dividend payments wall st stuffs
|
|
|
|
frozen123
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 74
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 07:19:43 AM |
|
hi busoni can you consider this suggestion: all the accounts should be unsuspended(group of people assume all the liability of the entire incident), with limitations placed on withdrawls, but allowing them to view all the information and trade . that also increase the income to you website from trading fee
i think this solution can make those suspended account more active and contribute more fees.
|
|
|
|
xnova
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 390
Merit: 254
Counterparty Developer
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 07:27:12 AM |
|
Developers: The API has changed a decent amount in the newest updates to the develop branch. This includes several enhancements, function name changes, changes in semantics, etc. Please check out the updated API documentation at: http://counterpartyd.readthedocs.org/en/develop/API.html
|
|
|
|
hamiltino
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 07:31:58 AM |
|
someone explain why and when a normal person off the street will use counterparty.
Thanks.
They won't. This isn't dogecoin. Nobody will be able to buy a sandwich with xcp. XCP is used for decentralized trading, DACs, Betting, Contracts, IPOs, Dividend payments wall st stuffs I thought that was what mastercoin did ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif)
|
stacking coin
|
|
|
Bountyful
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 07:51:01 AM Last edit: February 23, 2014, 08:01:14 AM by Bountyful |
|
Developers: The API has changed a decent amount in the newest updates to the develop branch. This includes several enhancements, function name changes, changes in semantics, etc. Please check out the updated API documentation at: http://counterpartyd.readthedocs.org/en/develop/API.html When will these changes be pushed to master? They appear very comprehensive.EDIT: It appears they are already in v6.1.
|
|
|
|
led_lcd
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 07:56:30 AM |
|
someone explain why and when a normal person off the street will use counterparty.
Thanks.
They won't. This isn't dogecoin. Nobody will be able to buy a sandwich with xcp. XCP is used for decentralized trading, DACs, Betting, Contracts, IPOs, Dividend payments wall st stuffs I thought that was what mastercoin did ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) Some of the more advanced use cases for XCP will be targetting Wall St and institutional investors. However, for the small investor, XCP offers trustless betting, spread betting, ownership of shares in assets. You can also use XCP to protect yourself say in the value of BTC going down against USD. Who wouldn't want that? Regarding the overlap of functionality between Mastercoin and Counterparty, that is where the similarity starts and ends. Counterparty is here developed for the community. Not to line the pockets of the developers. Read about how Mastercoin inflates their currency to 'pay the developers'. Read how the developers of Counterparty are funding everything themselves and not asking for a handout.
|
|
|
|
lonsharim
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 08:31:32 AM |
|
Its commendable that the community does not mind higher trading charges on the centralized exchange Poloniex to help Busoni recover some of the lost BTC.
The community largely consists of people already sold on the virtues of XCP, many of whom have participated in PoB and the rest have joined in shortly. Charging them 2.5% for their sell orders is perfectly fine because they understand the project, its protocol exploit issue that caused the mayhem and the loss it caused and as a community it seems the best way to help recoup losses.
However, I believe those joining the community have neither the involvement nor the understanding of the community. Therefore they are less likely to be sympathetic and pay a hefty commission to buy some XCP.
This will result in 1. Lower trade volumes @ Poloniex (we averaged 200+ BTC a day before the exploit) 2. Once the GUI wallet is stable result in better volume on the DEX.
I really hope this works out for Poloniex, they have maybe 1 or 2 weeks before gui wallets are more stable to use and a web wallet is out. If 2.5% does not work then maybe lower to 1% or charge 2.5% to sellers and not the buyers.
|
|
|
|
halfcab123
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 09:37:59 AM |
|
Who still needs help setting up counterpartyd ? I'm 100% trustworthy and willing to help
|
DayTrade with less exposure to risk, by setting buy and sell spreads with CabTrader v2, buy now @ crypto-folio.com
|
|
|
flatfly
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1016
760930
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 09:46:16 AM Last edit: February 23, 2014, 10:02:23 AM by flatfly |
|
Self-contained Windows builds for the JahPowerBit GUI client can be found in this thread: https://forums.counterparty.co/index.php?topic=74.15Note that they are still in alpha. I would greatly appreciate your feedback (especially, does it install properly on 64-bit Windows? No DLL errors?) so I can improve future builds.
|
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 10:00:08 AM |
|
Developers: The API has changed a decent amount in the newest updates to the develop branch. This includes several enhancements, function name changes, changes in semantics, etc. Please check out the updated API documentation at: http://counterpartyd.readthedocs.org/en/develop/API.html So it looks like a database rebuild is required for the develop commit?
|
|
|
|
zhaochong
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 10:42:33 AM |
|
How's going on with online wallet?
|
|
|
|
cityglut
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 10:48:33 AM |
|
How's going on with online wallet?
xnova plans to release Counterwallet on testnet in about a week. We are then hoping to have at least two weeks of (extensive) testing on testnet.
|
|
|
|
qtgwith
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 10:57:29 AM |
|
How's going on with online wallet?
xnova plans to release Counterwallet on testnet in about a week. We are then hoping to have at least two weeks of (extensive) testing on testnet. Excited for this good news.
|
|
|
|
nakaone
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 11:43:33 AM |
|
is there a new send command - the one in the explanation of 520Bit is not working for me any more
C:\Users\xxx>counterpartyd send --from=xxxx--to= 15buRLRW47AY9Md3mpFj17Yp6w4BtfMRjc --quantity=5 --asset=XCP
C:\Users\xxxx>echo off usage: counterpartyd send [-h] --source SOURCE --destination DESTINATION --quantity QUANTITY --asset ASSET counterpartyd send: error: argument --source is required
|
|
|
|
peled1986
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1002
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 11:51:42 AM |
|
is there a new send command - the one in the explanation of 520Bit is not working for me any more
C:\Users\xxx>counterpartyd send --from=xxxx--to= 15buRLRW47AY9Md3mpFj17Yp6w4BtfMRjc --quantity=5 --asset=XCP
C:\Users\xxxx>echo off usage: counterpartyd send [-h] --source SOURCE --destination DESTINATION --quantity QUANTITY --asset ASSET counterpartyd send: error: argument --source is required
change the word from for the word source change the word to for the word destination
|
|
|
|
brenzi
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 113
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 23, 2014, 01:20:47 PM Last edit: February 23, 2014, 01:54:24 PM by brenzi |
|
I'm glad to see the first DEX in action, but I'm slightly disappointed by how it is done right now. Especially the fee-policy seems strange to me. It can't be that a DEX is much more expensive than a centralized one. I see the need for trolling prevention, but what's the point of having a troll-free DEX that is not used because it's too expensive? There is one fundamental problem if users can set the fee required when placing an offer: The market does not necessarily converge to one price. There might be one price for low fees and another for high fees. this makes the whole thing very complicated to use. And the following DEX features are lacking (or please point me to the docs if I'm not up to date): - minimum match quantity should be selectable when placing an offer. If I want to sell 100x<asset> I might not want to to have 100 trades of 1x<asset>, especially if the process is not automized
- multisig escrow solution. Trading XCP/BTC is ok now because both are built on top of the same blockchain and the protocol can act as the escrow. But If I would like to trade PPC for BTC, how would that work trustlessly?
However: keep going on, the bleeding edge of crypto is exciting....
|
|
|
|
|