Burninj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 18, 2014, 10:10:39 PM |
|
wow 21 btc buy wall just got eaten on poloniex
|
|
|
|
badcat
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 18, 2014, 10:23:11 PM |
|
Geez so much for my 0.0065 buy order, sigh
I will move over to the new pool once my rig has sorted its gremlins out with setting up scrypt jane
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 18, 2014, 10:32:15 PM |
|
I can't for the life of me get mining to work. I've downloaded the modified cgminer from https://sites.google.com/site/rmdavidson/Used the suggested settings (cgminer.exe --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883) and I just get constant HW errors. Are there any other settings I should be using like -g 1 -I 13 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 8192 --lookup-gap 2? Every other type of coin I mine works fine MAX/Vert/Kitteh/PANDA etc. I'm running on 2x R9 280X. Cheers Will
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 18, 2014, 10:47:21 PM |
|
Ok, don't worry all. I've sussed it, but I'm not sure why this works. I changed --scrypt-jane to --scrypt and now I don't have HW errors and I am getting plenty of accepts.
|
|
|
|
r05
Full Member
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41782/417829057aa6c4e2161cd38333336bed95bbc466" alt="*" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41782/417829057aa6c4e2161cd38333336bed95bbc466" alt="*"
Offline
Activity: 193
Merit: 100
test cryptocoin please ignore
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 18, 2014, 10:52:25 PM |
|
Ok, don't worry all. I've sussed it, but I'm not sure why this works. I changed --scrypt-jane to --scrypt and now I don't have HW errors and I am getting plenty of accepts.
Some mining clients take -scrypt as working for CACHe - I've found this also, and have mined since launch quite happily data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43729/43729d461382a9c3c047d7c76cf365a7bcd56b3e" alt="Smiley"
|
BTC: 18tS6E9FRnXuh4JitAJykm6YRtJRSkP6jq XMR: 46BzjaUU1fyfFJ2b9vvg9RXUsw3XQtkaoc7cRkzYxMre69GtCaX6jg3Luc4B6ABHAaBmZNpJ4zzmAiX deGsCiXJJMniDbWE
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 18, 2014, 11:13:39 PM |
|
Just to prove I'm not a complete noob like my last post suggested.
I've just copied my tweaked scrypt130111.cl file from my standard cgminer folder and made similar fine tunes to the scrypt-jane.cl file and boosted my hashrate from 546kh/s~ to 586kh/s on both of my R9 280x.
I'm going to test it over night to make sure I'm getting accepts and coins in my wallet and then I can provide the files to anyone else to try. The tweaks assume you only ever use a lookup gap of 2.
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 18, 2014, 11:25:26 PM |
|
What's a good hashrate for a R9 280X currently? I'm now pushing 611kh/s on one of mine at 1150/1500.
|
|
|
|
kalgecin (OP)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 19, 2014, 12:32:03 AM |
|
For those who want to deploy a p2pool node without any hustle, I've made a vagrant box package. It's based on arch linux and has cachecoin wallet and p2pool software installed and started on bootup. you'll have to edit Vagrant file if you want to point it to public space though
|
|
|
|
|
kalgecin (OP)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 19, 2014, 12:53:14 AM |
|
short guide on vagrant Get vagrant from vagrantup.com then, 1. Download the box image2. run vagrant init <path to box image> 3. edit Vagrantfile and uncomment the line with "config.vm.network :public_network" 4. run vagrant up This will boot up the virtual box and launch the cachecoin wallet and p2pool node. You can access the virtual machine using the command vargant ssh. Then you can point your miners to the virtual machine and mine away :-D
|
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 19, 2014, 07:27:11 AM |
|
Now another problem, after 8 hours of mining I'm still not showing up on the P2Pool. But 99% accepts according to cgminer. I've tried a traditional pool - http://pool.cachecoin.net/index.php, but I just get constant "Reject - share above target" there. I've switched back to the standard .cl files and still the same problem. Any ideas data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68950/68950c5b405d1d003f8b5fda25d840704bc82996" alt="Huh"
|
|
|
|
singula
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 19, 2014, 08:06:32 AM |
|
Now another problem, after 8 hours of mining I'm still not showing up on the P2Pool. But 99% accepts according to cgminer. I've tried a traditional pool - http://pool.cachecoin.net/index.php, but I just get constant "Reject - share above target" there. I've switched back to the standard .cl files and still the same problem. Any ideas data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68950/68950c5b405d1d003f8b5fda25d840704bc82996" alt="Huh" I suspect bad parameters for Nfmin/Nfmax/StartT ... which version of cgminer and what commandline parameters are you using?
