alex-ru
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1010
|
|
May 05, 2015, 01:08:39 PM |
|
There were some links to masternode monthly data useage, please?
Can we get an average bandwidth across all masternodes?
~150-180 GB/month Thanks! 165 GB x 2519 MN. That's a lot of data the network is moving around. What's the average GB cost for the network? 165 GB x 2519 MN = 416 TB per month - Not so much. "Cost" you mean in hosting data-centers? Just as example-estimation - server from USA hosting-ptovider (un-managed): Xeon 3220 2.4GHz Quad Core / 8GB / 2x500GB / 1Gbs / 100TB = $219
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 05, 2015, 02:14:23 PM |
|
There were some links to masternode monthly data useage, please?
Can we get an average bandwidth across all masternodes?
~150-180 GB/month Thanks! 165 GB x 2519 MN. That's a lot of data the network is moving around. What's the average GB cost for the network? 165 GB x 2519 MN = 416 TB per month - Not so much. "Cost" you mean in hosting data-centers? Just as example-estimation - server from USA hosting-ptovider (un-managed): Xeon 3220 2.4GHz Quad Core / 8GB / 2x500GB / 1Gbs / 100TB = $219Yeah, hosting. So the average cost of 416 TB / month is: (5 x $219) / 2519 = $0.43 / GB. Apply a factor to remove economies of scale in your example, and the average network cost is between ~ $0.60 to $0.80 / GB. That doesn't sound right....let me check
|
|
|
|
spatula
|
|
May 05, 2015, 02:19:16 PM |
|
There were some links to masternode monthly data useage, please?
Can we get an average bandwidth across all masternodes?
~150-180 GB/month Thanks! 165 GB x 2519 MN. That's a lot of data the network is moving around. What's the average GB cost for the network? 165 GB x 2519 MN = 416 TB per month - Not so much. "Cost" you mean in hosting data-centers? Just as example-estimation - server from USA hosting-ptovider (un-managed): Xeon 3220 2.4GHz Quad Core / 8GB / 2x500GB / 1Gbs / 100TB = $219Yeah, hosting. So the average cost of 416 TB / month is: (5 x $219) / 2519 = $0.43 / GB. Apply a factor of 2 to remove economies of scale in your example, and the average network cost is between ~ $0.60 to $0.80 / GB. You never converted TB to GB. Actual cost per GB is much lower. You have to divide by 1000, so we are actually looking at $0.0006 to $0.0008 / GB
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 05, 2015, 02:21:50 PM |
|
There were some links to masternode monthly data useage, please?
Can we get an average bandwidth across all masternodes?
~150-180 GB/month Thanks! 165 GB x 2519 MN. That's a lot of data the network is moving around. What's the average GB cost for the network? 165 GB x 2519 MN = 416 TB per month - Not so much. "Cost" you mean in hosting data-centers? Just as example-estimation - server from USA hosting-ptovider (un-managed): Xeon 3220 2.4GHz Quad Core / 8GB / 2x500GB / 1Gbs / 100TB = $219Yeah, hosting. So the average cost of 416 TB / month is: (5 x $219) / 2519 = $0.43 / GB. Apply a factor of 2 to remove economies of scale in your example, and the average network cost is between ~ $0.60 to $0.80 / GB. You never converted TB to GB. Actual cost per GB is much lower. Yeah, it sounded a bit high. So we are really talking pennies, or ~$10/month / MN So, what's everyone paying per month? This will be good for your chi: http://lowendbox.com/This is a steal
|
|
|
|
spatula
|
|
May 05, 2015, 02:25:33 PM |
|
There were some links to masternode monthly data useage, please?
Can we get an average bandwidth across all masternodes?
