New profit-switching mining pool with nightly bonus payout-- CoinSolver.com

[vtminer]

Hey all, I just wanted to announce our new scrypt coin mining pool... Coinsolver.com

 
CoinSovler is a new auto-switching scrypt coin mining pool that pays out directly in BitCoin.  We're still in Beta, so suggestions and feedback are most welcome, and we have many features in the works.  We intend for it to be dead simple to use, highly profitable and very transparent about the mining information.
 
Features:

    Completely anonymous-- no user registration
    All payouts are directly in BTC
    Automatically mine the most profitable scrypt coin
    Bonus payout awarded nightly to random miner!
    Very low 1% mining fee
    Snazzy graphs and detailed statistics
    Full API access
    Very active development, constantly expanding features

Pool address: coinsolver.com:3333

Website: coinsolver.com


 

[1715511276]

1715511276

[1715511276]

1715511276

[1715511276]

1715511276

[1715511276]

1715511276

[Prelude]

Very nice looking interface, I'll give it a shot when I have time.

[vtminer]

Very nice looking interface, I'll give it a shot when I have time.

Thanks! 
We'd love to have you aboard... the more the merrier.

[vtminer]

Just an update, we've added a few new coins to our mining rotation, now up to 25.

New Coins:
MEOW
BQC

For convenience, we post our full coin with current profitability (every ~5 mins) on our site here.

Our current full coin list:
 FRK
 CGB
 MEOW
 WDC
 PHS
 TAG
 DGC
 EMD
 LOT
 NET
 ANC
 FST
 LTC
 MEC
 CAP
 SBC
 MNC
 GDC
 MOON
 BQC
 CSC
 CAT
 42
 DOGE

[dsergeevich]

try this

[dsergeevich]

Hey all, I just wanted to announce our new scrypt coin mining pool... Coinsolver.com

 
CoinSovler is a new auto-switching scrypt coin mining pool that pays out directly in BitCoin.  We're still in Beta, so suggestions and feedback are most welcome, and we have many features in the works.  We intend for it to be dead simple to use, highly profitable and very transparent about the mining information.
 
Features:

    Completely anonymous-- no user registration
    All payouts are directly in BTC
    Automatically mine the most profitable scrypt coin
    Bonus payout awarded nightly to random miner!
    Very low 1% mining fee
    Snazzy graphs and detailed statistics
    Full API access
    Very active development, constantly expanding features

Pool address: coinsolver.com:3333

Website: coinsolver.com


 

What about alternative servers in Europe?

[vtminer]

Hi dsergeevich,

Definitely, down the road.
Once we get out of beta, we hope to put up servers in Europe too.

[dsergeevich]

Hi dsergeevich,

Definitely, down the road.
Once we get out of beta, we hope to put up servers in Europe too.

well, I hope it will be soon

[zneww]

Good talking to "Support" whomever that may be haha..I like that feature. Site looks great. Pretty graphs. Much like.

[pineapples]

yes +1 on the support.
very nice.. and supportive

[vtminer]

Hi all, and thanks for the kind words.

I just wanted to let people know that we've been optimizing our coin lineup and rotation, and to take advantage of the growing size of the pool, we've added a handful of new coins to our mix:

http://coinsolver.com/coins.php
STR
EAC
TIPS
LEAF

We've also been improving the detail and clarity of our worker statistics, coin switching tuning, and expansion of our API.

Cheers,

-VTMiner

[sebdude420]

can you add sebuhcoin??
http://coingen.bluematt.me/build/7faad07f.zip

[vtminer]

Is that scrypt coin?  We only mine scrypt currently.
Also, you appear to have a name collision with an existing coin in our lineup (StableCoin - SBC)

[zneww]

Everything seems to be rolling along well. Everything is clean and fluid. Support is responsive and helpful. Dead simple like you said.


Just need more hashrate!! 

[kmsalex]

If your hash rate isn't high enough the pool won't take any shares before moving on to the next block? I've seen my page showing 0 acepted shares after a half hour mining .. :/

[alc]

Nice site - will give it go for a day or two and see how the profit looks.

[zneww]

We have an IRC for here now guys


#CoinSolver on Freenode

[Clayce]

Nice looking pool. An App would be super cool too..

[zneww]

Been very impressed VT....Coinsolver is growing on me 

[alc]

So far so good, profit looks about right. Not heard back from support yet though (simple question) and it's been 24 hours since query.

[vtminer]

Hi alc,

Sorry to hear you've been left hanging in support.  I don't see any open tickets in our system, so if you PM me your details, I will make sure you are taken care of asap.

Cheers,

-VTMiner

[dency45]

Are they giving the correct coins based on your hashrate?

[zneww]

Not sure what that means, but the pool seems to only mine the coins it can handle.

[JB.]

Just wanted to say thanks!

So far so good after 48 hours all seems to be running well.

I do have a few things, two issues and one request!

On the user stats page, can it include a text time stamp, just so it's clear when the page last refreshed. Saves having to hit F5 whenever I return to the screen and it gives the numbers context.

Next,

How are these numbers generated?

Unexchanged (estimate)   
Projected Balance (estimate)
BTC balance (below min)

My assumption is that BTC Balance is what I've earned, and Projected is my balance plus the un-exchanged value combined, to give a rough guide.

If this is correct, how can my BTC Balance decrease?

Lastly, I was nearly given a heart attack last night!

My projected balance rocketed to 0.49 BTC, which would have been very nice! I knew it was an error and later on it dropped back to reality, with a crash.

But this spike has made my graph unusuable. Is is possible to get this spike removed?

Cheers,

[MaTeZZ]

I do like CoinSolver

Payouts for 2/4/2014 were unusually low.
0.01BTC for 3.3+MH/s
I would expect +-0.03BTC for that speed
Any reason for that? Just bad luck?

[caav]

Hi dsergeevich,

Definitely, down the road.
Once we get out of beta, we hope to put up servers in Europe too.

if you want to put servers up in Europe contact me.

[zneww]

Hey guys, I talked to VT and it appears Cryptsy lost some of our coins to be sold. Thats why our payouts were shit. Pretty much halved. VT will get the coin and divide evenly.

[Clayce]

Hey guys, I talked to VT and it appears Cryptsy lost some of our coins to be sold. Thats why our payouts were shit. Pretty much halved. VT will get the coin and divide evenly.

Thanks for the update..so will those be added to the next payout?

[zneww]

Hey guys, I talked to VT and it appears Cryptsy lost some of our coins to be sold. Thats why our payouts were shit. Pretty much halved. VT will get the coin and divide evenly.

Thanks for the update..so will those be added to the next payout?

I do not know. I would believe so, do not quote me! 

[dency45]

Hey guys, I talked to VT and it appears Cryptsy lost some of our coins to be sold. Thats why our payouts were shit. Pretty much halved. VT will get the coin and divide evenly.

Is that the reason my coins are low, I am mining in Coinsolver for 14 hrs now at average 880kh/s. I only mined
  0.003249286 BTC ? In the graph I see my hash rate going down to 400, but in my cgminer it is consistent 879 - 880. I am new to mining that is why I'm using 1 r9 290, will invest more if mining is really profitable.

[dency45]

Why is doge not included in coins list?

[dency45]

Can I use cryptsy deposit address? It said there that do not mine directly in the address? I am using bter now to mine but I want all my coins deposited in cryptsy.

[123thibaut007]

I will check this out

[zneww]

Still rollin 

[156216]

On http://coinsolver.com/coins.php, there are coins more profitable that the one currently being mined (StableCoin [SBC]). Why does the pool not switch over to those coins?

@ Feb/07/14 01:42

[zneww]

On http://coinsolver.com/coins.php, there are coins more profitable that the one currently being mined (StableCoin [SBC]). Why does the pool not switch over to those coins?

@ Feb/07/14 01:42

There is more that goes into then just which one is worth the most.

[dency45]

Coin solver not good. Read this.
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/3895-unofficial-multicoinprofit-switching-pool-thread/

[zneww]

Coin solver not good. Read this.
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/3895-unofficial-multicoinprofit-switching-pool-thread/

Lol don't spread FUD like Coinsolver is not good. Let people make their own choices. I think Coinsolver is very good, so just by me saying that proves that to be very opinionated. He has his right, but don't come here and say "coin solver not good"

[grendel25]

What's the average btc equivalent pay out per mh/s?

[dency45]

Coin solver not good. Read this.
https://cryptocointalk.com/topic/3895-unofficial-multicoinprofit-switching-pool-thread/

Lol don't spread FUD like Coinsolver is not good. Let people make their own choices. I think Coinsolver is very good, so just by me saying that proves that to be very opinionated. He has his right, but don't come here and say "coin solver not good"

Okay, my mistake.

[greatwolf]

How do you request a payout or is there a scheduled payout for balances < 0.01?

[alc]

How do you request a payout or is there a scheduled payout for balances < 0.01?

Every three days ("If your balance remains under 0.01 for more than 3 days with no mining activity, payment will automatically be sent the following night.")

I dabbled with this pool last week and got a high rate of rejected shares, whatever caused it seems to have been fixed in the interim.

The support I received was courteous and responsive (after an initial wait) - overall far better than other pools I've used, anyway.

[zneww]

CoinSolver News

So, the good new is that we've added four new coins to our lineup, all of which are fairly strong performers at the moment:
NOBL
USDe
CON
KDC
_________________________

Daily BTC payouts have moved from midnight EST to 10 PM EST

CoinSolver Poolstats

[lorbocaust]

Hey guys. Just started using Coinsolver and i am very excited to see how it goes... I will be a strong advocate for this pool if everything works out well

Why dont we mine Doge just out of curiosity?

[zneww]

Hey guys. Just started using Coinsolver and i am very excited to see how it goes... I will be a strong advocate for this pool if everything works out well

Why dont we mine Doge just out of curiosity?

This pools hash rate isn't big enough to mine doge. Also, Doge just halved so we would get less Doge then before.

[Jahno]

Is there anyway to have all coins from coinwarz calculator added to the pool? Also I just added my rig (currently 570khash but should hit over 700khash once I fix my settings)  

Noticed my share rate is really really low, what could be the cause for this? I'm only getting like one share per 30+ seconds.

[156216]

It would be great to see a chart of the pool's hashrate over a time (1day, 7day, 30day, etc.). Happy to see that the pool is growing. 

[spiderdk]

By any change you will add port 80 mining?

[bal3wolf]

wonder if any of you could help me my 7970x2 6950 both work good on the pool after tweaking them but nothing i do can get my 5870 working very good i see a ton of getworks but very slow to getting acepts.

[zneww]

It would be great to see a chart of the pool's hashrate over a time (1day, 7day, 30day, etc.). Happy to see that the pool is growing. 

On the front page, towards the bottom.

wonder if any of you could help me my 7970x2 6950 both work good on the pool after tweaking them but nothing i do can get my 5870 working very good i see a ton of getworks but very slow to getting acepts.

Not sure what would be causing that. Check the configs.

[zneww]

CoinSolver now has a reddit!


http://www.reddit.com/r/CoinSolver/

[bal3wolf]

finaly got all my rigs peforming way i want and down to 3.3% rejects coins so far seem low for a 2.5MH setup but i havet mined a full 24hrs and should give it atleast 2 days to build up a buffer befor i judge how much it will make me a day.  Would be nice if it showed someplace or if it does i missed it how much its avging a day for per MH.

[pauldulong]

Since the MiddleCoin revenue is quite low the last days, I have started an experiment to compare profitability between MiddleCoin EU, MiddleCoin Amsterdam, CleverMining, WafflePool, Coinsolver, Hashbros and Hashcows. Total 12Mh/s. Topic here

[zneww]

Would be nice if it showed someplace or if it does i missed it how much its avging a day for per MH.

I will mention that to VT. I also like that idea.

Since the MiddleCoin revenue is quite low the last days, I have started an experiment to compare profitability between MiddleCoin EU, MiddleCoin Amsterdam, CleverMining, WafflePool, Coinsolver, Hashbros and Hashcows. Total 12Mh/s. Topic here

Nice, I will be interested in seeing this.

[ryancpwalsh]

I have only been trying coinsolver for approximately 16 hours now - but based on results over the last 16 hours my projected return is less than it was if I was mining LTC with today's difficulty.

Is there a target BTC per hashrate the pool is aiming for?  I'm ok with slower days if the end goal is most profitability and the highs outweigh the lows.

Also, about 1/2 way into 2/18, my balance went DOWN according to the chart (a significant loss of unexchanged BTC looks to be the primary cause).  Can you explain the negative earnings (that doesn't make sense to me)?

https://i.imgur.com/QRl1Km5.png

[zneww]

I have only been trying coinsolver for approximately 16 hours now - but based on results over the last 16 hours my projected return is less than it was if I was mining LTC with today's difficulty.

Is there a target BTC per hashrate the pool is aiming for?  I'm ok with slower days if the end goal is most profitability and the highs outweigh the lows.

Also, about 1/2 way into 2/18, my balance went DOWN according to the chart (a significant loss of unexchanged BTC looks to be the primary cause).  Can you explain the negative earnings (that doesn't make sense to me)?

From the main page:

Please Note: The user details statistics are under-reporting actual earnings. This is a display issue only, and we are working on it.

I can tell you not to watch the graphs b/c they are not that accurate. The balance seems to boost near payout time. It is a bug they are fixing.

Also, The payout system for CoinSovler is a proportionate one-- every night at payout, the daily earnings of BTC are divvied up amongst the miners according to their percentage of work for the day. Any coins pending tade, or immature coins are carried over for the next day's work.

[ryancpwalsh]

Also, The payout system for CoinSovler is a proportionate one-- every night at payout, the daily earnings of BTC are divvied up amongst the miners according to their percentage of work for the day. Any coins pending tade, or immature coins are carried over for the next day's work.

I'm concerned.  With approximately 2 Mh/s, I am doing approximate 1.4% of the work of the pool (current hashrate of 141821 Kh/s ).  The pool has earned 0.47 BTC today so far in 13.5 hours, or 0.0348 BTC/hour - which projects to 0.8352 BTC per day.  My projected take before fees (1.4%) is approximately 0.01169

Mining LTC I would have gotten over 0.015 BTC today.

Why would someone mine a multi pool like this over LTC (I think this is a fair question).  How do we increase our earnings as a group?  Are we low because our overall hash rate as a group isn't high enough to find blocks during profitable times?

[rammy2k2]

im mining here too, lets see how that goes

[vtminer]

Hey ryancpwalsh,

I wanted to jump in to confirm what zneww was saying about the graphs-- they have been fairly broken for a while.  They have also been under-reporting actual earnings (sometimes considerably) throughout the day, and occasionally do things like jump up and back down.  We're working on it :/  Actually, we did just fix part of the problem-- the graphs now show your progress a bit better during the day, as they account for most of the immature/mature/in transit coins properly.  The rest will be fixed very soon as we tack down the loose ends during our beta process.  Sorry for the alarm and confusion!

As for the earnings, we have good days and bad days, as do all coin-switching pools.  Coin price fluctuations, volatile difficulties, the whims of the wallets and exchanges, etc, work for and against us some days.  And, for the record, we are working on several improvements in the coming weeks that should help alot with our pool efficiency (therefore profitability).  Pool hash power doesn't hurt either, if we grow we can tackle some more difficult coins (ie. DOGE)-- but its not everything.

Also, we are going to be putting out data about our daily averages @ 1Mh/s to help people see how we've been doing a bit more easily.  We're open to suggestions/requests about information you would like to see on the site, as we'd like to be as transparent as possible about how we operate. 

Cheers,

-VTMiner

[ryancpwalsh]

Thanks for the reply.

In approximate 1.33 days, my first payout is approximately 0.00783 per Mh/s.  Via LTC and converting to BTC, I would have made 0.015.  LTC vs. Coinsolver multipool: LTC 1-0.

I'll let it ride for a few days so I can see if the "good days" are worth the low days - as it's the average over time that matters most.  I'll continue to update this thread with results for the rest of the week.

[zneww]

Unofficial Android App made by GopherDoc!

Unoffical CoinSolver Android App

[ryancpwalsh]

Rate of return has been brutal for 3 days now, significantly less than solo mining LTC.  The graphs show unexplained dips or rakes being taken right before payout last night (the graph showed me at around 0.017 BTC combined balance and then suddenly dipped to around 0.011 and payout ensued).  With my hashrate I would have taken 0.015 in LTC.

I'm going to have to switch to another multi pool.  Clever mining is advertising 158% profitability vs LTC and too much of coinsolver is not visible to the miner.  

Great idea, website was pretty decent, but not profitable.

[zneww]

Rate of return has been brutal for 3 days now, significantly less than solo mining LTC.  The graphs show unexplained dips or rakes being taken right before payout last night (the graph showed me at around 0.17 BTC combined balance and then suddenly dipped to around 0.11 and payout ensued).  With my hashrate I would have taken 0.15 in LTC.

I'm going to have to switch to another multi pool.  Clever mining is advertising 158% profitability vs LTC and too much of coinsolver is not visible to the miner. 

Great idea, website was pretty decent, but not profitable.

Hey Ryan,

What would that be? Clever doesn't even tell you what the fee is, nor do they have a coins list. Gotta let things run more then 3 days

That feature at Clever is the only thing they have over CS. Which VT addressed and said he will be putting out soon.

Also, you claim 0.17, I believe you mean 0.017. That's higher then Clever by far, they advertise 0.010 right now. So we would have outperformed Clever if your numbers are right. Am I wrong?

Another thing, I talked to VT and the prices of Coino and USDe fell dramatically near payout time as the main exchange for that coin was down a good part of the day. We mine those pretty heavily.

If your numbers are right, we all need to be mining Litecoin b/c these profit switchers apparently don't work. Another thing, Wafflepool is at 0.00962549/BTC/Mh, so if we broke 0.01, for being under 200Mh/s as a pool, I think that is pretty good.

CoinSolver is without a doubt one of the most transparent pools out there.

[ryancpwalsh]

You're correct, I meant another decimal point.  I will edit post.

