Blackjack.fun |SLOTS|SPORTS|ESPORTS| JACK Token

[JackpotRacer]

Folks, the only reason we're implementing KYC for this campaign is because it would be abused within the first minute of its launch otherwise. Unfortunately, some of you are ruining it for others.

No one ruined it, most users here who are talking about your $20 promo are just expressing their opinion about your promo.
It should be taken as feedback or critique to make your promo better, at least to make it more reasonable than what you try to give.
I think you are worrying to much about the possibility of abuse, lets say you remove or reduce the KYC requirement, I doubt people will try to abuse it due to the crazy 200x wagering requirement.
Only those who have no other things to do in life will try to spend their time and energy to abuse the promo.

This is exactly the other way around. You have no clue how far some people can go, and this has been experimented with in the past many times. Even for just 1 USDT, people have been trying to create hundreds of accounts, even knowing that they can't withdraw it.

The one who has no clue is you and the owner/developer of Blackjack.fun. It is nothing new that you always blame others for your incompetence.

[1715061975]

1715061975

[1715061975]

1715061975

[1715061975]

1715061975

[1715061975]

1715061975

[1715061975]

1715061975

[dimonstration]

This is exactly the other way around. You have no clue how far some people can go, and this has been experimented with in the past many times. Even for just 1 USDT, people have been trying to create hundreds of accounts, even knowing that they can't withdraw it.

The one who has no clue is you and the owner/developer of Blackjack.fun. It is nothing new that you always blame others for your incompetence.

It’s too harsh but I will not defend them this time for their current promotion that really sucks.

I understand why they come up to this kind of very strict safety measures because they become a victim of abused of multiple account that manage to withdraw funds out from their casino. But this is not a reason to make the requirements too overkill just to avoid potential abuse since other casino can do this kind of promotions without any issue.

Why not just improve your security like what @Jackpotrace suggesting.

[blackjack.fun]

Let's see what the future brings. We are experimenting with various bonuses.

[PytagoraZ]

How about getting serious and not trying to steal players' time?[/b][/color]

I think the wagering requirements are only given for the bonus, if you make a deposit then you don't need 200x wagering requirements.

It looks like you have a problem with blackjack.fun. I think what you did was too childish and your anger was very visible. I don't know what your problem is, but it might be a good idea for you to resolve your issue with them without disrupting their business. I think you also won't like it if your business is disturbed by other people.

[xLays]

Let's see what the future brings. We are experimenting with various bonuses.

Hopefully, these upcoming bonuses is not like the last one you posted in the games and rounds section. Imagine a 200x wagering requirement to win $20; only people who have time will play with that bonus. For sure that bonus  not reflect well on your marketing efforts. That make your casino look worst. Never since before a casino required  200x wager requirement.

[JackpotRacer]

How about getting serious and not trying to steal players' time?[/b][/color]

I think the wagering requirements are only given for the bonus, if you make a deposit then you don't need 200x wagering requirements.

It looks like you have a problem with blackjack.fun. I think what you did was too childish and your anger was very visible. I don't know what your problem is, but it might be a good idea for you to resolve your issue with them without disrupting their business. I think you also won't like it if your business is disturbed by other people.

Wrong my friend! Blackjack.fun behaved very unprofessionally and tried to cheat and still try to cheat their players.
I am for fairness and justice whether you like it or not.

You should read all the threads I posted the links here in thread not long ago. I am not sure if you are doing it because you are taking their side without knowing the full context.

Blackjack.fun until now has not answered very important questions and not only asked by me. you have to ask yourself why haven't they answered these questions? if they have nothing to hide they would answer these legit questions long ago. But they didn't.

Why are they going private with their free roll tourneys? they started those to get feedback so they can offer a perfect working tourney. I gave them feedback and an exploit and what did they do, even I did not ask for a withdrawal or bounty?
Yes, they banned me and allowed the original user of the exploit to continue playing, does that make sense to you?
It only makes sense if the player who knows the exploit and is using it is a friend of the owner, or if the owner is playing incognito.

Trust me, time will tell and I have patience until justice is done.

Cheers

Let's see what the future brings. We are experimenting with various bonuses.

