Bitcoin Forum
September 10, 2026, 03:34:53 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 31.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 [145] 146 147 148 149 150 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] TeamRedMiner v0.10.10 - Ironfish/Kaspa/ZIL/Kawpow/Etchash and More  (Read 212948 times)
abrgeza
Jr. Member
*
Offline

Activity: 117
Merit: 2


View Profile
February 13, 2022, 08:37:32 AM
 #2881

TRM v0.9.2.1 eth+ton works good on Navi cards, much better than lolminer.
Still waiting for Vega and Polaris support.
Dung-beetle_Lives_Matter
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 15, 2022, 02:54:15 AM
 #2882

Dear Dev, please add 'pool.services.tonwhales.com:443' support to your sweet miner as soon as possible, please!
lolMiner sucks!
mineozzie
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 1


View Profile
February 17, 2022, 10:28:24 AM
 #2883

Dear dev,

Please also engineer dualmining for Vega-s. I understand that HBM2 is rare and stuff, but...
Lolminer dualmining solution for Vega-s is not effective..
sxemini
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 1556
Merit: 74


View Profile
February 17, 2022, 10:32:14 AM
 #2884

Dear dev,

Please also engineer dualmining for Vega-s. I understand that HBM2 is rare and stuff, but...
Lolminer dualmining solution for Vega-s is not effective..

They are working on it. Good things need time.
waywoos2
Jr. Member
*
Offline

Activity: 62
Merit: 2


View Profile
February 22, 2022, 02:02:23 AM
 #2885

Can someone help. Got the newest version of trm. It supports Polaris. I get 0 soc mhz and gives me like 2mh. Compute is on.  Phoenix gives me 31 hashed. I’m trying dual  mining. I get full ton hashrate however.  Any experts?
sxemini
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 1556
Merit: 74


View Profile
February 22, 2022, 01:34:07 PM
 #2886

Can someone help. Got the newest version of trm. It supports Polaris. I get 0 soc mhz and gives me like 2mh. Compute is on.  Phoenix gives me 31 hashed. I’m trying dual  mining. I get full ton hashrate however.  Any experts?

Without any information - no one can help you. OS, Driver, Commandline, OC settings and so on or you think we all have a glass sphere?

Soc is 0 for polaris GPU´s

31mh on phönix are inflated hashrate - in real are 2 -5% less - TRM give more poolside hashrate

maybe first start with eth mining only on TRM - if this work than you can add the TON parameters.
waywoos2
Jr. Member
*
Offline

Activity: 62
Merit: 2


View Profile
February 22, 2022, 03:05:32 PM
 #2887

Can someone help. Got the newest version of trm. It supports Polaris. I get 0 soc mhz and gives me like 2mh. Compute is on.  Phoenix gives me 31 hashed. I’m trying dual  mining. I get full ton hashrate however.  Any experts?

Without any information - no one can help you. OS, Driver, Commandline, OC settings and so on or you think we all have a glass sphere?

Soc is 0 for polaris GPU´s

31mh on phönix are inflated hashrate - in real are 2 -5% less - TRM give more poolside hashrate

maybe first start with eth mining only on TRM - if this work than you can add the TON parameters.


Using win 11. Drivers are 19.1.1.  A little dated but has worked great for me with Polaris.  Using standard 1200/2150.  It works great on my other rig with a 5700 5600 and 580 mix. 
Shivoreun
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 22, 2022, 10:15:34 PM
 #2888

Hi to all.
Please, help me to solve the problem. I'am trying to mine ETC+TON with TRM 0.9.3 on polaris (574/584), and can't figure out, what I'am doing worng. The hashrate of primary algo (ETC) is extremely low, while the 2nd algo is vary from normal to low. Tried to fully auto-tune, the same as playing with "eth_config" and "dual_intensity" parameters, but results are nearly the same - I'am getting 3.8-4 MH/s on primary algo ETC, and 0.86-0.9 GH/s on secondary TON algo Sad Using Win10 with drv 20.9.2, compute mode is ON.
The competitor's software produces normal hashes, up to 30 MH/s on ETC and 0.36-0.4 GH/s on TON, so I don't think that there is some drivers/mode mess.

