Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘

[xSkylarx]

Nowadays its quite common for a casino to require their players to comply in kyc (specially the whale gamblers) because of the gambling regulatory law thus we should not be surprise if we are ask to abide.

Casino that doesn't require KYC often has bad reviews and likely scam their users. You will just be frustrated if you manage to win some big amount playing on their platform and not be able to withdraw it. They will suddenly require your personal information to withdraw your winnings. Submitting those info on non-reputable gambling website out of desperation is more dangerous than doing it on a trusted website.

[1714956255]

1714956255

[1714956255]

1714956255

[Strongkored]

Nowadays its quite common for a casino to require their players to comply in kyc (specially the whale gamblers) because of the gambling regulatory law thus we should not be surprise if we are ask to abide.

Casino that doesn't require KYC often has bad reviews and likely scam their users. You will just be frustrated if you manage to win some big amount playing on their platform and not be able to withdraw it. They will suddenly require your personal information to withdraw your winnings. Submitting those info on non-reputable gambling website out of desperation is more dangerous than doing it on a trusted website.

Usually casinos that do not require KYC do not have a license while the license is sometimes a part where players consider that this casino was built seriously and has a large bank roll so it is all a choice whether to play at a casino that does not require KYC but does not have a license or vice versa and both have pros and cons

[Taskford]

Even the legit services are hard to trust in these KYC matters because they store these data with some third party software where privacy breach can happen anytime or they could sell your data on dark web using it for illicit works so how do you remain anonymous in this market is what makes you safe.

Not all legitimate services cannot be trusted to maintain data privacy so we should not be pessimistic about this and assume all legitimate services cannot be trusted. I'm sure the casino partners with reputable legitimate services to keep customer data safe and not use it for anything prohibited.

We actually don’t know if our data is secure or not because even big companies are exposing our details just for the purpose of promotions. We just hope that Roobet is really safe and we are hoping that this KYC requirement can still be change. Crypto gambling is slowly becoming KYC mandatory but we should not worry that much as long as we secured our personal accounts, we are still safe. If you are not ok with Roobet policy, then try to look for other option that is still KYC free, for sure there’s still a site that will allow you to remain anonymous.

Even if we go on non KYC compliant casino still for sure they will go on this situation in long run so better accept what Roobet require for now because for sure in the long run all casino will implement this requirements in future. Roobet is reputable casino so for sure they will make sure to protect the identity of their costumer because they also building up the trust and this one is convertible to more costumers if they establish that they are good on many factors especially on important details like this.

If you are a die hard Roobet user or gambler then this level 1 KYC wont really be a bothersome for you although you could always put up fake details but of course you do know the risk involved
on doing so but if you are a gambler who do only make out small time deposits or not that much then it wont really be an issue.Majority of gambling casinos that we do have today is regulated
or abiding government laws which means that anytime they could ask out for some verification and this is mostly been stated on their terms and conditions which is common
and you should expect that anytime they could really switch into this.

Level 1 KYC procedure is not a big deal after all if we look at the situation in easy ways but for other who doesn't understand or skeptical about this because they are worried, maybe this kind of issuance still not good at them that's why they need to slowly accept the fact that this feature will come mandatory to them on any platform because they are dealing with money. So for now its good to practice and give a trust especially if the casino is performing so well and been trusted by many people.

[Eternad]

the situation in easy ways but for other who doesn't understand or skeptical about this because they are worried, maybe this kind of issuance still not good at them that's why they need to slowly accept the fact that this feature will come mandatory to them on any platform because they are dealing with money. So for now its good to practice and give a trust especially if the casino is performing so well and been trusted by many people.

Many will not understand your point because there’s still a lot of Casino out there that doesn’t required KYC upon registration and withdrawal of balance that’s many user will still insist that mandatory KYC requirements is not logical even though it’s what required by the Roobet license. I agree that the day of mandatory KYC is near to come since even DeFi is now being target by some country government to be KYC.

We can’t do anything if the law already insist on it and they have the right to do it because of the tax involved.