|
Big brother is not watching you anymore. Big brother is telling you how to live.
|
|
|
Walrusbonzo
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 19, 2014, 08:19:00 AM Last edit: February 19, 2014, 08:32:37 AM by Walrusbonzo |
|
I'm using Robert Davidson's modified scrypt-jane cgminer - https://sites.google.com/site/rmdavidson/cgminer-3.7.2-sj-0.02.zipThese are the parameters I'm using - cgminer.exe --scrypt --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883, initially I used --scrypt-jane but that just threw HW errors. I've tried with and without "-g 2 -I 13 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 8193 --lookup-gap 2". I've tried with and without my tuned .cl files. On any one of the P2Pools I get accepts, but don't show up on the webpage. If I'm getting share accepts where on earth are they going? On the traditional pool I show up, but just get rejects "share above target". Thanks for helping. What settings are others using for R9 280X?
|
|
|
|
DreadLord
Member
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41782/417829057aa6c4e2161cd38333336bed95bbc466" alt="*"
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 19, 2014, 09:57:11 AM |
|
I've set up second traditional pool at http://pool.cachecoin.netIf somebody is reading this and still mining at cach.catcoin.cz consider switching either to the second pool or one of p2pool nodes. As an incentive to switch, the second pool has currently lower fees (half the percentage of first pool fees). Once enough people will switch either to second pool or to p2pool nodes, I'll lower the fee on the first pool, so both pools will have equal, or very close to equal fees (hoping to keep the pool hashrates balanced to be approximately equal on both pools and I hope that by setting the fee slightly above fees in p2pool nodes it will balance the hashrate a bit in favor of p2pool nodes). Also, new registrations are now closed on first pool, so new users have to mine either at second pool or one of P2pool nodes (or mine solo, but unless they have really good mining rig, I wouldn't recommend that). Also, someone from USA requested my help with setting up own CACH mining pool, so we may soon have third traditional (mpos) pool for CACH mining (hosted on another continent than first two, so perhaps it will end up as preferred pool for US users, further distributing the hashrate). Nice incentive...I bet you didn't mind at all wile you are getting 3% fees from miners...nice move data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68950/68950c5b405d1d003f8b5fda25d840704bc82996" alt="Huh"
|
|
|
|
kalgecin (OP)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 19, 2014, 10:11:24 AM |
|
I've set up second traditional pool at http://pool.cachecoin.netIf somebody is reading this and still mining at cach.catcoin.cz consider switching either to the second pool or one of p2pool nodes. As an incentive to switch, the second pool has currently lower fees (half the percentage of first pool fees). Once enough people will switch either to second pool or to p2pool nodes, I'll lower the fee on the first pool, so both pools will have equal, or very close to equal fees (hoping to keep the pool hashrates balanced to be approximately equal on both pools and I hope that by setting the fee slightly above fees in p2pool nodes it will balance the hashrate a bit in favor of p2pool nodes). Also, new registrations are now closed on first pool, so new users have to mine either at second pool or one of P2pool nodes (or mine solo, but unless they have really good mining rig, I wouldn't recommend that). Also, someone from USA requested my help with setting up own CACH mining pool, so we may soon have third traditional (mpos) pool for CACH mining (hosted on another continent than first two, so perhaps it will end up as preferred pool for US users, further distributing the hashrate). Nice incentive...I bet you didn't mind at all wile you are getting 3% fees from miners...nice move data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68950/68950c5b405d1d003f8b5fda25d840704bc82996" alt="Huh" The fees were meant to encourage people to move to other pools and distribute the hashrate across the network
|
|
|
|
DreadLord
Member
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41782/417829057aa6c4e2161cd38333336bed95bbc466" alt="*"
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 19, 2014, 10:18:31 AM |
|