~150-180 GB/month Thanks! 165 GB x 2519 MN. That's a lot of data the network is moving around. What's the average GB cost for the network? 165 GB x 2519 MN = 416 TB per month - Not so much. "Cost" you mean in hosting data-centers? Just as example-estimation - server from USA hosting-ptovider (un-managed): Xeon 3220 2.4GHz Quad Core / 8GB / 2x500GB / 1Gbs / 100TB = $219Yeah, hosting. So the average cost of 416 TB / month is: (5 x $219) / 2519 = $0.43 / GB. Apply a factor of 2 to remove economies of scale in your example, and the average network cost is between ~ $0.60 to $0.80 / GB. You never converted TB to GB. Actual cost per GB is much lower. Yeah, it sounded a bit high. So we are really talking pennies, or ~$10/month / MN Well a lot less actually in bandwidth costs, which was the original question. There are other costs incurred from operating a masternode though, like storage, memory, and cpu utilization. Either way, if you are paying more than $5 per MN / month, you are paying too much. Until more network services are offered of course, then requirements will go up.
|
|
|
|
TanteStefana2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 05, 2015, 02:44:25 PM |
|
What's going on at the moment? Have all the trolls decided to do something useful with their time finally and stop posting crap here?!
Has there been any development news from Evan in the last week or 2? What is the core functionality the dev team is working on at the moment??
I think Evan is working on getting 0.12 ready for testing. This version should get rid of the reference node (basically, decentralizing it) and Masternode blinding with probably many other things, I am not thinking of right now, LOL. I hope we get to start testing soon, it's always fun to participate
|
Another proud lifetime Dash Foundation member My TanteStefana account was hacked, Beware trading "You'll never reach your destination if you stop to throw stones at every dog that barks."Sir Winston Churchill BTC: 12pu5nMDPEyUGu3HTbnUB5zY5RG65EQE5d
|
|
|
splawik21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
|
|
May 05, 2015, 02:52:45 PM |
|
What's going on at the moment? Have all the trolls decided to do something useful with their time finally and stop posting crap here?!
Has there been any development news from Evan in the last week or 2? What is the core functionality the dev team is working on at the moment??
I think Evan is working on getting 0.12 ready for testing. This version should get rid of the reference node (basically, decentralizing it) and Masternode blinding with probably many other things, I am not thinking of right now, LOL. I hope we get to start testing soon, it's always fun to participate ^^^ would be awesome, once we get rid of that the truth decentralisation will begin. edit: 4 pages to go 5k
|
BE SMART, USE DASH ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
splawik21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005
DASH is the future of crypto payments!
|
|
May 05, 2015, 03:39:06 PM |
|
270 shares to sell guys to get another masternode Interested? PM check my sig.
|
BE SMART, USE DASH ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 05, 2015, 03:45:35 PM Last edit: May 05, 2015, 04:30:00 PM by coins101 |
|
|
|
|
|
traderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 05, 2015, 04:17:21 PM |
|
0.012 is holding so far, but the monster support is at 0.01, that one is HUGE! Of course there is no guarantees that 0.01 will hold, but the chances are high that a lot of people will be executing orders there and the market will have a reaction. If you say there is a massive triple-support area sitting at 0.01, so we should be safe to put buy orders slightly above 0.01 knowing that heavy support will prevent price from crashing further? i just bought at 0.012 hopefully the price rises back to 0.015
|
|
|
|
etoque
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 05, 2015, 04:46:06 PM |
|
0.012 is holding so far, but the monster support is at 0.01, that one is HUGE! Of course there is no guarantees that 0.01 will hold, but the chances are high that a lot of people will be executing orders there and the market will have a reaction. If you say there is a massive triple-support area sitting at 0.01, so we should be safe to put buy orders slightly above 0.01 knowing that heavy support will prevent price from crashing further? i just bought at 0.012 hopefully the price rises back to 0.015 Last time we've hit 0.01 it was no wall and people was holding strong... Selling at 0.012 to maybe buy in at 0.01 ? Support was too big for this too short trading move.Not hard to say it was a good time to buy in now
|
|
|
|
TanteStefana2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 05, 2015, 04:53:19 PM |
|
I'm worried that the moderators are getting rid of important posts that tell the story of DASH. This would be very unfortunate, if they do, just to cut back on the number of pages. I think I'll dedicate some hard drive space and try downloading this thread before they take out all the good stuff! I simply don't trust the moderators!