Hopefully, these upcoming bonuses is not like the last one you posted in the games and rounds section. Imagine a 200x wagering requirement to win $20; only people who have time will play with that bonus. For sure that bonus  not reflect well on your marketing efforts. That make your casino look worst. Never since before a casino required  200x wager requirement.

Another great comment from @xLays and spot on.

By the way, he is not the first and not the last to write this 100% legitimate comment.
But they still reply with foggy BS and think that users here are stupid as sh*t.

[PytagoraZ]

How about getting serious and not trying to steal players' time?[/b][/color]

I think the wagering requirements are only given for the bonus, if you make a deposit then you don't need 200x wagering requirements.

It looks like you have a problem with blackjack.fun. I think what you did was too childish and your anger was very visible. I don't know what your problem is, but it might be a good idea for you to resolve your issue with them without disrupting their business. I think you also won't like it if your business is disturbed by other people.

Wrong my friend! Blackjack.fun behaved very unprofessionally and tried to cheat and still try to cheat their players.
I am for fairness and justice whether you like it or not.

You should read all the threads I posted the links here in thread not long ago. I am not sure if you are doing it because you are taking their side without knowing the full context.

Blackjack.fun until now has not answered very important questions and not only asked by me. you have to ask yourself why haven't they answered these questions? if they have nothing to hide they would answer these legit questions long ago. But they didn't.

Why are they going private with their free roll tourneys? they started those to get feedback so they can offer a perfect working tourney. I gave them feedback and an exploit and what did they do, even I did not ask for a withdrawal or bounty?
Yes, they banned me and allowed the original user of the exploit to continue playing, does that make sense to you?
It only makes sense if the player who knows the exploit and is using it is a friend of the owner, or if the owner is playing incognito.

Trust me, time will tell and I have patience until justice is done.

Cheers

Yes, I don't know your problem with them, maybe I will try to read your previous post, but I don't have the ability to evaluate a casino and don't know how to audit the code behind the casino. I just remember blackjack.fun once made a topic on the reputation board about what you were doing..

Hopefully everything can be resolved well because it is not good to interfere in other people's business and if they are suspicious maybe you need to have accurate arguments and data so that your accusations are believed by other members.

Trust me, time will tell and I have patience until justice is done.

Yes, hopefully it will soon be known which of you is at fault. I've never visited their site, but I'm curious and will try visiting the blackjack.fun site

[BitcoinSupremo]

Let's see what the future brings. We are experimenting with various bonuses.

Hopefully, these upcoming bonuses is not like the last one you posted in the games and rounds section. Imagine a 200x wagering requirement to win $20; only people who have time will play with that bonus. For sure that bonus  not reflect well on your marketing efforts. That make your casino look worst. Never since before a casino required  200x wager requirement.

No worries, mate! Them wagering requirements seem fair dinkum massive for such a tiny bonus, don't they? Reckon Blackjack.fun oughta give their reward system a fair dinkum upgrade if they wanna reel in more folks. reckon startin' with a signature move could be a good kickstart for that.

[Russlenat]

Let's see what the future brings. We are experimenting with various bonuses.

Glad to see a sports betting has been added, last time I checked that was not available yet. Odds are competitive as I have just compared it to the casino I'm currently using. I'll try to bet sometime and see how the process goes, hopefully everything is smooth from grading bets and processing withdrawals.

No comment yet about casino's reputation (^{(have to checked and see it first).}) since it looks like there's someone here who had some problem with the casino.

[BitcoinGirl.Club]

Let's see what the future brings. We are experimenting with various bonuses.

Amazing to see Blackjack developed so well from the last few years. I was checking your site and saw you have sportsbook and casino now. Well done  Blackjack team!

[3kpk3]

Amazing to see Blackjack developed so well from the last few years. I was checking your site and saw you have sportsbook and casino now. Well done  Blackjack team!

They haven't improved as well as you think. They got screwed by multiple account scammers thanks to bad security which clearly needs improvement and they are enforcing outrageous wagering requirements for their current bonuses.

I liked them before primarily thanks to their generous bonuses and fair wagering requirements, but that changed because they moved backwards in several ways.

[Ojima-ojo]

Let's see what the future brings. We are experimenting with various bonuses.