I could care less what the fees are, what I care about is what ends up in my wallet.  I don't mind paying someone 10% if I'm earning 50% more than I would have had I been with someone charging me 1% etc.  Bottom line is what ends up in my wallet, and based on my time on clever today already, I'm projecting 0.02+ btc (133% of LTC earnings, when I was making significantly less than LTC for 3 days on coinsolver).

CS may publish a fee, but they aren't any more transparent than anyone else (anyone running the pool can skim unbeknown to all of us, what matters is what ends up in our pockets).

I'm not suggesting CS was skimming, but their pool is less profitable than mining LTC or clever based on the last 3 days.  You're welcome to try for 10 days in each option if you want and share your results - I'd love for it to be wrong.

[zneww]

You're correct, I meant another decimal point.  I will edit post.

I could care less what the fees are, what I care about is what ends up in my wallet.  I don't mind paying someone 10% if I'm earning 50% more than I would have had I been with someone charging me 1% etc.  Bottom line is what ends up in my wallet, and based on my time on clever today already, I'm projecting 0.02+ btc (133% of LTC earnings, when I was making significantly less than LTC for 3 days on coinsolver).

CS may publish a fee, but they aren't any more transparent than anyone else (anyone running the pool can skim unbeknown to all of us, what matters is what ends up in our pockets).

I'm not suggesting CS was skimming, but their pool is less profitable than mining LTC or clever based on the last 3 days.  You're welcome to try for 10 days in each option if you want and share your results - I'd love for it to be wrong.

Okay, well I gave you all the evidence and statistics. You have not said anything that is based on anything besides the % of LTC Earnings...nor did you explain what "too much of coinsolver is not visible to the miner" means...

I would like to see the stats you are basing this off of that CS was making significantly less then LTC for 3 days, because I am interested in seeing it as well I am sure anyone else who mines here.

Wait, so  let me get this right... not disclosing your fees and the coins you mine is transparent? Man...VT, you are doing something wrong.

[ryancpwalsh]

I have already provided evidence.

With current LTC difficulty and my hashrate, the amount of LTC that can be mined, using current LTC/BTC conversion rate - 0.015 (and I have been consistently mining the same % since the latest block difficulty change).  BTC/LTC conversion has been very similar for a long time.  0.015 BTC per day - every day, with 1.915 Kh/s - period.

Using coinsolver, the take I received using the same hash rate, over the 3 days I was participating, was significantly less.  Significantly less.  0.011 over the first 36 hours for example.

What's important to me, is payout compared to hashrate.  I'm in it for the BTC, not the other coins.  Whomever can pay me the most for my hashrate, is where I want to be mining, bottom line.  I don't mind paying a fee, provided once subtracted I am earning more than if I was with anyone else, because bottom line, what matters is what is paid into my wallet, period.

Clever, and Middlecoin for example, publish a list of all users, their recorded hashrates, and their payouts.  Using that list, I can accurately predict what my payout would have been over the last 24 hours had I used that pool.  In both cases, they were significantly higher than what I ACTUALLY earned using coinsolver.  I switched to Clever based on that projection, and their stats show my projected payout based on what they say I have earned over the last 24 hours, to be 130%+ that what I would have earned via LTC / BTC conversion @ 0.015 BTC per day.  The projected payout they're showing is close to double what I took using coinsolver.

When I have received the payout - I will update this thread with the actual total, and total BTC per Mh/s so that I can present an actual comparison, apples to apples, of what was earned (and not projected) using either pool.

Aside from that, what evidence should I provide to back up my claim.  I can't think of anything better to prove that by using clever, I'm earning more per Mh/s than I did using CS.

If CS published non manipulated data that contained all users, their hashrates, and payouts over the last 24 hours - we could do an oranges to oranges comparison of projected stats.  I could also compare my earnings to published data to confirm non manipulation on both sides.

Again - who cares what their fees are - if you get X BTC in your account using clever, or any other pool, and you get Y BTC by using CS, and X > Y - the amount of fees being charged was irrelevant, X is better than Y.

[zneww]

I have already provided evidence.

With current LTC difficulty and my hashrate, the amount of LTC that can be mined, using current LTC/BTC conversion rate - 0.015 (and I have been consistently mining the same % since the latest block difficulty change).  BTC/LTC conversion has been very similar for a long time.  0.015 BTC per day - every day, with 1.915 Kh/s - period.

Using coinsolver, the take I received using the same hash rate, over the 3 days I was participating, was significantly less.  Significantly less.  0.011 over the first 36 hours for example.

What's important to me, is payout compared to hashrate.  I'm in it for the BTC, not the other coins.  Whomever can pay me the most for my hashrate, is where I want to be mining, bottom line.  I don't mind paying a fee, provided once subtracted I am earning more than if I was with anyone else, because bottom line, what matters is what is paid into my wallet, period.

Clever, and Middlecoin for example, publish a list of all users, their recorded hashrates, and their payouts.  Using that list, I can accurately predict what my payout would have been over the last 24 hours had I used that pool.  In both cases, they were significantly higher than what I ACTUALLY earned using coinsolver.  I switched to Clever based on that projection, and their stats show my projected payout based on what they say I have earned over the last 24 hours, to be 130%+ that what I would have earned via LTC / BTC conversion @ 0.015 BTC per day.  The projected payout they're showing is close to double what I took using coinsolver.

When I have received the payout - I will update this thread with the actual total, and total BTC per Mh/s so that I can present an actual comparison, apples to apples, of what was earned (and not projected) using either pool.

Aside from that, what evidence should I provide to back up my claim.  I can't think of anything better to prove that by using clever, I'm earning more per Mh/s than I did using CS.

If CS published non manipulated data that contained all users, their hashrates, and payouts over the last 24 hours - we could do an oranges to oranges comparison of projected stats.  I could also compare my earnings to published data to confirm non manipulation on both sides.

Again - who cares what their fees are - if you get X BTC in your account using clever, or any other pool, and you get Y BTC by using CS, and X > Y - the amount of fees being charged was irrelevant, X is better than Y.

If you can predict the prices of all the coins and when to trade them. You sir need to be a full time crypto trader and/or running your own pool.

You do not have the time mining Clever to support

I'm earning more per Mh/s than I did using CS.

you are going off what the little % thing tells you. I will be interested in seeing the results when you come back.

I do agree that a whole list of users and their hashrates would be a good addition to the pool. This is why you suggest it.

I haven't mentioned fees since I first replied. However I do care about fees if the payouts are not where they should be and still taking 4%.

[ryancpwalsh]

Using Clever, My reported earnings over the last 24 hours are 0.0175572 vs. 0.015 I would have made via LTC in the same time period, that's 113%.  This is 0.0092 BTC/Mh/s vs. 0.0078 BTC/Mh/s mining LTC vs. 0.0060 BTC/Mh/s using Coinsolver.

I suffered some power outages as well during this time.

As soon as I have received a payout, is when I'll declare that stat as official.  I'll report for 2-3 days to show paid out and reported BTC/Mh/s.  Those of you using CS should do the same over the same time period for comparison.

From this - so far, Clevermining multi pool > LTC pool > Coinsolver multi pool

[zneww]

Using Clever, My reported earnings over the last 24 hours are 0.0175572 vs. 0.015 I would have made via LTC in the same time period, that's 113%.  This is 0.0092 BTC/Mh/s vs. 0.0078 BTC/Mh/s mining LTC vs. 0.0060 BTC/Mh/s using Coinsolver.

I suffered some power outages as well during this time.

As soon as I have received a payout, is when I'll declare that stat as official.  I'll report for 2-3 days to show paid out and reported BTC/Mh/s.  Those of you using CS should do the same over the same time period for comparison.

From this - so far, Clevermining multi pool > LTC pool > Coinsolver multi pool

Ryan, I think this is a better discussion for the thread that has all the mutlipools in it. Also, the payout system is flawed for Clever. I've had 0.007 sitting in my account for at least a week. When I mined there, I had to wait two day for my "Expected Payout" to actually come. I mined to 0.0102 and then stopped and didn't get my payout for 2 days.

I think you need to take a look at the other pools and the results before you "Clevermining multi pool > LTC pool > Coinsolver multi pool" b/c you still haven't proven anything. I would like it if you didn't tell people not to mine here. This is not my pool but thats a dick move.

VTMiner is working his ass off to provide you this service. If you don't like it leave. 2-3 days is nothing on average. Come back with weeks of data and tell me which pool is better. Until then, stop posting here.

[ryancpwalsh]

I'm not telling people not to mine here - I'm showing my results.

The profitability results I showed, of Clever > LTC  > CS is accurate (I've backed it up with stats).  Like I said, I will confirm after payout is received.

Prove me wrong.  Mine on CS for a week, and post your earnings per Mh/s per day and let's compare.  It's not a dick move.  CS is asking people to spend resources mining with them, if it's not profitable to do so, they should know.  This is information that will allow them to make adustments such that they ARE more profitable, and capture a higher hash-rate (which will help increase payout frequencies and earnings for everyone).

[zneww]

I'm not telling people not to mine here - I'm showing my results.

The profitability results I showed, of Clever > LTC  > CS is accurate (I've backed it up with stats).  Like I said, I will confirm after payout is received.

Prove me wrong.  Mine on CS for a week, and post your earnings per Mh/s per day and let's compare.  It's not a dick move.  CS is asking people to spend resources mining with them, if it's not profitable to do so, they should know.  This is information that will allow them to make adustments such that they ARE more profitable, and capture a higher hash-rate (which will help increase payout frequencies and earnings for everyone).

You need to realize it is not just CoinSolver... BTC is worth a measly $600 right now.

HashCows = 0.00607474 BTC/MH
Waffle = 0.00879861 BTC/MH
Clever = 0.01087 BTC/MH

Middlecoin has lost over a quarter of their pool for bad payouts.

I do not have the data to add other pools. Clever seems to have never gone below 0.01 which I find BS, as all the other pools are struggling. Like I said, I think you need to take a look at the other pools and the results before claiming things with 2 days of data behind it.

[ryancpwalsh]

I have 8 weeks of LTC data   I'll report every day all week on actual payouts - so we can see if your call of "bs" is accurate or not.

[zneww]

I have 8 weeks of LTC data   I'll report every day all week on actual payouts - so we can see if your call of "bs" is accurate or not.

Well until you have 8 weeks of Clever/CoinSolver/Waffle. I could care less.

[ryancpwalsh]

I have 8 weeks of LTC data   I'll report every day all week on actual payouts - so we can see if your call of "bs" is accurate or not.

Well until you have 8 weeks of Clever/CoinSolver/Waffle. I could care less.

I invite your data to show otherwise.

[zneww]

I have 8 weeks of LTC data  I'll report every day all week on actual payouts - so we can see if your call of "bs" is accurate or not.

Well until you have 8 weeks of Clever/CoinSolver/Waffle. I could care less.

I invite your data to show otherwise.

Oh vay. You don't go away. Once I get my rig back up I will give you a weeks worth of data.

[ryancpwalsh]

I have 8 weeks of LTC data  I'll report every day all week on actual payouts - so we can see if your call of "bs" is accurate or not.

Well until you have 8 weeks of Clever/CoinSolver/Waffle. I could care less.

I invite your data to show otherwise.

Oh vay. You don't go away. Once I get my rig back up I will give you a weeks worth of data.

All this time you've been arguing against the data I collected, and you don't even have any?

Get that rig up and running - sharing results is best for everyone.

[zneww]

I have 8 weeks of LTC data  I'll report every day all week on actual payouts - so we can see if your call of "bs" is accurate or not.

Well until you have 8 weeks of Clever/CoinSolver/Waffle. I could care less.

I invite your data to show otherwise.

Oh vay. You don't go away. Once I get my rig back up I will give you a weeks worth of data.

All this time you've been arguing against the data I collected, and you don't even have any?

Get that rig up and running - sharing results is best for everyone.

I wasn't arguing against the data you collected. I was arguing on the way you are presenting it. My RMA comes in on Monday.

[zneww]

Just a head's up that we are delaying today's payouts due to some unannounced maintenance by one of our exchanges (CoinMarket). The bulk of the day's earnings are tied up there and until they 'unpause their markets' we must wait. If this persists, we may combine today and tomorrows payouts in a single run.

Sorry for the inconvenience!

Update: Their maintenance is still ongoing. We have been given an ETA of 6PM EST, so if that holds, we will just fold yesterday and today into the same payout.

Again, sorry for the trouble, and thanks for your patience!

[MaTeZZ]

BTC Balance shouldn't go down, right?

https://lh5.googleusercontent.com/-Ow1kFsNC9II/UwqoqWVk_0I/AAAAAAAAANo/Ze8CGWlXCSk/w937-h289-no/Screenshot+%252814%2529.png

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-rrRlMONjhtc/UwqoqaQW-YI/AAAAAAAAANs/6z5alOBntJU/w937-h289-no/Screenshot+%252813%2529.png

May be just a glitch...

[zneww]

New updates in the works  shhh, don't tell anyone I told you!

[VarDiff]

Coinsolver added to mining pools database
Good luck, miners

[stienski]

very cool! ill give it a try!

[zneww]

Coinsolver added to mining pools database
Good luck, miners

Sweet! That's a nifty little site you have.

[zneww]

VTMiner has added a few more coins to the lineup!

Code:

- iCoin
- Mintcoin
- Beecoin
- SmartCoin
- Digibyte
- PenguinCoin

[zneww]

this bonus payout is so elusive...ugh

[ryancpwalsh]

I have 8 weeks of LTC data  I'll report every day all week on actual payouts - so we can see if your call of "bs" is accurate or not.

Well until you have 8 weeks of Clever/CoinSolver/Waffle. I could care less.

I invite your data to show otherwise.

Oh vay. You don't go away. Once I get my rig back up I will give you a weeks worth of data.

All this time you've been arguing against the data I collected, and you don't even have any?

Get that rig up and running - sharing results is best for everyone.

I wasn't arguing against the data you collected. I was arguing on the way you are presenting it. My RMA comes in on Monday.

Did your RMA come in? 

I've had a bad couple of days hardware wise (added an extra GPU to a rig that keeps restarting (I think heat issues)) but I didn't catch it until well into the day.  Other than that, my mining experience with clever has been extremely positive.  With shitty hardware performance, I've mined 0.18963619 BTC in ~ 13 days (give or take a day as the website is saying I joined 13 days ago), or 0.015 per day, when with LTC, I would have averaged 0.012-0.013.

This is what I expected, some days to be MUCH better than LTC, others to be similar, some to be mildly under.

[zneww]

I have 8 weeks of LTC data  I'll report every day all week on actual payouts - so we can see if your call of "bs" is accurate or not.

Well until you have 8 weeks of Clever/CoinSolver/Waffle. I could care less.

I invite your data to show otherwise.

Oh vay. You don't go away. Once I get my rig back up I will give you a weeks worth of data.

All this time you've been arguing against the data I collected, and you don't even have any?

Get that rig up and running - sharing results is best for everyone.

I wasn't arguing against the data you collected. I was arguing on the way you are presenting it. My RMA comes in on Monday.

Did your RMA come in? 

I've had a bad couple of days hardware wise (added an extra GPU to a rig that keeps restarting (I think heat issues)) but I didn't catch it until well into the day.  Other than that, my mining experience with clever has been extremely positive.  With shitty hardware performance, I've mined 0.18963619 BTC in ~ 13 days (give or take a day as the website is saying I joined 13 days ago), or 0.015 per day, when with LTC, I would have averaged 0.012-0.013.

This is what I expected, some days to be MUCH better than LTC, others to be similar, some to be mildly under.

6 payouts, 6 days = 0.079390560 / 6 = 0.01323176/Day

This is with one of our main exchanges being down (Coinmarket) I have also not had the steadiest hash since getting back up trying to tune everything. If Coinmarket was up, higher payouts for first couple days. VTminer had to find a new exchange.

[ryancpwalsh]

Those two amounts are fairly close.

LTC is fairly close too.

Cmon pool operators - give us a reason to throw you some hashrate

[zneww]

Those two amounts are fairly close.

LTC is fairly close too.

Cmon pool operators - give us a reason to throw you some hashrate

nightly bonus

Ryan, VT has some pretty good features coming out soon. So keep checking in.

[bigtop1967]

I like this site...great idea!

First time I tried.....i mined about a day but got no payout, not even after 3 days - payout came when I started mining again.....going to give it a few days but still not sure i'm making the most of my poor 1MH...

The nightly prize draw - I'd like to see how much the prize was as well as who got it.  If it's a good sum, maybe you should award it to 2 or 3 people per night, either equally or have a 1st, 2nd and 3rd place.  It's a good incentive to mine, but with only one person getting any extra every day it's hard to get.

graph is confusing and so are figures:  it's not clear what 'combined' is (well, not to me anyway) because of the way its formatted.  BTC Balance - the way it's presented makes it look like you will be paid BTC balance + combined??

Will keep mining for a few days as I like the site and idea - thanks guys!

[zneww]

I like this site...great idea!

First time I tried.....i mined about a day but got no payout, not even after 3 days - payout came when I started mining again.....going to give it a few days but still not sure i'm making the most of my poor 1MH...

The nightly prize draw - I'd like to see how much the prize was as well as who got it.  If it's a good sum, maybe you should award it to 2 or 3 people per night, either equally or have a 1st, 2nd and 3rd place.  It's a good incentive to mine, but with only one person getting any extra every day it's hard to get.

graph is confusing and so are figures:  it's not clear what 'combined' is (well, not to me anyway) because of the way its formatted.  BTC Balance - the way it's presented makes it look like you will be paid BTC balance + combined??

Will keep mining for a few days as I like the site and idea - thanks guys!

Watch for many improvements coming up

Now, I did a short two day comparison with CoinSolver and CleverMining.

It appears during these two days that CoinSolver did beat out Clever.

Two payouts from Clever: 0.01036633 BTC and 0.01075317 BTC for my 2Mh/s

One payout from CoinSolver for two day(Exchange issue): 0.022693226 BTC or 0.011346613 BTC for 2 days.

After that, I only had one payout from CS be near CM, which was 0.0104 and that being my lowest payout from CS.

Not a lot of time or data, but preliminary results. CoinSolver is only getting better.

