Do you think 40% bonus is too much for early Investors?

[Meysa_richa]

40% bonus is indeed very big for investors, especially if the bonus is given when holding pre ICO, where the price of the token is very cheap. sometimes, developers try to attract investors by using a fairly large bonus. of course, this will have an impact on the price of the token later. Well, however, it's too big for a bonus, and will most likely have an impact on the token price going forward.

A dump will occur when the token enters the market later, that is what happens if the sales bonus is too large. And if this happens, most of them defeat Bounty hunters, whereas the allocation for the Bounty Campaign is usually no more than 2%. 10% -15% bonus I think that's better.

[super8]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

I think 10 to 20 is best bonus

[cherryganda]

Forty percent is not a huge bonus, it is an average one.
Most team need to offer huge discounts to attract early investors which will serve as good foundation for public sales.
But i hope that early investors token will have their tokens LOCKED for a minimum of half year, this will prevent dumping in the market.

[Nolimitz84]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

You see, when it comes to the minimum amount of investment to ensure the lowest initial costs,the 40% bonus is not so much.To avoid mass token sale at the first listing,it is necessary to pay tokens for early investors in stages.Now it is a common practice and there is nothing wrong.

[drumamat]

For sure 40% is too much. It's not the way to attract smart investors. Big bonus means low real token value.

I do not agree with any of your three statements.1-You say that 40% is a lot, but how much do you think you need to provide a bonus to attract at least some investors?.2-It is smart investors who invest their money in the early stages with great bonuses.3-There are many projects that provided early investors with bonuses and as a result, these projects are now keeping the price of their tokens at a height.Example:https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/algorand/.Early investors could purchase tokens for 0.16$.Despite this, the token is currently trading at 0.56$.

[Aveatrex]

Forty percent is not a huge bonus, it is an average one.

You are absolutely wrong in my opinion. 40% is a huge bonus, even 10% is still a big deal; not surprising that a lot of projects end up dead because bonuses got dumped early even if the project by itself is legit and developing.

But i hope that early investors token will have their tokens LOCKED for a minimum of half year, this will prevent dumping in the market.

This isn't going to happen.You won't find an investor that agree to invest and have his investment locked up for a period of time, that's literally depriving him from his own money.

[EmmaBen]

I personally think it is and encourages token dumping. Most investors take this opportunity to sell of these bonuses and relatively cheap prices seeing that, they didn't get it for much, they can easily sell them off for some cheap bucks leading to enormous price fluctuations and drops. Purchase bonuses and discounts are good but not when offered in excess.

[satriagedhe]

i guess so , 40% is too much also sometime that ICO also mention about refreal program and i think that the cause price always get low when hitting new market

[Helpme_please]

I personally think it is and encourages token dumping. Most investors take this opportunity to sell of these bonuses and relatively cheap prices seeing that, they didn't get it for much, they can easily sell them off for some cheap bucks leading to enormous price fluctuations and drops. Purchase bonuses and discounts are good but not when offered in excess.

big bonuses be one of reason why token price dumped in market.investors thinking if we took 5% only from their initial investment was enough and immediately moved to another projects.but the fact now much private sale contributors didn't patient to wait projects completely developted.they prefer to sell their bonus as soon as possible to market.good projects will calculate this factors and maybe they won't give big bonus to their investors to keep price in market.

[Twinkledoe]

I personally think it is and encourages token dumping. Most investors take this opportunity to sell of these bonuses and relatively cheap prices seeing that, they didn't get it for much, they can easily sell them off for some cheap bucks leading to enormous price fluctuations and drops. Purchase bonuses and discounts are good but not when offered in excess.

big bonuses be one of reason why token price dumped in market.investors thinking if we took 5% only from their initial investment was enough and immediately moved to another projects.but the fact now much private sale contributors didn't patient to wait projects completely developted.they prefer to sell their bonus as soon as possible to market.good projects will calculate this factors and maybe they won't give big bonus to their investors to keep price in market.

And then, some projects are blaming bounty hunters for the sudden decrease of value of their coin. The major reason actually are those investors who dumped their holdings because they got those at very dirty cheap prices so it doesn't matter if they will sell cheap so long they have profit. I think it is okay to have that high percentage of bonus but it should be locked in a certain period of time where they can't sell their possessions. And they can withdraw it in staggered amounts not in bulk.

[fortunecrypto]

i think 40% bonus is not a big deal for early investor!early investor is the real supporter of the project as they invest their project and support from early stage.but without bonus is best for the whole project

I think otherwise, 40% is a big amount,  20% although still is high, still, manageable I agree that early investors are the real supporter of the project, but we should look forward on what's going to happen in the future on the price of the token/coin, there's a dump that is going to happen, developers should see to it that the project has potential in the future and do not concentrate on the bonus.