Sorry for a long post...
Code:
1)There is a fully automated tuning of TRM, no additional options defined, all the miner defaults:

[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU PCIe      CUs CoreMHz SocMHz MemMHz TEdge TJct  TMem  FanPct  FanRpm  VDDC   Power  ETH Cfg
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 0   01:00.0   32  1250    0      2050   48C   48C   48C   54.00%  2152    893 mV  98 W  A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 1   02:00.0   32  1245    0      2015   47C   47C   47C   48.00%  1959    906 mV  99 W  A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 2   03:00.0   32  1175    0      2000   49C   49C   49C   57.00%  1594    900 mV  89 W  A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 3   06:00.0   32  1270    0      2050   49C   49C   49C   57.00%  2243    893 mV 100 W  A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] 4   07:00.0   36  1245    0      2025   47C   47C   47C   48.00%  1916    875 mV  98 W  A64 (1.00)
[2022-02-22 23:52:49]
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:03:18
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  0 [48C, fan 54%]      ethash: 3.951Mh/s, avg 3.252Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  1 [47C, fan 48%]      ethash: 4.022Mh/s, avg 3.690Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  2 [49C, fan 57%]      ethash: 3.849Mh/s, avg 3.190Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  3 [49C, fan 57%]      ethash: 745.1kh/s, avg 637.4kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  4 [47C, fan 48%]      ethash: 731.3kh/s, avg 625.2kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] Total                      ethash: 13.30Mh/s, avg 11.39Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] eu.ezil.me                 ethash: 13.14Mh/s, avg 11.17Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  0 [48C, fan 54%]      ton: 921.4Mh/s, avg 804.3Mh/s, pool 2.218Gh/s a:2 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  1 [47C, fan 48%]      ton: 917.9Mh/s, avg 796.6Mh/s, pool 1.111Gh/s a:1 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  2 [49C, fan 57%]      ton: 860.8Mh/s, avg 746.5Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  3 [49C, fan 57%]      ton: 967.8Mh/s, avg 774.7Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] GPU  4 [47C, fan 48%]      ton: 1.075Gh/s, avg 846.2Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] Total                      ton: 4.743Gh/s, avg 3.968Gh/s, pool 3.329Gh/s a:3 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] pplns.toncoinpool.io/stratum (PROXY) ton: 4.943Gh/s, avg 3.876Gh/s, pool 3.327Gh/s a:3 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:52:49] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2)Next step, I trying to set --dual_intensity=0.25 to get a 75% of GPU power directed to primary algo ETC
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU PCIe      CUs CoreMHz SocMHz MemMHz TEdge TJct  TMem  FanPct  FanRpm  VDDC   Power  ETH Cfg
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 0   01:00.0   32  1250    0      2050   44C   44C   44C   42.00%  1807    893 mV  68 W  A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 1   02:00.0   32  1245    0      2015   42C   42C   42C   36.00%  1593    906 mV  80 W  A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 2   03:00.0   32  1175    0      2000   44C   44C   44C   42.00%  1184    900 mV  70 W  A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 3   06:00.0   32  1270    0      2050   43C   43C   43C   39.00%  1697    893 mV  79 W  A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] 4   07:00.0   36  1245    0      2025   42C   42C   42C   36.00%  1542    875 mV  75 W  A128 (0.25)
[2022-02-22 23:37:07]
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] Stats Uptime: 0 days, 00:07:49
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  0 [44C, fan 42%]      ethash: 710.2kh/s, avg 665.8kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  1 [42C, fan 36%]      ethash: 4.025Mh/s, avg 3.760Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  2 [44C, fan 42%]      ethash: 3.900Mh/s, avg 3.775Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  3 [43C, fan 39%]      ethash: 755.0kh/s, avg 711.2kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  4 [42C, fan 36%]      ethash: 740.6kh/s, avg 698.3kh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] Total                      ethash: 10.13Mh/s, avg 9.610Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] eu.ezil.me                 ethash: 9.731Mh/s, avg 9.506Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- GPU Status -------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  0 [44C, fan 42%]      ton: 475.4Mh/s, avg 449.9Mh/s, pool 1.329Gh/s a:3 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  1 [42C, fan 36%]      ton: 465.6Mh/s, avg 454.5Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  2 [44C, fan 42%]      ton: 436.0Mh/s, avg 422.8Mh/s, pool 443.5Mh/s a:1 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  3 [43C, fan 39%]      ton: 481.1Mh/s, avg 461.2Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] GPU  4 [42C, fan 36%]      ton: 538.5Mh/s, avg 525.1Mh/s, pool 0.000 h/s a:0 r:0 hw:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] Total                      ton: 2.397Gh/s, avg 2.313Gh/s, pool 1.772Gh/s a:4 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ----------------------------------------- Pool Status ------------------------------------------
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] pplns.toncoinpool.io/stratum (PROXY) ton: 2.268Gh/s, avg 2.283Gh/s, pool 1.772Gh/s a:4 r:0
[2022-02-22 23:37:07] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As you can see, the secondary algo hashrate goes down, but at the same time there is no increase of h/r in primary algo Sad
Any ideas, what I need to tune, to get the normal hashes, please?..
Thanks.

