Bitcoin Forum
July 01, 2024, 08:37:47 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 »
  Print  
Author Topic: The Cypherfunks[FUNK]: a coin for a global band! Talking v2. Join! 80+ songs  (Read 148689 times)
doofer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 06:35:25 AM
 #1641

Well, it broke loose for a bit, and now the diff is way up Tongue Not so bad as before.

I'd highly suggest that all FUNK holders go into your debug console and type

setgenerate true (number of cores)

I usually put mine at 2 so I can still run other things. The number, for those who don't know, is the number of cpu threads to start mining. The network hashrate is not huge, if everybody is mining it should level things out a bit.

And according to their latest tweet, Cryptopia is trying to get their shit wired too.
LoveandPeace2018
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 09:12:02 AM
 #1642

I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Hello HashUnlimited, I suggest you continue with this project, Better we get a fork of this project. This project is currently in the wrong hands. Soundposition has just been deceiving people all these while. Little spike in price was not because of development. It happens to all crypto.. I cant believe a project like this is not gaining traction when even the shittest of coin are gaining momentum presently.

Sound position have been posting about working on new website since more than 5 Months ago. If website takes a whole year to build, then working on the Coin itself will take a decade.

I joined this project because of the interesting update I got which am sure brought a lot of people too. You should not take us for granted.

Dear HashUnlimited, Please Let's fork this project and they should continue with whatever they want with this old shit.. I am so sure so many people will support you like I  did.
DataAnalyst
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 117
Merit: 2


View Profile
January 06, 2018, 10:46:47 AM
 #1643

I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Hello HashUnlimited, I suggest you continue with this project, Better we get a fork of this project. This project is currently in the wrong hands. Soundposition has just been deceiving people all these while. Little spike in price was not because of development. It happens to all crypto.. I cant believe a project like this is not gaining traction when even the shittest of coin are gaining momentum presently.

Sound position have been posting about working on new website since more than 5 Months ago. If website takes a whole year to build, then working on the Coin itself will take a decade.

I joined this project because of the interesting update I got which am sure brought a lot of people too. You should not take us for granted.

Dear HashUnlimited, Please Let's fork this project and they should continue with whatever they want with this old shit.. I am so sure so many people will support you like I  did.

Yup, 'little' spike in price of 15x in a month happens to all crypto, especially to those with no ongoing development, and those with no future.

No.
cryptoctrader
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 07, 2018, 12:57:33 PM
 #1644

I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Hello HashUnlimited, I suggest you continue with this project, Better we get a fork of this project. This project is currently in the wrong hands. Soundposition has just been deceiving people all these while. Little spike in price was not because of development. It happens to all crypto.. I cant believe a project like this is not gaining traction when even the shittest of coin are gaining momentum presently.

Sound position have been posting about working on new website since more than 5 Months ago. If website takes a whole year to build, then working on the Coin itself will take a decade.

I joined this project because of the interesting update I got which am sure brought a lot of people too. You should not take us for granted.

Dear HashUnlimited, Please Let's fork this project and they should continue with whatever they want with this old shit.. I am so sure so many people will support you like I  did.

Yup, 'little' spike in price of 15x in a month happens to all crypto, especially to those with no ongoing development, and those with no future.

No.

Many of the unpopular coins have showed such spike!!! And seems like many more will do, just watch!!!!
HashUnlimited
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 110
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 07, 2018, 02:45:51 PM
 #1645

I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Hello HashUnlimited, I suggest you continue with this project, Better we get a fork of this project. This project is currently in the wrong hands. Soundposition has just been deceiving people all these while. Little spike in price was not because of development. It happens to all crypto.. I cant believe a project like this is not gaining traction when even the shittest of coin are gaining momentum presently.

Sound position have been posting about working on new website since more than 5 Months ago. If website takes a whole year to build, then working on the Coin itself will take a decade.

I joined this project because of the interesting update I got which am sure brought a lot of people too. You should not take us for granted.

Dear HashUnlimited, Please Let's fork this project and they should continue with whatever they want with this old shit.. I am so sure so many people will support you like I  did.

Yup, 'little' spike in price of 15x in a month happens to all crypto, especially to those with no ongoing development, and those with no future.

No.

Many of the unpopular coins have showed such spike!!! And seems like many more will do, just watch!!!!

