[ANN][CACH] CACHeCoin released based on scrypt-jane

[kalgecin]

small update in the master branch for p2pool runners. This should fix all errors on the p2pool node :-P

[coin-table]

Hi,

we are running the site www.crypto-coins-table.com

- 646 coins indexed so far (28th May 2014)
- providing detailed charts on pricing and volume
- capitalisation listing
- top and flop coins
- many filters to analyse

personalized features
- create individual watchlists
- track your coins value and compare

W have listed your coin already. To provide the full and uptodate information
on your coin, please use the update function.

Thanks, the coin-table team

contact us, if you would like to join the team or advertise on crypto-coins-table.com

[jasinlee]

Some of the features we are integrating require some massive changes to the code. We have taken on several c/c++ devs to finish this in a quicker timeline. Depending on whether you have ever dug through the satoshi client, you will see that the code while revolutionary is not cleanly coded. We have decided to rewrite/convert the entire codebase, and is already in process.

Once the rewrite is complete we will be able to add features easier, then submit them to kalgecin for review much faster.

[kalgecin]

Some of the features we are integrating require some massive changes to the code. We have taken on several c/c++ devs to finish this in a quicker timeline. Depending on whether you have ever dug through the satoshi client, you will see that the code while revolutionary is not cleanly coded. We have decided to rewrite/convert the entire codebase, and is already in process.

Once the rewrite is complete we will be able to add features easier, then submit them to kalgecin for review much faster.

Yeah, one of the biggest benefit to the new rewrite is that it will enable us to make updates a breeze (even optionally automatic in the near future)

[Stenull]

Some of the features we are integrating require some massive changes to the code. We have taken on several c/c++ devs to finish this in a quicker timeline. Depending on whether you have ever dug through the satoshi client, you will see that the code while revolutionary is not cleanly coded. We have decided to rewrite/convert the entire codebase, and is already in process.

Once the rewrite is complete we will be able to add features easier, then submit them to kalgecin for review much faster.

Yeah, one of the biggest benefit to the new rewrite is that it will enable us to make updates a breeze (even optionally automatic in the near future)

Makes me a happy camper 
This is how one should develop things!

[vertoe]

* vertoe buys more cach *

[gentamicin]

diiff change tomorrow ??

[kalgecin]

diiff change tomorrow ??

 next Nfactor: 13, N: 16384, eta: 0 days 14 hr 35 min 53 sec

[gentamicin]

nfactor 13, getting 21 kh/s on my 290x on pool.cachecoin.org

pool not providing work fast enough , is there a work around for this

[singula]

nfactor 13, getting 21 kh/s on my 290x on pool.cachecoin.org

pool not providing work fast enough , is there a work around for this

If you look at http://p2pool.cachecoin.org:8336/static/about.html
- you can choose difficulty for your miner, so for 21 kh/s just append +0.00002000 after your Cachecoin address and perhaps it will work
(this difficulty selection should work with all p2pools)

[kalgecin]

THERE WAS A BUG IN DIFF RETARGET MAKE SURE YOU HAVE VERSION 5.3 UPDATE TO 5.3 ASAP and are advised to delete the blockchain and resync

[singula]

cach.catcoin.cz and pool.cachecoin.net are now both updated to bug-less versions and the fork should be thus now also fixed.

There may be some transactions done to the forked-out blockchain - it seems 4 users may be affected. These transactions will be verified and if not found in the current blockchain, they will be repaid manually. I'll look into this in the evening once things settle down.

[kalgecin]

cach.catcoin.cz and pool.cachecoin.net are now both updated to bug-less versions and the fork should be thus now also fixed.

There may be some transactions done to the forked-out blockchain - it seems 4 users may be affected. These transactions will be verified and if not found in the current blockchain, they will be repaid manually. I'll look into this in the evening once things settle down.

Was it your pool that mined the bad block?

The next diff should fall by about 3-4x that puts the diff below 1.5 :-D

[gentamicin]

still getting getwork failures despite setting difficulty , does that mean i need to increase it ?

[kalgecin]

still getting getwork failures despite setting difficulty , does that mean i need to increase it ?

Still not providing work fast enough? I'll be home in about an hr. Will check the pool. But it is updated as it needs to be. So it's safe to mine on it :-)

[myagui]

still getting getwork failures despite setting difficulty , does that mean i need to increase it ?

Seems you found a block at the updated diff gentamicin.    (here's to the block maturing!!!!)

Kalgecin,

I don't know if it's just a matter of giving it some time, but in any case, looks like the block stats are not updating yet on
http://explorer.cachecoin.org

Think we're generally over the nfactor 'bump' now (or as soon as everyone is running the updated code). 
Maybe we need to reach out to exchanges & what not? (don't ask me, I'm clueless  )

Good job guys!
~ Myagui

 

[singula]

Was it your pool that mined the bad block?

The next diff should fall by about 3-4x that puts the diff below 1.5 :-D

Actually two of them (at diff around 15), now with the update the diff droped to 0.86

[singula]

I don't know if it's just a matter of giving it some time, but in any case, looks like the block stats are not updating yet on
http://explorer.cachecoin.org

Is a newest (i.e. with the bugfix) version running at the block explorer? If not, the new blocks from bugfixed version will be seen as invalid and thus won't appear at all.

[kalgecin]

I don't know if it's just a matter of giving it some time, but in any case, looks like the block stats are not updating yet on
http://explorer.cachecoin.org

Is a newest (i.e. with the bugfix) version running at the block explorer? If not, the new blocks from bugfixed version will be seen as invalid and thus won't appear at all.

it seems he hasn't updated it yet :-(

[kalgecin]

Was it your pool that mined the bad block?

The next diff should fall by about 3-4x that puts the diff below 1.5 :-D

Actually two of them (at diff around 15), now with the update the diff droped to 0.86

I wish to compensate for the 2 blocks. It was my fault that this bug caused this and i'd be happy to refund them. They were 19.01 and 15.83 cach?