silencesilence
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 07, 2014, 06:00:22 PM |
|
Cannot start the program with this config. Where do I wrong? setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 sgminer.exe --kernel Lyra2RE -o stratum+tcp://92.27.201.170:9174 -u blabla.1 -p 1234 --worksize 256 --thread-concurrency 8192 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-engine 1050 --gpu-memclock 1500 --intensity 13 -g 2 use --algorithm Lyra2RE, and get rid of thread concurrency and lookup gap - they don't even make sense for this algo. @Wolf0 you have to add an VTC address, to the signature DONATE will certainly thankful people who you helped
|
|
|
|
Handofmidas
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
December 07, 2014, 06:04:30 PM |
|
Try this instead:
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 --kernel Lyra2RE -o stratum+tcp://92.27.201.170:9174 -u blabla.1 -p 1234 --worksize 256 --thread-concurrency 8192 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-engine 1050 --gpu-memclock 1500 --intensity 13 -g 2 sgminer.exe
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
December 07, 2014, 06:06:48 PM |
|
Cannot start the program with this config. Where do I wrong? setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 sgminer.exe --kernel Lyra2RE -o stratum+tcp://92.27.201.170:9174 -u blabla.1 -p 1234 --worksize 256 --thread-concurrency 8192 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-engine 1050 --gpu-memclock 1500 --intensity 13 -g 2 use --algorithm Lyra2RE, and get rid of thread concurrency and lookup gap - they don't even make sense for this algo. Cannot start the program with this config. Where do I wrong? setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 sgminer.exe --kernel Lyra2RE -o stratum+tcp://92.27.201.170:9174 -u blabla.1 -p 1234 --worksize 256 --thread-concurrency 8192 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-engine 1050 --gpu-memclock 1500 --intensity 13 -g 2 use --algorithm Lyra2RE, and get rid of thread concurrency and lookup gap - they don't even make sense for this algo. wonder why they removed thread concurrency in sgminer5 and force us to hardcode it... makes no sense... anyhow, it needs some adjustment, right now the buffer is a bit too large
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
silencesilence
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 07, 2014, 06:25:56 PM |
|
someone reloads little by little
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
December 07, 2014, 06:28:21 PM |
|
@Wolf0 I used like this, nothing changed: setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1 sgminer.exe --algorithm Lyra2RE -o stratum+tcp://92.27.201.170:9174 --worksize 256 --gpu-engine 1050 --gpu-memclock 1500 --intensity 13 I don't know what is the problem. I cannot see the error message because it dissappears so fast. Maybe because I use 64 bit Win7? add "pause" at the end of your bat file
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
|
clubsofsteel
|
|
December 07, 2014, 06:54:49 PM |
|
is this vertacoin?
|
|
|
|
rokkyroad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1090
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 07, 2014, 06:57:08 PM |
|
Thanks James122 for clearing up the version number.
I understand the algorithm change is not for a while yet. I assume there will be another wallet upgrade then?
|
" If you have to spam and shout to justify your existence then you are a shit coin." TaunSew
|
|
|
|
silencesilence
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 07, 2014, 07:00:32 PM |
|
is this vertacoin?
first hear about this coin "vertacoin" , maybe you do not understand properly .... this is VERTCOIN - Bitcoin Upgraded
|
|
|
|
jamesl22
|
|
December 07, 2014, 07:03:44 PM |
|
Version 0.9.0.1 released, update now!Version 0.9.0.1 released! Fixes testnet, fixes version number, confirmed working. EVERYONE MUST UPDATE THEIR WALLETS NOW!Wallet downloads:Miners: (Thanks to djm43 for his great work on this!) Other software:You guys can help by contacting your pool operator/any Vertcoin related services you use and asking them to update to the latest wallet.
|
|
|
|
rokkyroad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1090
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 07, 2014, 07:22:57 PM |
|
I just flashed up the new v.0.9.0.1 64 bit linux wallet. Everything appears as it should and is syncing up nicely.
You guys compiled a linux ccminer for me! You rock!
|
" If you have to spam and shout to justify your existence then you are a shit coin." TaunSew
|
|
|
asemov
|
|
December 07, 2014, 07:30:26 PM |
|
Is the testnet pre-forked with new wallet ?
|
|
|
|
jch9678
|
|
December 07, 2014, 07:40:10 PM |
|
Not sure if this is tripping any of you guys up but xintensity 64 for a 290x is not the same as xintensity 64 for a 280x or even a 290. xintensity is a multiple of shaders your card has.
