Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘

[Mate2237]

Roobet is one or the highest growing casino in the online casino space. It has a very good reputation in the forum. All the campaign I have seen or met as I came to the forum Roobet is one of the last longing I know. Although I have seen other two like Chipmixer and The Best Change.

Those type of companies are there basically for just security reasons and not because of hard work. Collecting KYC and keeping them secure is not that much of extra work and any casino could do that, just put it on some offline server where nobody can hack, and you will be fine, there is absolutely no trouble at all.

It is done because of governmental pressure, if you use KYC company supported by the government, then you could legally be a casino without a trouble and would be able to say "we worked with the government on this" and get away with it, plus you could tell the gamblers "we do not hold any of your information" which is good for marketing.

But I have not heard any bad report on Roobet both in payout or in security. Roobet uses their KYC and also ues it to secure their transaction. Yes online server is the best option for the use of KYC. Government pressurized casino companies to use KYC because the security. Many gamblers use different information in the process of registering  KYC. There are sometimes  the information used in the site is different from the DOCUMENTS provided for the prove of ownership. That is where the problem is always escalating.

[1714954557]

1714954557

[1714954557]

1714954557

[1714954557]

1714954557

[1714954557]

1714954557

[erep]

snip
Government pressurized casino companies to use KYC because the security. Many gamblers use different information in the process of registering  KYC. There are sometimes  the information used in the site is different from the DOCUMENTS provided for the prove of ownership. That is where the problem is always escalating.

Government regulations have pressured every casino to add an obligation to complete KYC on the terms and conditions, these regulations are based on security and money laundering prevention, but users expect the anonymity factor to be increased so that they do not agree to use KYC even though they do not commit money laundering crimes and others. But there is no other choice if using a centralized gambling platform because it is guided by government regulations.

[crzy]

snip
Government pressurized casino companies to use KYC because the security. Many gamblers use different information in the process of registering  KYC. There are sometimes  the information used in the site is different from the DOCUMENTS provided for the prove of ownership. That is where the problem is always escalating.

Government regulations have pressured every casino to add an obligation to complete KYC on the terms and conditions, these regulations are based on security and money laundering prevention, but users expect the anonymity factor to be increased so that they do not agree to use KYC even though they do not commit money laundering crimes and others. But there is no other choice if using a centralized gambling platform because it is guided by government regulations.

Many are requiring level 1 KYC first but sooner or later they will surely ask for another KYC which requires the supporting documents and that is because of the regulations which is already beyond the control of any gambling site. If you are still not ok with the KYC, better to use other platform for now but don’t stay your money on any site because they can implement KYC even without informing you.

[goaldigger]

snip
Government pressurized casino companies to use KYC because the security. Many gamblers use different information in the process of registering  KYC. There are sometimes  the information used in the site is different from the DOCUMENTS provided for the prove of ownership. That is where the problem is always escalating.

Government regulations have pressured every casino to add an obligation to complete KYC on the terms and conditions, these regulations are based on security and money laundering prevention, but users expect the anonymity factor to be increased so that they do not agree to use KYC even though they do not commit money laundering crimes and others. But there is no other choice if using a centralized gambling platform because it is guided by government regulations.

Many are requiring level 1 KYC first but sooner or later they will surely ask for another KYC which requires the supporting documents and that is because of the regulations which is already beyond the control of any gambling site. If you are still not ok with the KYC, better to use other platform for now but don’t stay your money on any site because they can implement KYC even without informing you.

This is actually what happened to Roobet before, I remember they implement KYC without announcing it and the gamblers left with no choice but to comply or else they will not access their money, though it’s only a level 1 KYC but doing that without announcing is something not good. Well, it happened years ago and I don’t think it’s still an issue here. Regulations will always win, the government have its own way to regulate casinos, and KYC is one thing.

[Slow death]

KYC is very important because it is the key to their authenticity, the subject is complicated, but both sides must be understood.

That's tough. Majority of the gamblers including me will continue hating on KYC due to various reasons which is why it's very, very difficult for both sides of the KYC debate to reach a mutual consensus.