|
Another proud lifetime Dash Foundation member My TanteStefana account was hacked, Beware trading "You'll never reach your destination if you stop to throw stones at every dog that barks."Sir Winston Churchill BTC: 12pu5nMDPEyUGu3HTbnUB5zY5RG65EQE5d
|
|
|
Lebubar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 05, 2015, 04:57:27 PM Last edit: May 05, 2015, 05:19:05 PM by Lebubar |
|
Yes just a look to the order book on cryptsy gives us : 2700 buy to reach 0.0134 level 12600 buy support to reach 0.0105 level. "Normally" we should go up from here... : 0.012 is holding so far, but the monster support is at 0.01, that one is HUGE! Of course there is no guarantees that 0.01 will hold, but the chances are high that a lot of people will be executing orders there and the market will have a reaction. If you say there is a massive triple-support area sitting at 0.01, so we should be safe to put buy orders slightly above 0.01 knowing that heavy support will prevent price from crashing further? i just bought at 0.012 hopefully the price rises back to 0.015
|
|
|
|
Sub-Ether
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Quantum entangled and jump drive assisted messages
|
|
May 05, 2015, 05:23:51 PM |
|
Interesting sliding slides but doesn't Dash cover time locked contracts and off chain transactions with the masternode network already ? http://lightning.network/lightning-network.pdfProblems of the bitcoin network Transactions aren’t instant ● Micropayments don’t actually work ○ High transaction fees ● “Bitcoin Doesn’t Scale”
|
Dash is 27.3 times faster with syncing and updating than Bitcoin and 93.7 times faster than Monero. Bitcoin (v0.11.0) has a Tao ratio 11.2% faster than bitcoin (v0.10.0) release. Dash (v.0.12.0.49) = Tao sync ratio = 0.15 seconds / hour of update || Dash (v.0.11.2.23) = Tao sync ratio = 0.24 seconds / hour of update. V12 versus V11 speedup = +36.5% Bitcoin (v.0.11.0) = Tao sync ratio = 4.14 seconds / hour of update || Monero (v.0.41.1) = Tao sync ratio = 14.2 seconds / hour of update
|
|
|
AlexGR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049
|
|
May 05, 2015, 05:35:18 PM |
|
0.012 is holding so far, but the monster support is at 0.01, that one is HUGE! Of course there is no guarantees that 0.01 will hold, but the chances are high that a lot of people will be executing orders there and the market will have a reaction.
Crypto markets are way more "irrational" than normal markets due to factors that are inherent in the current ecosystem. You can have a hack in an exchange, a guy running off with a stash of money from a market or an exchange and suddenly the market floods with coins. Technical analysis, charts etc are useless in this regard as they can't predict anomalies like these. The moolah scammer was dumping hundreds of thousands of DRKs down to 0.002x. Can this be predicted? No. Bottoms are difficult to calculate because the market players are not playing rationally. Even the highs can be difficult to predict due to the same irrational reasons. Say someone steals 100.000 BTCs and floods the anon altcoin market with buy orders... You can't see these coming. Instead you must assume that the bottoms and ceilings are always greater than what you can imagine
|
|
|
|
Sub-Ether
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Quantum entangled and jump drive assisted messages
|
|
May 05, 2015, 05:43:44 PM |
|
Crypto markets are way more "irrational" than normal markets due to factors that are inherent in the current ecosystem. You can have a hack in an exchange, a guy running off with a stash of money from a market or an exchange and suddenly the market floods with coins. Technical analysis, charts etc are useless in this regard as they can't predict anomalies like these.