For example a 290x at xintensity 64 is 2816*64 = 180224 raw intensity which is close to an intensity of 17.45 (2^17.45 = 179049) a 290 at xintensity 64 is 2560*64 = 163840 raw intensity which is close to an intensity of 17.32 (2^17.32 = 163621)
Not much of a difference between a 290x and a 290 but with a 7950 having 1792 shaders would be something like an intensity of 16.8
Again not a huge deal but something to consider.
|
BTC: 15GqpmqNNJ1REWrDWTfymh7moos1sEvz7A
|
|
|
|
jch9678
|
|
December 07, 2014, 08:06:46 PM |
|
Not sure if this is tripping any of you guys up but xintensity 64 for a 290x is not the same as xintensity 64 for a 280x or even a 290. xintensity is a multiple of shaders your card has.
For example a 290x at xintensity 64 is 2816*64 = 180224 raw intensity which is close to an intensity of 17.45 (2^17.45 = 179049) a 290 at xintensity 64 is 2560*64 = 163840 raw intensity which is close to an intensity of 17.32 (2^17.32 = 163621)
Not much of a difference between a 290x and a 290 but with a 7950 having 1792 shaders would be something like an intensity of 16.8
Again not a huge deal but something to consider.
No shit. That's the entire point of xintensity. Just trying to help. I guarantee that someone out there thinks they are pushing their 7950 with an xintensity of 64 as hard as you are pushing your 290x. Maybe I have a misunderstanding, is the thinking supposed to be that a 7950 can't handle the same intensity as a 290? I try to keep my 290s and 290Xs around the same raw intensity. I always took it that intensity was just how hard you want to push your card, so if you wanted to push your 290x to intensity of 17, for an older card you would have to add more to xintensity to reach intensity of 17. Oh well I've never mined with different types of cards so I never had to consider it.
|
BTC: 15GqpmqNNJ1REWrDWTfymh7moos1sEvz7A
|
|
|
Sharkie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2014, 08:21:44 PM |
|
Not sure if this is tripping any of you guys up but xintensity 64 for a 290x is not the same as xintensity 64 for a 280x or even a 290. xintensity is a multiple of shaders your card has.
For example a 290x at xintensity 64 is 2816*64 = 180224 raw intensity which is close to an intensity of 17.45 (2^17.45 = 179049) a 290 at xintensity 64 is 2560*64 = 163840 raw intensity which is close to an intensity of 17.32 (2^17.32 = 163621)
Not much of a difference between a 290x and a 290 but with a 7950 having 1792 shaders would be something like an intensity of 16.8
Again not a huge deal but something to consider.
No shit. That's the entire point of xintensity. Awww shame...why sooo mean Wolf?
|
|
|
|
Sharkie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 25
Merit: 0
|
|
December 07, 2014, 08:34:23 PM |
|
Not sure if this is tripping any of you guys up but xintensity 64 for a 290x is not the same as xintensity 64 for a 280x or even a 290. xintensity is a multiple of shaders your card has.
For example a 290x at xintensity 64 is 2816*64 = 180224 raw intensity which is close to an intensity of 17.45 (2^17.45 = 179049) a 290 at xintensity 64 is 2560*64 = 163840 raw intensity which is close to an intensity of 17.32 (2^17.32 = 163621)
Not much of a difference between a 290x and a 290 but with a 7950 having 1792 shaders would be something like an intensity of 16.8
Again not a huge deal but something to consider.
No shit. That's the entire point of xintensity. Awww shame...why sooo mean Wolf? Not my intention to be mean; I can be rather blunt when I've been awake for more than 60 hours or so. Understandable, it happens. All is forgiven. See jch9678, Wolf was just tired from all the tinkering and reporting back to us, that he has been doing. Thaaaank you Woooolf.
|
|
|
|
jk_14
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1292
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 07, 2014, 09:06:44 PM |
|
I just flashed up the new v.0.9.0.1 64 bit linux wallet. Everything appears as it should and is syncing up nicely.
You guys compiled a linux ccminer for me! You rock!
If you use KopiemTu in your rigs, this compiled ccminer supports also KopiemTu web statistics ("syslog" option in configuration file)
|
|
|
|
|
|