I'd say bear market will make them get benefit since gamblers will try to gamble more in order to get profit from bear market and the fees is much lower due to the network aren't busy.

That makes zero sense. Gamblers will try to gamble less due to the bear market which will directly cause these gambling sites to earn less in the short-term.

yes, like many cat and mouse games this will be a never ending debate with the probable outcome of KYC policies getting more and more restrict over time, and possible some decentralized alternatives appearing here and there

Whether we do like it or not, there's no other path we would really be seeing or taking but to have those KYC sooner or on later years, considering that regulation and laws becomes even more tighter as the years passing.Good thing we do have here is that we do still have options which other platforms would really be taking the place into those who had fallen into that KYC set-up.
We've seen that there are still lots of platforms or companies that doesnt apply that KYC this is why we do still have choice or option to take.
I do agree that this is really indeed a never ending debate or talks about KYC.

Most people would agree that KYC was inevitable, but the most worrying and shocking thing here is that the casino is anonymous (it is located in an uncertain part) and the owner of the casino is anonymous, the license of the casino is from a country where the laws are lenient or in certain cases, they don't even have a license, so this same casino asks customers to KYC (deliver their precious documents) to remember that when doing KYC the person delivers an identity document and proof of address, that is, the owner of the anonymous casino is knowing where every customer lives in detail but the customer has never seen the casino owner's face and doesn't even know where the heck the casino is located, so what part of that is fair?

[Scripture]

Most people would agree that KYC was inevitable, but the most worrying and shocking thing here is that the casino is anonymous (it is located in an uncertain part) and the owner of the casino is anonymous, the license of the casino is from a country where the laws are lenient or in certain cases, they don't even have a license, so this same casino asks customers to KYC (deliver their precious documents) to remember that when doing KYC the person delivers an identity document and proof of address, that is, the owner of the anonymous casino is knowing where every customer lives in detail but the customer has never seen the casino owner's face and doesn't even know where the heck the casino is located, so what part of that is fair?

Is the team of Roobet remain anonymous? I’m not following this project for a long time though I manage to participate on their contest and I can say that once you deal with Roobet, you have no choice but to comply with their KYC requirement or else you can’t access your account. If KYC is a requirement, I also agree that the site should also disclose their information, this can also help to at least give peace of mind for the gamblers.

[lienfaye]

snip
Government pressurized casino companies to use KYC because the security. Many gamblers use different information in the process of registering  KYC. There are sometimes  the information used in the site is different from the DOCUMENTS provided for the prove of ownership. That is where the problem is always escalating.

Government regulations have pressured every casino to add an obligation to complete KYC on the terms and conditions, these regulations are based on security and money laundering prevention, but users expect the anonymity factor to be increased so that they do not agree to use KYC even though they do not commit money laundering crimes and others. But there is no other choice if using a centralized gambling platform because it is guided by government regulations.

Many are requiring level 1 KYC first but sooner or later they will surely ask for another KYC which requires the supporting documents and that is because of the regulations which is already beyond the control of any gambling site. If you are still not ok with the KYC, better to use other platform for now but don’t stay your money on any site because they can implement KYC even without informing you.

This is actually what happened to Roobet before, I remember they implement KYC without announcing it and the gamblers left with no choice but to comply or else they will not access their money, though it’s only a level 1 KYC but doing that without announcing is something not good. Well, it happened years ago and I don’t think it’s still an issue here. Regulations will always win, the government have its own way to regulate casinos, and KYC is one thing.

Yes the level 1 kyc implementation is so sudden. But as you can see many gamblers still comply and chose to stay, not only those who have funds on their account but the gamblers who trusted Roobet as a reliable casino. As you have pointed out the Government have ways to regulate the casinos and it's inevitable for them to continue to operate. Thus it's up to us if we will comply or will stay away.

[bitterguy28]

Most people would agree that KYC was inevitable, but the most worrying and shocking thing here is that the casino is anonymous (it is located in an uncertain part) and the owner of the casino is anonymous, the license of the casino is from a country where the laws are lenient or in certain cases, they don't even have a license, so this same casino asks customers to KYC (deliver their precious documents) to remember that when doing KYC the person delivers an identity document and proof of address, that is, the owner of the anonymous casino is knowing where every customer lives in detail but the customer has never seen the casino owner's face and doesn't even know where the heck the casino is located, so what part of that is fair?