I think you just covered points 7,10 and 11 at least. http://deepcrypto.tumblr.com/post/114139983853/why-trading-bitcoin-is-better-than-trading-stock
|
Dash is 27.3 times faster with syncing and updating than Bitcoin and 93.7 times faster than Monero. Bitcoin (v0.11.0) has a Tao ratio 11.2% faster than bitcoin (v0.10.0) release. Dash (v.0.12.0.49) = Tao sync ratio = 0.15 seconds / hour of update || Dash (v.0.11.2.23) = Tao sync ratio = 0.24 seconds / hour of update. V12 versus V11 speedup = +36.5% Bitcoin (v.0.11.0) = Tao sync ratio = 4.14 seconds / hour of update || Monero (v.0.41.1) = Tao sync ratio = 14.2 seconds / hour of update
|
|
|
spatula
|
|
May 05, 2015, 05:45:24 PM |
|
So does anyone know which posts are being deleted? I don't see much missing, is it mainly older posts?
|
|
|
|
Sub-Ether
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Quantum entangled and jump drive assisted messages
|
|
May 05, 2015, 05:47:25 PM |
|
So does anyone know which posts are being deleted? I don't see much missing, is it mainly older posts?
We've on pages 4995 -5000 for days now, its constant erasures, probably not much point in posting anymore if this continues,suggest regrouping back at head office. The difference with the erasures this time is they are done in blocks and no messages are sent to your inbox.
|
Dash is 27.3 times faster with syncing and updating than Bitcoin and 93.7 times faster than Monero. Bitcoin (v0.11.0) has a Tao ratio 11.2% faster than bitcoin (v0.10.0) release. Dash (v.0.12.0.49) = Tao sync ratio = 0.15 seconds / hour of update || Dash (v.0.11.2.23) = Tao sync ratio = 0.24 seconds / hour of update. V12 versus V11 speedup = +36.5% Bitcoin (v.0.11.0) = Tao sync ratio = 4.14 seconds / hour of update || Monero (v.0.41.1) = Tao sync ratio = 14.2 seconds / hour of update
|
|
|
Rux
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1291
Merit: 1024
https://crypto.ba
|
|
May 05, 2015, 05:49:52 PM |
|
So does anyone know which posts are being deleted? I don't see much missing, is it mainly older posts?
We've on pages 4995 -5000 for days now, its constant erasures, probably not much point in posting anymore if this continues,suggest regrouping back at head office. The difference with the erasures this time is they are done in blocks and no messages are sent to your inbox. i think BTCTALK admins are affraid of DASH taking lead on every Thread related to their precious BITCOIN so they are deleting everything they can....
|
RXC Crypto.ba Decentralized solutions!
|
|
|
Sub-Ether
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Quantum entangled and jump drive assisted messages
|
|
May 05, 2015, 05:51:41 PM |
|
So does anyone know which posts are being deleted? I don't see much missing, is it mainly older posts?
We've on pages 4995 -5000 for days now, its constant erasures, probably not much point in posting anymore if this continues,suggest regrouping back at head office. The difference with the erasures this time is they are done in blocks and no messages are sent to your inbox. i think BTCTALK admins are affraid of DASH taking lead on every Thread related to their precious BITCOIN so they are deleting everything they can.... 100% agree with you, have been noticed by the big boys and they don't like what they're seeing (I mean the lightning network link I posted if its still there sums up how behind they are)
|
Dash is 27.3 times faster with syncing and updating than Bitcoin and 93.7 times faster than Monero. Bitcoin (v0.11.0) has a Tao ratio 11.2% faster than bitcoin (v0.10.0) release. Dash (v.0.12.0.49) = Tao sync ratio = 0.15 seconds / hour of update || Dash (v.0.11.2.23) = Tao sync ratio = 0.24 seconds / hour of update. V12 versus V11 speedup = +36.5% Bitcoin (v.0.11.0) = Tao sync ratio = 4.14 seconds / hour of update || Monero (v.0.41.1) = Tao sync ratio = 14.2 seconds / hour of update
|
|
|
|