P.S. Sorry for errors in English - it's not my native language...
hbouma
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 23, 2022, 12:44:15 AM
 #2889

Hi to all.
Please, help me to solve the problem. I'am trying to mine ETC+TON with TRM 0.9.3 on polaris (574/584), and can't figure out, what I'am doing worng. The hashrate of primary algo (ETC) is extremely low, while the 2nd algo is vary from normal to low. Tried to fully auto-tune, the same as playing with "eth_config" and "dual_intensity" parameters, but results are nearly the same - I'am getting 3.8-4 MH/s on primary algo ETC, and 0.86-0.9 GH/s on secondary TON algo Sad Using Win10 with drv 20.9.2, compute mode is ON.
The competitor's software produces normal hashes, up to 30 MH/s on ETC and 0.36-0.4 GH/s on TON, so I don't think that there is some drivers/mode mess.

Yeah, I'm having the same issue. Reducing the dual intensity does lower the TON hashrate, but doesn't do anything for the ETH hashrate. I guess we'll have to wait for fixes.

Hal
Shivoreun
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 04, 2022, 11:26:14 AM
 #2890

Hi.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5059817.msg59332215#msg59332215

Any solution for this problem?.. Sad

P.S. Sorry for errors in English - it's not my native language...
sxemini
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 1556
Merit: 74


View Profile
March 04, 2022, 11:30:00 AM
 #2891


Did you activate compute mode on your RX570? And your TON hashrate is to high, this cause the low ETC performance also.
I tested it on 2x RX470 - without tweaking i get 29.5mh ETC and around 600mh on TON.

Ok i read your compute mode is on. I use the ETH config A160.


AND NOW I SEE THE PROBLEM. DUAL MINING ETC+ZIL is only possible if you generate a new DAG every time on windows pc´s. ETC+ZIL DAG is now lightly over 4GB in windows for sure - linux have a little bit more time. Lolminer cannot caching the Zil DAG on ETC (reported to lolliedieb so often, but he don´t care about it)
You must delete the command:  --eth_dag_cache=0
Dojo76
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 04, 2022, 11:23:56 PM
 #2892

In v0.9.4 dual mining is super improved, TON+ETH is more stable, higher hashrate compared to previous versions and more shares (Hiveon +3/4%).

Kudos to the developers for the great job, it's good to see how skilled programmers can still add value to an almost perfect product 

 
Shivoreun
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 10


View Profile
March 06, 2022, 12:53:33 PM
 #2893

AND NOW I SEE THE PROBLEM. DUAL MINING ETC+ZIL is only possible if you generate a new DAG every time on windows pc´s. ETC+ZIL DAG is now lightly over 4GB in windows for sure - linux have a little bit more time. Lolminer cannot caching the Zil DAG on ETC (reported to lolliedieb so often, but he don´t care about it)
You must delete the command:  --eth_dag_cache=0

Thank you for reply!
Yes, I'am using tripple mining Cheesy ETC+ZIL+TON (ezil.me)
There is no --eth_dag_cache=0 key present, but I've also tried to add it, and no result Sad Now trying to play with --eth_4g_max_alloc, but still no result.