[retnocintaku]

Investors will not be interested in investing if there is no bonus. Especially if the bonus is very large of course investors will invest. Developers should be good at developing projects, so when these early investors sell coins, the price of the coin does not happen to decline, but the price still remains steady.

Moreover, better bonuses for investors are not too big. So when the token is already listed in the exchange, the price of the token is not too far declining. And the price can return up again and have a large volume.

[matchi2011]

i think 40% bonus is not a big deal for early investor!early investor is the real supporter of the project as they invest their project and support from early stage.but without bonus is best for the whole project

I think otherwise, 40% is a big amount,  20% although still is high, still, manageable I agree that early investors are the real supporter of the project, but we should look forward on what's going to happen in the future on the price of the token/coin, there's a dump that is going to happen, developers should see to it that the project has potential in the future and do not concentrate on the bonus.

But without those promise bonuses investors won't be attracted to take the risk, we can't deny the fact at it's all about money and investors will always ask for advantages to take the risk otherwise they will not go and place any investment, there's already an open market where they can invest in any available projects where results can be seen faster, unlike with new projects that needs to attract new investors to support in order to build and develop the project.

[aioc]

i think 40% bonus is not a big deal for early investor!early investor is the real supporter of the project as they invest their project and support from early stage.but without bonus is best for the whole project

I think otherwise, 40% is a big amount,  20% although still is high, still, manageable I agree that early investors are the real supporter of the project, but we should look forward on what's going to happen in the future on the price of the token/coin, there's a dump that is going to happen, developers should see to it that the project has potential in the future and do not concentrate on the bonus.

But without those promise bonuses investors won't be attracted to take the risk, we can't deny the fact at it's all about money and investors will always ask for advantages to take the risk otherwise they will not go and place any investment, there's already an open market where they can invest in any available projects where results can be seen faster, unlike with new projects that needs to attract new investors to support in order to build and develop the project.

investors should consider the long term profitability of the project, a huge bonus is just an invitation for a future dump of the coin, we have seen that so many times in many projects, then they put the blame on bounty hunters.
If the project is that good and with a good concept, there's no need to give a huge bonus of 5% for me is enough.

[Strongkored]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

first an ICO ITO or IEO gives a bonus is to attract as many investors as possible so that the fundraising target is reached, 2016-2017 I invest in several ICOs and as I recall the ICO did not give a bonus of more than 20% and the Coin or Token when I entered the exchange got price is quite high.
In my opinion a 40% bonus could be the cause of the drop in the price of a Coin or Token when entering an exchange or it could be because investors see that the developer of the project does not have the ability to develop the project so that investors choose to actually exit the project to look for new projects that it's better for them to invest their capital in new projects

[michellee]

This is too big for a bonus because indeed if we see a large bonus it would mostly be a pretty bad thing where there is a price reduction when the initial listing on the market. some projects even dropped more than 50% due to their private sales or sales giving a sizeable bonus. this will be a consideration for teams to consider bonuses

Yes, that will make the price got a big dump, and I don't think the price can stay at the ico price or even it could down for a long time. The investor will sell some of their tokens to get their money back, and then they will think about how they can make money from the token. I think that will be the team's decision to give that percentage to the investor, and if they really give that much, then they need to prepare to see the down of the price.

[sjbi]

Every crypto project functions as per its rules and regulations. So some projects give up to 70 percent bonus on the purchase of its coins in a bid to attract as many as investors. But in some cases, this will result in dumping coin price upon hitting exchanges. But giving more percentage bonus is not good.

[joshua123]

In some cases where a token price crashes soon after listing on the Exchange, the blames has over time been attributed to the bounty hunters and sometimes to early investors that received certain bonuses.

Do you think 40% bonus for early investors is too much and capable of crashing token price?

Considering the volatility of market. I know that many tokens are bound to go down so even the price is cut by half if youre given bonus token it will leverage the loss. But if the tokens are great then you just win a lottery jackpot price with some bonus. I think its not cool to blame it all on bounty, some traders also the reason why its go down and they playing the price so they can manipulate it on the market. I think bounty has only little percentage of tokens so I doubt it will affect the market.

[pinoy.bolanon]

For me, 40% extra bonus is too much, this is the result of having a billions of supply of the tokens, they give too much for early investors and the result would be the price would be dump, but i like the idea of deflation tokens where they have limited number of supply, alright talking about this bonuses given by them itself, i think this is not good i know it will attract investors but it will just give the price dump in the long run.

[setialovers]

For me, 40% extra bonus is too much, this is the result of having a billions of supply of the tokens, they give too much for early investors and the result would be the price would be dump, but i like the idea of deflation tokens where they have limited number of supply, alright talking about this bonuses given by them itself, i think this is not good i know it will attract investors but it will just give the price dump in the long run.

Agree, with 40% bonus, investors who get a bonus have the opportunity to sell below the ICO price when the token starts listing in the market. This strategy can be positive to boost sales targets but negative because prices are vulnerable to falling