[bigtop1967]

Things I've noticed.....

First - the figures on the stats page do not add up - they just don't make sense!
My hashrate sometimes shows as nothing (0.0KH/s)
Yesterday I thought I was getting 0.02xxx btc, it even stangely showed as 2 payment transactions of slightly different amounts - 0.01xxx each.  One had no block code with it - this transaction then disappeared.

SO
Surely Combined Balance should be the total of Immature + Unexchanged? - but it's not - it's more! (which of course I dont mind, i'm just trying to make sense of these figures).  What is my btc balance exactly?  I would assume, from the way it;s presented, that I would be getting my btc balance (coins already mined and exchanged?) + the estimates above?  Is there a way to make these figure more meaningful?  I have got my thinking cap on and will let you know if I come up with anything!

Should I worry that sometimes my hashrate is showing as zero, even though my min hashrate is 200KH/s?

What's with the weird payout?

I'm still sticking with this project - it's interesting and if you get it right, it will be a winner!  My returns are ok and easier (and at this point I think better) to get than me, as a small miner, having to select coins, mine, and exchange myself.

[zneww]

Hey bigtop, I'll try to help answer some questions as VT is a busy guy with the new system coming.

First - the figures on the stats page do not add up - they just don't make sense!
My hashrate sometimes shows as nothing (0.0KH/s)
Yesterday I thought I was getting 0.02xxx btc, it even stangely showed as 2 payment transactions of slightly different amounts - 0.01xxx each.  One had no block code with it - this transaction then disappeared.

The 2nd payout was a bug in the system. I talked with VT last night in IRC and he fixed it.

Surely Combined Balance should be the total of Immature + Unexchanged? - but it's not - it's more! (which of course I dont mind, i'm just trying to make sense of these figures).  What is my btc balance exactly?  I would assume, from the way it;s presented, that I would be getting my btc balance (coins already mined and exchanged?) + the estimates above?  Is there a way to make these figure more meaningful?  I have got my thinking cap on and will let you know if I come up with anything!

The combined balance is your BTC Balance plus your Unexchanged balance. The reason I was getting from VT on why the graphs do not match up really is b/c he does a lot of manual trades and a lot of manual entry's. That is why around payout time, all the unexchanged is cashed in, and payouts proceed. He then has to enter that info into the system b/c most of the exchanged he uses do not have the proper trade API.

Should I worry that sometimes my hashrate is showing as zero, even though my min hashrate is 200KH/s?

For the Current hashrate, I am not sure what going on with that but it is not just you, but if you look at the graph, your hash rate is correct. So I wouldn't worry as it looks only visual.


Hopefully that answers your questions. Like I said in the post above though, CoinSolver is only getting better. As you see on the home page, upgrades are incoming. Good to see you sticking with it.

[bigtop1967]

Thanks for the info - makes a lot of sense now - I just couldn't figure out why those numbers didn't add up!

Thanks to VT as well for all the hard work - i'm a dev myself so know what it's like.

Thanks again...

[zneww]

New CoinSolver update incoming !!!

[Vinz87]

Can someone explain me how the payouts work for small btc amounts?

I read that if the balance is under 0.01 you will be payed after 3 days if there is no mining activity.
Does it mean that if mine everyday I won't be payed every 3 days for an amount under 0.01, but only when the balance reaches 0.01?

[zneww]

Can someone explain me how the payouts work for small btc amounts?

I read that if the balance is under 0.01 you will be payed after 3 days if there is no mining activity.
Does it mean that if mine everyday I won't be payed every 3 days for an amount under 0.01, but only when the balance reaches 0.01?

Once you hit 0.01 you get a payout that night. If you do not mine for 3 days, you will get paid out whatever is in your balance.

[Vinz87]

Can someone explain me how the payouts work for small btc amounts?

I read that if the balance is under 0.01 you will be payed after 3 days if there is no mining activity.
Does it mean that if mine everyday I won't be payed every 3 days for an amount under 0.01, but only when the balance reaches 0.01?

Once you hit 0.01 you get a payout that night. If you do not mine for 3 days, you will get paid out whatever is in your balance.

Yes. And if I mine everyday and I take N days to reach 0.01, I will be payed on the Nth day, whichever number is N?

[zneww]

Can someone explain me how the payouts work for small btc amounts?

I read that if the balance is under 0.01 you will be payed after 3 days if there is no mining activity.
Does it mean that if mine everyday I won't be payed every 3 days for an amount under 0.01, but only when the balance reaches 0.01?

Once you hit 0.01 you get a payout that night. If you do not mine for 3 days, you will get paid out whatever is in your balance.

Yes. And if I mine everyday and I take N days to reach 0.01, I will be payed on the Nth day, whichever number is N?

Yes so usually if you have 1Mh you make about 0.01 a day or less with current market conditions. If you have 500Kh/s it will take two or three days, etc

[klotzenhotz]

- deleted.

[zneww]

COINSOLVER HAS BEEN UPPPPPPPDAAAATEDDDDDD

[klotzenhotz]

why no LTC on coinsolver, btw?

[zneww]

why no LTC on coinsolver, btw?

I could only assume the difficulty is to high to make it worth it as we are still small. Good question, I'll see what VT has to say.

[zneww]

http://coinsolver.com/blog/

Mar 19th, 2014 - New and Improved

 
As of March 17th, we are now running on our new and improved hosting environment. Not only that, but our pool software has also received a significant facelift. Both of these should help us with our goal to improve your profitability, and the pool's efficiency.

So what's in the new update? Glad you asked... alot of things. Most notably, the ability to mine multiple coins simultaneously has been added. The 'round' based coin mining system is a thing of the past, as we can adapt more fluidly to the various coins' profitablilty fluctuations. This should give us a distinct boost with the coins employing KGW/1 block difficulty adjustments.

Additionally, we have put in a significant amount of work to improve your accept/reject rates, which in turn improves the pool's efficiency. Hopefully you will notice in your stats as well.

We also now support custom difficulty setting via your password. You can pick your dificulty using the d=X method, where X can be 64, 128, 256, etc. Please note: your custom difficulty must be the same for all miners sharing the same BTC address!

Also, if you do not select a difficulty of your own, the pool will now choose a difficulty for each coin, in order to get the best performance.


Beyond these features, there are many little niceties, such as invalid user checking, and dynamic coin adding (no pool downtime), etc.

So, with any major upgrade, there are bound to be bumps and bugs, so by all means, if you spot one, or are effected by one, please let us know asap!

Finally, I want to thank everyone who has helped us through this whole process. Your assistance, support, feedback and encouragement has been overwhelming. I truely appreciate all of it!

Cheers,

-VTMiner

[iru786]

HI,
I have currently switched my miner to the site to see how it compares to other multipools.
What i would like to see is "Your Estimated BTC/24Hours" or "Your Estimated BTC/Daily" info.

Thanks

[captainbluff]

Hi,

No payouts today?

[zneww]

Hi,

No payouts today?

On the top of the page.

Payouts were delayed due to network connectivity issues. They will be processed at the regular time tonight. Sorry for the inconvenience!

They will be put in tonights

[zneww]

After 2 days without a pay, one was b/c I missed payout, and the other b/c we had network problems.

For 72hrs my payout was 0.025604421BTC on ~1.6Mh/s which divided by 3, would roughly be 0.008534807BTC per day.

Things are defiantly looking up here.

[zneww]

Looking like we are around the ~0.008 /Day/Mh mark

[JHammer]

Hi.. CoinSolver looks interesting..  But why not show your moving daily Avg BTC per 1 MH's on your pool site like most other sites do?    I keep hearing 0.008 but not sure I believe it..


Also..  Why is it every time I look on your Web site, it says currently mining Pot Coin?   
 

[zneww]

Hi.. CoinSolver looks interesting..  But why not show your moving daily Avg BTC per 1 MH's on your pool site like most other sites do?    I keep hearing 0.008 but not sure I believe it..


Also..  Why is it every time I look on your Web site, it says currently mining Pot Coin?   
 

VT said he has the BTC/Mh thing in the works in the last news update. My last payout was near ~0.0073/Mh/Day and before that it was ~0.008/Mh/Day


Taken from http://coinsolver.com/poolstats.php

CoinSolver mines multiple coins simultaneously, selecting the most profitable option at the time, but also balancing the load to improve efficiency and avoid overwhelming any single coin.

Maybe that can answer your question?

[andre1980]

Started to mine here yesterday 9.30 PM with about 6MH, at 6AM this morning i was paid 0.0146893. Below expected, but it's the first day..

However, the pool seems buggy and unstable, earlier today it saw my hash correctly but was mining nothing (no coin selected and 0,000 profit)

Now suddenly my hash is gone (0,0KH/s).. While both my GPU as my GridSeeds are still mining..
Hopefully it get fixed soon.

Also, i've seen my Gridseed up to 12MH/s.. No problem with that, but obviously incorrect.

I'll check for a day if it fixes itself, or i'll change back to waffle..

[zneww]

Started to mine here yesterday 9.30 PM with about 6MH, at 6AM this morning i was paid 0.0146893. Below expected, but it's the first day..

However, the pool seems buggy and unstable, earlier today it saw my hash correctly but was mining nothing (no coin selected and 0,000 profit)

Now suddenly my hash is gone (0,0KH/s).. While both my GPU as my GridSeeds are still mining..
Hopefully it get fixed soon.

Also, i've seen my Gridseed up to 12MH/s.. No problem with that, but obviously incorrect.

I'll check for a day if it fixes itself, or i'll change back to waffle..

Its not buggy, but I think it is someone trying to attack the server and bring it down. Which they seem to be successful at. I've talked to VT about it and he is trying to figure it out and block it. This is all speculation however. I would be interested in seeing what VT has to say

[andre1980]

Started to mine here yesterday 9.30 PM with about 6MH, at 6AM this morning i was paid 0.0146893. Below expected, but it's the first day..

However, the pool seems buggy and unstable, earlier today it saw my hash correctly but was mining nothing (no coin selected and 0,000 profit)

Now suddenly my hash is gone (0,0KH/s).. While both my GPU as my GridSeeds are still mining..
Hopefully it get fixed soon.

Also, i've seen my Gridseed up to 12MH/s.. No problem with that, but obviously incorrect.

I'll check for a day if it fixes itself, or i'll change back to waffle..

Its not buggy, but I think it is someone trying to attack the server and bring it down. Which they seem to be successful at. I've talked to VT about it and he is trying to figure it out and block it. This is all speculation however. I would be interested in seeing what VT has to say

Could be.. Maybe i'll give it a day longer.. I'll have still to get to 24H of mining to make a informed decision. If i get near the expected 0.045+ BTC a day for my 20 gridseeds (some don't seem to work) and my R9 280X total, i'll stay. Hopefully no mining is lost and everything is still registered on the CoinSolver end. -otherwise, i'll switch until it's permanently fixed..-

[zneww]

Well I can tell you that I've been mining here since January, and CS has never lost any coins, besides when Coinmarket went down, and that was only for a short period(got them back)

You coins and hash are in good hands

[TheRaven]

Why would my BTC balance be going down without a payout?
http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc31/redfisher17/btc-bal_zps998b8aca.png (red line)

[chipxtreme]

Are you planning on adding an EU server?

[zneww]

Are you planning on adding an EU server?

I do believe this is a priority.

Why would my BTC balance be going down without a payout?
(red line)

It is all estimated numbers. Lots of manual entries and trades.

[JHammer]

I am interested but will come back in a week or two to see how things are going..

But I wont join until I see better and easier to read simple stats on your Pool page..  Something like most other pools are now showing..

very simple % vs mining LTC 

and BTC per MH per day..

[JHammer]

Congrats on your new baby..   

Because of all the Hijacked pools this weekend, I have now pointed 10 MH's at your pool..

Will see how it goes.. 



  Thanks!

[Pilot2]

Lots of unexchanged, is this a regular thing?

[zneww]

Yeah, it gets exchanged but has to be manual entered into the system. I believe. b/c they do a lot of manual trades and such

[JHammer]

Why does OP never post on here?


Is your site being DOS attacked or something?  Something is not right with your site..  Things were running ok this morning and during the day but now my miners are slowly dropping in Hash rate..  


Something is wrong and not working right..

Other pools are being attacked..  Are you now..

Hash rate slowly dropping is the same symptoms the other sites are having


Please update your Miners on what is going on please..

[zneww]

Why does OP never post on here?


Is your site being DOS attacked or something?  Something is not right with your site..  Things were running ok this morning and during the day but now my miners are slowly dropping in Hash rate..  


Something is wrong and not working right..

Other pools are being attacked..  Are you now..

Hash rate slowly dropping is the same symptoms the other sites are having


Please update your Miners on what is going on please..

Well, as for the pool problems i do not know but I know that they are working on it.

As for him not posting, he is usually busy doing working on the pool. Plus he JUST had a baby last night.

[JHammer]

Why does OP never post on here?


Is your site being DOS attacked or something?  Something is not right with your site..  Things were running ok this morning and during the day but now my miners are slowly dropping in Hash rate..  


Something is wrong and not working right..

Other pools are being attacked..  Are you now..

Hash rate slowly dropping is the same symptoms the other sites are having


Please update your Miners on what is going on please..

Well, as for the pool problems i do not know but I know that they are working on it.

As for him not posting, he is usually busy doing working on the pool. Plus he JUST had a baby last night.

Yes I know.. Did not mean why he not posting now. Just meant why it seems like he has not posted in the past..

My hash rate seems ok now and is no longer dropping.... Maybe he was doing something on the server side..  

Hopefully he is spending most of his time right now with his wife and new little baby girl..  

[Dishes]

VT, congrats on the baby. I'm gonna throw my hash here for awhile and see how it goes. Figure all the multi pools are doing pretty poorly anyway, so what's there to lose? Anyway, seems to be working pretty well so far. Keep up the good work and good luck with the little one.

[suchmoon]

Sorry if this has been mentioned before, but what I would really like to see on CoinSolver is a pool hashrate chart for the last 24 hours (or more). Something like this:

http://clevermining.com/hashrate

This would help tremendously to evaluate the stability of the pool. Right now, like some other posters here, after testing it and having hours of downtime I'm reluctant to try again.

[ryancpwalsh]

Are BTC per MH/s earnings/payouts posted anywhere?

Earlier in the thread I compared with Clevermining.  I can say with certainty - the last 3 weeks clevermining's payouts and reported earnings, and LTC profitability have been 100% accurate (what you see on the website is what you get).

The last time that I used coinsolver, my actual earnings over a few days were significantly lower than that posted by clever (significantly).  I would love to give this pool another try - but can't find the stats to suggest that I should.

Who can help me out?

[vtminer]

Hi All,

Yes, sorry for the lack of posting.  Things have been pretty hectic, and I've been focusing on major pool improvements, not to mention my new daughter (thanks for the well wishes!).  So, to try to answer a couple questions floating out there...

Yes, it appears we've been seeing our fare share of malicious activity lately, which has caused some service interruptions.  We have been, and continue to work on it, and it seems we've made some progress.  We hope to get some final fixes in place shortly.

As for our pool hashrate, a graph is actually available on our front page, at the bottom.  Another useful page to know about, if people don't already, is our pool stats overview.  Finally, we are working to provide a BTC/Mhs type chart, as seen elsewhere, but the recent events have caused some delays in rolling that out.

Finally, as we mine multiple coins simultaneously sometimes, the 'current coin' box can be a bit misleading.  To see the breakdown, you can take a peek at our coins page.

As always, feel free to contact me directly for any account specific questions.

Cheers,

[suchmoon]

Hi All,

Yes, sorry for the lack of posting.  Things have been pretty hectic, and I've been focusing on major pool improvements, not to mention my new daughter (thanks for the well wishes!).  So, to try to answer a couple questions floating out there...

Yes, it appears we've been seeing our fare share of malicious activity lately, which has caused some service interruptions.  We have been, and continue to work on it, and it seems we've made some progress.  We hope to get some final fixes in place shortly.

As for our pool hashrate, a graph is actually available on our front page, at the bottom.  Another useful page to know about, if people don't already, is our pool stats overview.  Finally, we are working to provide a BTC/Mhs type chart, as seen elsewhere, but the recent events have caused some delays in rolling that out.

Finally, as we mine multiple coins simultaneously sometimes, the 'current coin' box can be a bit misleading.  To see the breakdown, you can take a peek at our coins page.

As always, feel free to contact me directly for any account specific questions.

Cheers,

Congratulations!

As for the hashrate chart, there is something not right with it. Maybe the sampling periods are too long. I have seen hashrate go down to zero 0 (zero) on the pool stats page a couple of times in the last few days, and my miners switched to backup pools, clearly indicating the stratum server was offline, but that chart doesn't go anywhere near zero. A 24-hour chart with 5, 10, or 15 minute datapoints would be great.

Thanks.

[JHammer]

All 3 of my miners(10 MH's) have been running good on this site since late last night..  And all day today..  No drop in Hash rate or Fail overs..(Like happened to me here yesterday during the day)

I get stales on this site so should I add "submit-stale" : "true" to my Config site?

[vtminer]

Suchmoon- Thanks! And I see what you mean about the graph not reflecting reality so well.  I'll add that to the short list to get ironed out.

JHammer - Great, I'm glad to hear things are a bit more stable.  Like I said, I haven't corrected 100% of the known issues, but it looks like we're defending against many of them now.  As for submitting stales, yes you certainly can (and probably should).  Due to the way we multiplex work, a stale could technically contain a solution. 

[andre1980]

I'll give it a few more days, but i'm paid out 0,0024, 0,040 (1,5 day), 0,023 for 6+MH/s..
Should be 0,040+.. A bit dissapointing!
Also, stats aren't that stable.. Even when hashrate is high the profits sometimes stay at a low point for a while.

Most pools seem to be doing better than we are. (I'm at 0,004MH/s or so, not 0,008)

Andre

P.S: Congrats with your baby!

[JHammer]

I'll give it a few more days, but i'm paid out 0,0024, 0,040 (1,5 day), 0,023 for 6+MH/s..
Should be 0,040+.. A bit dissapointing!
Also, stats aren't that stable.. Even when hashrate is high the profits sometimes stay at a low point for a while.