Well, the code itself if I remember right is plain bitcoin protocol without any fancy stuff inside, the only issue is that KGW which is basically acting like a handbrake. The code itself can be done in a week or less.
soundposition
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 260



View Profile WWW
January 07, 2018, 03:07:10 PM
 #1646

I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Hello HashUnlimited, I suggest you continue with this project, Better we get a fork of this project. This project is currently in the wrong hands. Soundposition has just been deceiving people all these while. Little spike in price was not because of development. It happens to all crypto.. I cant believe a project like this is not gaining traction when even the shittest of coin are gaining momentum presently.

Sound position have been posting about working on new website since more than 5 Months ago. If website takes a whole year to build, then working on the Coin itself will take a decade.

I joined this project because of the interesting update I got which am sure brought a lot of people too. You should not take us for granted.

Dear HashUnlimited, Please Let's fork this project and they should continue with whatever they want with this old shit.. I am so sure so many people will support you like I  did.

Yup, 'little' spike in price of 15x in a month happens to all crypto, especially to those with no ongoing development, and those with no future.

No.

Many of the unpopular coins have showed such spike!!! And seems like many more will do, just watch!!!!

Well, the code itself if I remember right is plain bitcoin protocol without any fancy stuff inside, the only issue is that KGW which is basically acting like a handbrake. The code itself can be done in a week or less.


Please don't tamper with the code. We are working hard on launching the new token.

I'm an Operational Support Manager representative of GameCredits
  GameCredits Facebook   GameCredits Twitter   GameCredits G+
HashUnlimited
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 110
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 07, 2018, 03:35:26 PM
 #1647

I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Hello HashUnlimited, I suggest you continue with this project, Better we get a fork of this project. This project is currently in the wrong hands. Soundposition has just been deceiving people all these while. Little spike in price was not because of development. It happens to all crypto.. I cant believe a project like this is not gaining traction when even the shittest of coin are gaining momentum presently.

Sound position have been posting about working on new website since more than 5 Months ago. If website takes a whole year to build, then working on the Coin itself will take a decade.

I joined this project because of the interesting update I got which am sure brought a lot of people too. You should not take us for granted.

Dear HashUnlimited, Please Let's fork this project and they should continue with whatever they want with this old shit.. I am so sure so many people will support you like I  did.

Yup, 'little' spike in price of 15x in a month happens to all crypto, especially to those with no ongoing development, and those with no future.

No.

Many of the unpopular coins have showed such spike!!! And seems like many more will do, just watch!!!!

Well, the code itself if I remember right is plain bitcoin protocol without any fancy stuff inside, the only issue is that KGW which is basically acting like a handbrake. The code itself can be done in a week or less.


Please don't tamper with the code. We are working hard on launching the new token.

Who cares? If a large part of the community would like to see the chain continue, why not. For the ticker change you need to pay anyways.
MarcoBischero
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 07, 2018, 03:37:56 PM
 #1648

follows
"sounds" interesting Cheesy
soundposition
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 260



View Profile WWW
January 07, 2018, 03:45:42 PM
 #1649

I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Hello HashUnlimited, I suggest you continue with this project, Better we get a fork of this project. This project is currently in the wrong hands. Soundposition has just been deceiving people all these while. Little spike in price was not because of development. It happens to all crypto.. I cant believe a project like this is not gaining traction when even the shittest of coin are gaining momentum presently.

Sound position have been posting about working on new website since more than 5 Months ago. If website takes a whole year to build, then working on the Coin itself will take a decade.

I joined this project because of the interesting update I got which am sure brought a lot of people too. You should not take us for granted.

Dear HashUnlimited, Please Let's fork this project and they should continue with whatever they want with this old shit.. I am so sure so many people will support you like I  did.

Yup, 'little' spike in price of 15x in a month happens to all crypto, especially to those with no ongoing development, and those with no future.

No.

Many of the unpopular coins have showed such spike!!! And seems like many more will do, just watch!!!!

Well, the code itself if I remember right is plain bitcoin protocol without any fancy stuff inside, the only issue is that KGW which is basically acting like a handbrake. The code itself can be done in a week or less.


Please don't tamper with the code. We are working hard on launching the new token.

Who cares? If a large part of the community would like to see the chain continue, why not. For the ticker change you need to pay anyways.