[Apocollapse]

Level 1 KYC procedure is not a big deal after all if we look at the situation in easy ways but for other who doesn't understand or skeptical about this because they are worried, maybe this kind of issuance still not good at them that's why they need to slowly accept the fact that this feature will come mandatory to them on any platform because they are dealing with money. So for now its good to practice and give a trust especially if the casino is performing so well and been trusted by many people.

It's just funny to see many people are very skeptical about the level 1 KYC while they're already give that information since Binance forcing all their customers to submit the basic KYC lol. I don't think users in this forum didn't using Binance as their centralized exchanges since Binance is very popular and very known. After all you're trusting your KYC with Binance, how it's different if you submit your KYC to trustworthy casino?

[rhomelmabini]

It's just funny to see many people are very skeptical about the level 1 KYC while they're already give that information since Binance forcing all their customers to submit the basic KYC lol. I don't think users in this forum didn't using Binance as their centralized exchanges since Binance is very popular and very known. After all you're trusting your KYC with Binance, how it's different if you submit your KYC to trustworthy casino?

That varies from individuals to the others and their preferences will just make us wonder, "how come that one is fine but this one is not?". I think there's difference in it, Binance are probably known who runs it but for a casino that is quiet unknown who the owner is, that keeps other skeptical if they'll proceed.

[Killredillla]

Level 1 KYC procedure is not a big deal after all if we look at the situation in easy ways but for other who doesn't understand or skeptical about this because they are worried, maybe this kind of issuance still not good at them that's why they need to slowly accept the fact that this feature will come mandatory to them on any platform because they are dealing with money. So for now its good to practice and give a trust especially if the casino is performing so well and been trusted by many people.

It's just funny to see many people are very skeptical about the level 1 KYC while they're already give that information since Binance forcing all their customers to submit the basic KYC lol. I don't think users in this forum didn't using Binance as their centralized exchanges since Binance is very popular and very known. After all you're trusting your KYC with Binance, how it's different if you submit your KYC to trustworthy casino?

Maybe just because binance is the largest exchange in the world in terms of daily trading volume of cryptocurrencies and its both licensed and regulated in many countries worldwide while roobet is a fairly new, fairly not so popular, shady licensed casino ?

[hd49728]

Level 1 KYC procedure is not a big deal after all if we look at the situation in easy ways but for other who doesn't understand or skeptical about this because they are worried, maybe this kind of issuance still not good at them that's why they need to slowly accept the fact that this feature will come mandatory to them on any platform because they are dealing with money. So for now its good to practice and give a trust especially if the casino is performing so well and been trusted by many people.

Yes it is not a big deal. Because it would be a lie if a crypto guy says he does not use Binance. Now, use Binance means KYC. To operate, platforms must follow laws and regulations locally so even companies can not reject KYC request from governments. As users, we can not reject if governments go with KYC.

It's just funny to see many people are very skeptical about the level 1 KYC while they're already give that information since Binance forcing all their customers to submit the basic KYC lol. I don't think users in this forum didn't using Binance as their centralized exchanges since Binance is very popular and very known. After all you're trusting your KYC with Binance, how it's different if you submit your KYC to trustworthy casino?

It is just a little panic and noise when something is changed in ToS and policy. You know I think in future, more KYC will be required on centralized platforms. We will not be able to avoid it forever. Like Binance, they were KYC free but now it is mandatory.

Level 1 KYC is not the end of anything. So I don't have big issue with level 1 KYC at Roobet. It is like if you love Binance, you will do KYC there. The same if you love Roobet, you will do KYC on Roobet.

Is it good or better if you do level 1 KYC on Roobet and continue to bet and get paid there or you move to another KYC-free gambling site but in the end, they turn to be scam?

[babygun]

Maybe just because binance is the largest exchange in the world in terms of daily trading volume of cryptocurrencies and its both licensed and regulated in many countries worldwide while roobet is a fairly new, fairly not so popular, shady licensed casino ?

