Im wondering how a small currency like ANC are able to create a decent looking infographic about their technology while Darkcoin seems to be unable to achieve such a thing. Hopefully this is in the works.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=227287.msg9042059#msg9042059A professionally made information video would be great too. These are the little things that will matter now at this stage of the project. There is a lot of talk about adoption and what we should do to achieve this; these 2 things are the most important (other than sorting out the website which for some reason has gotten worse instead of better).
Cointelegraph did one, but it's tiny & got the max price wrong. Surely there's an artist here who could do better.
I can try and create an infographic.
But I need more detailled information.
1) This 7% decrease per year, when did this actually start? Because I don't think this mechanism started back in jan 18 2015 when darkcoin came into existence, but only weeks/months? later.
If I am not mistaken it was camosoul who came up with the 7%, lol
2) Block reward is controlled by moore's law? I don't understand this, can someone phrase this differently? It sounds pretty meaningless to me.
3) About 22 Million Max coins, which year will this be the case, approximately?
This small one lack detail to the point that it inaccurate. You'd need to make a much larger infographic to put it all out there. A part showing how other coins' clockchains are exposing every transaction you make (BTC, LTC, PPC, DOGE) and why that fails would contrast to DRK works... The problem we have is that nobody knows why the things DRK does different matter. You have to tell them because they have no idea how any of the coins they use now work. They never did any research. They don't understand anyway. They just throw money at waves.
Monero: impossible to implement, bloat is just another thing that makes it impossible, if it doesn't die in a few years the blockchain will be so huge we'll need to invent new hard drives just to hold it, tech appears to be exploitable and dead in the water, etc...
PPC: proof of hoard, 100% traceable just like BTC, shares many of the same flaws as BTC
DOGE: no diff massive inflation coin worse than the Federal Reserve, 100% traceable just like BTC, shares all other fundamental flaws of BTC because it's just a clone minus the diff which is really bad inflation... Their silly meme may as well be Bernanke's head snorting coke.
LTC: brings nothing to the table, algo a lie because all static algos are ASIC ready not ASIC resistant the complete opposite of what they told everyone, 100% traceable just like BTC, shares all other fundamental flaws of BTC because it's just a clone
BTC: has fundamental flaws that the devs refuse to fix such as 100% traceability, mining pools/51% threat, super long TX times, etc...
I don't think any of the others need mentioning because they're all just copies of various parts of the above accompanied by buzzwords and lies all of similar nature, zero function, and all the same problems.
One of the biggest obstacles is explaining to people that all the stuff they read in the media and from the government about BTC being "anonoymous" is a lie designed to catch them doing something bad because it's not anonymous at all. It couldn't be more the complete opposite of anonymous. It's more traceable than your bank account because they don't even need a search warrant; it's all public info and it is, in fact, 100% traceable. They told the "anon" lie to trick stupid people into a false sense of security so they could catch them... "Oh, they say it's anon, pshaw, Silk Road here I come!" Nope, not anon, "they" know exactly what you did with it.
Everyone does. We all have the blockchain, so we all know it came straight out of your heavily documented/identified coinbase account and went over to blockchain.info, then straight to SR. You're not clever at all, you're a dumbass sucker that fell right into their trap...
Maybe present them in reverse order from what I did here... BTC at the top, go down from there...
I put my previous unused payment towards this project instead.