The team that is working on this project care a lot. The chain has continued for almost 4 years now without any tampering. We are investing a lot of time and resources into this project, and have a lot of passion and talent driving this project forward. We are paying the costs for development, marketing and spending a great deal of time on this.

I'm an Operational Support Manager representative of GameCredits
  GameCredits Facebook   GameCredits Twitter   GameCredits G+
N-DEE
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 47
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 07, 2018, 05:01:11 PM
 #1650

Hi Soundposition,

please provide some updates / information!

THX
Andy
HashUnlimited
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 110
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 07, 2018, 05:35:27 PM
 #1651

I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Hello HashUnlimited, I suggest you continue with this project, Better we get a fork of this project. This project is currently in the wrong hands. Soundposition has just been deceiving people all these while. Little spike in price was not because of development. It happens to all crypto.. I cant believe a project like this is not gaining traction when even the shittest of coin are gaining momentum presently.

Sound position have been posting about working on new website since more than 5 Months ago. If website takes a whole year to build, then working on the Coin itself will take a decade.

I joined this project because of the interesting update I got which am sure brought a lot of people too. You should not take us for granted.

Dear HashUnlimited, Please Let's fork this project and they should continue with whatever they want with this old shit.. I am so sure so many people will support you like I  did.

Yup, 'little' spike in price of 15x in a month happens to all crypto, especially to those with no ongoing development, and those with no future.

No.

Many of the unpopular coins have showed such spike!!! And seems like many more will do, just watch!!!!

Well, the code itself if I remember right is plain bitcoin protocol without any fancy stuff inside, the only issue is that KGW which is basically acting like a handbrake. The code itself can be done in a week or less.


Please don't tamper with the code. We are working hard on launching the new token.

Who cares? If a large part of the community would like to see the chain continue, why not. For the ticker change you need to pay anyways.

The team that is working on this project care a lot. The chain has continued for almost 4 years now without any tampering. We are investing a lot of time and resources into this project, and have a lot of passion and talent driving this project forward. We are paying the costs for development, marketing and spending a great deal of time on this.

I don't get it, once you are working on a new token, next time you care about the then obsolete chain. What now? New Token or old Chain?
soundposition
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 260



View Profile WWW
January 07, 2018, 05:43:26 PM
 #1652

Hi Soundposition,

please provide some updates / information!

THX
Andy

Yes, of course. The website is almost finished. It looks fantastic. Our very passionate web developer is doing a great job on it. I had hoped to launch the site before the end of 2017. The holidays slowed everything down a little bit, but now things are picking up pace again.

We have setup the domain name, twitter account, discord, reddit, FB etc.. We have recruited an excellent internet marketing analyst, and also a community manager. We have a developer consultant who helps guide our technical development. We also have a developer for the token. All of them are also working for GameCredits, so for them this is a side project they are interested in being involved in.

We have begun weekly team meetings, scheduled this time with a terrific developer next Saturday, and he's stoked to work on the token.

Finally... Cryptopia appears to be taking the necessary actions to restore the markets. There's nothing we can do about that at the moment as we are all simply waiting for the servers to upgrade.

There are lots of exciting developments to look forward to in 2018!!

P.S. Mike the new token is going to be gained by exchanging FUNK. 500 FUNK will equal 1 new token. There will be a supply reduction this way. We definitely care about the old chain, because people will have to exchange FUNK to obtain the new token.

I suggest reading the white paper on the website once launched. It will explain in much more detail.

I'm an Operational Support Manager representative of GameCredits
  GameCredits Facebook   GameCredits Twitter   GameCredits G+
LoveandPeace2018
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 07, 2018, 08:22:56 PM
 #1653

Hi Soundposition,

please provide some updates / information!

THX
Andy

Yes, of course. The website is almost finished. It looks fantastic. Our very passionate web developer is doing a great job on it. I had hoped to launch the site before the end of 2017. The holidays slowed everything down a little bit, but now things are picking up pace again.

We have setup the domain name, twitter account, discord, reddit, FB etc.. We have recruited an excellent internet marketing analyst, and also a community manager. We have a developer consultant who helps guide our technical development. We also have a developer for the token. All of them are also working for GameCredits, so for them this is a side project they are interested in being involved in.

We have begun weekly team meetings, scheduled this time with a terrific developer next Saturday, and he's stoked to work on the token.

