andyatcrux
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 938
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 02, 2014, 05:08:10 AM |
|
I don't get more than that with my 270s, so I am interested to see if someone can offer up better config.
|
|
|
|
MinerP
|
|
April 02, 2014, 05:11:13 AM |
|
Settings for R9 270 cards? "Only" getting about exactly 1.25 mh/s per card with following settings: "xintensity" : "4", "lookup-gap" : "0", "thread-concurrency" : "8128", "expiry" : "1", "worksize" : "128", "log" : "5", "queue" : "0", "scan-time" : "1", "device" : "0,1,2", "gpu-threads" : "2", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "gpu-engine" : "1050", "gpu-memclock" : "1250", "gpu-powertune" : "20", "gpu-dyninterval" : "7", "kernel" : "darkcoin" I have undervolted cards (1.075) so i can't do any "wild" settings. what brand?
|
|
|
|
ibfragalot
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
April 02, 2014, 05:55:09 AM Last edit: April 02, 2014, 11:11:42 AM by ibfragalot |
|
I don't get more than that with my 270s, so I am interested to see if someone can offer up better config.
I get a little more with my 270x - 1,385khs. Brand is GIGABYTE GV-R927XOC-2GD Radeon R9 270X 2GB . The top card is a cheap 6950 unlocked to 6970. It actually goes faster than the 270x!! More shaders. Config (6950,270x,270x) "gpu-threads" : "2,2,2", "gpu-engine" : "850,1150,1150", "gpu-memclock" : "1250,1500,1500", "gpu-powertune" : "20,20,20", "kernel" : "darkcoin", "temp-target" : "75,65,65", "temp-overheat" : "80,75,75", "temp-cutoff" : "85,85,85", "lookup-gap" : "2,2,2", "thread-concurrency" : "8193,8193,8193", "worksize" : "256,256,256", "intensity" : "18,18,18" I have undervolted cards (1.075) so i can't do any "wild" settings.
Is this for less watts? How much less? Thanks.
|
|
|
|
HiroS (OP)
|
|
April 02, 2014, 09:31:20 AM |
|
Some good news, there has been a known bug in KGW for a while and various fixes has been put forward. Darkcoin gave it a go with DGW but that is still vulnerable. It looks like Nite69 may have come up with the solution. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=552895.msg6016831#msg6016831I will add this fix to a branch on GitHub and testnet it to make sure it is sane then roll it out. We already have heavily reduced time manipulation for Hirocoin and this will secure us further. Once this is in place we will be the most secure altcoin there is. So far Nite69 has not given a name to the new version of KGW. Any ideas as to what it should be?
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
April 02, 2014, 10:18:16 AM |
|
What is settings for R9 290?
|
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
April 02, 2014, 10:22:26 AM |
|
What is settings for R9 290?
Let me see edit: I use these settings for my R9 290's @ 2.5Mhash/s. setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
start /D "C:\sgminer_drk" sgminer.exe -k darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://hiro.suprnova.cc:3313 -u MaGNeT.2 -p x --thread-concurrency 32765 -I 22 --lookup-gap 2 --shaders 2560 --worksize 512 -g 1 -d 0 -d 1 --gpu-memclock 1450 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --gpu-engine 500-1000 --temp-target 74 --temp-overheat 78 --gpu-fan 40-100 -s 1 --expiry 1 --queue 0
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
April 02, 2014, 10:37:52 AM |
|
What is settings for R9 290?
Let me see edit: I use these settings for my R9 290's @ 2.5Mhash/s. setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
start /D "C:\sgminer_drk" sgminer.exe -k darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://hiro.suprnova.cc:3313 -u MaGNeT.2 -p x --thread-concurrency 32765 -I 22 --lookup-gap 2 --shaders 2560 --worksize 512 -g 1 -d 0 -d 1 --gpu-memclock 1450 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --gpu-engine 500-1000 --temp-target 74 --temp-overheat 78 --gpu-fan 40-100 -s 1 --expiry 1 --queue 0 What about powertune?
|
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
April 02, 2014, 10:40:12 AM |
|
What is settings for R9 290?
Let me see edit: I use these settings for my R9 290's @ 2.5Mhash/s. setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
start /D "C:\sgminer_drk" sgminer.exe -k darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://hiro.suprnova.cc:3313 -u MaGNeT.2 -p x --thread-concurrency 32765 -I 22 --lookup-gap 2 --shaders 2560 --worksize 512 -g 1 -d 0 -d 1 --gpu-memclock 1450 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --gpu-engine 500-1000 --temp-target 74 --temp-overheat 78 --gpu-fan 40-100 -s 1 --expiry 1 --queue 0 What about powertune? No need for, cards are not maxed out.
|
|
|
|
sammy007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1003
|
|
April 02, 2014, 10:42:51 AM |
|
What is settings for R9 290?
