[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[williamj2543]

Sure vardiff matters, the guy just doesn't understand.

Vardiff does not matter for profits. It helps lower short term variance on stats and smooths out results for lower power rigs. That is why it exists. Again, profits are not effected by it.
[/quote]
And do you honestly care about stats? I rarely check the website. I just leave my computer on and let my 0.01 bitcoin payouts roll in multiple times a day. I would rather have Terk working on actual useful things like new servers, instead of making stats 2% more accurate.

[Dishes]

Vardiff does not matter for profits. It helps lower short term variance on stats and smooths out results for lower power rigs. That is why it exists. Again, profits are not effected by it.

And do you honestly care about stats? I rarely check the website. I just leave my computer on and let my 0.01 bitcoin payouts roll in multiple times a day. I would rather have Terk working on actual useful things like new servers, instead of making stats 2% more accurate.

Exactly.

[klondike_bar]

my GPU rig cannot seem to handle a set difficulty of 512. on other pools at 128 or 256 it runs fine on all 4 cards, but at 512 GPU 2 is declared sick in less than 30 seconds

any ideas? its a sapphire R9 270x

[lastblade]

Is normal the first payment takes longer ?
I have more than 0.02 btc and nothing...

http://www.clevermining.com/users/14DuKiay4rGiYSqjkRdMtWtu7oaRpiipkc#

[Dishes]

my GPU rig cannot seem to handle a set difficulty of 512. on other pools at 128 or 256 it runs fine on all 4 cards, but at 512 GPU 2 is declared sick in less than 30 seconds

any ideas? its a sapphire R9 270x

That is odd. Hard to say without more information about your setup. If only GPU 2 is failing, it sounds like a thermal problem. Try jacking your fan up to 100 as a test. Of course it could be a myriad of other issues: not enough power, drivers, even monitor setup or could just be a bad card. Pure assumptions here.

[yrj]

I just checked 30 days stats and realized, that there're some unexchanged bitcoins from, for example, 2nd of February. It was a long time ago. Does it mean that miners would never get those money?

[yslyung]

Same for me. I'm waiting for EU. There is already eu.clevermining.com (nl.clevermining.com) responding for ping, but it's probably not ready to use.

Yay! Finally 60ms and not 250+

asia server in singapore

Pinging sg.clevermining.com [128.199.227.18] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 128.199.227.18: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=49
Reply from 128.199.227.18: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=49
Reply from 128.199.227.18: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=49
Reply from 128.199.227.18: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 128.199.227.18:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 130ms, Maximum = 135ms, Average = 133ms

what happened ?

Pinging us.clevermining.com [54.200.13.55] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 54.200.13.55:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),

are the servers up yet terk ? as far as i could remember, ping for me to usa server & sg server is almost same. seems like usa server is slightly better.

[tengattack]

Same for me. I'm waiting for EU. There is already eu.clevermining.com (nl.clevermining.com) responding for ping, but it's probably not ready to use.

Yay! Finally 60ms and not 250+

asia server in singapore

Pinging sg.clevermining.com [128.199.227.18] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 128.199.227.18: bytes=32 time=133ms TTL=49
Reply from 128.199.227.18: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=49
Reply from 128.199.227.18: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=49
Reply from 128.199.227.18: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 128.199.227.18:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 130ms, Maximum = 135ms, Average = 133ms

what happened ?

Pinging us.clevermining.com [54.200.13.55] with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.

Ping statistics for 54.200.13.55:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),

are the servers up yet terk ? as far as i could remember, ping for me to usa server & sg server is almost same. seems like usa server is slightly better.

110ms to sg.clevermining.com
nice!!

[klondike_bar]

my GPU rig cannot seem to handle a set difficulty of 512. on other pools at 128 or 256 it runs fine on all 4 cards, but at 512 GPU 2 is declared sick in less than 30 seconds

any ideas? its a sapphire R9 270x

That is odd. Hard to say without more information about your setup. If only GPU 2 is failing, it sounds like a thermal problem. Try jacking your fan up to 100 as a test. Of course it could be a myriad of other issues: not enough power, drivers, even monitor setup or could just be a bad card. Pure assumptions here.

turns out a reboot did the trick for whatever reason. I had a similar issue before on another card where i was seeing only about 60-80% of the expected hashrate

however, some of these low-difficulty coins are wrecking havoc on my reject rate - 7-12% for the last little while, mostly whenever it switches to coins with network difficulty <50

[MegaKill]

sg server!? SWEET! is it up?? can I point and use it yet?? 

[dency45]

what does 'rejected untracked stratum share from pool 0' mean? all my reject is showing this message.

[sjasbury]

Looks like an EU server is coming online

C:\Users\Alienware Laptop>ping eu.clevermining.com

Pinging nl.clevermining.com [188.226.191.238] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=49
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=31ms TTL=49
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=49
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=49

Ping statistics for 188.226.191.238:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 30ms, Maximum = 35ms, Average = 31ms

[Monty-Python]

Looks like an EU server is coming online

No official announcement yet. 26ms ping on my side is great though.

[CoinBuzz]

I am getting PING TIMEOUT from eu server:

Pinging nl.clevermining.com [188.226.191.238] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=45
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=45

why?

[igoork]

It is not official yet, wait to be announced then comment.

[Kalroth]

I am getting PING TIMEOUT from eu server:

Pinging nl.clevermining.com [188.226.191.238] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=45
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=45

why?

Likely because your ISP is sending your packets through a shoddy route.
I get a 27ms ping and without any time outs.

You can try monitoring the route with something like WinMTR: http://winmtr.net/

[nowaltcoin]

I am getting PING TIMEOUT from eu server:

Pinging nl.clevermining.com [188.226.191.238] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=45
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=45

why?

Your TTL=45
from my side the TTL=57  so you are passing a lot of more routers...

TTL-(Time to live) is a counter so that packets will not live forever if TTL=0 packet will be discarded

Normaly every router your packet pass thru will decrease the TTL-Value by one (sometimes by two)

stay tuned

in windows try

tracert nl.clevermining.com

[CoinBuzz]

I am getting PING TIMEOUT from eu server:

Pinging nl.clevermining.com [188.226.191.238] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=45
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=45

why?

Your TTL=45
from my side the TTL=57  so you are passing a lot of more routers...

TTL-(Time to live) is a counter so that packets will not live forever if TTL=0 packet will be discarded

Normaly every router your packet pass thru will decrease the TTL-Value by one (sometimes by two)

stay tuned

in windows try

tracert nl.clevermining.com

can i increase TTL ?

[nowaltcoin]

I am getting PING TIMEOUT from eu server:

Pinging nl.clevermining.com [188.226.191.238] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=177ms TTL=45
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Reply from 188.226.191.238: bytes=32 time=170ms TTL=45

why?

Your TTL=45
from my side the TTL=57  so you are passing a lot of more routers...

TTL-(Time to live) is a counter so that packets will not live forever if TTL=0 packet will be discarded

Normaly every router your packet pass thru will decrease the TTL-Value by one (sometimes by two)

stay tuned

in windows try

tracert nl.clevermining.com

can i increase TTL ?

There is no need to increase TTL !

It's just a hint how many hops it takes you from your start address to your target address
In your local network you can see how you start just ping your router the TTL should be 64
so in your case it takes you 19 hops to the target. (TTL at the end 45)
Even if you would increase your starting TTL to 128 you will end up with 19 hops at the target  

stay tuned

http://www.binbert.com/blog/2009/12/default-time-to-live-ttl-values/

[tengattack]

oops, profit go down
what's wrong?