Is IEO better than ICO?

[Forbiddenone]

Yup kind of as IEO are more trusted as compared to ICO view but at last it depend on project. It is also true that on average basis IEO receive more funds than regular ico and we are seeing trend shifted towards IEO.

[magnum cyber]

for the moment I think both are equally bad. I mean the presence of the IEO project today is like a market trend, it doesn't last long and only for a moment. honestly at this time I no longer see IEO projects or ICO projects that are truly profitable for investment. they only offer sweet promises and I hate to say this.

[DU18]

To me ICO and IEO are somehow identical only the main difference is that things are easier in IEO, the question is does making it easier change the overall view of perspective regarding investors or its just the same making IEO a faster or more convenient version of ICO, it bothers me a lot since for me making it more convenient is a side grade more than an upgrade since it just offers extra utility and it does not make IEO better than ICO.

Tell me what you think, is IEO better than ICO or they are just the same with only difference in method.

regarding the profits we can get in investments, of course, IEO is not better than ICO, because there is still a greater risk for us to get losses than profits after investing in IEO, but regarding security I think IEO is slightly better than ICO because usually exchanges will do checks that are strict against the IEO project to avoid the IEO project is a fraud, but certainly not all exchanges can guarantee that the IEO project is really potential and far from fraud. , so we who invests in IEO also remain rigorous and careful in choosing IEO projects to invest.

[key4co.in]

for the moment I think both are equally bad. I mean the presence of the IEO project today is like a market trend, it doesn't last long and only for a moment. honestly at this time I no longer see IEO projects or ICO projects that are truly profitable for investment. they only offer sweet promises and I hate to say this.

Obviously true because most IEOs are still crappie. The truth sometimes is like a bitter pill, very hard to swallow, I like the fact that you pointed out their similarity. Well, IEO is still better than ICO if and only if the IEO is done on a reputable exchange and not otherwise.

[asyakashi]

the most important part of trading is being able to process information. many factors a coin will rise. including news from dev or platform updates. so far I don't believe in presumptions in trading.

[devillnj2.1]

IEO is much better than ICO, but yes its true that its still unsure if IEO is profitable but alteast the coin/token will be listed, unlike ICO, listing still questionable, but its very important that the IEO will be concluded in reputable exchanger like Binance and most importantly, check everything about the project and dont concentrate about the price, you should know the essence of the project in the long run

[superving]

Yup kind of as IEO are more trusted as compared to ICO view but at last it depend on project. It is also true that on average basis IEO receive more funds than regular ico and we are seeing trend shifted towards IEO.

but we cant deny that ico are also good the old times ,the only reason why ico fails is because of scam projects that uses ico just to steal  money from investors. Before ,a project can reached its hard cap in just days using ico which is the most exciting when you joined on thier bounty campaign..

[bukhara85]

yes, ieo is better than ico.
almost 80% ico is failed to launch on a good exchange.
on the other hand in ieo there is a confirmed exchange and rather than low risk to invest.

[MOProgress]

This comparison is somewhat hard, the reason is that, they are almost the same thing, the only difference I know about them is, IEO means Initial Exchange Offering while ICO is Initial Coin Offering, where they both focus on crowd sales to raise fund for their projects. IEO seems to gain much trust based on the fact that they are making their sals in exchanges.

[biddicoin]

The transformation from ICO to IEO is something done by quality projects. IEO is not easy, bypassing many conditions, in contrast to ICO which is mostly done directly. IEO has an intermediary exchange. And I think it's better to get a lot of investors, who still stick to the ICO, don't have a guarantee the project will be on target.

IEO is much better than ICO, but there are still risks for IEO, of course, I hope that 2020 this IEO has special rules so that investors are truly safe,

IEO is high risk high return system. it wont 100% safe for investors. that's what should we understand.

the problem is that exchanges that do IEO are not serious, many projects do not clearly go into exchange and start IEO, this is not a good action

so, who's not serious here? the project or exchange itself?
if the project wont go to exchange and start IEO, it's clear that the project which is not serious. or they are just a shit which doesnt pass requirement

[HabiebRiziq]

Yup kind of as IEO are more trusted as compared to ICO view but at last it depend on project. It is also true that on average basis IEO receive more funds than regular ico and we are seeing trend shifted towards IEO.

but we cant deny that ico are also good the old times ,the only reason why ico fails is because of scam projects that uses ico just to steal  money from investors. Before ,a project can reached its hard cap in just days using ico which is the most exciting when you joined on thier bounty campaign..