I wouldn't call Roobet a new, not so popular and shady casino. There are online since 2 years, have grown massively and until now, there were not a lot of problems or complaints and everybody gets paid. It is simple, if you don't want to submit your KYC information to Roobet, than you are free to use one of the other casinos but there is no risk to submit your information to Roobet.

[Findingnemo]

Level 1 KYC procedure is not a big deal after all if we look at the situation in easy ways but for other who doesn't understand or skeptical about this because they are worried, maybe this kind of issuance still not good at them that's why they need to slowly accept the fact that this feature will come mandatory to them on any platform because they are dealing with money. So for now its good to practice and give a trust especially if the casino is performing so well and been trusted by many people.

It's just funny to see many people are very skeptical about the level 1 KYC while they're already give that information since Binance forcing all their customers to submit the basic KYC lol. I don't think users in this forum didn't using Binance as their centralized exchanges since Binance is very popular and very known. After all you're trusting your KYC with Binance, how it's different if you submit your KYC to trustworthy casino?

First of all not every trader has to be a gambler or vice versa so they don't know what is actually happening in one sector while they never crossed from their sectors. For example who has cryptocurrencies a lot and used to gamble only not using any exchange then they maybe surprised by sudden implementation of KYC because there is no such thing in the previous days they were playing.

[LUCKMCFLY]

i tried to be member.. i saw , there is adress info on witdrawal section.. this is not good for bitcointalk gamblers

You may not know this, but there are many casinos on the market today that don't yet require any personal information from their players. Or at least, they ask for identification only when withdrawing large sums of money. This means that you still have a lot of choices, but if you decide to play with Roobet, you will have to comply with KYC procedures. It is important to know, however, that Level 1 KYC is usually sufficient, which means only basic personal information is required.

stake and sportsbet io dont want kyc..  i witdrawal 25.000 dollar on stake and sportsbet  without kyc 1 or kyc 2 ...

there bookies are not good than stake , sportsbet

If you don't want KYC you can always skip playing at Roobet.  Each casino have terms and condition to implement, they are carefully made to protect both players and the casino and each casino have a different point of interest so you can see different policy in each casino.  You can either reach out to them about your issue and get the best answer yourself.

What happens is that both Stake, Bitcasino, SB are casinos that have had a long history over the years, they have a very good reputation and that age makes them somewhat more flexible, as well as their licenses, therefore they are more flexible with their clients, but there is something that Roobet has that is very good, the good reputation and its good contests, in addition to all this they have their contracts when the registration is made, what they call the T&C that we all give them to accept and when accepting we have to be willing to meet their demands, it's something like that, we can't go against it, if later on their terms and conditions are something else.

Level 1 KYC procedure is not a big deal after all if we look at the situation in easy ways but for other who doesn't understand or skeptical about this because they are worried, maybe this kind of issuance still not good at them that's why they need to slowly accept the fact that this feature will come mandatory to them on any platform because they are dealing with money. So for now its good to practice and give a trust especially if the casino is performing so well and been trusted by many people.

It's just funny to see many people are very skeptical about the level 1 KYC while they're already give that information since Binance forcing all their customers to submit the basic KYC lol. I don't think users in this forum didn't using Binance as their centralized exchanges since Binance is very popular and very known. After all you're trusting your KYC with Binance, how it's different if you submit your KYC to trustworthy casino?

First of all not every trader has to be a gambler or vice versa so they don't know what is actually happening in one sector while they never crossed from their sectors. For example who has cryptocurrencies a lot and used to gamble only not using any exchange then they maybe surprised by sudden implementation of KYC because there is no such thing in the previous days they were playing.

If it can be, what happens is that the community of players is something else, but I know that there are many casino players who do not speculate in the market, they only care about having money, in this case coins to be able to play and try. Winning is something like when you enter a physical casino and exchange real money for chips or local currencies from the same casino, in the event that many players have some knowledge, some prefer decentralized exchanges, but you have to see what type of player and trader is, or what type of player-player or can be the case of trader-investor.

I think that a casino like Rootet encompasses all that, maybe the KYC is annoying, but in some cases it is necessary.