Is the team of Roobet remain anonymous? I’m not following this project for a long time though I manage to participate on their contest and I can say that once you deal with Roobet, you have no choice but to comply with their KYC requirement or else you can’t access your account. If KYC is a requirement, I also agree that the site should also disclose their information, this can also help to at least give peace of mind for the gamblers.

If you manage to participate in events recently then yeah you need to comply with their KYC as this was strictly implemented earlier last year but if you happen to join or play in the past? nope their KYC requirement is only for those under questioned and not mandatory , I have been playing and joining event for many times even before and yes there are no strict kyc back then.
but about the info of each account? I'm sure that this will remain safe and private as this will only runs from the team and the players involved.

[LUCKMCFLY]

There are some casino that has already integrated Monero as a payment method before the compliance risk which led to the delisting of Monero on some tier 1 exchanges and the integration of Monero can still happen in some casinos. However, it's going to be 1 out of 10 casinos because of any form of anonymous deposit or withdrawal against casino Master license holder rules and regulations.

Yes, and I really like that integration in the event that it happens, because not everyone will do it, perhaps for fear that they might give them even more follow-up? I'm not very sure, but the SEC may be able to get in there, I think that the current KYC requirements that are so demanding, both for casinos and exchanges, is for that same action, to be able to do follow-ups, so they don't use Monero, because I've seen As an exchange as prestigious as Binance, they have surrendered to the is of many governments and authorities of some countries and have blocked many users of the exchange, including the blocking of some user funds that those governments considered suspicious, this is good for users. which are bad actually, but Monero makes the transactions more private, and more anonymous, I think that would make it more difficult for the authorities to trace them. I think that may be a compelling reason today.

The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.

Yes, and that's where we have to assume that if things aren't done that way, then it doesn't make sense, that is, the casinos have to side with the players, in the future there will be many problems that have to do with privacy, the dangers will be imminent and no one likes to leave their data on platforms that can be easily hacked and that do not offer them any type of backup, if this is so, if people do not play more in casinos they would simply fail, so it will become something very complicated, because there will be casinos that go against all KYC, and of all lack of identification, let's not be surprised that casinos with 0 KYC will come out.

snip
Government pressurized casino companies to use KYC because the security. Many gamblers use different information in the process of registering  KYC. There are sometimes  the information used in the site is different from the DOCUMENTS provided for the prove of ownership. That is where the problem is always escalating.

Government regulations have pressured every casino to add an obligation to complete KYC on the terms and conditions, these regulations are based on security and money laundering prevention, but users expect the anonymity factor to be increased so that they do not agree to use KYC even though they do not commit money laundering crimes and others. But there is no other choice if using a centralized gambling platform because it is guided by government regulations.

Many are requiring level 1 KYC first but sooner or later they will surely ask for another KYC which requires the supporting documents and that is because of the regulations which is already beyond the control of any gambling site. If you are still not ok with the KYC, better to use other platform for now but don’t stay your money on any site because they can implement KYC even without informing you.

This is actually what happened to Roobet before, I remember they implement KYC without announcing it and the gamblers left with no choice but to comply or else they will not access their money, though it’s only a level 1 KYC but doing that without announcing is something not good. Well, it happened years ago and I don’t think it’s still an issue here. Regulations will always win, the government have its own way to regulate casinos, and KYC is one thing.

Yes the level 1 kyc implementation is so sudden. But as you can see many gamblers still comply and chose to stay, not only those who have funds on their account but the gamblers who trusted Roobet as a reliable casino. As you have pointed out the Government have ways to regulate the casinos and it's inevitable for them to continue to operate. Thus it's up to us if we will comply or will stay away.

This is very true, in casinos we have the complete freedom to choose the one we want, but when choosing it we know that they all have their own rules or laws, and due to the requirements to maintain their authenticity and licenses, they require KYC is something that escapes so much. from the hands of the casino as well as from us, we all know the ances that governments have to put the s mnaos in the crypto world, and they know that casinos handle a lot of money, if they do not meet certain standards it is likely that the casino will be put in danger, a government or a command entity does not care about the life of a casino or a company, they only want their share of the money, and one way they find is through regulations, rules, KYC, it is a tactic.