So true. In the past the ICO was very profitable because many projects were able to achieve the targets they wanted and could provide benefits that could be said to have a price and benefit for us and when compared to now many projects ended in failure because of the many scam projects and also the difficulty get funding to reach softcap.

[elisabetheva]

Yup kind of as IEO are more trusted as compared to ICO view but at last it depend on project. It is also true that on average basis IEO receive more funds than regular ico and we are seeing trend shifted towards IEO.

but we cant deny that ico are also good the old times ,the only reason why ico fails is because of scam projects that uses ico just to steal  money from investors. Before ,a project can reached its hard cap in just days using ico which is the most exciting when you joined on thier bounty campaign..

So true. In the past the ICO was very profitable because many projects were able to achieve the targets they wanted and could provide benefits that could be said to have a price and benefit for us and when compared to now many projects ended in failure because of the many scam projects and also the difficulty get funding to reach softcap.

Only changes in the system between ICO and IEO, actually only provide convenience and try to have protection. but all is of no use if as a whole do not want a significant change. because a change in the system will not make people who cheat will not try to do it again. what is needed is cooperation between all so that naughty practices can be avoided.

[ohyeahhaha122]

I think Ieo will be better than ico because every project that wants to ieo on an exchange will verify the quality of its own project, to avoid cases of fraudulent projects. run out of money to invest, and investing in ieo is also safer as you can know some of the exchanges when you buy ieo will know for sure that their prices will increase after listing on the exchange.

[miningguru]

IEO and ICO are both birds of the same feathers.  The only thing distinguishing them is just the method of operations.  While IEOs are usually listed or done on exchanges,  it is not applicable to ICOs. So aside this, I think IEO and ICO are both same thing.  Just a change in name. Nothing different. I stand to be corrected  though!

Agree with you, both are meant for raising money, have the same opinion, that's why till now I never invested in both the ICO and IEO. My only choice, I always choose to trade the coins in Binance exchanges, because I find it very comfortable with the coin listed there.

[b1boy]

They are both birds of same feathers and for me persoNally I believe none is to be trusted anymore, ICO was good 2years ago and there has been good profit before scam destroyed it and then we were Thinking IEO was ta better solution only for all this Exchanges to be listing all this dead scam projects and running away with peoples money ... none is better

[cryptothreads]

I think Ieo will be better than ico because every project that wants to ieo on an exchange will verify the quality of its own project, to avoid cases of fraudulent projects. run out of money to invest, and investing in ieo is also safer as you can know some of the exchanges when you buy ieo will know for sure that their prices will increase after listing on the exchange.

IEO has all the things an investor needs when trading and if listed at big exchange your chances of making a profit will be very high.

In fact, there aren't many good projects for you to invest in this time, but when there is news of a new IEO project at high liquidity exchanges, it will surely attract a lot of investors. Last year I made a huge profit from this type of investment and hope this year will be more favorable if I lucky.

[Roidz]

Although Ieo is not better than Ico, but at least Ieo can make investors feel more secure in participating Ieo, because investors do not need to be afraid or worried if later the coin does not have an exchange like Ico coins, because usually projects that put on Ieo in an exchange such as probit, binance or other exchanges certainly most likely the tokens will be listed on the exchange.

[OrangeII]

This comparison is somewhat hard, the reason is that, they are almost the same thing, the only difference I know about them is, IEO means Initial Exchange Offering while ICO is Initial Coin Offering, where they both focus on crowd sales to raise fund for their projects. IEO seems to gain much trust based on the fact that they are making their sals in exchanges.

why is that difficult? it certainly looks different. lies in the sales system, such as ICO does not have an exchanger, while IEO has a partnership with IEO. however, many people feel IEO is better. it's just that, until now, the development of IEO is not like 2019. I think people are also starting to lose their trust.

[puremage111]

Well to be honest, its almost the same thing
Both tokens are new
Except the fact that one is listed immediately on the exchange whom conduct the IEO
One is not

[ebykamsiokoro]

Honestly now, after all said and done, and no matter how you look at it, IEO still by far is better than ICO. And to me, I think the benefits are both for the project developers and the investors alike. IEO offers both parties a faster means of clearing several hurdles towards listing and trading of the crypto asset in question.