[Findingnemo]

Level 1 KYC procedure is not a big deal after all if we look at the situation in easy ways but for other who doesn't understand or skeptical about this because they are worried, maybe this kind of issuance still not good at them that's why they need to slowly accept the fact that this feature will come mandatory to them on any platform because they are dealing with money. So for now its good to practice and give a trust especially if the casino is performing so well and been trusted by many people.

It's just funny to see many people are very skeptical about the level 1 KYC while they're already give that information since Binance forcing all their customers to submit the basic KYC lol. I don't think users in this forum didn't using Binance as their centralized exchanges since Binance is very popular and very known. After all you're trusting your KYC with Binance, how it's different if you submit your KYC to trustworthy casino?

First of all not every trader has to be a gambler or vice versa so they don't know what is actually happening in one sector while they never crossed from their sectors. For example who has cryptocurrencies a lot and used to gamble only not using any exchange then they maybe surprised by sudden implementation of KYC because there is no such thing in the previous days they were playing.

If it can be, what happens is that the community of players is something else, but I know that there are many casino players who do not speculate in the market, they only care about having money, in this case coins to be able to play and try. Winning is something like when you enter a physical casino and exchange real money for chips or local currencies from the same casino, in the event that many players have some knowledge, some prefer decentralized exchanges, but you have to see what type of player and trader is, or what type of player-player or can be the case of trader-investor.

I think that a casino like Rootet encompasses all that, maybe the KYC is annoying, but in some cases it is necessary.

KYC implementation is forced to all the cryptocurrency related service providers in the name of regulations so we can't blame the service provider when the government make such laws and in the next few years we will see mandatory KYC for all the centralized crypto services either its an exchange or casino or anything.

[FanEagle]

Never anticipate that you won hundreds of thousands out of 50 bucks but its not impossible considering odds and chances but we should stick on being realistic because you would really be needing all

luck in the world for you to able to hit or win like that thats why you shouldnt really that anticipate that you would win up that way.Each gambler is really that different when it comes to financial
capacity thats why it would really vary.

For KYC matters then it would be no surprise that whale players do undergo into such process when it comes to verification which is something a standard thing
when it comes to this one.

If you really think that it is "possible" then you are in for a treat in the gambling world. I have been here for a decade and I can tell you that there hasn't been a single person I have ever saw that went from 50 bucks deposited into like 100k withdrawn, that is not how it happens.

You usually lose your money and the possibility is a smaller amount as well, people do not even deposit and wager all of it for an odd like that, they do that in nothing. It means that if you deposited 50 bucks, you wager with 1 dollar at best, probably less, and that means you are going to make 1x million in order to reach those levels and that has never happened before in history of crypto gambling as far as I know.

[Apocollapse]

If you really think that it is "possible" then you are in for a treat in the gambling world. I have been here for a decade and I can tell you that there hasn't been a single person I have ever saw that went from 50 bucks deposited into like 100k withdrawn, that is not how it happens.

You usually lose your money and the possibility is a smaller amount as well, people do not even deposit and wager all of it for an odd like that, they do that in nothing. It means that if you deposited 50 bucks, you wager with 1 dollar at best, probably less, and that means you are going to make 1x million in order to reach those levels and that has never happened before in history of crypto gambling as far as I know.

What about this one The Biggest Wins with lowest risks in Casino History? it's possible based on this thread, but of course if you're okay with the stranger achievement, not the one who you're already know it before. Though I don't know the games that they played, but it seems the odds is way above than 1x million considering how small the amount they bet and the winning they get.

I think it's possible to get such amazing odds by betting on sports with multi bet features especially you pick the underdog fighters/clubs.

[babygun]

What about this one The Biggest Wins with lowest risks in Casino History? it's possible based on this thread, but of course if you're okay with the stranger achievement, not the one who you're already know it before. Though I don't know the games that they played, but it seems the odds is way above than 1x million considering how small the amount they bet and the winning they get.

I think it's possible to get such amazing odds by betting on sports with multi bet features especially you pick the underdog fighters/clubs.