Most pools seem to be doing better than we are. (I'm at 0,004MH/s or so, not 0,008)

Andre

P.S: Congrats with your baby!

My Payment today for me was 0.00419 per 1 MH's    

[divxrullz]

Mining DOPE, in case that EMC2 or FLT have better proffi.... so strange...

[JHammer]

Mining DOPE, in case that EMC2 or FLT have better proffi.... so strange...

80% of the times I look, we are mining the Pot Coin.. I know nothing about this coin so cant really comment but I do find it odd we seem to mine it so much..

One of the reasons I wanted to try this pool was there was several posts stating this pool was Avg'ing 0.008..   But so far, I see no proof of that..    I was hoping that at least it would Avg what most of the other ones are.. Around 0.005..   But I have not seen that yet..  But I have only been here 2 days so will give it a couple more days..  


Maybe OP will comment..  

[JHammer]

I want to make a correction to my above post.. I was half asleep and rusing out the Door when I did this.  My payout last night/this morning was actually about 0.004 per MH's  


Sorry about that.. Above Post corrected


But Still..  0.004 not very good..

[iru786]

Guys,
What happens to your balance on the pool if you don't mine there anymore? Does it get paid out after few days?

[xiaoxiaojie]

Those two amounts are fairly close.

LTC is fairly close too.

Cmon pool operators - give us a reason to throw you some hashrate.

Very good！！！

[JHammer]

Guys,
What happens to your balance on the pool if you don't mine there anymore? Does it get paid out after few days?

It should get to you but depends on the pool.  Ask the Pool operator.. 

[vtminer]

So, I'll chime in on a few of the recent posts/questions...

We seem to always be mining coin X.  The way this is shown on the website is a bit misleading currently, and is scheduled for an update.  This is because we mine multiple coins at the same time, but the "currently mining" box can only show one.  So, while we've actually been mining coin X, its not the only one.  (And you'd think we have an agenda seeing as the website always displays either DOPE or POT coins.)  So, for the time being, you can check out the coins page to see all the coins being mined at any given time (highlighted in green).  Our API will also be exposing a getpoolstats method which will show the specific coins being mined, as well as the percentage hashrate being directed to them.

Yes, our payout rate yesterday appeared to be about .004, which certainly isn't ideal, but it was about the same as the other major switching pools.  Almost exactly the same as clever, waffle, etc, actually.  So I'm not sure why there are statements like 'other pools are doing better than us'.  Further to this, we (unfortunately) had a bit of a clerical slipup yesterday which caused us to mine SPA coin when we intended to remove it (due to its hard fork switching to scrypt-n).  Had this error not occurred, I suspect we would have done a far sight better.
As I've said before, we're working on providing a running list of daily profitability for ease of comparison.  This is a high priority for me, as it will help clarify some concerns and conversations out there.  Its taken longer than hoped due to recent events, so to help give a bit of data to work with, I did post the past few days performance on our site.

Finally, to answer iru786's question, yes we pay old balances after there has been no activity for a while.  However, we also are happy to make payments upon request.  Ideally we would like to have a 'pay me now' button on the website, but with the chance for abuse, especially given the recent spike in unfriendly traffic, we've yet been able to come up with a comfortable way to achieve this.  I'm certainly open to suggestions on this topic, btw.

[JHammer]

Vt thank you for that Info..  Its amazing what a little communication can do..  Lack of it, is one reason I left MiddleCoin..     Hint Hint..  (keep the Info coming please.. Even if its just once or twice a week.  Always good to hear whats going on)

I plan to stay here for a while and see how things go..     Although with the price of LTC going up a bit and the LTC Diff coming down a Bit, that is becoming tempting..  Is LTC one of our mined coins on here?   I would hope so..   At work and can’t go look right now..


  Thanks!

[vtminer]

JHammer- thanks and we're glad to have you.  I definitely will try to be a bit more talkative around here, but I also tend to hang out a bit more often in IRC, if you're looking to get me quickly.  As for LTC, its in our lineup, so we would mine it given the right circumstances (pool hashpower is a limiting factor currently). 

Cheers!

[JHammer]

Whats going on?  Your Pool and front end are down?

[zneww]

seems to be up now? i was gone

[JHammer]

seems to be up now? i was gone

Yes..  Looks like it was down just a few min..  But the issue is when this happens it goes to my fail overs..  If I would not of looked, I would have been mining somewhere else and not even known..  I need to look into my CGWatcher as I have heard you can set emails to your self when events happen to alert you..

[gtraah]

seems to be up now? i was gone

Yes..  Looks like it was down just a few min..  But the issue is when this happens it goes to my fail overs..  If I would not of looked, I would have been mining somewhere else and not even known..  I need to look into my CGWatcher as I have heard you can set emails to your self when events happen to alert you..

I have heard there has been some downtime here, a multipool comparisons page did not want to compare it as it was not stable , Well He did try it for a short time but was not stable so dropped the tests. WHat's the go here now? I wouldn't mind giving it a go but If I look up at some recent posts , I can still see people talking about down time.

[zneww]

Yes, but it is only small downtime, most has been malicious. If you read it has been explained. Also, profits are still the same as other pools. Wafflepool was down for like a whole day? lol..

What's it to you?

[gtraah]

Yes, but it is only small downtime, most has been malicious. If you read it has been explained. Also, profits are still the same as other pools. Wafflepool was down for like a whole day? lol..

What's it to you?

Well I decided to start pointing some hash here and I want to ask some experienced people, is that a problem?

waffle has actually been up more than 24 hrs now but profits are lower than other pools I moved from there now... Clevermining has actually been good last few days, I decided to give this ago for 24 hours or more...

in the last few days what has been the average mh/btc , I really like the interface here...

One things I noticed is the front page says we are mining ****** Coin and when I look into my user stats it says I am mining Another coin.. and Mh/BTC is more in my user stats.

[gtraah]

Yes, but it is only small downtime, most has been malicious. If you read it has been explained. Also, profits are still the same as other pools. Wafflepool was down for like a whole day? lol..

What's it to you?

Well I decided to start pointing some hash here and I want to ask some experienced people, is that a problem?

waffle has actually been up more than 24 hrs now but profits are lower than other pools I moved from there now... Clevermining has actually been good last few days, I decided to give this ago for 24 hours or more...

in the last few days what has been the average mh/btc , I really like the interface here...

One things I noticed is the front page says we are mining ****** Coin and when I look into my user stats it says I am mining Another coin.. and Mh/BTC is more in my user stats.

Wow, within the first 2 hours of pointing my hash here already a disconnect... I see why this is hard to be placed on the comparisons list. It is a shame as I was actually starting to like this

[zneww]

Please read the posts above you. Everything you say is already been said.

[JHammer]

My Hash rates showing about 30% to 40% low on Pool User Stats page but then I log in and check my miners they look fine?

[iru786]

So, I'll chime in on a few of the recent posts/questions...

We seem to always be mining coin X.  The way this is shown on the website is a bit misleading currently, and is scheduled for an update.  This is because we mine multiple coins at the same time, but the "currently mining" box can only show one.  So, while we've actually been mining coin X, its not the only one.  (And you'd think we have an agenda seeing as the website always displays either DOPE or POT coins.)  So, for the time being, you can check out the coins page to see all the coins being mined at any given time (highlighted in green).  Our API will also be exposing a getpoolstats method which will show the specific coins being mined, as well as the percentage hashrate being directed to them.

Yes, our payout rate yesterday appeared to be about .004, which certainly isn't ideal, but it was about the same as the other major switching pools.  Almost exactly the same as clever, waffle, etc, actually.  So I'm not sure why there are statements like 'other pools are doing better than us'.  Further to this, we (unfortunately) had a bit of a clerical slipup yesterday which caused us to mine SPA coin when we intended to remove it (due to its hard fork switching to scrypt-n).  Had this error not occurred, I suspect we would have done a far sight better.
As I've said before, we're working on providing a running list of daily profitability for ease of comparison.  This is a high priority for me, as it will help clarify some concerns and conversations out there.  Its taken longer than hoped due to recent events, so to help give a bit of data to work with, I did post the past few days performance on our site.

Finally, to answer iru786's question, yes we pay old balances after there has been no activity for a while.  However, we also are happy to make payments upon request.  Ideally we would like to have a 'pay me now' button on the website, but with the chance for abuse, especially given the recent spike in unfriendly traffic, we've yet been able to come up with a comfortable way to achieve this.  I'm certainly open to suggestions on this topic, btw.

Hi Mate,
Thanks for answering my question. I have sent you a PM requesting a manual payment for the address i was mining with.

Thanks

[suchmoon]

Finally, to answer iru786's question, yes we pay old balances after there has been no activity for a while.  However, we also are happy to make payments upon request.  Ideally we would like to have a 'pay me now' button on the website, but with the chance for abuse, especially given the recent spike in unfriendly traffic, we've yet been able to come up with a comfortable way to achieve this.  I'm certainly open to suggestions on this topic, btw.

You could require a signed message to confirm the ownership of the address. Wouldn't work with exchanges or other shared wallets, but anyone who's using that for pool earnings is asking for trouble anyway.

You could also restrict manual withdrawals to once every 24-48 hours, this would not prevent abuse but would at least limit damage.

[zneww]

Finally, to answer iru786's question, yes we pay old balances after there has been no activity for a while.  However, we also are happy to make payments upon request.  Ideally we would like to have a 'pay me now' button on the website, but with the chance for abuse, especially given the recent spike in unfriendly traffic, we've yet been able to come up with a comfortable way to achieve this.  I'm certainly open to suggestions on this topic, btw.

You could require a signed message to confirm the ownership of the address. Wouldn't work with exchanges or other shared wallets, but anyone who's using that for pool earnings is asking for trouble anyway.

You could also restrict manual withdrawals to once every 24-48 hours, this would not prevent abuse but would at least limit damage.

That is a good idea. I like it.

My Hash rates showing about 30% to 40% low on Pool User Stats page but then I log in and check my miners they look fine?

The hashrate goes off the shares you submitted the last 10 minutes I think...but the graphs have always been a wee bit off. Check the hashrate in the big graph and see if its normal.

[JHammer]

Ok Guys..   My hash rates on here are now 50% to 60% lower then the WU reported in my cgminer...

I am not sure if this pool is under attack or what but something is wrong.

[zneww]

Ok Guys..   My hash rates on here are now 50% to 60% lower then the WU reported in my cgminer...

I am not sure if this pool is under attack or what but something is wrong.

Well, I do not think the pool is under attack. However, the hash rates are reported by the shares submitted every 10 minutes or so I think VT said. VT has told me that the stats are pretty finicky, so idk if I would go whole hardheartedly believing them.

Does the graph where your hashrate is blue correspond with your actually hash?

[JHammer]

Ok Guys..   My hash rates on here are now 50% to 60% lower then the WU reported in my cgminer...

I am not sure if this pool is under attack or what but something is wrong.

Well, I do not think the pool is under attack. However, the hash rates are reported by the shares submitted every 10 minutes or so I think VT said. VT has told me that the stats are pretty finicky, so idk if I would go whole hardheartedly believing them.

Does the graph where your hashrate is blue correspond with your actually hash?

Yes..  That is what is really worry me..  The blue Graph matches what the hash rate is showing..  The blue line is WAY down and for several hrs now..   I have been here going on 4 days and this is the first time I have seen it do this...   

[divxrullz]

look like - big waste of time

[JHammer]

We can only vote with our hash rate but I left after last nights issues and no word form anyone..  Will keep an eye on this pool and if things improve would come back at some point..  I tend to switch pools about once a week anyway these days..

[zneww]

look like - big waste of time

how lol CS is the opposite. Also JH, I suggest sticking to a pool man and not get so caught up in stats and wait for payouts.

[humman39]

Other pools stats:

www.yevych.com/poolStats.html

[zneww]

Other pools stats:

www.yevych.com/poolStats.html

Add CoinSolver? Why would you post here if it's not included?

[gtraah]

look like - big waste of time

Yeh seems my comment was deleted, Ill say it again " I decided to point my miner here despite hearing of disconnects and thought maybe its just these people having bad luck with there internet, well no - first couple hours in and what do you know Disconnect"..  So just to add, Now I am waiting for the $$ that I mined to be paid out, no sign of it - Left Support a message - left OP a message No response... The only attention I got was my post being deleted to try to cover up what my experience with this pool was.. Beware... Watch this post disappear and if it doesnt, judge for yourself.

[zneww]

look like - big waste of time

Yeh seems my comment was deleted, Ill say it again " I decided to point my miner here despite hearing of disconnects and thought maybe its just these people having bad luck with there internet, well no - first couple hours in and what do you know Disconnect"..  So just to add, Now I am waiting for the $$ that I mined to be paid out, no sign of it - Left Support a message - left OP a message No response... The only attention I got was my post being deleted to try to cover up what my experience with this pool was.. Beware... Watch this post disappear and if it doesnt, judge for yourself.

You know I do not like to say this much, but are you part retard? It is literally impossible for anyone but a mod to delete your post. Unless this was self-moderated. Which it is not..I talk to the dev everyday, where he is 99% time, IRC. Like he said. You sir are an idiot. I don't speak for CS but I am glad you don't mine here.

EDIT: Bold for the easy points since you can't read.

[Blando]

look like - big waste of time

Yeh seems my comment was deleted, Ill say it again " I decided to point my miner here despite hearing of disconnects and thought maybe its just these people having bad luck with there internet, well no - first couple hours in and what do you know Disconnect"..  So just to add, Now I am waiting for the $$ that I mined to be paid out, no sign of it - Left Support a message - left OP a message No response... The only attention I got was my post being deleted to try to cover up what my experience with this pool was.. Beware... Watch this post disappear and if it doesnt, judge for yourself.

You know I do not like to say this much, but are you part retard? It is literally impossible for anyone but a mod to delete your post. Unless this was self-moderated. Which it is not..I talk to the dev everyday, where he is 99% time, IRC. Like he said. You sir are an idiot. I don't speak for CS but I am glad you don't mine here.

EDIT: Bold for the easy point since you can't read.

Deeeeeeeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaammm!!!

[gtraah]

look like - big waste of time

Yeh seems my comment was deleted, Ill say it again " I decided to point my miner here despite hearing of disconnects and thought maybe its just these people having bad luck with there internet, well no - first couple hours in and what do you know Disconnect"..  So just to add, Now I am waiting for the $$ that I mined to be paid out, no sign of it - Left Support a message - left OP a message No response... The only attention I got was my post being deleted to try to cover up what my experience with this pool was.. Beware... Watch this post disappear and if it doesnt, judge for yourself.

You know I do not like to say this much, but are you part retard? It is literally impossible for anyone but a mod to delete your post. Unless this was self-moderated. Which it is not..I talk to the dev everyday, where he is 99% time, IRC. Like he said. You sir are an idiot. I don't speak for CS but I am glad you don't mine here.

EDIT: Bold for the easy points since you can't read.

LOL well congrats you seem have found I made a mistake *Claps 4 u* , I just realised that , -I wonder where my comment went- anyways what ever it may be, seems I didnt think before commenting - must of been the frustration of me not receiving a response for over 2 days since requested my left overs to be sent to me. 1st msg fine, 2nd msg not fine, 3 days still no response = ridiculous. Whats the point of having a leave a message button if no one attends to it? So i thought hmm maybe his busy, lets leave a PM in This forum = Nope, still no response. Why should I leave more than 2 messages for the same request?

I see so much passion and so many posts from you here, defending etc... Is there something I don't know about you and OP -? I am a retart? So your saying I have a disabilty? LOL well then you know what? I think your are a fkn Faggot who gets hurt when someone talks down about his lovers pool. You seem to have missed all my other parts but jumped at the mistake I made? - Thats what I call weak, What about the messages to support & no reply? You didnt seem to mention that huh? Thats awesome ah ? If I received a response even 1 day (24hrs) after I made request I would not have commented. Go back to defendin the dik u suck.

But anyways to ppl who want to try, Just so the pool owner doesn't think I have a INN for him (no I dont) ..... Like I said in one of my first posts , this pool seems great if it wasnt for the D/C I had and seen others having , and who knows maybe it was just bad luck and timing for me, anyways I decided to not spend more hashtime and leave. But don't take my words for it try yourself, you have have some good luck.

[zneww]

look like - big waste of time

Yeh seems my comment was deleted, Ill say it again " I decided to point my miner here despite hearing of disconnects and thought maybe its just these people having bad luck with there internet, well no - first couple hours in and what do you know Disconnect"..  So just to add, Now I am waiting for the $$ that I mined to be paid out, no sign of it - Left Support a message - left OP a message No response... The only attention I got was my post being deleted to try to cover up what my experience with this pool was.. Beware... Watch this post disappear and if it doesnt, judge for yourself.

You know I do not like to say this much, but are you part retard? It is literally impossible for anyone but a mod to delete your post. Unless this was self-moderated. Which it is not..I talk to the dev everyday, where he is 99% time, IRC. Like he said. You sir are an idiot. I don't speak for CS but I am glad you don't mine here.

EDIT: Bold for the easy points since you can't read.

LOL well congrats you seem have found I made a mistake *Claps 4 u* , I just realised that , -I wonder where my comment went- anyways what ever it may be, seems I didnt think before commenting - must of been the frustration of me not receiving a response for over 2 days since requested my left overs to be sent to me. 1st msg fine, 2nd msg not fine, 3 days still no response = ridiculous. Whats the point of having a leave a message button if no one attends to it? So i thought hmm maybe his busy, lets leave a PM in This forum = Nope, still no response. Why should I leave more than 2 messages for the same request?

I see so much passion and so many posts from you here, defending etc... Is there something I don't know about you and OP -? I am a retart? So your saying I have a disabilty? LOL well then you know what? I think your are a fkn Faggot who gets hurt when someone talks down about his lovers pool. You seem to have missed all my other parts but jumped at the mistake I made? - Thats what I call weak, What about the messages to support & no reply? You didnt seem to mention that huh? Thats awesome ah ? If I received a response even 1 day (24hrs) after I made request I would not have commented. Go back to defendin the dik u suck.

