nowaltcoin
|
|
March 11, 2014, 07:53:50 PM |
|
or would comma seperated values work? gonna test it out ...
-d 0,1,2,3 -O username-btc0:pass-x0,username-btc1:pass-x1,username-btc2:pass-x3,username-ltc3:pass-x3
--scrypt -d 0,1,2,3 -o stratum+tcp://ny.clevermining.com:3333,stratum+tcp://useast.wafflepool.com:3333,stratum+tcp://useast.middlecoin.com:3333,stratum+tcp://united.wemineltc.com:3334 -O username-btc:pass-x --gpu-platform 0 --worksize 256 --vectors 1 --intensity 20 --gpu-threads 1 --log 3 --thread-concurrency 33792 --lookup-gap 2 --api-port 4028 --expiry 120 --queue 1 --scan-time 60 --auto-fan --temp-target 95 --gpu-powertune 50 --gpu-memclock 1500 --gpu-engine 1000 --failover-only -o stratum+tcp://us.clevermining.com:3333,stratum+tcp://uswest.wafflepool.com:3333,stratum+tcp://uswest.middlecoin.com:3333,stratum+tcp://usa.wemineltc.com:3336 -O username-btc0:pass-x0,username-btc1:pass-x1,username-btc2:pass-x3,username-ltc3:pass-x3
thanks!
That will probably not do what you want. I'm not familiar with cgwatcher, but you I think you also will have to run one cgwatcher for each cgminer. (And then use different api ports) Before you start digging yourself into big and difficult configs, you haven't considering setting up simple load balancing rather than dedicating devices to pools? This will give 2/4 of the work to pool1, 1/4 to pool2 and 1/4 to pool3 (skip --url/-o and --failover-only) -U "2;pool1:port" -u user1 -p pass -U "1;pool2:port" -u user2 -p pass -U "1;pool3:port" -u user3 -p pass ... thanks Burnie! will try out load balancing Try it this way: ---------------------------------------------- { "pools" : [ { "quota" : "25;stratum+tcp://us.clevermining.com:3333", "user" : "your_BTC_address", "pass" : "x" }, { "quota" : "25;stratum+tcp://eu.clevermining.com:3333", "user" : "your_BTC_address", "pass" : "x" }, { "quota" : "25;stratum+tcp://ny.clevermining.com:3333", "user" : "your_BTC_address", "pass" : "x" }, { "quota" : "25;stratum+tcp://asia.clevermining.com:3333", "user" : "your_BTC_address", "pass" : "x" }, { "quota" : "0;stratum+tcp://asia.middlecoin.com:3333", "user" : "your_BTC_address", "pass" : "x" } ] "load-balance" : true, "failover-only" : true, ----------------------------------------------------------- This will split your power to all 4 pools (here all clevermining server) 25%/25%/25%/25% The last pool will be the failover if all of the above pools are dead. stay tuned
|
8 * Blackarrow Prospero at Low-Voltage mining @ ckpool.org 12 * GPU's mining ETN/Sumocoin You like to mine something different: https://deutsche-emark.de/
|
|
|
|
Jynger
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
March 11, 2014, 08:17:24 PM |
|
WU is low and you are not submitting stales. so left is only 2.7MH effective hash.
|
|
|
|
Starving_Marvin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 511
Merit: 250
Open and Transparent Science Powered By Blockchain
|
|
March 11, 2014, 08:22:51 PM |
|
WU is low and you are not submitting stales. so left is only 2.7MH effective hash.
Why would one submit stales?
|
|
|
|
Echoenigma
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
March 11, 2014, 08:24:46 PM |
|
WU is low and you are not submitting stales. so left is only 2.7MH effective hash.
Why would one submit stales? Stales can still be accepted. Sometimes they're not, but submitting them at least gives you a chance to pump your accepted hash rate. It would help if you posted your BTC address. The information is public anyways. It'll provide anyone investigating with full information to help.
|
|
|
|
Jynger
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
March 11, 2014, 08:27:07 PM |
|
because on most autoswitch multicoin pools some shares at the moment of coin switch are falsely identified as stale by your mining software. If you do not submit it it will be lost hash.
|
|
|
|
nowaltcoin
|
|
March 11, 2014, 08:30:41 PM Last edit: March 11, 2014, 08:48:14 PM by nowaltcoin |
|
Your miner is running 28 min. so your WU-Rate is not stable enough. Your WU: is 3.6 MH/s that is what the pool should show the next time. Your GPU's have no rejects but at the top there are 10% Rejects (which are no real rejects/stratum issue) SS:66 ----> seems to be that your miner decide which share is stale (thats bad) let the server decide it! You are mining in a switching pool !! "no-submit-stale" : true, in the sgminer.conf ? Just have a look that your WU:-Rate gets up to 90-95% of your hashrate! This takes some hours to be stable. Then just try Intensity 18 (it could be that this will give you a better WU-to-hash-ratio) and save some power. Keep in Mind not your hashrate is paid it is your WU-Rate (and this is what the server will show) The server could not know about your hashrate because it counts only the amount of share that are submitted every time slice. So the hashrate shown at the server ist not accurate at any given time....you have to look the last 60 minutes.
|
8 * Blackarrow Prospero at Low-Voltage mining @ ckpool.org 12 * GPU's mining ETN/Sumocoin You like to mine something different: https://deutsche-emark.de/
|
|
|
tomashas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
March 11, 2014, 08:50:49 PM |
|
Wow, thanks for the replies guys, wasn't expecting an answer so quick My stats are here: http://www.clevermining.com/users/16GYFXDxHRnZqWCMLBctA53Vj9pueCquvMIt's been running a little longer now: http://dump.chiko.nl/g/05f94d.pngOne of the reasons I'm asking about this is because I'm using BAMT and have seen some posts about BAMT or SMOS, or similar, have contained scripts to mine for their own profits somehow. Luckily I don't need to worry about power usage, the only thing I need to worry about is how to get my sixth GPU to work, it doesn't show up in dmesg, but that's an entirely different story. Edit: SS:66 ----> seems to be that your miner decide which share is stale (thats bad) let the server decide it! You are mining in a switching pool !! "no-submit-stale" : true, in the sgminer.conf ?