Finally... Cryptopia appears to be taking the necessary actions to restore the markets. There's nothing we can do about that at the moment as we are all simply waiting for the servers to upgrade.

There are lots of exciting developments to look forward to in 2018!!

P.S. Mike the new token is going to be gained by exchanging FUNK. 500 FUNK will equal 1 new token. There will be a supply reduction this way. We definitely care about the old chain, because people will have to exchange FUNK to obtain the new token.

I suggest reading the white paper on the website once launched. It will explain in much more detail.

You can't continue to fool everyone. You have posted about new Website around September 2017. I wonder why building a website will take forever..  Maybe you are hosting in the moon. Your sweet talks about the development on this project brought someone like me. I had to sold one of my investments which if I had leave would have worth much more.

Or better still, @soundposition, Can you discuss with your so called team.. They should give us dates to expects their updates, then if the dates are not met, other people can start working on the project. If this is a real community coin, This is what we need.
soundposition
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 260



View Profile WWW
January 08, 2018, 12:26:53 AM
 #1654

Hi Soundposition,

please provide some updates / information!

THX
Andy

Yes, of course. The website is almost finished. It looks fantastic. Our very passionate web developer is doing a great job on it. I had hoped to launch the site before the end of 2017. The holidays slowed everything down a little bit, but now things are picking up pace again.

We have setup the domain name, twitter account, discord, reddit, FB etc.. We have recruited an excellent internet marketing analyst, and also a community manager. We have a developer consultant who helps guide our technical development. We also have a developer for the token. All of them are also working for GameCredits, so for them this is a side project they are interested in being involved in.

We have begun weekly team meetings, scheduled this time with a terrific developer next Saturday, and he's stoked to work on the token.

Finally... Cryptopia appears to be taking the necessary actions to restore the markets. There's nothing we can do about that at the moment as we are all simply waiting for the servers to upgrade.

There are lots of exciting developments to look forward to in 2018!!

P.S. Mike the new token is going to be gained by exchanging FUNK. 500 FUNK will equal 1 new token. There will be a supply reduction this way. We definitely care about the old chain, because people will have to exchange FUNK to obtain the new token.

I suggest reading the white paper on the website once launched. It will explain in much more detail.

You can't continue to fool everyone. You have posted about new Website around September 2017. I wonder why building a website will take forever..  Maybe you are hosting in the moon. Your sweet talks about the development on this project brought someone like me. I had to sold one of my investments which if I had leave would have worth much more.

Or better still, @soundposition, Can you discuss with your so called team.. They should give us dates to expects their updates, then if the dates are not met, other people can start working on the project. If this is a real community coin, This is what we need.

LoveandPeace2018

I have provided an update. The decisions you make are your own. If you sold one of your investments, that's your business. I don't think you will have the patience for this project, and I suggest you involve yourself with some other project.

I'm not sure what group you consider yourself to be a part of. You talk of 'us' and 'we' and really there is only you. You don't speak for other people on this forum. You are basically a troll and not a helpful community member. I am kindly requesting that you stop posting here.

Thank you.

I'm an Operational Support Manager representative of GameCredits
  GameCredits Facebook   GameCredits Twitter   GameCredits G+
cryptoctrader
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 08, 2018, 01:39:03 AM
 #1655

I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Hello HashUnlimited, I suggest you continue with this project, Better we get a fork of this project. This project is currently in the wrong hands. Soundposition has just been deceiving people all these while. Little spike in price was not because of development. It happens to all crypto.. I cant believe a project like this is not gaining traction when even the shittest of coin are gaining momentum presently.

Sound position have been posting about working on new website since more than 5 Months ago. If website takes a whole year to build, then working on the Coin itself will take a decade.

I joined this project because of the interesting update I got which am sure brought a lot of people too. You should not take us for granted.

Dear HashUnlimited, Please Let's fork this project and they should continue with whatever they want with this old shit.. I am so sure so many people will support you like I  did.

Yup, 'little' spike in price of 15x in a month happens to all crypto, especially to those with no ongoing development, and those with no future.

No.

Many of the unpopular coins have showed such spike!!! And seems like many more will do, just watch!!!!

Well, the code itself if I remember right is plain bitcoin protocol without any fancy stuff inside, the only issue is that KGW which is basically acting like a handbrake. The code itself can be done in a week or less.