But anyways to ppl who want to try, Just so the pool owner doesn't think I have a INN for him (no I dont) ..... Like I said in one of my first posts , this pool seems great if it wasnt for the D/C I had and seen others having , and who knows maybe it was just bad luck and timing for me, anyways I decided to not spend more hashtime and leave. But don't take my words for it try yourself, you have have some good luck.

Well maybe you are a "retart"....OP and I have nothing together, besides me liking his pool and knowing he is extremely busy with this pool PLUS his NEWBORN. I am a nice guy and VT has shown me nothing but respect and courtesy from day 1. He acknowledge he needs to post more but has been busy, as he has said. I would rather him work on the pool then post to everyones need.

You seemed to have missed the part where I said I talk to him EVERYDAY on IRC where HE IS EVERYDAY. LIKE HE SAID. What more needs to be said? You are a "retart" no doubt. Also, you are mad that he didn't manually payout your balance that is below $1 USD. I know it is your coin and it is yours, you will get it. I promise you that.

From your posts its seems you do have an "INN" for the OP, I am assuming what is meant here of course b/c this makes no sense. I however respect you for your last line. Be on your way now.

[Dishes]

^^^ Zneww posts quite a bit in this thread and in other pool threads and is usually trying to help others or offer advice and promote critical thinking.

@Gtraah. Your posts going all the way back to the middlecoin days have made you come accross like an entitled, high maintenance teenager. I think you pushed zneew past his frustration threshold to out rite insult you in the way he did. Perhaps you should rethink your posting strategy, think before posting, if you want people to help you more in the future.

[gtraah]

You seemed to have missed the part where I said I talk to him EVERYDAY on IRC where HE IS EVERYDAY. LIKE HE SAID. What more needs to be said? You are a "retart" no doubt. Also, you are mad that he didn't manually payout your balance that is below $1 USD. I know it is your coin and it is yours, you will get it. I promise you that.

From your posts its seems you do have an "INN" for the OP, I am assuming what is meant here of course b/c this makes no sense. I however respect you for your last line. Be on your way now.

You know what ? from the first post I made I only queried about what I heard about the pool and was interested in it all I got was attitude from you " Whats it to you? " you reply to me when I wanted people that have had experience to enlighten me. I respect when I am respected. Anyways I dont go On IRC, and you seemed to have missed the point i just usually hit the support button which is why I thought its their for? Right? Or is that a decor? Anyway I thought I will also PM maybe he didn't see the message as I saw him reply to someones post in this thread about manual payment. I am not that desperate and to be honest I don't really care about the COIN but I thought " Why shouldnt I request for it" But then If I got simple reply from you or him since you speak to him every day I would Of said -- No worries & thanks take your time"  One thing I get aggravated on is being insulted especially after being avoided when I never said a bad thing about anyone but only wasted time and power here, yes I got a payout from that few hours of mining which is great thanks. But if you said "You must be mistaken - Your post could not have been deleted by the OP & his been really busy because of this and that he isnt avoiding you" I would not have responded properly. If I get insulted well thats not going to get far.

@ Dishes

I dont have a problem with people untill they insult me in some way - And yes Middlecoin, I used to mine there for months and Never said  a bad thing until ? Yes Until? Well I dont think I have to say much here, you know what occured and has been occuring just like MANY others have had issues - No response to issues that occur, no communication, Left over coins sitting in an accounts for over 2 months without getting returned and most likely NEVER will , so then when I don't get responded to in another pool of course I naturally I think the worst as my first mining pool was middlecoin and he went MIA on everyone.
And no Im not aware about Zneww helping others all I am aware off is him insulting me as this is the first communication I had from him, From >> Whats it to you? To Are you a retart? and you say I sound like a teenager?, Sorry I defended myself from an insult, If that little phrase I made cut Zneww so bad then I think a sign of maturity (adult) would be to respond properly or by correcting me.

anyway OP knows I have left overs , Zneww know I have left overs - will see when it gets sorted. But I now know his busy with his child so now I know why he may not respond so soon. Thanks for just telling me.. Cya

[zneww]

^^^ Zneww posts quite a bit in this thread and in other pool threads and is usually trying to help others or offer advice and promote critical thinking.

@Gtraah. Your posts going all the way back to the middlecoin days have made you come accross like an entitled, high maintenance teenager. I think you pushed zneew past his frustration threshold to out rite insult you in the way he did. Perhaps you should rethink your posting strategy, think before posting, if you want people to help you more in the future.

Thanks for your word Dishes. That is all I am trying to do. As for gtraah, I am done responding and hopefully we can mutually agree to keep it civil.

[trc]

You shall not try to argue with someone who fails in his native language. You will only get more and more frustrated. Yes; excuse them for their stupidity.

"must of been" I love that one. Makes it very easy to spot someone you shouldn't even bother to reply to.

Now we need someone to call me a grammar Nazi to complete the circle. lol

[zneww]

haha yes, i was very close to not responding. Whatever, he just made himself look worse.

[Pfool]

Hi guys,

The Coinsolver pool and addresses stats are now available on my site http://stratehm.net. Just put your address (up to 10 addresses simultaneously) in the address box to register your address and stats will be recorded every ten minutes for 7 days.

Enjoy !

(Thank you for your feedback)

[zneww]

Hi guys,

The Coinsolver pool and addresses stats are now available on my site http://stratehm.net. Just put your address (up to 10 addresses simultaneously) in the address box to register your address and stats will be recorded every ten minutes for 7 days.

Enjoy !

(Thank you for your feedback)

Wow! Very nice man! Looks great. Thank you for this.

[tammuz]

2VT
Thanks for reducing payout threshold!

The Coinsolver pool and addresses stats are now available on my site http://stratehm.net. Just put your address (up to 10 addresses simultaneously) in the address box to register your address and stats will be recorded every ten minutes for 7 days.
Enjoy !
(Thank you for your feedback)

Thank you! It's very useful!

[zneww]

VT has been very busy on a new update for CoinSolver, which may change the game! Keep a look out.

[JHammer]

VT has been very busy on a new update for CoinSolver, which may change the game! Keep a look out.

I hope so as I was underwhelmed the first time I tried this pool..   

[andre1980]

Hopefully earnings go up.. Made 0,036 2 days ago, 0,030 yesterday.. I'm only upto 0,016 right now.
Think about moving back to Waffle or so..

[zneww]

its been pretty tragic everywhere tbh with ya. I can't speak for CS right now as my mobos are being rma'd but I know its not just here thats suffering. Sucks But hopefully whats coming soon can help that!

[zneww]

Apr 2nd, 2014 - New Scrypt-N Pool

We are happy to announce that we will be rolling out a new Scrypt-N base coin switching pool very soon!
In fact, for the brave, it is available for testing now:
stratum+tcp://useast.coinsolver.com:3334

Please remember: Scrypt-N coins require different/specialized mining software, so your standard scrypt miner will not work. For now, perhaps this link will help out. If in doubt, please ask!

Once the new pool proves stable and all the kinks are worked out, we'll be rolling it out properly. But for now, payouts are working, and all the fees, bonuses, etc apply to the new pool as well. 

[trc]

Congrats man! This is going to be the standard for us GPU miners soon. Death to scrypt ASICs!

[JHammer]

Congrats man! This is going to be the standard for us GPU miners soon. Death to scrypt ASICs!

scrypt-n ASICs will come soon believe me...

[zneww]

Congrats man! This is going to be the standard for us GPU miners soon. Death to scrypt ASICs!

scrypt-n ASICs will come soon believe me...

go awaaaaaaay. lordy. Soon as in a year? Fine with me, we will be on to the next one. I wouldn't believe this guy if he said the earth was round.

[JHammer]

Congrats man! This is going to be the standard for us GPU miners soon. Death to scrypt ASICs!

scrypt-n ASICs will come soon believe me...

go awaaaaaaay. lordy. Soon as in a year? Fine with me, we will be on to the next one. I wouldn't believe this guy if he said the earth was round.

Not dishing it..  Congrats to VT for being one of the first to stand one of these up..  I have a couple of GPU miners I might point here in a few weeks..

Will there be a different front end page for this?

[zneww]

Congrats man! This is going to be the standard for us GPU miners soon. Death to scrypt ASICs!

scrypt-n ASICs will come soon believe me...

go awaaaaaaay. lordy. Soon as in a year? Fine with me, we will be on to the next one. I wouldn't believe this guy if he said the earth was round.

Not dishing it..  Congrats to VT for being one of the first to stand one of these up..  I have a couple of GPU miners I might point here in a few weeks..

Will there be a different front end page for this?

Everything will be the same. Just a Scrypt-N tab.

[JHammer]

Will the n-script mining payout in BTC?

Also is VT still working on better Stats on his front page to show Avg BTC per day per 1 MH's?    For both script and N-Script..  I wont even consider coming back here until I see that up and running so I can comparison shop..


If your Pool is kicking Butt, Show it..  

[zneww]

Yes. Everything is the same. Just scrypt-n. He is working on it I am sure. He wants to get the pool out first.

[aaa10247]

would be great to have the option to turn on/off the auto exchange for scrypt-n multiport

[zneww]

would be great to have the option to turn on/off the auto exchange for scrypt-n multiport

Not sure if that will be added. As that is one of the main reasons there is this pool. To exchange the most profitable coins into BTC.

[goodluck0319]

@echo off
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
COLOR 0C
timeout /t 4

vertminer.exe -g 1 -o stratum+tcp://coinsolver.com:3334 -u 18hACeySua2ePvVwErr7T5k5tybCnNafzV -p xx --intensity 18,13 --worksize 512  --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-engine 950,110 --gpu-memclock 1250,1165 --thread-concurrency 20481,6440 --gpu-vddc 1.20,1.25 

is this a correct setting for this sites?

I cannot mine it with this setting.

1 x 290 non x and 1 x 270x

[suchmoon]

@echo off
setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
COLOR 0C
timeout /t 4

vertminer.exe -g 1 -o stratum+tcp://coinsolver.com:3334 -u 18hACeySua2ePvVwErr7T5k5tybCnNafzV -p xx --intensity 18,13 --worksize 512  --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-engine 950,110 --gpu-memclock 1250,1165 --thread-concurrency 20481,6440 --gpu-vddc 1.20,1.25  

is this a correct setting for this sites?

I cannot mine it with this setting.

1 x 290 non x and 1 x 270x

I don't think gpu-engine 110 is a correct setting for any pool. I would also help if you explained what "cannot mine" actually means.

[zneww]

And its useast.coinsolver.com:3334

[goodluck0319]

this is the error I am getting.

[zneww]

Can't really read that.

[goodluck0319]

u can click on the pic so u can make it larger.

[zneww]

I have no idea. I am mining right now, and I have been for a couple days.

[suchmoon]

u can click on the pic so u can make it larger.

Well that's definitely a pool error. Also provides some useful information for aspiring SQL injection enthusiasts

[zneww]

From site

We have resolved the authenticatin issues of new workers in the Scrypt-N pool! We've reduce the connection issues, and hope to eliminate them soon.

[goodluck0319]

so is the n-scrpy pool is fix or not?

[zneww]

so is the n-scrpy pool is fix or not?

Read the post above you...lol

And like I said, I have been mining on the Scrypt-N pool since it came out, so it has never been broken to me.

[andre1980]

Just left after about a month.. Kept getting lower than expected payouts, even MiddleCoin was doing better most of the time..
Was getting 0,022 per day here. Moved back to Waffle: 0,019 and 0,021 per day.. Almost twice as much!

But thanks for the opportunity and good luck with the pools!
If payouts gets better, i'll return.

[zneww]

Just left after about a month.. Kept getting lower than expected payouts, even MiddleCoin was doing better most of the time..
Was getting 0,022 per day here. Moved back to Waffle: 0,019 and 0,021 per day.. Almost twice as much!

But thanks for the opportunity and good luck with the pools!
If payouts gets better, i'll return.

hey andre. thats sad :/ sorry to see ya go

Did you misplace a decimal? otherwise this post doesnt make much sense

[andre1980]

hey andre. thats sad :/ sorry to see ya go

Did you misplace a decimal? otherwise this post doesnt make much sense

Hi,

Don't think so. Have about 7MH/s, payout Coinsolver on April 9th: 0.0221833
Payout on Wafflepool: 0.01950071 and 0.02116265 (April 11th)

That's quite a difference!

Could be something else entrily, but the first payout of today was also 0,019 and the second is almost at the same point yesterday.

Andre

[zneww]

hey andre. thats sad :/ sorry to see ya go

Did you misplace a decimal? otherwise this post doesnt make much sense

Hi,

Don't think so. Have about 7MH/s, payout Coinsolver on April 9th: 0.0221833
Payout on Wafflepool: 0.01950071 and 0.02116265 (April 11th)

That's quite a difference!

Could be something else entrily, but the first payout of today was also 0,019 and the second is almost at the same point yesterday.

Andre

So....CoinSolvers payout was higher then both of those? and you switched? Im confused.

EDIT: Oh ic, you are getting two payouts at WP. Gotcha. I was lost

[andre1980]

So....CoinSolvers payout was higher then both of those? and you switched? Im confused.

EDIT: Oh ic, you are getting two payouts at WP. Gotcha. I was lost

Yes, Waffle pays out in the morning (in my case today at 3.04 AM) and once again in the afternoon.
It doesn't look like it's on a specific time, since i haven't received my 2nd payout today yet. But, otherwise it just builds up for payout tommorrow..

EDIT: Just received second payout: 0,019 also (0.01950071+0.0191661= 0,03866681, so about 0,016 more then here).
Was expecting a bit more, but it seems it wasn't exchanged yet and will be added to next day. (already 0,0052)

[jimlite]

Your scrypt-N display is wrong, since scrypt-N is about 40% of scrypt btc/mhs/day.

[goodluck0319]

what is today n-scrypt btc/mhs/day?

[kupan787]

It looks like the API for the site doesn't pick up scrypt-n miners. My user stats page is showing (1D6Adb2Ce4LFkQXiVojv9phM7WoBiQAkcv) but if I try the api command for my user (http://coinsolver.com/api.php?getaccountinfo=1D6Adb2Ce4LFkQXiVojv9phM7WoBiQAkcv) it responds "No Account Found"

Also, any chance you can update the API for getaccountinfo to also show the following:

Immature
Unexchanged
Combined Balance
BTC balance

Thanks!

[unlock.mk]

i have a will to make a statistics website for coinsolver, but i do not know how to connect api.
I have a server and  i will buy a domain,
So anyone with experience can help me ?

[zneww]

i have a will to make a statistics website for coinsolver, but i do not know how to connect api.
I have a server and  i will buy a domain,
So anyone with experience can help me ?

Shit i've got a domain and hosting already.

[Pfool]

i have a will to make a statistics website for coinsolver, but i do not know how to connect api.
I have a server and  i will buy a domain,
So anyone with experience can help me ?

I have some stats for coinsolver on my website http://stratehm.net. What kind of help do you want ? (Advices, technical info...)

[unlock.mk]

It supposed to be autoswitching pool, but today coinsolver does not autoswitch, it is stuck on Myriadcoin that gives 0.005 BTC/Day/MH/s whole day long, instead to swich to White Coin or Noblecoin that gives 0.010 BTC/Day/MH/s. Even DOPE Coin gives 0.098 BTC/Day/MH/s.
Or maybe i am wrong ?

[unlock.mk]

[DarkAGeS]

http://www.reddit.com/r/CoinSolver/comments/223usn/scryptn_multipool_incoming/cgxz9n7

[compumine]

I was looking at your pool to consider.

However when looking @ what you're mining according to your site, the pool is minin gthe 4th down coin from the top!! @ present it's mining Flutter (0.00971433 BTC/day/Mhs) while DOPE shows first @ 0.03507254

So why is the pool mining a less profitable coin?

[zneww]

The hashpower is split among different coins. There is usually different coins being mined at once. Say 70% Dope, 30% flutter. The coin switching algo ia always being monitored by VT so i wouldnt worry to much. You can go to Clever and not be told what you are mining, or waffle and mine "hidden" coins. The transparency hwre is bar none.

[compumine]

The hashpower is split among different coins. There is usually different coins being mined at once. Say 70% Dope, 30% flutter. The coin switching algo ia always being monitored by VT so i wouldnt worry to much. You can go to Clever and not be told what you are mining, or waffle and mine "hidden" coins. The transparency hwre is bar none.

Are you the pool's operator?

Because you've not given me a reply in reality.  I know what Clever or waffle do.  My question was to the pool's reasoning for mining the less profitable coin showing on the pool's site.  Even the graph shows 100% is going towards that coin!  So where is this 70%, 30% split you are talking about?

[zneww]

The hashpower is split among different coins. There is usually different coins being mined at once. Say 70% Dope, 30% flutter. The coin switching algo ia always being monitored by VT so i wouldnt worry to much. You can go to Clever and not be told what you are mining, or waffle and mine "hidden" coins. The transparency hwre is bar none.

Are you the pool's operator?

Because you've not given me a reply in reality.  I know what Clever or waffle do.  My question was to the pool's reasoning for mining the less profitable coin showing on the pool's site.  Even the graph shows 100% is going towards that coin!  So where is this 70%, 30% split you are talking about?

I am not. How didn't I give you a reply?

You want the answer its on the website. Go to the about section and then "Why we mine what we mine"

This question has also been previously asked. Search button does wonders.

[unlock.mk]

Hmmm, i am honestly thinking (maybe i am wrong) that there is no "autoswitch" feauture implemented. Everything goes manual.
However, Coinsolver is still very good pool. Keep it up.

[DarkAGeS]

coinsolver mine SPA all the day on scrypt+n... They can not sell it, cause of low trade volume. All this time they could mine Caishen - which is more profitable and easy to sell. I just don't understand this. And they don't answer in online support form or in reddit, so... I think it is time to move to another multipool - will try trademybit.com scrypt+n

[zneww]

Hmmm, i am honestly thinking (maybe i am wrong) that there is no "autoswitch" feauture implemented. Everything goes manual.
However, Coinsolver is still very good pool. Keep it up.