I'm using Robert Davidson's modified scrypt-jane cgminer - https://sites.google.com/site/rmdavidson/cgminer-3.7.2-sj-0.02.zipThese are the parameters I'm using - cgminer.exe --scrypt --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883, initially I used --scrypt-jane but that just threw HW errors. I've tried with and without "-g 2 -I 13 -w 256 --thread-concurrency 8193 --lookup-gap 2". I've tried with and without my tuned .cl files. On any one of the P2Pools I get accepts, but don't show up on the webpage. If I'm getting share accepts where on earth are they going? On the traditional pool I show up, but just get rejects "share above target". Thanks for helping. What settings are others using for R9 280X? Hello, my batch file is this > cgminer.exe --scrypt-jane --sj-nfmin 4 --sj-nfmax 30 --sj-time 1388949883 -o http://q30.qhor.net:8336 -u <Wallet Address> -p x --shaders 2048 --thread-concurrency 11200 -I 13 -g 2 -w 256 --gpu-engine 1050 --gpu-memclock 1500 --lookup-gap 2 --shaders 2048 --gpu-fan 85 I'm getting 566 KH/s from my R9 280X, you can OC more if you have room for it...
|
|
|
|
DreadLord
Member
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41782/417829057aa6c4e2161cd38333336bed95bbc466" alt="*"
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 19, 2014, 10:19:32 AM |
|
I've set up second traditional pool at http://pool.cachecoin.netIf somebody is reading this and still mining at cach.catcoin.cz consider switching either to the second pool or one of p2pool nodes. As an incentive to switch, the second pool has currently lower fees (half the percentage of first pool fees). Once enough people will switch either to second pool or to p2pool nodes, I'll lower the fee on the first pool, so both pools will have equal, or very close to equal fees (hoping to keep the pool hashrates balanced to be approximately equal on both pools and I hope that by setting the fee slightly above fees in p2pool nodes it will balance the hashrate a bit in favor of p2pool nodes). Also, new registrations are now closed on first pool, so new users have to mine either at second pool or one of P2pool nodes (or mine solo, but unless they have really good mining rig, I wouldn't recommend that). Also, someone from USA requested my help with setting up own CACH mining pool, so we may soon have third traditional (mpos) pool for CACH mining (hosted on another continent than first two, so perhaps it will end up as preferred pool for US users, further distributing the hashrate). Nice incentive...I bet you didn't mind at all wile you are getting 3% fees from miners...nice move data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68950/68950c5b405d1d003f8b5fda25d840704bc82996" alt="Huh" The fees were meant to encourage people to move to other pools and distribute the hashrate across the network The fees are for the pool owner....that's all I know data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00984/009840c6adbc1d79ab993509482971bc4c3bbc80" alt="Wink"
|
|
|
|
kalgecin (OP)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 19, 2014, 10:30:46 AM |
|
I've set up second traditional pool at http://pool.cachecoin.netIf somebody is reading this and still mining at cach.catcoin.cz consider switching either to the second pool or one of p2pool nodes. As an incentive to switch, the second pool has currently lower fees (half the percentage of first pool fees). Once enough people will switch either to second pool or to p2pool nodes, I'll lower the fee on the first pool, so both pools will have equal, or very close to equal fees (hoping to keep the pool hashrates balanced to be approximately equal on both pools and I hope that by setting the fee slightly above fees in p2pool nodes it will balance the hashrate a bit in favor of p2pool nodes). Also, new registrations are now closed on first pool, so new users have to mine either at second pool or one of P2pool nodes (or mine solo, but unless they have really good mining rig, I wouldn't recommend that). Also, someone from USA requested my help with setting up own CACH mining pool, so we may soon have third traditional (mpos) pool for CACH mining (hosted on another continent than first two, so perhaps it will end up as preferred pool for US users, further distributing the hashrate). Nice incentive...I bet you didn't mind at all wile you are getting 3% fees from miners...nice move data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68950/68950c5b405d1d003f8b5fda25d840704bc82996" alt="Huh" The fees were meant to encourage people to move to other pools and distribute the hashrate across the network The fees are for the pool owner....that's all I know data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00984/009840c6adbc1d79ab993509482971bc4c3bbc80" alt="Wink" Yes, and running the pool also costs