P.S. Sorry for errors in English - it's not my native language...
batsonxl
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 1217
Merit: 30


View Profile
March 06, 2022, 04:38:41 PM
 #2894

Thanks for TON. Can you please add ALPH too?
sxemini
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 1556
Merit: 74


View Profile
March 07, 2022, 08:27:12 AM
 #2895

AND NOW I SEE THE PROBLEM. DUAL MINING ETC+ZIL is only possible if you generate a new DAG every time on windows pc´s. ETC+ZIL DAG is now lightly over 4GB in windows for sure - linux have a little bit more time. Lolminer cannot caching the Zil DAG on ETC (reported to lolliedieb so often, but he don´t care about it)
You must delete the command:  --eth_dag_cache=0

Thank you for reply!
Yes, I'am using tripple mining Cheesy ETC+ZIL+TON (ezil.me)
There is no --eth_dag_cache=0 key present, but I've also tried to add it, and no result Sad Now trying to play with --eth_4g_max_alloc, but still no result.

Try ETC+TON only first or only ETC.
tornvidia
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 09, 2022, 10:44:07 AM
 #2896

Hello, can someone tell me where I can change intesity in teamred miner(I am using the latest verison). I have rx 6900xt, mining ETH+TON in Windows, but when I am mining my system works very slow, what can do with it? If I use nbminer for ETH mining I have 0 problems even playing some simple games!
sxemini
Member
**
Offline

Activity: 1556
Merit: 74


View Profile
March 09, 2022, 10:58:57 AM
 #2897

Hello, can someone tell me where I can change intesity in teamred miner(I am using the latest verison). I have rx 6900xt, mining ETH+TON in Windows, but when I am mining my system works very slow, what can do with it? If I use nbminer for ETH mining I have 0 problems even playing some simple games!

TON is very GPU intensive, so i think this is normal. And no Teamredminer has no intensity paramater, you can play with --eth_config (more information in teamredminer folder or github) - but for sure the pool hashrate is much higher than nbminer. nbminer inflated the hashrate up to 5%.
tornvidia
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 09, 2022, 11:07:58 AM
 #2898

Hello, can someone tell me where I can change intesity in teamred miner(I am using the latest verison). I have rx 6900xt, mining ETH+TON in Windows, but when I am mining my system works very slow, what can do with it? If I use nbminer for ETH mining I have 0 problems even playing some simple games!

TON is very GPU intensive, so i think this is normal. And no Teamredminer has no intensity paramater, you can play with --eth_config (more information in teamredminer folder or github) - but for sure the pool hashrate is much higher than nbminer. nbminer inflated the hashrate up to 5%.
Thanks for an answer! Will check the config!
dastardlyman12
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 21
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 11, 2022, 06:09:42 PM
 #2899

very impressed with this miner
i manage a LOT of polaris - see the dastardlyman youtube channel recent video.

first the eth plus ton has ran great - some cards you turn intensity down a bit but its all good.
the second bit is we have a lot of old cards that are lets face it shagged. worn out.
they wont run stable on phoenix. but used with trm in pure eth mode or eth plus zero ton
they are stable and mine just fine.

for instance ive got a shagged 5600xt here at home
it wont run stable at any speed on phoenix.
but its doing stable 37 m hash on trm
if i slide the memclock up beyond 1750 trm doesnt crash but it goes weird
basically stops mining but then when i slide the mem back to 1750
it mines away like a trooper and forgets that i oversped the ram too much
ive never seen software do that - amazing - not crash!

i like the trm honest hashrate counter
best wishes from manchester uk
Dojo76
Newbie
*
Offline

Activity: 30
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 09, 2022, 10:26:10 AM
 #2900

I'm testing the latest beta in HiveOS, I enable R-mode but I get this error:         


Team Red Miner version 0.9.4.6
[2022-05-09 12:13:36] Pool eu1.ethermine.org: Ethermine ethash auto mode detected, setting --eth_stratum_mode=ethproxy
Failed to execute command './ubuntu_mode_script.sh', errno 2 (No such file or directory)
[2022-05-09 12:13:36] Linux kernel vm mode script failed, see output.
[2022-05-09 12:13:36] Failed executing linux kernel vm mode script, check output.

teamredminer exited (exitcode=0), waiting to cooldown a bit

I also tried executing manually "echo -e "amdgpu.vm_block_size=11\namdgpu.vm_size=2048" > /hive/etc/grub.custom && selfupgrade -g && sreboot" but still the same error, not sure how to fix it
Pages: « 1 ... 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 [145] 146 147 148 149 150 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!