Ive been here since Jan. That is not true. The algo is very picky it seems.

coinsolver mine SPA all the day on scrypt+n... They can not sell it, cause of low trade volume. All this time they could mine Caishen - which is more profitable and easy to sell. I just don't understand this. And they don't answer in online support form or in reddit, so... I think it is time to move to another multipool - will try trademybit.com scrypt+n

VT, the dev, is always in IRC. I talk to him daily. Hes very busy.

How do you know what can or cannot be traded

[DarkAGeS]

coinsolver mine SPA all the day on scrypt+n... They can not sell it, cause of low trade volume. All this time they could mine Caishen - which is more profitable and easy to sell. I just don't understand this. And they don't answer in online support form or in reddit, so... I think it is time to move to another multipool - will try trademybit.com scrypt+n

VT, the dev, is always in IRC. I talk to him daily. Hes very busy.

I did not try irc. OK, will know that. Besides support answered me to email, but it was veeery long.

How do you know what can or cannot be traded

it is not difficult - look at the volume on cryptsy. Pool mining much more coins, that exchange can eat with acceptable (profitable) price

[DarkAGeS]

where is today's payout?.. 4 hours after 11 PM EST, but nothing was payed

update:
after about 6 hours after 11 PM EST payout has arrived

[unlock.mk]

According to web, i will get 0.008252 BTC/1Mh but i am getting just half of that. >> 0.004813670 BTC
Why ?

It was nice at Sat, Apr 19 2014 when i've got 0.013153254 BTC. in 24h

[zneww]

According to web, i will get 0.008252 BTC/1Mh but i am getting just half of that. >> 0.004813670 BTC
Why ?

It was nice at Sat, Apr 19 2014 when i've got 0.013153254 BTC. in 24h

variance my friend..

[unlock.mk]

Variance is ok, but it need to be visible, not like that, says one thing delivers other. Says 0.008 delivers 0.004.
And i will try one more time, cos admin of coinsolver says that he updated something, about the pool and the web, but i do not see any web updates, however i will test pool one more time.
If i get lower that it is showed on his web than i would be forced to leave,  i do not want, cos i like coinsolver, but there is more profitable pools out there.

[zneww]

Variance is ok, but it need to be visible, not like that, says one thing delivers other. Says 0.008 delivers 0.004.
And i will try one more time, cos admin of coinsolver says that he updated something, about the pool and the web, but i do not see any web updates, however i will test pool one more time.
If i get lower that it is showed on his web than i would be forced to leave,  i do not want, cos i like coinsolver, but there is more profitable pools out there.

Could you post your stats page here?

It should look like this

Code:

http://coinsolver.com/user-details.php?account=BITCOINADDRESS

[hillsta89]

For my 2cents of input, Im yet to do a few more days here to see how profitable it all works out to be comparing to my own past history, rather than uneducated opinions that has caused me to spend the most time reading a thread and finally sign up to these forums But that said im already far in front profitability wise because i didnt spend my spare time sending a few mBTC here n there seeing if i can fluke some bullshit rigged gamble lol. Liking everything so far, mostly a few responses from zneww on the forums but all counts? ha, Na love the idea's ill stick around and add another soon to be 12Mh for ya's.

[unlock.mk]

[unlock.mk]

At 8:00h today connection to coinslover dropped, and now i can not even connect to this pool.
Found my miner switched to my backup pool.
log:

[09:28:08] Coinsolver alive, testing stability
[09:28:11] Stratum connection to Coinsolver interrupted
[09:28:18] Accepted 73e19bb4 Diff 566/512 GPU 3 at Wafflepool
[09:28:24] Accepted 3953b435 Diff 1.14K/512 GPU 2 at Wafflepool
[09:28:59] Accepted 3caf7ab4 Diff 1.08K/512 GPU 1 at Wafflepool
[09:29:07] Accepted 1a8e8e86 Diff 2.47K/512 GPU 1 at Wafflepool
[09:29:14] Coinsolver alive, testing stability
[09:29:20] Stratum connection to Coinsolver interrupted

Pool hashrate:



btw..
Coinslover mines coin that it is not in the list of coins... Asia Coin

[zneww]

At 8:00h today connection to coinslover dropped, and now i can not even connect to this pool.
Found my miner switched to my backup pool.
log:

[09:28:08] Coinsolver alive, testing stability
[09:28:11] Stratum connection to Coinsolver interrupted
[09:28:18] Accepted 73e19bb4 Diff 566/512 GPU 3 at Wafflepool
[09:28:24] Accepted 3953b435 Diff 1.14K/512 GPU 2 at Wafflepool
[09:28:59] Accepted 3caf7ab4 Diff 1.08K/512 GPU 1 at Wafflepool
[09:29:07] Accepted 1a8e8e86 Diff 2.47K/512 GPU 1 at Wafflepool
[09:29:14] Coinsolver alive, testing stability
[09:29:20] Stratum connection to Coinsolver interrupted

Pool hashrate:



btw..
Coinslover mines coin that it is not in the list of coins... Asia Coin

Believe its fixed....

Its called adding a new coin...lol jeeez.

[csa1234]

can someone please explain me the picture bellow?

[Adapted]

Coinsolver (VTminer) knows how to professionaly ripoff ppl belive me you're better off mining and dumping dodge\catalonia\cga..etc coins that hasing at his site (coinsolver) he will rip you off for 0.002btc at minimum
I did math with many other great miners around the world and the information he is providing to you and public is everything but true!

And the best part always the same excuse " The site is in BETA"...i tell you he's got a great business model and it's full of greed !

And on the end he's not even mining the "most profitable coins"

Heh just my opinion
Not here to accuse but do your own math and research about this site!

[zneww]

Coinsolver (VTminer) knows how to professionaly ripoff ppl belive me you're better off mining and dumping dodge\catalonia\cga..etc coins that hasing at his site (coinsolver) he will rip you off for 0.002btc at minimum
I did math with many other great miners around the world and the information he is providing to you and public is everything but true!

And the best part always the same excuse " The site is in BETA"...i tell you he's got a great business model and it's full of greed !

And on the end he's not even mining the "most profitable coins"

Heh just my opinion
Not here to accuse but do your own math and research about this site!

Well then...thats an interesting conspiracy and 100% FUD. I have been here since January...lmao, VT has never robbed me. The site is not in beta?

I did math with many other great miners around the world and the information he is providing to you and public is everything but true!

What? Lets see your MATH, and who are these "great miners around the world"? Coinsolver is about the most transparent pool there is. So all I am hearing from you is FUD and baseless claims.

Prove me wrong and I will take back what I said.

Heh just my opinion
Not here to accuse but do your own math and research about this site!

Excuse me!? Not here to accuse? Am I seeing things?

[zneww]

can someone please explain me the picture bellow?

I could only assume b/c at the time we mined a coin, the price was high. When it was actually traded (VT does a lot of manually trading) the price was different then when mined.

[DarkAGeS]

I see again that coinsolver mine not first profitable coins (CAI) - it mines SPA again, wich is less profitable and more difficult to sell. I just don't understand this. I think coinsolver may show us that it mines SPA or other crap, but all this time it mines profitable coins - than it get difference to himself and explain that some problems with choice algorithm, so the math is maybe correct, but it looks like scam for me, cause coinsolver mine crap coins

[zneww]

I see again that coinsolver mine not first profitable coins (CAI) - it mines SPA again, wich is less profitable and more difficult to sell. I just don't understand this. I think coinsolver may show us that it mines SPA or other crap, but all this time it mines profitable coins - than it get difference to himself and explain that some problems with choice algorithm, so the math is maybe correct, but it looks like scam for me, cause coinsolver mine crap coins

I say VT just doesn't tell you at all what he mines. HOW IS SHOWING YOU WHAT YOU MINE A SCAM!?! Wow..loll i dont understand you people.

Picking a coin is more then just how profitable it is. You guys need to do more research

[hoop]

is this pool profitable

[roughdude]

geez, i will never be a pool admin..... Or i'll do communication courses and terrorist negotiation training before.

[zneww]

geez, i will never be a pool admin..... Or i'll do communication courses and terrorist negotiation training before.

HAHAHA!! This made me laugh. It really is that serious. I feel bad for VT .

[DarkAGeS]

who is VT guys?

[zneww]

who is VT guys?

The developer of CoinSolver

[JHammer]

Whats the BTC per 1 MH's Daily Avg?

VT said we would add this weeks ago but never did..   

[zneww]

Whats the BTC per 1 MH's Daily Avg?

VT said we would add this weeks ago but never did..  

Look at your stats page, and then go to payouts.



Look at that...

[JHammer]

Whats the BTC per 1 MH's Daily Avg?

VT said we would add this weeks ago but never did..  

Look at your stats page, and then go to payouts.



Look at that...

Hu??? I am not mining on this pool..  Just want to see what the overall daily Avg is like 99.9999999999999% of the other pools show..

Never could figure out what the BFD is about adding that to this pool.. 

Oh well..   Will check back in a another month to see if it was added..

[zneww]

Whats the BTC per 1 MH's Daily Avg?

VT said we would add this weeks ago but never did..  

Look at your stats page, and then go to payouts.



Look at that...

Hu??? I am not mining on this pool..  Just want to see what the overall daily Avg is like 99.9999999999999% of the other pools show..

Never could figure out what the BFD is about adding that to this pool.. 

Oh well..   Will check back in a another month to see if it was added..

Maybe because it is never an accurate way to depict the true btc/mh/day. CS does more manually trades then any other pool. The transparency is unparalleled. The dev is pretty good. And the site is beautiful. Sorry it doesn't have btc/mh/day

[JHammer]

Whats the BTC per 1 MH's Daily Avg?

VT said we would add this weeks ago but never did..  

Look at your stats page, and then go to payouts.



Look at that...

Hu??? I am not mining on this pool..  Just want to see what the overall daily Avg is like 99.9999999999999% of the other pools show..

Never could figure out what the BFD is about adding that to this pool..  

Oh well..   Will check back in a another month to see if it was added..

Maybe because it is never an accurate way to depict the true btc/mh/day. CS does more manually trades then any other pool. The transparency is unparalleled. The dev is pretty good. And the site is beautiful. Sorry it doesn't have btc/mh/day

Can you tell us what you have been Avg then?   You should know your daily Avg's after you receive each days payouts..

[zneww]

Whats the BTC per 1 MH's Daily Avg?

VT said we would add this weeks ago but never did..  

Look at your stats page, and then go to payouts.



Look at that...

Hu??? I am not mining on this pool..  Just want to see what the overall daily Avg is like 99.9999999999999% of the other pools show..

Never could figure out what the BFD is about adding that to this pool..  

Oh well..   Will check back in a another month to see if it was added..

Maybe because it is never an accurate way to depict the true btc/mh/day. CS does more manually trades then any other pool. The transparency is unparalleled. The dev is pretty good. And the site is beautiful. Sorry it doesn't have btc/mh/day

Can you tell us what you have been Avg then?   You should know your daily Avg's after you receive each days payouts..

Ive only gotten two payouts full speed on that account. I just got my 3rd gpu up and my rig was rented out most of last week b/c the whitecoin craze.

I will have good data if my rig doesnt get rented in the next couple days

[zneww]

Last three payouts have been as follows

Wenesday- 0.008893900 BTC = 0.00572323 BTC/Mh/Day with the average hash of 1.6Mh/s
Thursday- 0.006855389 BTC = 0.0053937 BTC/Mh/Day with the average hash of 1.3Mh/s (had server outtage)
Friday- 0.008195613 BTC = 0.00491934 BTC/Mh/Day with the average hash of 1.7Mh/s


Wafflepool and Clevers "averages"
 
Wenesday- WP: 0.00652959 BTC/Mh/Day | CM: 0.00636 BTC/Mh/Day
Thursday- WP: 0.00609424 BTC/Mh/Day | CM : 0.00659 BTC/Mh/Day
Friday- WP: 0.00556131 BTC/Mh/Day | CM : 0.00598 BTC/Mh/Day


Those are just averages. If we can have some actually data from CM and WP that would be cool.

Pool size:
WP: 48.35 GH/s
CM: 20.44 Gh/s
CS: 259 Mh/s

[JHammer]

Thanks!

[zneww]

Saturday- 0.005771161 BTC = 0.00331105 BTC/Mh/Day with the average hash of 1.7Mh/s


Wafflepool and Clevers "averages"

Saturday WP: 0.00480263 BTC/Mh/Day | CM 0.00402 BTC/Mh/Day

Pool size:
WP: 50.45 GH/s
CM: 18.92 GH/s
CS: 325 Mh/s

So not that far off then the other multis...which I am sure we could make up if we had more hash, as the coin selection here is awesome. New coins seem to arrive everyday.

Thanks VT for your hard work.

[DarkAGeS]

Saturday- 0.005771161 BTC = 0.00331105 BTC/Mh/Day with the average hash of 1.7Mh/s


Wafflepool and Clevers "averages"

Saturday WP: 0.00480263 BTC/Mh/Day | CM 0.00402 BTC/Mh/Day

Pool size:
WP: 50.45 GH/s
CM: 18.92 GH/s
CS: 325 Mh/s

So not that far off then the other multis...which I am sure we could make up if we had more hash, as the coin selection here is awesome. New coins seem to arrive everyday.

Thanks VT for your hard work.

I think it is far off then the other multis - 50% difference man... with so awesome coin selection as you said it is very bad result I think, and the reason of that not in low hashrate - it is quite enough

[kmsalex]

I've been mining hear for over a month and honestly it seams like everytime i check the page it says mining CHNCoin like... all of the time.... even though it is not always the most profitable coin. After reading the last few post i'm gonna be trying out wafflepool for a while.

[zneww]

I've been mining hear for over a month and honestly it seams like everytime i check the page it says mining CHNCoin like... all of the time.... even though it is not always the most profitable coin. After reading the last few post i'm gonna be trying out wafflepool for a while.

Well...CoinSolver doesn't mine CHNCoin so you must be checking out the wrong site.

That is the problem. Wafflepool has over 50GH/s in power.

[kmsalex]

I've been mining hear for over a month and honestly it seams like everytime i check the page it says mining CHNCoin like... all of the time.... even though it is not always the most profitable coin. After reading the last few post i'm gonna be trying out wafflepool for a while.

Well...CoinSolver doesn't mine CHNCoin so you must be checking out the wrong site.

That is the problem. Wafflepool has over 50GH/s in power.

Wow I can't believe what an idiot I am. I read this thread title as coincatcher, not solver.

[DarkAGeS]

again there is no payout today. thats it, I'm off...

[zneww]

again there is no payout today. thats it, I'm off...

Straight from the site as always...adios!

Apr 30th, 2014 -  Payout delays

Last night's delayed payout was due to an unfortunate combination of brief exchange delays and a minor personal/family medical scare (everyone's fine now, thanks). But, because the delay was longer than expected, we will roll payouts forward to tonight's regular payout time (11pm EST). Sorry for any inconvenience this may have caused people!

So, I thought I would give a brief explaination of why this happens occasionally. Our payout process is not a fully automated system, mostly due to the limitations of the various exchanges we use, but also to ensure a bit of human oversight to the process. This required human touch has benefits and drawbacks, but of course can be more suceptable to whims of fate. If we grow larger, this is an area that will be addressed to ensure more routine payouts, but for now its part of our pool's quirky personallity

For the record, our standard policy in these 'delay' situations is, if the delay is more than ~3 hours, to roll payments forward to the next night, as we did today. This policy is based on preferences from community feedback, but if you have any suggestions please let me know.

Sincerely,
VTMiner

[tammuz]

Is it possible to make threshold payout at least 0.005? Not 0,001. Miners with slow equipment lose about 10% because of payment fee 0.0001 BTC.

[zneww]

Is it possible to make threshold payout at least 0.005? Not 0,001. Miners with slow equipment lose about 10% because of payment fee 0.0001 BTC.

Well, I am 100% sure that the request to LOWER the payout threshold from 0.01, was from miners with slow equipment. So I am not sure you want them to do.

[suchmoon]

Is it possible to make threshold payout at least 0.005? Not 0,001. Miners with slow equipment lose about 10% because of payment fee 0.0001 BTC.

Is coinsolver really charging everyone 0.0001 BTC? Normally pools would send out payouts in one big transaction, which would on average cost a lot less than 0.0001 for each user, and it's typically covered by the pool fees anyway.

[grendel25]

can anyone provide info on comparison of mining scrypt to scrypt-n?  looking for btc per mh/s #'s

thx

[tammuz]

Is coinsolver really charging everyone 0.0001 BTC? Normally pools would send out payouts in one big transaction, which would on average cost a lot less than 0.0001 for each user, and it's typically covered by the pool fees anyway.

According stats - yes (see the pic below)



At 12:40 am BTC Balance was 0,001171743 (on the pictire combined and btc balance in the same point). But withdraw amount only 0,001071743 (same amount appeared in my wallet), so fee is 0,0001.

Also on April 29 I got only 0,000922303, but threshold is 0,001. It means that 0,0001 was subtracted.

So, what do we have: If I will have five withdraws, I will have about 0,005 earnings and I will pay 5x0,0001 = 0,0005 fee (10%)
If threshold will be 0,005 I will pay 0,0001 fee (2%).

Conclusion: slow miners lose about 10% of their earnings. Only high-powered miners can earn a lot of BTC during the day and this fee for them just a small percent.

Is it possible increase threshold or combine several withdraw transactions? (or maybe something else)

P.S. sorry for my English, my native language is Russian

[tammuz]

Normally pools would send out payouts in one big transaction, which would on average cost a lot less than 0.0001 for each user, and it's typically covered by the pool fees anyway.

P.P.S. No, they don't combine (see pic)

[suchmoon]

Ok, I agree, that's ridiculous and needs fixing. I don't see anything about it in the FAQ either: http://coinsolver.com/faq.php

Here is how a normal pool payout should look like:

https://blockchain.info/tx/f4cd8f146b44ecbe70df93641cb0b71ef783dbaf0b6c37b036c9e8f77d161c2e

You can see a bunch of small payments too, but the fee is 0.0014 for 2 BTC (0.07%), and is paid the pool, not the recipient(s).