This is awesome to know and looking forward to see the implementation of those bonuses in the most fair ways and manners, blackjack fun have hard a long time of presence here and for that it nice to see them making a welcome back with promised of seeing experimentation of new bonuses since that will give blackjack a new visibilities.


I believe many members of the forum will like to try out in the period of experimental stage of those bonuses to see how fair those bonuses are and also profer ways that the team could improve in areas that need improvement along the line.

[JackpotRacer]

Amazing to see Blackjack developed so well from the last few years. I was checking your site and saw you have sportsbook and casino now. Well done  Blackjack team!

They haven't improved as well as you think. They got screwed by multiple account scammers thanks to bad security which clearly needs improvement and they are enforcing outrageous wagering requirements for their current bonuses.

I liked them before primarily thanks to their generous bonuses and fair wagering requirements, but that changed because they moved backwards in several ways.

Exactly! they had and still have security issues and even the exploit i found and i am sure it is costing them a lot of money in prizes they give is still not fixed as they have not confirmed the fix after many requests from me and others.

Maybe they have no interest in fixing this dangerous exploit and who knows how many similar exploits there are. a casino can profit from such exploits.

[JollyGood]

If there are exploits reported to a any casino/gaming website, they need to be fixed as soon as they are reported. It is fair to say any competent casino or online gaming business would do that. I could not fully understand from their post in another thread whether they have fixed the problem that was reported to them but any exploit that could be used to benefit the casino puts a cloud of uncertainty over their reputation.

I am not saying that is the case here, but it would help if the casino being accused of various misdemeanours actually responds directly to the claims being made against them.

They haven't improved as well as you think. They got screwed by multiple account scammers thanks to bad security which clearly needs improvement and they are enforcing outrageous wagering requirements for their current bonuses.

I liked them before primarily thanks to their generous bonuses and fair wagering requirements, but that changed because they moved backwards in several ways.

Exactly! they had and still have security issues and even the exploit i found and i am sure it is costing them a lot of money in prizes they give is still not fixed as they have not confirmed the fix after many requests from me and others.

Maybe they have no interest in fixing this dangerous exploit and who knows how many similar exploits there are. a casino can profit from such exploits.

[blackjack.fun]

If there are exploits reported to a any casino/gaming website, they need to be fixed as soon as they are reported. It is fair to say any competent casino or online gaming business would do that. I could not fully understand from their post in another thread whether they have fixed the problem that was reported to them but any exploit that could be used to benefit the casino puts a cloud of uncertainty over their reputation.

I am not saying that is the case here, but it would help if the casino being accused of various misdemeanours actually responds directly to the claims being made against them.

They haven't improved as well as you think. They got screwed by multiple account scammers thanks to bad security which clearly needs improvement and they are enforcing outrageous wagering requirements for their current bonuses.

I liked them before primarily thanks to their generous bonuses and fair wagering requirements, but that changed because they moved backwards in several ways.

Exactly! they had and still have security issues and even the exploit i found and i am sure it is costing them a lot of money in prizes they give is still not fixed as they have not confirmed the fix after many requests from me and others.

Maybe they have no interest in fixing this dangerous exploit and who knows how many similar exploits there are. a casino can profit from such exploits.

The concept of listening to our players is something we do every day: engaging with our community, playing, reporting bugs, and fixing them. New issues will arise, and the same story repeats. (Regarding our Blackjack Tournaments) There is no cloud of uncertainty when there's no "casino game" where people take risks. It would be a completely different story if it would be product where people risks with their money. But this is not the case.

It's just that JackpotRacer is not part of our community. He is simply a disappointed narcissist who is harassing us for his own agenda, which is to tailor our product to his desires.

[JackpotRacer]

If there are exploits reported to a any casino/gaming website, they need to be fixed as soon as they are reported. It is fair to say any competent casino or online gaming business would do that. I could not fully understand from their post in another thread whether they have fixed the problem that was reported to them but any exploit that could be used to benefit the casino puts a cloud of uncertainty over their reputation.

I am not saying that is the case here, but it would help if the casino being accused of various misdemeanours actually responds directly to the claims being made against them.

They haven't improved as well as you think. They got screwed by multiple account scammers thanks to bad security which clearly needs improvement and they are enforcing outrageous wagering requirements for their current bonuses.

