Bitcoin Forum
June 23, 2024, 09:50:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 [115] 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 ... 167 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Execoin: | First Open-Source Stealth Wallet Released! | Fast | ASIC-proof  (Read 281635 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
oker
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 118
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 07:36:49 AM
 #2281

Please can someone tell me if p2pool are more profitable than mining pools, and exactly why? I'm thinking of switching to p2pool but I'm a little scared ...

Bwincoin - 100% Free POS. <BNWgzRMApfiwjDksTBXRNSB7BDBzRaPcy9>
ozie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 239
Merit: 103


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 07:46:17 AM
 #2282

I am happy to say I got the exechain to work.  I am not yet 100% sure why it wasn't working yet, but am planning to dig into it.  I was using the zen2pool version of p2pool and am now using donSchoe's version of it.  I started the chain on a fresh vm and then connected to it with my other systems and it worked without a hitch (first vm started with persistant set to false and then added the others with true (not sure if this matters, but that is what I did)).

The code I used

Code:
execoin2=math.Object(
        PARENT=networks.nets['execoin'],
        SHARE_PERIOD=22, # seconds
        CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
        REAL_CHAIN_LENGTH=24*60*60//10, # shares
        TARGET_LOOKBEHIND=200, # shares
        SPREAD=55, # blocks
        IDENTIFIER='657865636fe89f61'.decode('hex'),
        PREFIX='656578656398ed71'.decode('hex'),
        P2P_PORT=25000,
        MIN_TARGET=4,
        MAX_TARGET=2**256//2**20 - 1,
        PERSIST=True,
        WORKER_PORT=9173,
        BOOTSTRAP_ADDRS='216.249.119.195 216.249.119.194 216.249.119.112'.split(' '),
        ANNOUNCE_CHANNEL='#p2pool-exe2',
        VERSION_CHECK=lambda v: True,
    ),

I will report back later on how the results fair after I've had some more time to test it.  Your welcome to test it for your selves to see if the longer block time works better for your gpu's.  You can connect to any of my nodes (current bootstrap_addrs's) or make your own.

What do you want to improve with your changes to the Share Period?

Just changing it to 22 Seconds Sharetime will make things work worse. Execoin Blocktime is 60 Seconds!
Dont take this personal but according to your past questions you seem to not really have a clue what your doing there.
So better don't change a working system.

If you want to improve Stales there are other things to do and these are mostly on the miners side. But keep in mind that with p2pool Stales are always higher that any traditional pool.

I did it partially for the learning experience and am experimenting with how it plays with my gpu's.  I changed the port so it shouldn't affect the current net.  One of my gpu's has issues with stales shares with the fast block time and, since the difficulty is low enough for me to solo mine, I decided that this was an oppertune time to try it out.  Nobody is obliged to use those setting unless they want to or feel like it might be worth trying.

Thats perfectly fine. More People interested in P2Pool is always a good thing  Grin

There are just some rules for the Values of P2Pool that have to match the Coin Specifications.

If you set the Sharetime to 22 Secs Miners will only have the chance to submit 2 Shares in the whole P2Pool Network until the next EXE Block is found. This works fine with 10-20 Mh/s.
But the P2Pool wont scale well since this slow Sharetime will drive Sharedifficulty very high as Poolspeed increases. This will be a big Problem for smaller Miners since they get very inconsistent Payments.
This was one issue VTC P2Pool was facing before some changes where made. Even now as a small miner its better to not use the main VTC P2Pool.

DarkAGeS
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 219
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 09:08:38 AM
 #2283

is it possible to merge-mine exe with both mon/plx like vtc on simplevert?
cryptofrance
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 12:47:31 PM
Last edit: May 15, 2014, 01:22:20 PM by cryptofrance
 #2284

OMG what a spike !!  Shocked

Edit : what a 2nd spike !!  Shocked  Shocked
executter
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 147
Merit: 100



View Profile
May 15, 2014, 01:28:10 PM
 #2285

+400k. this guy'll be the top 1 holder for sure Shocked
Lordoftherigs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 313
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 01:32:20 PM
 #2286

this coin is going places
FryguyUK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 801
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 02:26:28 PM
 #2287

vindyne8
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1009



View Profile
May 15, 2014, 04:55:26 PM
 #2288

https://www.pexpeppers.com/ now accepts EXEcoin!