[zneww]

Ok, I agree, that's ridiculous and needs fixing. I don't see anything about it in the FAQ either: http://coinsolver.com/faq.php

Here is how a normal pool payout should look like:

https://blockchain.info/tx/f4cd8f146b44ecbe70df93641cb0b71ef783dbaf0b6c37b036c9e8f77d161c2e

You can see a bunch of small payments too, but the fee is 0.0014 for 2 BTC (0.07%), and is paid the pool, not the recipient(s).

EDIT: Wrong

[vtminer]

Hey Guys,

I just wanted to jump in here to clarify things a bit...  you're right, that transaction fee is ridiculous.  However, its not by design.  It would appear that you have discovered a bug in the payout system.  The nightly payments were incorrectly being sent individually instead of in a batch, increasing the transaction fees, and deducting them from the payments.  The way its supposed to work is that payments are sent in batches, and the pool absorbs the fees.  I will get this corrected asap, sorry for the mistake.

So with that understood, zneww is correct, I lowered the payout threshold to .001 to help the slower miners out.  Once this bug is fixed, is it safe to assume the lower payout threshold is a non-issue for folks?

[zneww]

I would love to see some input on reddit about this topic, I know VT is always up for ideas, and no one better to get it from then the customers. Thanks guys!

http://www.reddit.com/r/CoinSolver/comments/24l82w/what_do_you_guys_want/

[tammuz]

I will get this corrected asap, sorry for the mistake.

Will await eagerly )

[DarkAGeS]

do you know about scrypt-n merged mining?
monocle - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=585817.0
parallax - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583660.0
this can boost profit greatly - use it admins

[zneww]

do you know about scrypt-n merged mining?
monocle - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=585817.0
parallax - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583660.0
this can boost profit greatly - use it admins

Good info!

[DarkAGeS]

I see that Coinsolver mining ParallaxCoin now - is it merge-mining with other coin or what?.. The profit must be doubled with merge-mining.
Multipools can now say that they mine EXE for example, but in same time they mine Parallax or Monocle and have all profit from parallel mining for themselfs.
Or vice versa - they shows PLX mining, but they mining it through EXE blockchain.
And users can not verify that! So if multipools do not say explicitly about that - we should think they are cheating us guys!

update:
as long as there is no answer from VT I'm merge-mining exe/plx, couse it much more profitable anyway

[carrotX]

I see that Coinsolver mining ParallaxCoin now - is it merge-mining with other coin or what?.. The profit must be doubled with merge-mining.
Multipools can now say that they mine EXE for example, but in same time they mine Parallax or Monocle and have all profit from parallel mining for themselfs.
Or vice versa - they shows PLX mining, but they mining it through EXE blockchain.
And users can not verify that! So if multipools do not say explicitly about that - we should think they are cheating us guys!

Hi, It is not very nice to be so fast on the gun and start accusing straight away. ;-)
You have been nice to point out the option to merged mining and yesterday, less than 12 hours ago I had a talk with coinSolver about this, the operator managed to start implementing this (this is what is suspect since PLX was not mined before at coinsolver).

I don't know the status of this, I don't know if it is relay merget at this point. But for sure i don't think that the OP had time to update the web page to reflect what is going on.

Can we give the OP at least one day to update the web and to publish some info about that?

The mining of PLX started 3 hours ago and so far we only have immature coins according to the stats on coinsolver

[DarkAGeS]

Can we give the OP at least one day to update the web and to publish some info about that?

of couse, but as I've sad, as long as there is no explicit information about status of merged-mining at Coinsolver, I prefer to merge-mine myself exe/plx
Nothing personal, just business
But good to know that VT working on that

[zneww]

Not everyone cheats darkages....sheesh..

Not sure if its merged or not. But I wouldn't worry about it either. VT is getting shit done, and we've talked to him. He is busy so i could care less if he posts in here.

Plus, everyone here is a savage so I wouldnt come on here much if I were him. most of you guys don't know your ass from a hole in the ground.

[vtminer]

Hi Folks,

Sorry about the intermittent responses, but as zneww says, I've been/am pretty busy these days.  But, let me set the record straight on a couple things:

1. No, I'm not secretly stealing any coins via merged mining, or any other fantastical ploy.
2. Yes, I setup ParallaxCoin yesterday, but no, it isn't currently doing merged mining yet.

In fact I added PLX mostly so I could study the requirements for merged mining on our backend and codebase, which appear to be non-trivial.  Not that merged mining PLX/EXE would currently amount to a windfall for the pool in itself, but the idea is intriguing, and I will continue to tinker with it to see if its something that can be added.  When and if I do add it, I will certainly announce it publicly (from the deck of my yacht, purchased with stolen merge-mined coins, of course).


I also wanted to loop back to another issue brought here recently, specifically the BTC transaction fee bug.  This issue has now been fixed, and users should no longer see transaction fees in their payouts (the pool now correctly covers these)

[zneww]

Hi Folks,

Sorry about the intermittent responses, but as zneww says, I've been/am pretty busy these days.  But, let me set the record straight on a couple things:

1. No, I'm not secretly stealing any coins via merged mining, or any other fantastical ploy.
2. Yes, I setup ParallaxCoin yesterday, but no, it isn't currently doing merged mining yet.

In fact I added PLX mostly so I could study the requirements for merged mining on our backend and codebase, which appear to be non-trivial.  Not that merged mining PLX/EXE would currently amount to a windfall for the pool in itself, but the idea is intriguing, and I will continue to tinker with it to see if its something that can be added.  When and if I do add it, I will certainly announce it publicly (from the deck of my yacht, purchased with stolen merge-mined coins, of course).


I also wanted to loop back to another issue brought here recently, specifically the BTC transaction fee bug.  This issue has now been fixed, and users should no longer see transaction fees in their payouts (the pool now correctly covers these)

1. Are you positive? 

hahahaha thx for the work VT

[DarkAGeS]

wow, ther is now possible to tripple merge-mining VTC/PLX/MON
http://www.reddit.com/r/vertcoin/comments/24vpgf/how_to_mine_vtcmonplx_all_3_simultaneously/
that pool can do it - simplevert.com
I'm mining with all my power

[zneww]

wow, ther is now possible to tripple merge-mining VTC/PLX/MON
http://www.reddit.com/r/vertcoin/comments/24vpgf/how_to_mine_vtcmonplx_all_3_simultaneously/
that pool can do it - simplevert.com
I'm mining with all my power

Interesting. Not what CoinSolver was made for...and it's difficult, like VT has said. He has his own custom stratum. You cannot just say "Oh i want to merge mine" doesnt work like that

[Fizikal]

VT... What haaappened today? Did the exchange take a dump before coins were exchanged? By the looks of the charts, that's what it appears to be. Lost all of a day's profits. Back at square one now.

[zneww]

VT... What haaappened today? Did the exchange take a dump before coins were exchanged? By the looks of the charts, that's what it appears to be. Lost all of a day's profits. Back at square one now.

From the site

May 12th, 2014 -  Delayed Payout

Just to clarify what happened during last night's payout... the scrypt-n pool payouts were proceed on time, however the scrypt pool payouts encountered a new sort of problem that prevented them from running. As I was just about to run the scrypt pool payouts, I lost power/internet. I suppose living in Vermont has its benefits and drawbacks. In any event, I do apologize since I am to blame for this event.

Since the delay lasted many hours, I will be rolling the payouts forward to this evening, as is usual. By the way, this process of rolling payouts to the next evening as opposed to running delayed payouts asap (causing a shortened day for the next day) is based on user preferences and feedback. If you have other suggestions or preferences, please don't hesitate to let me know.
Sincerely,
  -VTMiner

[tammuz]

I also wanted to loop back to another issue brought here recently, specifically the BTC transaction fee bug.  This issue has now been fixed, and users should no longer see transaction fees in their payouts (the pool now correctly covers these)

Good news! Thanks a lot, VT!

[Fizikal]

VT... What haaappened today? Did the exchange take a dump before coins were exchanged? By the looks of the charts, that's what it appears to be. Lost all of a day's profits. Back at square one now.

From the site

May 12th, 2014 -  Delayed Payout

Just to clarify what happened during last night's payout... the scrypt-n pool payouts were proceed on time, however the scrypt pool payouts encountered a new sort of problem that prevented them from running. As I was just about to run the scrypt pool payouts, I lost power/internet. I suppose living in Vermont has its benefits and drawbacks. In any event, I do apologize since I am to blame for this event.

Since the delay lasted many hours, I will be rolling the payouts forward to this evening, as is usual. By the way, this process of rolling payouts to the next evening as opposed to running delayed payouts asap (causing a shortened day for the next day) is based on user preferences and feedback. If you have other suggestions or preferences, please don't hesitate to let me know.
Sincerely,
  -VTMiner

That's not quite what I was referring to. I was referring to the huge drop in estimated unexchanged and combined with the normal subtle increase in actual BTC. The way I see it, the coin that was being mined, likely SC, dropped more than anticipated and only contributed to a very small amount of BTC. I would suggest cashing out all that SC right now if possible, it shot up 2.5x overnight.



EDIT: BTW, what is the best way to get in contact with VT? I didn't find him on the Twitterverse, and I honestly don't think the forum is the best place to get in contact with him, is it?

[zneww]

To your edit: IRC or Reddit

[zneww]

SO I guess since it has been so quiet in here and the hash has been rising, that means VT is doing something right

I have averaged around 0.003 and 0.005 BTC/Mh/Day on the scrypt-n side.

[p4u]

Due to the technical requirements of allowing multiple miners to share a single username (BTC address), no VARDIFF is used. Difficulty is set to 256 for all workers at this time. Don't worry, that has zero effect on your profitability over the course of a day.

Please, fix this issue. Scrypt mining devices are getting more and more faster and 256 is a too small difficulty. I would suggest you to use VARDIFF (from 64 to 16384 at least) or in the worst case set a fixed difficulty of 1024 or 2048. It is OK also for small miners, they will just have more variance but same profitability (and probably less rejected).

[zneww]

Due to the technical requirements of allowing multiple miners to share a single username (BTC address), no VARDIFF is used. Difficulty is set to 256 for all workers at this time. Don't worry, that has zero effect on your profitability over the course of a day.

Please, fix this issue. Scrypt mining devices are getting more and more faster and 256 is a too small difficulty. I would suggest you to use VARDIFF (from 64 to 16384 at least) or in the worst case set a fixed difficulty of 1024 or 2048. It is OK also for small miners, they will just have more variance but same profitability (and probably less rejected).

Pretty sure you can set your difficulty threw your password... ie -u BTCADDRESS -p d=1024...you can....


From CoinSolver's site.... http://coinsolver.com/getting-started.php

Choose your own difficulty
You can optionally set your own difficulty by using the password d=X, where X is the difficulty number you want. Valid choices are: 64,128,256,512,768, 1024.
Note: All miners using the same BTC address must share the same custom difficulty. Failure to do so will cause erratic difficulty levels, and degraded performance.

If you choose any other password, we will select the best difficulty for you, based on the coin being mined.
http://coinsolver.com/user-details.php?account=[your BTC address]

Please note:
you can use the same BTC address for as many mining rigs as you like, making managing your systems a snap.

[p4u]

From your quote:

Note: All miners using the same BTC address must share the same custom difficulty. Failure to do so will cause erratic difficulty levels, and degraded performance.

From my quote (took from the FAQ):

Due to the technical requirements of allowing multiple miners to share a single username (BTC address), no VARDIFF is used. Difficulty is set to 256 for all workers at this time. Don't worry, that has zero effect on your profitability over the course of a day.

What I understand is that this p=d is disabled

Anyway, it is also a big problem to not being able to set up different difficulties for different stratum connections using the same BTC address.

[zneww]

From your quote:

Note: All miners using the same BTC address must share the same custom difficulty. Failure to do so will cause erratic difficulty levels, and degraded performance.

From my quote (took from the FAQ):

Due to the technical requirements of allowing multiple miners to share a single username (BTC address), no VARDIFF is used. Difficulty is set to 256 for all workers at this time. Don't worry, that has zero effect on your profitability over the course of a day.

What I understand is that this p=d is disabled

Anyway, it is also a big problem to not being able to set up different difficulties for different stratum connections using the same BTC address.

My information is more correct. P=d is not disabled. It says it does not use VARDIFF, not that p=d is disabled.

What is such a big problem?

[p4u]

Then it should be OK, I can set d=8192 for both, small and big rigs.
But it would be even nicer if it would be possible to specify different difficulties for different workers using the same BTC address as user name.

[fivejonnyfive]

Grumble Grumble. First day trying the pool.
.003 confirmed balance - no payout.

The minimum is indeed .001, no? Payed out at "about 11pm EST"?

Nope :-|

Actually the payout went fine, only a little late. Color me satisfied! Going to stick to this pool for a while.

[zneww]

Grumble Grumble. First day trying the pool.
.003 confirmed balance - no payout.

The minimum is indeed .001, no? Payed out at "about 11pm EST"?

Nope :-|

Actually the payout went fine, only a little late. Color me satisfied! Going to stick to this pool for a while.

hehe awesome, good to hear   payouts are somewhat manual so they dont have a super set time

[Jacky161]

I been mining for a few hours then stopped mining. I got around 1000 shares. The next day I checked my balance. Immature (estimate)   0 BTC
Unexchanged (estimate)   0 BTC
Combined Balance (estimate)     0 BTC
Total BTC Paid   0 BTC
Then I checked my wallet which had nothing in it. Did I really just waste about 5 hours of my life?
It says that payouts happen at 11pm Est. I checked the time for est right now. It is 9:41 am. That is way past 11pm est.

[wwzoon]

one advice:  "borderd" the box to put your address,now it is invisible

[zneww]

I been mining for a few hours then stopped mining. I got around 1000 shares. The next day I checked my balance. Immature (estimate)   0 BTC
Unexchanged (estimate)   0 BTC
Combined Balance (estimate)     0 BTC
Total BTC Paid   0 BTC
Then I checked my wallet which had nothing in it. Did I really just waste about 5 hours of my life?
It says that payouts happen at 11pm Est. I checked the time for est right now. It is 9:41 am. That is way past 11pm est.

You need to mine for more then a few hours. This isn't some get rich quick scheme.

[Jacky161]

I been mining for a few hours then stopped mining. I got around 1000 shares. The next day I checked my balance. Immature (estimate)   0 BTC
Unexchanged (estimate)   0 BTC
Combined Balance (estimate)     0 BTC
Total BTC Paid   0 BTC
Then I checked my wallet which had nothing in it. Did I really just waste about 5 hours of my life?
It says that payouts happen at 11pm Est. I checked the time for est right now. It is 9:41 am. That is way past 11pm est.

You need to mine for more then a few hours. This isn't some get rich quick scheme.

I thought I would get like 0.00000001 at least since I got some shares.

[Jacky161]

Does this only show the first zero for your balance?

[zneww]

Does this only show the first zero for your balance?

Im confused.

[hashpower]

Hi Guys,
Any idea why the graphs are not showing the BTC/MH/Day for the last 3 days?
how is it possible to contact the Admins?

thanks

[zneww]

Hi Guys,
Any idea why the graphs are not showing the BTC/MH/Day for the last 3 days?
how is it possible to contact the Admins?

thanks

Not sure.

email, or IRC \. IRC being the easiest.

[Jacky161]

Does this only show the first zero for your balance?

Im confused.

There is 9 zeros 0.00000000 does it only show the first zero? Think of it like the first zero is the doller and the other zeros are cents.

[fivejonnyfive]

I been mining for a few hours then stopped mining. I got around 1000 shares. The next day I checked my balance. Immature (estimate)   0 BTC
Unexchanged (estimate)   0 BTC
Combined Balance (estimate)     0 BTC
Total BTC Paid   0 BTC
Then I checked my wallet which had nothing in it. Did I really just waste about 5 hours of my life?
It says that payouts happen at 11pm Est. I checked the time for est right now. It is 9:41 am. That is way past 11pm est.

I mean, by my math with 1000 shares you'd have yielded 0.00000192 Btc. ($0.0013 at 700$btc)

So, by some regards, yes you did waste 5 hours :-D

But, yes the site should still show that result. Are you positive you specified the correct btc address in your miner? Does it show the shares on the website?
It sounds like you're mining with your CPU or graphics card - in which case I would recommend a X11 pool - OR the scrypt-n pool of coinsolver.

Wait, good point, are you on scrypt or scrypt-n? You have to choose scrypt-n on the top of the userstats page if that's what you were mining. I bet that's the issue. If it's not, then stop mining scrypt with your GPU and mine scrypt-n, you'll have much better profits. 

[zneww]

I been mining for a few hours then stopped mining. I got around 1000 shares. The next day I checked my balance. Immature (estimate)   0 BTC
Unexchanged (estimate)   0 BTC
Combined Balance (estimate)     0 BTC
Total BTC Paid   0 BTC
Then I checked my wallet which had nothing in it. Did I really just waste about 5 hours of my life?
It says that payouts happen at 11pm Est. I checked the time for est right now. It is 9:41 am. That is way past 11pm est.

I mean, by my math with 1000 shares you'd have yielded 0.00000192 Btc. ($0.0013 at 700$btc)

So, by some regards, yes you did waste 5 hours :-D

But, yes the site should still show that result. Are you positive you specified the correct btc address in your miner? Does it show the shares on the website?
It sounds like you're mining with your CPU or graphics card - in which case I would recommend a X11 pool - OR the scrypt-n pool of coinsolver.

Wait, good point, are you on scrypt or scrypt-n? You have to choose scrypt-n on the top of the userstats page if that's what you were mining. I bet that's the issue. If it's not, then stop mining scrypt with your GPU and mine scrypt-n, you'll have much better profits. 

Basically covered it all. Never had any problems with stats showing, as long as its correct on your end.

[Jacky161]

I been mining for a few hours then stopped mining. I got around 1000 shares. The next day I checked my balance. Immature (estimate)   0 BTC
Unexchanged (estimate)   0 BTC
Combined Balance (estimate)     0 BTC
Total BTC Paid   0 BTC
Then I checked my wallet which had nothing in it. Did I really just waste about 5 hours of my life?
It says that payouts happen at 11pm Est. I checked the time for est right now. It is 9:41 am. That is way past 11pm est.