I liked them before primarily thanks to their generous bonuses and fair wagering requirements, but that changed because they moved backwards in several ways.

Exactly! they had and still have security issues and even the exploit i found and i am sure it is costing them a lot of money in prizes they give is still not fixed as they have not confirmed the fix after many requests from me and others.

Maybe they have no interest in fixing this dangerous exploit and who knows how many similar exploits there are. a casino can profit from such exploits.

The concept of listening to our players is something we do every day: engaging with our community, playing, reporting bugs, and fixing them. New issues will arise, and the same story repeats. (Regarding our Blackjack Tournaments) There is no cloud of uncertainty when there's no "casino game" where people take risks. It would be a completely different story if it would be product where people risks with their money. But this is not the case.

WRONG!
Even the players in a free roll can play for free and win a prize, they can be cheated out of the prize by the owner who gives out prizes. I will answer this now, so you don't have to play dumb and ask how

The Owner or Eva can play incognito with whatever username and use the exploit(s) to win. I am not talking about 1USDT Prizes.

But what about the invitational tournaments you offer from time to time with 100USDT prize pool

Or you let customers host their own tournaments or open private tables

You can clear those tourneys and tables if you can participate! and if you cannot participate then it is still unfair that the exploit(s) is still there.

It's just that JackpotRacer is not part of our community. He is simply a disappointed narcissist who is harassing us for his own agenda, which is to tailor our product to his desires.

Eva, I have never attacked you or offended you personally, now you are getting personal and I can do that too, because I can mirror you! If you were a decent person and a casino representative, you would apologize. So let's see!

[Pokapoka124]

~snip~

You are quite active on this thread and the coloring and bolden texts makes it hard to miss your posts. It’s obvious you have a problem with the casino. I went through your scam accusation thread and I can’t find a good reason why you opened a scam accusation while admitting you cheated the system. What’s even more interesting was that there wasn’t a problem with your withdrawal being withheld, you just didn’t like the fact that you were caught exploiting bugs in the system at the time.

Now that I do not share the same opinion as you, am I getting a retaliatory feedback because that seems to be your style.

[PytagoraZ]

~snip~

You are quite active on this thread and the coloring and bolden texts makes it hard to miss your posts. It’s obvious you have a problem with the casino. I went through your scam accusation thread and I can’t find a good reason why you opened a scam accusation while admitting you cheated the system. What’s even more interesting was that there wasn’t a problem with your withdrawal being withheld, you just didn’t like the fact that you were caught exploiting bugs in the system at the time.

Now that I do not share the same opinion as you, am I getting a retaliatory feedback because that seems to be your style.

Yes, this seems strange. He seems to really hate blackjack.fun and this is not a good condition at all. Maybe it would be better for JackpotRacer to create its own thread and not interfere with the ANN thread, I feel sorry for the OP because their business is being disrupted. Or maybe JackpotRacer and OP can resolve the issue via PM or telegram.

This is not an easy situation for OP as they also build their reputation through signature campaigns.

[dimonstration]

Yes, this seems strange. He seems to really hate blackjack.fun and this is not a good condition at all. Maybe it would be better for JackpotRacer to create its own thread and not interfere with the ANN thread, I feel sorry for the OP because their business is being disrupted. Or maybe JackpotRacer and OP can resolve the issue via PM or telegram.

This is not an easy situation for OP as they also build their reputation through signature campaigns.

He created already his own thread for scam accusations and bash fest against this casino. This is his style whenever he doesn’t get what he wants to a casino he involves. He is also the main reason why this thread was lock by the OP due to the harassment to the casino.

I’m not really sure now what his end goal on being persistent aside from obviously getting paid for the “bug” that he found it the originally he us to abuse for the tournament.

[JackpotRacer]

It's just that JackpotRacer is not part of our community. He is simply a disappointed narcissist who is harassing us for his own agenda, which is to tailor our product to his desires.

I thought again about your very insulting and unjustified attack and I am sorry to tell you that you are Eva and the owner of Blackjack.fun and maybe you are both one person anyway.

You have the HUBRIS syndrome, but a very strong one.

sadly I have to run now so I will answer the other members postings later