Added bonus that the hotsauce is actually really good too, btw!
ficklepickle
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
May 15, 2014, 06:28:40 PM
Last edit: May 15, 2014, 06:56:16 PM by ficklepickle
 #2289

Why is chrome and internet explorer telling me the wallet is malicious?

Can the devs please work with google on a malware review?

Is this a scam or have you seriously not worked with either of those companies to resolve this issue? 

Fuck Avast is going it malware as well. 

Doom4535
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 07:08:56 PM
 #2290

Why is chrome and internet explorer telling me the wallet is malicious?

Can the devs please work with google on a malware review?

Is this a scam or have you seriously not worked with either of those companies to resolve this issue?  

Fuck Avast is going it malware as well.  

I haven't had any issues, although I'm not using windows.  It is highly unlikely tht it is infected, they often are labeled that because bot nets have been known to be used to mine on ther peoples computers.

FLAP: FDf1mMgvMU5CxT1vR33iZr5sf9u2Mb4gcr
EXE: EKtwmweMBLtg5xNXp1anofonJsJiao1DYY
free bitcoin lottery
cryptofrance
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 07:13:45 PM
 #2291

Why is chrome and internet explorer telling me the wallet is malicious?

Can the devs please work with google on a malware review?

Is this a scam or have you seriously not worked with either of those companies to resolve this issue?  

Fuck Avast is going it malware as well.  

I haven't had any issues, although I'm not using windows.  It is highly unlikely tht it is infected, they often are labeled that because bot nets have been known to be used to mine on ther peoples computers.

Same, never had any problems at all.
ficklepickle
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
May 15, 2014, 07:24:11 PM
 #2292

Why is chrome and internet explorer telling me the wallet is malicious?

Can the devs please work with google on a malware review?

Is this a scam or have you seriously not worked with either of those companies to resolve this issue?  

Fuck Avast is going it malware as well.  

I haven't had any issues, although I'm not using windows.  It is highly unlikely tht it is infected, they often are labeled that because bot nets have been known to be used to mine on ther peoples computers.

Why would they install the wallets on other people's computers? 

CryptoGuy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 524
Merit: 500


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 07:29:59 PM
 #2293

Why is chrome and internet explorer telling me the wallet is malicious?

Can the devs please work with google on a malware review?

Is this a scam or have you seriously not worked with either of those companies to resolve this issue?  

Fuck Avast is going it malware as well.  

I haven't had any issues, although I'm not using windows.  It is highly unlikely tht it is infected, they often are labeled that because bot nets have been known to be used to mine on ther peoples computers.

Why would they install the wallets on other people's computers? 

To CPU mine. Get a couple hundred thousand CPU's pulling 20kh, it adds up quick.

<Insert favorite coin here>
ficklepickle
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
May 15, 2014, 07:38:07 PM
 #2294

Why is chrome and internet explorer telling me the wallet is malicious?

Can the devs please work with google on a malware review?

Is this a scam or have you seriously not worked with either of those companies to resolve this issue?  

Fuck Avast is going it malware as well.  

I haven't had any issues, although I'm not using windows.  It is highly unlikely tht it is infected, they often are labeled that because bot nets have been known to be used to mine on ther peoples computers.

Why would they install the wallets on other people's computers? 

To CPU mine. Get a couple hundred thousand CPU's pulling 20kh, it adds up quick.

why not just custom compile minderd or something? 

I still want to know why the devs have not been working to get Google and Microsoft and Avast from labelling their wallets as malware. 