|
|
|
|
DreadLord
Member
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41782/417829057aa6c4e2161cd38333336bed95bbc466" alt="*"
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 19, 2014, 10:36:04 AM |
|
I've set up second traditional pool at http://pool.cachecoin.netIf somebody is reading this and still mining at cach.catcoin.cz consider switching either to the second pool or one of p2pool nodes. As an incentive to switch, the second pool has currently lower fees (half the percentage of first pool fees). Once enough people will switch either to second pool or to p2pool nodes, I'll lower the fee on the first pool, so both pools will have equal, or very close to equal fees (hoping to keep the pool hashrates balanced to be approximately equal on both pools and I hope that by setting the fee slightly above fees in p2pool nodes it will balance the hashrate a bit in favor of p2pool nodes). Also, new registrations are now closed on first pool, so new users have to mine either at second pool or one of P2pool nodes (or mine solo, but unless they have really good mining rig, I wouldn't recommend that). Also, someone from USA requested my help with setting up own CACH mining pool, so we may soon have third traditional (mpos) pool for CACH mining (hosted on another continent than first two, so perhaps it will end up as preferred pool for US users, further distributing the hashrate). Nice incentive...I bet you didn't mind at all wile you are getting 3% fees from miners...nice move data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68950/68950c5b405d1d003f8b5fda25d840704bc82996" alt="Huh" The fees were meant to encourage people to move to other pools and distribute the hashrate across the network The fees are for the pool owner....that's all I know data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00984/009840c6adbc1d79ab993509482971bc4c3bbc80" alt="Wink" Yes, and running the pool also costs Yes I know that also...but 1% to 2% that's good...every pool have those fees but increasing from 1% to 3%....there's no sense in that data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cbc9/3cbc930d1381efa17bd822eefc1c86be8084ed5d" alt="Angry" Besides now that pool is running at 36% of net hash rate as we speak...so why didn't he lower fees?
|
|
|
|
kalgecin (OP)
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/686e1/686e1d2afeabd36ed797180a16bf21b0e58a4a69" alt="" |
February 19, 2014, 10:38:34 AM |
|
I've set up second traditional pool at http://pool.cachecoin.netIf somebody is reading this and still mining at cach.catcoin.cz consider switching either to the second pool or one of p2pool nodes. As an incentive to switch, the second pool has currently lower fees (half the percentage of first pool fees). Once enough people will switch either to second pool or to p2pool nodes, I'll lower the fee on the first pool, so both pools will have equal, or very close to equal fees (hoping to keep the pool hashrates balanced to be approximately equal on both pools and I hope that by setting the fee slightly above fees in p2pool nodes it will balance the hashrate a bit in favor of p2pool nodes). Also, new registrations are now closed on first pool, so new users have to mine either at second pool or one of P2pool nodes (or mine solo, but unless they have really good mining rig, I wouldn't recommend that). Also, someone from USA requested my help with setting up own CACH mining pool, so we may soon have third traditional (mpos) pool for CACH mining (hosted on another continent than first two, so perhaps it will end up as preferred pool for US users, further distributing the hashrate). Nice incentive...I bet you didn't mind at all wile you are getting 3% fees from miners...nice move data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/68950/68950c5b405d1d003f8b5fda25d840704bc82996" alt="Huh" The fees were meant to encourage people to move to other pools and distribute the hashrate across the network The fees are for the pool owner....that's all I know data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00984/009840c6adbc1d79ab993509482971bc4c3bbc80" alt="Wink" Yes, and running the pool also costs Yes I know that also...but 1% to 2% that's good...every pool have those fees but increasing from 1% to 3%....there's no sense in that data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3cbc9/3cbc930d1381efa17bd822eefc1c86be8084ed5d" alt="Angry" Besides now that pool is running at 36% of net hash rate as we speak...so why didn't he lower fees? If you don't like the fees, move to another pool
|
|
|
|
|