Please don't tamper with the code. We are working hard on launching the new token.

Who cares? If a large part of the community would like to see the chain continue, why not. For the ticker change you need to pay anyways.

The team that is working on this project care a lot. The chain has continued for almost 4 years now without any tampering. We are investing a lot of time and resources into this project, and have a lot of passion and talent driving this project forward. We are paying the costs for development, marketing and spending a great deal of time on this.

I don't get it, once you are working on a new token, next time you care about the then obsolete chain. What now? New Token or old Chain?


Folks, why not BOTH!!!!

Let us fork and have both the coin and the token!!!! Then, there will FUNK and FUNKCASH (after the true vision of FUNKToshi Nakamoto!!!!)

That worked for BCASH, it might work for FUNK as well!!!! Grin
soundposition
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 260



View Profile WWW
January 08, 2018, 01:57:14 AM
Last edit: January 08, 2018, 02:07:25 AM by soundposition
 #1656


Folks, why not BOTH!!!!

Let us fork and have both the coin and the token!!!! Then, there will FUNK and FUNKCASH (after the true vision of FUNKToshi Nakamoto!!!!)

That worked for BCASH, it might work for FUNK as well!!!! Grin

The reason why not is firstly because there isn't a need to fork to have the coin. We already have the coin, and a forked coin is not supported by the major holders and supporters of FUNK. There are no nodes, miners, developers or infrastructure for a forked coin. The resources and focus is on the new token, and not on another scrypt algo token.

Another user 'crunck' (see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=469407.msg17860141#msg17860141 and make sure to see their trust rating) tried to hijack development of the coin earlier last year, and had caused major disruptions by trying to fork the coin without the support of the network. It caused people to lose coins to blocks that became orphaned due to people using his wallet.

We have learned from the mistakes of the past, and will not repeat them again.

I'm an Operational Support Manager representative of GameCredits
  GameCredits Facebook   GameCredits Twitter   GameCredits G+
Tihocan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 08, 2018, 02:38:23 AM
 #1657

I'm still hanging around on vacation (or held hostage by a well overpriced hotel like I would call it) but at least I was able to have a good look into the wallet / node code. The upgrade needs to be done in 2 steps, first one to sneak in BIP65 and BIP66 as they are still following Bitcoin's isSuperMajority rule and it wouldn't be worth the effort to change those to BIP9 as well IMO. The required hard forks can take place there as well. Second, we could simply upgrade to the latest version whatever this will be but I guess Litecoin 0.14 codebase is the way to go.

I also agree that the new specifications need to be fixed and frozen before actually getting some code out in the wild. There for feel free to discuss them and get us on thinking, coding and testing ;-)

Hi Mike. After discussing everything with our devs, we have decided not to do any hard forking. The only option for a long term project is to create an ETH token, most likely using the ERC223 token standard. Right now we are working on a killer web design, and our devs are now looking directly at the project.

TSP

Hello HashUnlimited, I suggest you continue with this project, Better we get a fork of this project. This project is currently in the wrong hands. Soundposition has just been deceiving people all these while. Little spike in price was not because of development. It happens to all crypto.. I cant believe a project like this is not gaining traction when even the shittest of coin are gaining momentum presently.

Sound position have been posting about working on new website since more than 5 Months ago. If website takes a whole year to build, then working on the Coin itself will take a decade.

I joined this project because of the interesting update I got which am sure brought a lot of people too. You should not take us for granted.

Dear HashUnlimited, Please Let's fork this project and they should continue with whatever they want with this old shit.. I am so sure so many people will support you like I  did.

Yup, 'little' spike in price of 15x in a month happens to all crypto, especially to those with no ongoing development, and those with no future.

No.

Many of the unpopular coins have showed such spike!!! And seems like many more will do, just watch!!!!

Well, the code itself if I remember right is plain bitcoin protocol without any fancy stuff inside, the only issue is that KGW which is basically acting like a handbrake. The code itself can be done in a week or less.


Please don't tamper with the code. We are working hard on launching the new token.

Who cares? If a large part of the community would like to see the chain continue, why not. For the ticker change you need to pay anyways.

The team that is working on this project care a lot. The chain has continued for almost 4 years now without any tampering. We are investing a lot of time and resources into this project, and have a lot of passion and talent driving this project forward. We are paying the costs for development, marketing and spending a great deal of time on this.