Other devs do that, why not here? 

gsupp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 07:50:19 PM
 #2295

Why is chrome and internet explorer telling me the wallet is malicious?

Can the devs please work with google on a malware review?

Is this a scam or have you seriously not worked with either of those companies to resolve this issue?  

Fuck Avast is going it malware as well.  

I haven't had any issues, although I'm not using windows.  It is highly unlikely tht it is infected, they often are labeled that because bot nets have been known to be used to mine on ther peoples computers.

Why would they install the wallets on other people's computers? 

To CPU mine. Get a couple hundred thousand CPU's pulling 20kh, it adds up quick.

why not just custom compile minderd or something? 

I still want to know why the devs have not been working to get Google and Microsoft and Avast from labelling their wallets as malware. 

Other devs do that, why not here? 

At what point does Chrome say it could be malware? I went to execoin.net and downloaded both Windows installer and Windows EXE wallets without any warnings on Chrome 34.
execoin (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 204
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 08:06:12 PM
 #2296


51attack.com has started to accept EXE!

Crypto Miner Gear

http://51attack.com


Doom4535
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 158
Merit: 100


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 08:49:06 PM
Last edit: May 15, 2014, 09:55:28 PM by Doom4535
 #2297

Why is chrome and internet explorer telling me the wallet is malicious?

Can the devs please work with google on a malware review?

Is this a scam or have you seriously not worked with either of those companies to resolve this issue?  

Fuck Avast is going it malware as well.  

I haven't had any issues, although I'm not using windows.  It is highly unlikely tht it is infected, they often are labeled that because bot nets have been known to be used to mine on ther peoples computers.

Why would they install the wallets on other people's computers?  

To CPU mine. Get a couple hundred thousand CPU's pulling 20kh, it adds up quick.

why not just custom compile minderd or something?  

I still want to know why the devs have not been working to get Google and Microsoft and Avast from labelling their wallets as malware.  

Other devs do that, why not here?  

The wallet has the ability to be used to mine (although it is less efficient than the custom compiled miners) and that may be what triggers the antivirus software.

FLAP: FDf1mMgvMU5CxT1vR33iZr5sf9u2Mb4gcr
EXE: EKtwmweMBLtg5xNXp1anofonJsJiao1DYY
free bitcoin lottery
gsupp
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 10:04:11 PM
 #2298


51attack.com has started to accept EXE!

Crypto Miner Gear

http://51attack.com




Sweet! I emailed them a few days ago asking if they could accept EXE, I'd like to think I had a small part in their decision  Wink

I like their LTC and BTC t-shirts, cool design!
gostrol
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 15, 2014, 10:35:18 PM
 #2299

Does this coin has a twitter-bot?

Would be nice to have one in addition to the reddit-bot Smiley
suppersz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250

There is a day to be born, and another to die


View Profile
May 16, 2014, 01:37:09 AM
 #2300

Important!

We started a promotion campaign couple of days ago to push Execoin and increase its value. You can see EXE has been added to FIAT exchange and coinpayments as a result of this campaign. These are not all the steps, but just a beginning!
We beleive Execoin already has a solid base (features, wallets etc.) but more promotion is still required. Execoin is a non-premine coin and we cannot do any massive promo campaigns without solid support from community and big bag EXE holders! That's why we need more fundraising to keep promotion going, please understand that nothing is for free in crypto world now! Voting is valuable and greatly appreciated, but paying decent bounties to merchants and exchanges can bring real results way faster. Please keep spread the word about Execoin and donate to Execoin fund to help us promoting the coin!

We'll publish a detailed plan soon!

Execoin fund (EXE): EZF3TXHFEwK58cjESPewcPHk9pZ5M6nDBF
Execoin fund (BTC): 1D9x2Jt3uJUxptZZLha1UvzAeHR7tn9zpS



Could you publish the detailed plan now?

Pages: « 1 ... 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 [115] 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 ... 167 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!