Let me see edit: I use these settings for my R9 290's @ 2.5Mhash/s. setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
start /D "C:\sgminer_drk" sgminer.exe -k darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://hiro.suprnova.cc:3313 -u MaGNeT.2 -p x --thread-concurrency 32765 -I 22 --lookup-gap 2 --shaders 2560 --worksize 512 -g 1 -d 0 -d 1 --gpu-memclock 1450 --auto-fan --auto-gpu --gpu-engine 500-1000 --temp-target 74 --temp-overheat 78 --gpu-fan 40-100 -s 1 --expiry 1 --queue 0 What about powertune? No need for, cards are not maxed out. Got only 2.18 Mhs on Linux.
|
|
|
|
Shurelia
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
April 02, 2014, 10:52:13 AM |
|
"gpu-threads" : "2,2,2", "gpu-engine" : "850,1150,1150", "gpu-memclock" : "1250,1500,1500", "gpu-powertune" : "20,20,20", "kernel" : "darkcoin", "temp-target" : "75,65,65", "temp-overheat" : "80,75,75", "temp-cutoff" : "85,85,85", "lookup-gap" : "2,2,2", "thread-concurrency" : "8193,8193,8193", "worksize" : "256,256,256", "intensity" : "18,18,18" Thanks! I got my 270x to ~1.370Mh/s with this.
|
|
|
|
ibfragalot
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
April 02, 2014, 11:08:57 AM Last edit: April 02, 2014, 11:20:23 AM by ibfragalot |
|
In others news... anyone notice the "fight" going on with Hiro on MintPal the past few hours? Soon as it goes up, BOOM smackdown, 5-6 times already. I'm no great market reader, but it does seem like someone's trying to keep this coin from increasing too much... and losing Thanks! I got my 270x to ~1.370Mh/s with this.
No problem, nice to know it helped
|
|
|
|
n00bnoxious
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Bitnation Development Team Member
|
|
April 02, 2014, 11:52:11 AM |
|
Settings for R9 270 cards? "Only" getting about exactly 1.25 mh/s per card with following settings: "xintensity" : "4", "lookup-gap" : "0", "thread-concurrency" : "8128", "expiry" : "1", "worksize" : "128", "log" : "5", "queue" : "0", "scan-time" : "1", "device" : "0,1,2", "gpu-threads" : "2", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "gpu-engine" : "1050", "gpu-memclock" : "1250", "gpu-powertune" : "20", "gpu-dyninterval" : "7", "kernel" : "darkcoin" I have undervolted cards (1.075) so i can't do any "wild" settings. That's actually pretty good for an undervolted 270. Mine are stock XFX/Sapphire and I get maybe 0.1Mh/s less than that after much playing around with settings trying to increase it.
|
|
|
|
n00bnoxious
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Bitnation Development Team Member
|
|
April 02, 2014, 11:54:21 AM |
|
In others news... anyone notice the "fight" going on with Hiro on MintPal the past few hours? Soon as it goes up, BOOM smackdown, 5-6 times already. I'm no great market reader, but it does seem like someone's trying to keep this coin from increasing too much... and losing There were an obscene number of coins minted very early on. It's probably whichever whale got the majority of them trying to dump them at a certain price - of course whenever they place a sell order for a large number at a certain price, nobody else can place a sell order any higher and push the price up... Bloody early adoption pump/dumpers ruining everything for others again.
|
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
April 02, 2014, 11:56:43 AM |
|
In others news... anyone notice the "fight" going on with Hiro on MintPal the past few hours? Soon as it goes up, BOOM smackdown, 5-6 times already. I'm no great market reader, but it does seem like someone's trying to keep this coin from increasing too much... and losing There were an obscene number of coins minted very early on. It's probably whichever whale got the majority of them trying to dump them at a certain price - of course whenever they place a sell order for a large number at a certain price, nobody else can place a sell order any higher and push the price up... Bloody early adoption pump/dumpers ruining everything for others again. The same happened to Litecoin 12 months ago, but still it managed to go up after the whales dumped at 0.07$ Let them dump, cheap Hiro for me
|
|
|
|
Acidyo
|
|
April 02, 2014, 11:59:03 AM |
|
In others news... anyone notice the "fight" going on with Hiro on MintPal the past few hours? Soon as it goes up, BOOM smackdown, 5-6 times already. I'm no great market reader, but it does seem like someone's trying to keep this coin from increasing too much... and losing There were an obscene number of coins minted very early on. It's probably whichever whale got the majority of them trying to dump them at a certain price - of course whenever they place a sell order for a large number at a certain price, nobody else can place a sell order any higher and push the price up... Bloody early adoption pump/dumpers ruining everything for others again. The same happened to Litecoin 12 months ago, but still it managed to go up after the whales dumped at 0.07$ Let them dump, cheap Hiro for me Agree completely. The coin is new, I don't even look at the charts right now.
|
|
|
|
Acidyo
|
|
April 02, 2014, 12:02:17 PM |
|
We still need to spread the hashpower out to different pools though, come on guys. Let's not fork it.
|
|
|
|
ibfragalot
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
April 02, 2014, 12:10:35 PM |
|
We still need to spread the hashpower out to different pools though, come on guys. Let's not fork it.
I wanted to, but I could only see 3 pools. 2 were huge, and the other empty! We need some big players to move over first. No point me mining by myself for a fee.
|
|
|
|
Acidyo
|
|
April 02, 2014, 12:13:33 PM |
|
We still need to spread the hashpower out to different pools though, come on guys. Let's not fork it.
I wanted to, but I could only see 3 pools. 2 were huge, and the other empty! We need some big players to move over first. No point me mining by myself for a fee. You are right, we need to choose a 2nd pool, vote on when we switch and everyone do it at the same time. If all of us who frequent these threads would do that, we would probably be able to split the hashrate and no one loses any mining time. Maybe the dev can add a poll on the front page for a date and pool to switch to at the same time.
|
|
|
|
Acidyo
|
|
April 02, 2014, 12:14:11 PM |
|
Also after we have split the hashpower into 2 pools, it will be a lot easier for new pools to get miners.
|
|
|
|
|
|