I mean, by my math with 1000 shares you'd have yielded 0.00000192 Btc. ($0.0013 at 700$btc)

So, by some regards, yes you did waste 5 hours :-D

But, yes the site should still show that result. Are you positive you specified the correct btc address in your miner? Does it show the shares on the website?
It sounds like you're mining with your CPU or graphics card - in which case I would recommend a X11 pool - OR the scrypt-n pool of coinsolver.

Wait, good point, are you on scrypt or scrypt-n? You have to choose scrypt-n on the top of the userstats page if that's what you were mining. I bet that's the issue. If it's not, then stop mining scrypt with your GPU and mine scrypt-n, you'll have much better profits. 

I was mining scrypt and I was sure that I used the correct address to login because the shares showed up. I clicked scrypt 2 times and still it says 0 BTC. I checked scrypt-n and still nothing. I'm going to mine scrypt-n for a while and see what I get.

[emdje]

Hi Guys,
Any idea why the graphs are not showing the BTC/MH/Day for the last 3 days?
how is it possible to contact the Admins?

thanks

Would like to know as well.

[Crypto84]

I recently bought a GAW miners fury asic. It can do about 1.3 MH/s. every time I point it at coinsolver my rejected shares hit 25% to 30%. Other mining sites like clevermining.com I only get about 2%. The Fury is a Clone of the Zeusminer blizzard. Has 6 chips just like the blizzard. What difficulty level should I put it at? I’ve tried a few. None of them change the reject level much.

[gfuzz]

I recently bought a GAW miners fury asic. It can do about 1.3 MH/s. every time I point it at coinsolver my rejected shares hit 25% to 30%. Other mining sites like clevermining.com I only get about 2%. The Fury is a Clone of the Zeusminer blizzard. Has 6 chips just like the blizzard. What difficulty level should I put it at? I’ve tried a few. None of them change the reject level much.

I too can confirm - I have 4 Furys (Blizzards) pointed as CS, each running 1.33 MH/s and over 3 days my reject shares are between 24-26%..... I'm not sure the reject percentage is accurate on CS, or if its a function of the Furys.

I also average about 2% reject on CleverMining.... Again, this is just what the stats show, so I'm not really sure where the problems are coming from.... Its also worth pointing out that despite rejects @ 2% CM and 24% CS, I do seem to be generating about the same amount of BTC per Mh per Day on CoinSolver and Clevermining.

Edit: The % I mention above are poolside. zenminer AND minera (furys/blizzard and gridseeds) show different reject percentages. 

[zneww]

I recently bought a GAW miners fury asic. It can do about 1.3 MH/s. every time I point it at coinsolver my rejected shares hit 25% to 30%. Other mining sites like clevermining.com I only get about 2%. The Fury is a Clone of the Zeusminer blizzard. Has 6 chips just like the blizzard. What difficulty level should I put it at? I’ve tried a few. None of them change the reject level much.

I too can confirm - I have 4 Furys (Blizzards) pointed as CS, each running 1.33 MH/s and over 3 days my reject shares are between 24-26%..... I'm not sure the reject percentage is accurate on CS, or if its a function of the Furys.

I also average about 2% reject on CleverMining.... Again, this is just what the stats show, so I'm not really sure where the problems are coming from.... Its also worth pointing out that despite rejects @ 2% CM and 24% CS, I do seem to be generating about the same amount of BTC per Mh per Day on CoinSolver and Clevermining.

Edit: The % I mention above are poolside. zenminer AND minera (furys/blizzard and gridseeds) show different reject percentages. 

I recently bought a GAW miners fury asic. It can do about 1.3 MH/s. every time I point it at coinsolver my rejected shares hit 25% to 30%. Other mining sites like clevermining.com I only get about 2%. The Fury is a Clone of the Zeusminer blizzard. Has 6 chips just like the blizzard. What difficulty level should I put it at? I’ve tried a few. None of them change the reject level much.

Hey guys! I know we have some very knowledgeable people about ASIC in the IRC. So if you guys wanna hop on in, I am sure we can figure it out

[fivejonnyfive]

I recently bought a GAW miners fury asic. It can do about 1.3 MH/s. every time I point it at coinsolver my rejected shares hit 25% to 30%. Other mining sites like clevermining.com I only get about 2%. The Fury is a Clone of the Zeusminer blizzard. Has 6 chips just like the blizzard. What difficulty level should I put it at? I’ve tried a few. None of them change the reject level much.

I too can confirm - I have 4 Furys (Blizzards) pointed as CS, each running 1.33 MH/s and over 3 days my reject shares are between 24-26%..... I'm not sure the reject percentage is accurate on CS, or if its a function of the Furys.

I also average about 2% reject on CleverMining.... Again, this is just what the stats show, so I'm not really sure where the problems are coming from.... Its also worth pointing out that despite rejects @ 2% CM and 24% CS, I do seem to be generating about the same amount of BTC per Mh per Day on CoinSolver and Clevermining.

Edit: The % I mention above are poolside. zenminer AND minera (furys/blizzard and gridseeds) show different reject percentages. 

I recently bought a GAW miners fury asic. It can do about 1.3 MH/s. every time I point it at coinsolver my rejected shares hit 25% to 30%. Other mining sites like clevermining.com I only get about 2%. The Fury is a Clone of the Zeusminer blizzard. Has 6 chips just like the blizzard. What difficulty level should I put it at? I’ve tried a few. None of them change the reject level much.

Hey guys! I know we have some very knowledgeable people about ASIC in the IRC. So if you guys wanna hop on in, I am sure we can figure it out

I'd bet it has more to do with the mining software than the asic's themselves. GAWminers gear uses customized CGminer, no? I wonder if there's something about coinsolver that doesn't agree with CGminer perhaps? or vice versa, or maybe it's just that VERSION of cgminer.

[terciops]

quote - "I recently bought a GAW miners fury asic. It can do about 1.3 MH/s. every time I point it at coinsolver my rejected shares hit 25% to 30%. Other mining sites like clevermining.com I only get about 2%. The Fury is a Clone of the Zeusminer blizzard. Has 6 chips just like the blizzard. What difficulty level should I put it at? I’ve tried a few. None of them change the reject level much."

I am probably teaching 'Granny to suck eggs' here, but maybe not....

I have recently started playing around with some GridSeeds (3 cans and a Blade pair).  I run the Blades on one instance of BFGMINER4.1 and the Cans on another.  Reason is the Blades run best at 800 and the Cans at 838. I also have a GPU in the PC in the office that contributes a little.  I was getting terrible rejects, HW errors - you name it; everything was total cwap..

Then I read the documentation properly and put ALL the units onto the SAME difficulty.... (using d=xxx).  That sorted it all.  I am now down to a reasonable 3% if I leave things alone.

But here is the thing, on start / restart or if there is a connection break for whatever reason, then all goes to worms again for a short while.

As to what difficulty.  It is a bit of a compromise.  I have found that lower is better and that stops the stales and rejects nicely.  But too low overloads the internet connection rate and the miners starve.  When they starve I get HW errors.  Go figure.   Too high and you never get a result before the block changes.  My 3 GridSeed cans are running together and they do 900k to 1.0Mhz, while the Blades are 2.7Mhz each.  The blades would handle 512, but that is too much for the cans.  I have tried 128 for both but I run out of data.  The obvious compromise (and that is what it is), is 256 for my setup.  Works for me - and 256 will probably be you best bet too.

But remember you have to let it settle down.  If you have been shifting difficulties and restarting, there will be old (different difficulty) blocks in the buffers.  They have to flush out, and while they do you will get all the annoying "rejected share above target' nonsense and, if you are really 'lucky' you will get really weird messages that parse out to something like - 'I am fu^king confused'.  All good stuff, and totally vexing...

The secret is get it all at the same difficulty.  Restart everything from scratch and go take a long walk or go to bed.  Give it at least a couple of hours to settle and TAKE NOTES !! 

Oh and another thing ...

Get the 'expiry' and 'scan-time' down to 10 (well that seems to work best for me ATM, but I have some work to do on that).

Hope this helps

Ken

PS - Well done the Sysop(s) today - GREAT RESULT in a difficult market.... 

[Crypto84]

why doesn't coinsolver have a vardiff mechanism? other pools have them and they are awesome. i wish coinsolver had one. on other pools (with VARDIFF) i get less than 1% rejected shares. on Coinsolver it was 30% at one point.

[zneww]

why doesn't coinsolver have a vardiff mechanism? other pools have them and they are awesome. i wish coinsolver had one. on other pools (with VARDIFF) i get less than 1% rejected shares. on Coinsolver it was 30% at one point.

Creates a lot of stress. What other pools? You can set youre on difficulty. I never had more then .2% rejects.

[Crypto84]

What diff setting would you suggest for 3 furys (blizzards) connected to 1 zen controller?

edit: i set it to 1536 since i read that the 1 fury should be 512. my mining software is showing 0 rejected share of 683 accepted shares. but on the website user stats page its showing 6.1%. not sure which is correct lol.

edit2: finally got 2 rejected shares after it hit 689 accepted.
edit3: epic fail on the 1536. they all went sick and wouldn't restarted until i power cycled them

[terciops]

On coinsolver you can set your difficulty by using :

d=xxx

as the password, where xxx is the required diff.

Coinsolver has a fair crack at shifting shares around so you don't want the diff too high at all, otherwise you will get rejects.  I use 256 with my Gridseeds and it works well.  Perhaps I could go higher to say 512 on the blades, but you have to have ALL devices at the same diff or it becomes chaos...

t
 

[Crypto84]

I have my 5 furys set at 384. it goes good for a while then i get these errors  in the console. i also get stale shares too.

Jun 14 13:37:54 cgminer[2281]: Submitting share b74102b9 to pool 0
Jun 14 13:37:54 cgminer[2281]: JSON decode failed(1): '}' expected near '"result"'
Jun 14 13:37:54 cgminer[2281]: JSON decode failed(1): '}' expected near '"result"'
Jun 14 13:37:54 cgminer[2281]: Unknown stratum msg: {"error": null, "id": 1284 "result": true}
Jun 14 13:37:56 cgminer[2281]: Pool 0 stale share detected, submitting as user requested
Jun 14 13:37:56 cgminer[2281]: Submitting share 57c0bef8 to pool 0
Jun 14 13:37:56 cgminer[2281]: JSON decode failed(1): '}' expected near '"result"'
Jun 14 13:37:56 cgminer[2281]: JSON decode failed(1): '}' expected near '"result"'

[terciops]

Looks like an error in the JSON of your conf file.  Can you post the text of cgminer.conf as is at the moment.

[Pfool]

It is an error in the stratum response of coinsolver: {"error": null, "id": 1284 "result": true}. A comma is missing between the id and the result. Looks like a bug in the stratum implementation of coinsolver.

[Crypto84]

i cant use coinsolver for more that 12-14 hours. after that my miners all show "sick" status. i really want to use coinsolver but it just wont work with Zenminer/zencontroller or hashra controla. both are based off of CGMiner 3.1.1.

[Pfool]

You could try to use my stratum proxy between your miners and coinsolver: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=611338.0
(it is easy to use and it just needs java)

[CrashOverride]

i cant use coinsolver for more that 12-14 hours. after that my miners all show "sick" status. i really want to use coinsolver but it just wont work with Zenminer/zencontroller or hashra controla. both are based off of CGMiner 3.1.1.

As I have just started with CS after leaving CL I noticed they same, rejected shares around %21, stale shares and above target shares. Im running  six fury's with normal set up to USB hub to PC. I moved over to the test port 5555, so far okay but have only been mining it for about 1hr. Not sure what the fix would be for the fury's, would love to only get .2% -%5 rejection rate! LOL! Not sure if its the cgminer 3.1.1 since my config does not use the --scrypt in it. Or the pool can't handle the hashrate.   Not sure. Difficulty is set to 512 as per default for the pool, so maybe increasing that would help, what are you guys thoughts and recommendations?

 :)I'm happy with CS because of the transparency!


*UPDATE* So I let my miners run on the new port 5555, still high rejection rate, and now I see rejected worker temporarily banned..Miner SICK!!! OMG this is crazy! The constant shutting down and restarting is really killing me!

[Crypto84]

i cant use coinsolver for more that 12-14 hours. after that my miners all show "sick" status. i really want to use coinsolver but it just wont work with Zenminer/zencontroller or hashra controla. both are based off of CGMiner 3.1.1.

As I have just started with CS after leaving CL I noticed they same, rejected shares around %21, stale shares and above target shares. Im running  six fury's with normal set up to USB hub to PC. I moved over to the test port 5555, so far okay but have only been mining it for about 1hr. Not sure what the fix would be for the fury's, would love to only get .2% -%5 rejection rate! LOL! Not sure if its the cgminer 3.1.1 since my config does not use the --scrypt in it. Or the pool can't handle the hashrate.   Not sure. Difficulty is set to 512 as per default for the pool, so maybe increasing that would help, what are you guys thoughts and recommendations?

 :)I'm happy with CS because of the transparency!


*UPDATE* So I let my miners run on the new port 5555, still high rejection rate, and now I see rejected worker temporarily banned..Miner SICK!!! OMG this is crazy! The constant shutting down and restarting is really killing me!

I've been dealing with this on coinsolver as well. Ive tried everything i can think of. it just doesn't work. what mining software are you using?

[btcnike]

2.3 Mh/s should get what amount in bitcoins per day with scrypt-N mining?

Is it better than 4Mh/s of scrypt mining?

Thanks!

[Mick2K]

I made a few 12 hour test runs on multiple pools. So after 12 hours on your pool 5 days ago i still have immature balance. How is this possible?
Absolutely no coin needs 5 days to mature. Thanks!

btw my BTC adress: 13q7oxGF6qL2BUFWVnDT7n7nY5wn1hhiX2

[alainb33]

i also had very high rejections on coinsolver.
i resolved this with a diff of 256  (password set as d=256) . i used coinsolver.com:5555

and for 24 hours , i got only 11% rejection , i tested with 3 fury , and they all give me the same percentage.
it is a huge improvement  as i was having 25% two days ago with a diff of 512 , i also tried with vardiff without success

hope it helps

[zneww]

i also had very high rejections on coinsolver.
i resolved this with a diff of 256  (password set as d=256) . i used coinsolver.com:5555

and for 24 hours , i got only 11% rejection , i tested with 3 fury , and they all give me the same percentage.
it is a huge improvement  as i was having 25% two days ago with a diff of 512 , i also tried with vardiff without success

hope it helps

Great to hear

[zneww]

X11 pool is in the works! Anyone interested in trying it out?


**It is use at your own risk right now, x11 is beta**

[Crypto84]

so which ports should we be using? i have 5 GAW furys. someone on hashtrader.com told me to try port 4444 because its more compatible with the GAW miners. then i come here and see port 5555? confused.

Edit: im using the latest version of CGminer 4.3.5. compiled it last night.

[fivejonnyfive]

so which ports should we be using? i have 5 GAW furys. someone on hashtrader.com told me to try port 4444 because its more compatible with the GAW miners. then i come here and see port 5555? confused.

Edit: im using the latest version of CGminer 4.3.5. compiled it last night.

As far as I know: Use 3333, if you have connection issues use 4444, and on either of them if your reject rate is quite high try 5555.

[Crypto84]

well port 4444 is working awesome. my rig hasn't dipped below 7mh/s for the 2 hours ive been on it so far. its much more stable. before it was very erratic and would dip down to 5mh/s.

[zneww]

well port 4444 is working awesome. my rig hasn't dipped below 7mh/s for the 2 hours ive been on it so far. its much more stable. before it was very erratic and would dip down to 5mh/s.

Great, good to hear

[RockDaddy]

Just FYI to anyone running GAW ASICS.  I am new as of a day or so ago and just read the last few posts here.

I am using a cgminer 3.7.2 with Gridseeds support for my 4 g-blades and 10 seeds and then I am using the most current cgminer 4.3.5 with Zeus support for 8 Fury's and 2 Black Widows.  Connected to the normal port 3333 I believe and I am not having any real issues. These are on Raspberry Pi's. I assume the newest cgminer for the GAW devices is working well now when it was not before for this pool.  All 4 different miner types are using the same BTC address and have the same diff set as required.

Current HashRate   62.86 Gh
Today's Accepted Shares   40087552
Today's Rejected Shares   329728 (0.8%)

[Panteraswift]

Anyone mining on the the ScryptN pool? No payments for nearly 48 Hrs and the graph looks flat. Do any of you have the same issues?

[ahsbqt]

Hi, i am on scrypt-n, i've got my payment at 12:26am, contact Vt on irc, he would help. cya pal

Luthor

[Mick2K]

Can you please payout my balance?

I testet your pool for 12 hours a few weeks ago an till then i try here and there to reach minimum payout threshold with a few hours of mining every other day.
But every time my few thousand shares get lost and my balance does'nt grow bigger.

So please payout my 0.0008 BTC (i know it is not much but it is not about the amount but about principles)

My adress is "13q7oxGF6qL2BUFWVnDT7n7nY5wn1hhiX2"

[Winds666]

I have been mining on this pool for a while now, but recently switched to the X11 pool because of diminishing profits. X11 seemed to be a lot more profitable, based on the estimated btc/day. But now that I have been mining for a week or so, it seems like the estimated btc/day is off by quite a lot? It's telling me I should be getting about 0.0014 a day per MH, but I am putting in more than twice the amount of MH's (this is reported correctly on the site too) and I am not getting 0.0014 a day by a long shot. In fact based on my last payout, the amount of MHs and the time it took to gather it, my calculations show I'm actually getting only 0,0001485790625 BTC/day, which is TEN TIMES lower than the estimated value.  I've got no HW errors and a very reasonable reject rate. What's going on? Is the estimated btc/day counter just off, or is something wrong with my system? I haven't mined x11 before so I can't really compare to anything.

For reference, my account is 1FHxvCF2DrcyMYns6DZpPm3vAMw8G74XYg