Oops, that was indeed in my config, I kicked it out.
|
|
|
|
Kifissia
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
March 11, 2014, 08:59:43 PM |
|
So which is correct? 1 or 2? My cards mine at around 3.7 to 3.8MH/s but the site says I am below 3.5 and 3MH/s for the last hour.
|
|
|
|
Echoenigma
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 54
Merit: 0
|
|
March 11, 2014, 09:03:31 PM |
|
So which is correct? 1 or 2? My cards mine at around 3.7 to 3.8MH/s but the site says I am below 3.5 and 3MH/s for the last hour. https://i.imgur.com/1A5iOzh.jpg1 and 2 are different measurements though 1 is hour average 2 is last 10 minutes.
|
|
|
|
Kifissia
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
March 11, 2014, 09:05:51 PM |
|
Thats my average for the last 2 hours. The bottom is the last one hour, sure. But Everything is bellow 3.5KH/s (around 3.2) and now its below 3.
The graph #2 is my real hashrate that is accepted by the server?
|
|
|
|
rammy2k2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 11, 2014, 09:07:19 PM |
|
you should lower pool diff , scryptguild has from 32 to 256 , clever has only 512 ....
I agree. Before, it was vardiff, 16 to 1024, but for "technical issues" it was disabled. I think its about time you switched it back on. yea, please go back
|
|
|
|
nowaltcoin
|
|
March 11, 2014, 09:19:42 PM |
|
Wow, thanks for the replies guys, wasn't expecting an answer so quick My stats are here: http://www.clevermining.com/users/16GYFXDxHRnZqWCMLBctA53Vj9pueCquvMIt's been running a little longer now: http://dump.chiko.nl/g/05f94d.pngOne of the reasons I'm asking about this is because I'm using BAMT and have seen some posts about BAMT or SMOS, or similar, have contained scripts to mine for their own profits somehow. Luckily I don't need to worry about power usage, the only thing I need to worry about is how to get my sixth GPU to work, it doesn't show up in dmesg, but that's an entirely different story. Edit: SS:66 ----> seems to be that your miner decide which share is stale (thats bad) let the server decide it! You are mining in a switching pool !! "no-submit-stale" : true, in the sgminer.conf ?
Oops, that was indeed in my config, I kicked it out. Did you try gpu-thread: 2 and xintensity with your hw-configuration and one of the experimental kernels in sgminer ? You can reach over 90% of your hashrate for WU: I have got 1.18MH/s and 1100WU 1.40MH/s and 1297WU
|
8 * Blackarrow Prospero at Low-Voltage mining @ ckpool.org 12 * GPU's mining ETN/Sumocoin You like to mine something different: https://deutsche-emark.de/
|
|
|
nowaltcoin
|
|
March 11, 2014, 09:24:08 PM |
|
Thats my average for the last 2 hours. The bottom is the last one hour, sure. But Everything is bellow 3.5KH/s (around 3.2) and now its below 3.
The graph #2 is my real hashrate that is accepted by the server?
Your hashrate is 3.7-3.8MH/s ? but what is your WU-Rate ?? ------------------schnipp-------------- Keep in Mind not your hashrate is paid it is your WU-Rate (and this is what the server will show) The server could not know about your hashrate because it counts only the amount of share that are submitted every time slice. So the hashrate shown at the server ist not accurate at any given time....you have to look the last 60 minutes. -------------------------schnapp----------------
|
8 * Blackarrow Prospero at Low-Voltage mining @ ckpool.org 12 * GPU's mining ETN/Sumocoin You like to mine something different: https://deutsche-emark.de/
|
|
|
Kifissia
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
March 11, 2014, 09:26:43 PM |
|
Worker #1: 97% Worker #2: 90% Worker #3: 89% Worker #4: 91%
So I guess my WUs are fine. Must be something else..
|
|
|
|
nowaltcoin
|
|
March 11, 2014, 09:37:48 PM |
|
Worker #1: 97% Worker #2: 90% Worker #3: 89% Worker #4: 91%
So I guess my WUs are fine. Must be something else..
if you post a link to your statistic we will see
|
8 * Blackarrow Prospero at Low-Voltage mining @ ckpool.org 12 * GPU's mining ETN/Sumocoin You like to mine something different: https://deutsche-emark.de/
|
|
|
pengoau
|
|
March 11, 2014, 09:46:49 PM |
|
Just because they had minimal effect in your particular setup doesn't mean they won't work for someone else, especially when the server is not setting your q, e, s for you.
It would be good if Terk could confirm if these settings matter, so we can put this issue to rest finally.
|
|
|
|
|
ozzy1926
|
|
March 11, 2014, 10:16:21 PM |
|
Worker #1: 97% Worker #2: 90% Worker #3: 89% Worker #4: 91%
So I guess my WUs are fine. Must be something else..
if you post a link to your statistic we will see i can only see WU numbers with sgminer but where can i see my WU %?
|
|
|
|
Kifissia
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
March 11, 2014, 10:30:36 PM |
|
i can only see WU numbers with sgminer but where can i see my WU %?
I am using cgminer 3.7.2 kalroth (dont know if sgminer has this as well)
|
|
|
|
|