I don't get it, once you are working on a new token, next time you care about the then obsolete chain. What now? New Token or old Chain?


Folks, why not BOTH!!!!

Let us fork and have both the coin and the token!!!! Then, there will FUNK and FUNKCASH (after the true vision of FUNKToshi Nakamoto!!!!)

That worked for BCASH, it might work for FUNK as well!!!! Grin

That's a good idea, fork FUNK. So far all we got is soundposition talking about this new project nothing more, maybe he is trolling us maybe not, the fact is there is nothing.
If another team or dev wants to fork I'll support it. In fact I can talk to some devs that are already interested in coins like FUNK.
cryptoctrader
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 263
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 08, 2018, 02:45:22 AM
 #1658


Folks, why not BOTH!!!!

Let us fork and have both the coin and the token!!!! Then, there will FUNK and FUNKCASH (after the true vision of FUNKToshi Nakamoto!!!!)

That worked for BCASH, it might work for FUNK as well!!!! Grin

That's a good idea, fork FUNK. So far all we got is soundposition talking about this new project nothing more, maybe he is trolling us maybe not, the fact is there is nothing.
If another team or dev wants to fork I'll support it. In fact I can talk to some devs that are already interested in coins like FUNK.

Well, many people interested in FUNK. I wonder why it has been such a deadcoin so far.
Delphinus
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 112


View Profile
January 08, 2018, 10:26:43 AM
 #1659

@Soundposition have you also been in contact with Cryptopia regarding the swap? Will they list the new token and cooperate?

LoveandPeace2018
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 08, 2018, 11:38:53 AM
 #1660

Hi Soundposition,

please provide some updates / information!

THX
Andy

Yes, of course. The website is almost finished. It looks fantastic. Our very passionate web developer is doing a great job on it. I had hoped to launch the site before the end of 2017. The holidays slowed everything down a little bit, but now things are picking up pace again.

We have setup the domain name, twitter account, discord, reddit, FB etc.. We have recruited an excellent internet marketing analyst, and also a community manager. We have a developer consultant who helps guide our technical development. We also have a developer for the token. All of them are also working for GameCredits, so for them this is a side project they are interested in being involved in.

We have begun weekly team meetings, scheduled this time with a terrific developer next Saturday, and he's stoked to work on the token.

Finally... Cryptopia appears to be taking the necessary actions to restore the markets. There's nothing we can do about that at the moment as we are all simply waiting for the servers to upgrade.

There are lots of exciting developments to look forward to in 2018!!

P.S. Mike the new token is going to be gained by exchanging FUNK. 500 FUNK will equal 1 new token. There will be a supply reduction this way. We definitely care about the old chain, because people will have to exchange FUNK to obtain the new token.

I suggest reading the white paper on the website once launched. It will explain in much more detail.

You can't continue to fool everyone. You have posted about new Website around September 2017. I wonder why building a website will take forever..  Maybe you are hosting in the moon. Your sweet talks about the development on this project brought someone like me. I had to sold one of my investments which if I had leave would have worth much more.

Or better still, @soundposition, Can you discuss with your so called team.. They should give us dates to expects their updates, then if the dates are not met, other people can start working on the project. If this is a real community coin, This is what we need.

LoveandPeace2018

I have provided an update. The decisions you make are your own. If you sold one of your investments, that's your business. I don't think you will have the patience for this project, and I suggest you involve yourself with some other project.

I'm not sure what group you consider yourself to be a part of. You talk of 'us' and 'we' and really there is only you. You don't speak for other people on this forum. You are basically a troll and not a helpful community member. I am kindly requesting that you stop posting here.

Thank you.

You asked why I speaks for people. I have the same right as you. You are the only one here writing on the Devs behalf (We dont even know if the DEVS really exists, only you have been posting here for so long). If you want to be so sure how WE investors are not happy about your reactions, you can make a troll, If you win, I will dash you all my FUNK token and gladly leave here for life.

I can't believe a great project like this can be in the mold all because of someone's incompetence. Even the tokens we get for free as airdrop are doing fine not talking of what we paid for.

Am so used to your promises that I have to always consider them as lies.... I mean We cant wait on empty promises. I stand against this and we all do
Newcomers should please just read few threads back, then you will all understand what I mean.
Pages: « 1 ... 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 [83] 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!