I have also seen multiple bet slips with people winning crazy amounts (even with a low bet size) but in the end, betting on multiples will never give you a positive ROI. It is much better to bet on value bets with odds of 1.6 -1.7. From time to time, I still make some crazy betslips but almost never won one.

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

Even you're not seen the person, but doesn't mean is impossible.

Could be there has some people are winning 100,000$ in here, but is not active who know right ? In gambling can be happen. Just like BTC and other while people think can't reach 20,000$ or 50,000$

But the reality can reach that number, so nothing is imposible.

[wiss19]

the situation in easy ways but for other who doesn't understand or skeptical about this because they are worried, maybe this kind of issuance still not good at them that's why they need to slowly accept the fact that this feature will come mandatory to them on any platform because they are dealing with money. So for now its good to practice and give a trust especially if the casino is performing so well and been trusted by many people.

Many will not understand your point because there’s still a lot of Casino out there that doesn’t required KYC upon registration and withdrawal of balance that’s many user will still insist that mandatory KYC requirements is not logical even though it’s what required by the Roobet license. I agree that the day of mandatory KYC is near to come since even DeFi is now being target by some country government to be KYC.

We can’t do anything if the law already insist on it and they have the right to do it because of the tax involved.

That is not their problem though. I mean I get that there could be a situation where it's Roobets duty to get KYC because of their license, but why would the customer care? I mean there are places that do not ask for it, and there is this place that ask for it, that's why they do not really care about what they think, because in the end we are talking about a place that is barely giving an inch on this subject, they just said KYC mandatory and never changed it.

Well, who cares if they have a license duty to get that KYC? I could go out there and gamble on a place with no KYC requirement and have fun and withdraw and go about my day without a trouble.

[aysg76]

What about this one The Biggest Wins with lowest risks in Casino History? it's possible based on this thread, but of course if you're okay with the stranger achievement, not the one who you're already know it before. Though I don't know the games that they played, but it seems the odds is way above than 1x million considering how small the amount they bet and the winning they get.

This is why we call gambling the luck game and unpredictable as small bets could land you into life changing fortune.We have seen these big wins and there are many people who have win big amounts in the real world casino as well crypto casinos but we can only hope for the best while it's all about being lucky at one point.

[Johnyz]

What about this one The Biggest Wins with lowest risks in Casino History? it's possible based on this thread, but of course if you're okay with the stranger achievement, not the one who you're already know it before. Though I don't know the games that they played, but it seems the odds is way above than 1x million considering how small the amount they bet and the winning they get.

This is why we call gambling the luck game and unpredictable as small bets could land you into life changing fortune.We have seen these big wins and there are many people who have win big amounts in the real world casino as well crypto casinos but we can only hope for the best while it's all about being lucky at one point.

Any idea how much is the biggest win ever here on Roobet?
Do they have any announcement with regards to this one? Let's talk more about Roobet here so gamblers can know if there's also a lucky gambler that won the jackpot in Roobet. Winning against all odds is one of the greatest achievements of every gamblers, if you got the chance to experience this better to have a good financial planning or else you'll just lose it again in gambling.

[Apocollapse]

Any idea how much is the biggest win ever here on Roobet?
Do they have any announcement with regards to this one? Let's talk more about Roobet here so gamblers can know if there's also a lucky gambler that won the jackpot in Roobet. Winning against all odds is one of the greatest achievements of every gamblers, if you got the chance to experience this better to have a good financial planning or else you'll just lose it again in gambling.

Although I can't find the biggest win or reach 1x Million multipliers, but at least this can be included since hitting one thousand multipliers isn't easy. This player just bet for $2 and win over $2,634 that's really a big win for most of people.

$2,634 Was Just Won on Roobet!🥳

Congratulations to yuyu8756 on a 1,317x Multiplier! 💰
https://twitter.com/Roobet/status/1544033302918574080

Based on their twitter account, it's quite rarely to see gamblers win big multipliers, it's either they're not really fan to post a big win since they're already active conducting a giveaway or it's already common to see a big multipliers won since if you check on Roobet lucky wins, you will see the recent of huge multipliers win there.