kadrek
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:06:48 PM |
|
What's the best miner to use with amd cards? I haven't mined in months and feel like starting up again. I think I used to get ~2.2 Mh/s with my 270x's.
|
SWIPE │ │ │ Monetizing mobile engagement data, on the blockchain [ SWIPE . WHITEPAPER ] TELEGRAM TWITTER MEDIUM REDDIT
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:07:56 PM |
|
What's the best miner to use with amd cards? I haven't mined in months and feel like starting up again.
Download the latest sphminer. Should have all the optimizations for better X11 hashing.
|
|
|
|
kadrek
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:09:32 PM |
|
What's the best miner to use with amd cards? I haven't mined in months and feel like starting up again.
Download the latest sphminer. Should have all the optimizations for better X11 hashing. This one? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=475795.0;allEdit: I read that sphminer isn't being developed anymore at the end of the thread. There is a link to this one at the end. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=632503.0 Should I use that or the first link I posted?
|
SWIPE │ │ │ Monetizing mobile engagement data, on the blockchain [ SWIPE . WHITEPAPER ] TELEGRAM TWITTER MEDIUM REDDIT
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:12:28 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Drobek
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:12:40 PM |
|
This guy on the Darknet is right: I'm a vendor on a couple markets and would personally prefer to accept Darkcoin IF it passes open source code review by trusted sources. I won't touch it until then, however. I've been following its development and would prefer my customers not go through centralized mixers and instead use Darkcoin. If I was LE, I would setup mixers. As a vendor, it is one of my biggest concerns. If a new market opens that uses Darkcoin and my current markets do not, I will open up shop.
|
|
|
|
kadrek
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:14:19 PM |
|
|
SWIPE │ │ │ Monetizing mobile engagement data, on the blockchain [ SWIPE . WHITEPAPER ] TELEGRAM TWITTER MEDIUM REDDIT
|
|
|
semajjames
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:16:39 PM |
|
What's the best miner to use with amd cards? I haven't mined in months and feel like starting up again.
Edit: I read that sphminer isn't being developed anymore at the end of the thread. There is a link to this one at the end. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=632503.0 Should I use that or the first link I posted? +1 i have found this fastest also
|
|
|
|
ddink7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:19:01 PM |
|
This guy on the Darknet is right: I'm a vendor on a couple markets and would personally prefer to accept Darkcoin IF it passes open source code review by trusted sources. I won't touch it until then, however. I've been following its development and would prefer my customers not go through centralized mixers and instead use Darkcoin. If I was LE, I would setup mixers. As a vendor, it is one of my biggest concerns. If a new market opens that uses Darkcoin and my current markets do not, I will open up shop. It already passed a code review by Krisov Atlas.
|
|
|
|
illodin
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:19:59 PM |
|
It already passed a code review by Krisov Atlas.
Yes, but they also want the code so they can compile it themselves. EDIT: and oh, I would imagine instant transactions without having to wait for confirms is a huge thing for vendors as well.
|
|
|
|
|
kadrek
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:23:15 PM |
|
You must have answered right when I deleted that post lol
|
SWIPE │ │ │ Monetizing mobile engagement data, on the blockchain [ SWIPE . WHITEPAPER ] TELEGRAM TWITTER MEDIUM REDDIT
|
|
|
|
kadrek
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:32:30 PM |
|
I suppose I should What is the huge "unknown" portion of the hashrate distribution? https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/#!extraction
|
SWIPE │ │ │ Monetizing mobile engagement data, on the blockchain [ SWIPE . WHITEPAPER ] TELEGRAM TWITTER MEDIUM REDDIT
|
|
|
Propulsion
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:36:57 PM |
|
A consolidation image of all unknown entities that are mining Darkcoin not necessarily a single entity.
|
|
|
|
kadrek
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:39:51 PM |
|
A consolidation image of all unknown entities that are mining Darkcoin not necessarily a single entity. I thought so, it just seems like a lot of power that's unaccounted for.
|
SWIPE │ │ │ Monetizing mobile engagement data, on the blockchain [ SWIPE . WHITEPAPER ] TELEGRAM TWITTER MEDIUM REDDIT
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:41:45 PM |
|
Breaking...RC5 working like a champ, open source coming Friday! DARKCOIN.IO #getintothedark #buildthedarkness #darkcoin #bitcoin #DRK #btc
#getintothrdark #buildthedarkness #DarkcoinChameleon
Join us on Twitter!
@TaoOfSatoshi
It's important that you are getting your facts right. Open source is in one week, so next Monday. Not Friday.
|
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:50:31 PM |
|
Buy opportunity - not for traders, for merchants
|
|
|
|
kadrek
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:51:35 PM |
|
Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong in my .bat file? It says unexpected command line arguments when I run it.
sgminer.exe --algorithm darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://stratum1.suchpool.pw:3335 -u user.worker -p pass --failover-only stratum+tcp://stratum2.suchpool.pw:3335 -u user.worker -p pass -g 2 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 15232 pause
|
SWIPE │ │ │ Monetizing mobile engagement data, on the blockchain [ SWIPE . WHITEPAPER ] TELEGRAM TWITTER MEDIUM REDDIT
|
|
|
KryptoFoo
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:51:45 PM |
|
4h MACD getting ready to turn green soon, RSI has cooled off to mid-range after the last runup, recent selling has been on low volume.
RC5 release has been going very well. We have open source and instant transactions coming.
Things are looking up!
|
|
|
|
KryptoFoo
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:52:54 PM |
|
Can anyone see what I'm doing wrong in my .bat file? It says unexpected command line arguments when I run it.
sgminer.exe --algorithm darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://stratum1.suchpool.pw:3335 -u user.worker -p pass --failover-only stratum+tcp://stratum2.suchpool.pw:3335 -u user.worker -p pass -g 2 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 --thread-concurrency 15232 pause
looks like you are missing -o after --failover-only
|
|
|
|
|