Most people would agree that KYC was inevitable, but the most worrying and shocking thing here is that the casino is anonymous (it is located in an uncertain part) and the owner of the casino is anonymous, the license of the casino is from a country where the laws are lenient or in certain cases, they don't even have a license, so this same casino asks customers to KYC (deliver their precious documents) to remember that when doing KYC the person delivers an identity document and proof of address, that is, the owner of the anonymous casino is knowing where every customer lives in detail but the customer has never seen the casino owner's face and doesn't even know where the heck the casino is located, so what part of that is fair?

Is the team of Roobet remain anonymous? I’m not following this project for a long time though I manage to participate on their contest and I can say that once you deal with Roobet, you have no choice but to comply with their KYC requirement or else you can’t access your account. If KYC is a requirement, I also agree that the site should also disclose their information, this can also help to at least give peace of mind for the gamblers.

If you manage to participate in events recently then yeah you need to comply with their KYC as this was strictly implemented earlier last year but if you happen to join or play in the past? nope their KYC requirement is only for those under questioned and not mandatory , I have been playing and joining event for many times even before and yes there are no strict kyc back then.
but about the info of each account? I'm sure that this will remain safe and private as this will only runs from the team and the players involved.

I understand that many people question KYC, but you have to remember something, in every casino, new or old, there will always be a KYC requirement, this is something that will be normal and that will be for all casinos, for me I already know I see normal, also sometimes as players we want something and then we complain, that is, sometimes when casinos do not have certain licenses, we say that it is important, that licenses are needed to be able to trust completely, when there are licenses and they require KYC then we get upset, and yes, there are reasons, but if they don't demand that, they won't be in compliance with the law, and they could sanction the casino, or even close it, sometimes we must accept certain demands, and we are all free to play in casinos Our favorites, in the case of Robbet, it has always shown its great commitment to players, and it is reliable and has a great reputation, for me that is enough, of course, there are more demanding customers, but the trend is always It will go in that direction.

[suzanne5223]

There are some casino that has already integrated Monero as a payment method before the compliance risk which led to the delisting of Monero on some tier 1 exchanges and the integration of Monero can still happen in some casinos. However, it's going to be 1 out of 10 casinos because of any form of anonymous deposit or withdrawal against casino Master license holder rules and regulations.

Yes, and I really like that integration in the event that it happens, because not everyone will do it, perhaps for fear that they might give them even more follow-up? I'm not very sure, but the SEC may be able to get in there, I think that the current KYC requirements that are so demanding, both for casinos and exchanges, is for that same action, to be able to do follow-ups, so they don't use Monero, because I've seen As an exchange as prestigious as Binance, they have surrendered to the is of many governments and authorities of some countries and have blocked many users of the exchange, including the blocking of some user funds that those governments considered suspicious, this is good for users. which are bad actually, but Monero makes the transactions more private, and more anonymous, I think that would make it more difficult for the authorities to trace them. I think that may be a compelling reason today.

The SEC doing some follow-up is the reason why I said if we're going to count 1-10 the casinos that will make use of XMR in the future it will be only 1 casino which believe may be created by a privacy focus project.
The exchange like Binance has to surrender to the authorities because it's never a DEX, to begin with, but I'm surprised that they never delist Monero.
Having said that, I just want people to understand that no matter how we like privacy and no KYC for huge withdrawals on casinos since Cryptocurrency is the talk worldwide we will never escape the KYC aspect except if a privacy focus project creates a no KYC casino but if we consider the risk involved it doesn't worth it.

I think this trend will continue and probably get more extreme in the future
governments sanctioning privacy tools and people having to find alternatives if they care about privacy
it won't be different with online casinos.

Yes, and that's where we have to assume that if things aren't done that way, then it doesn't make sense, that is, the casinos have to side with the players, in the future there will be many problems that have to do with privacy, the dangers will be imminent and no one likes to leave their data on platforms that can be easily hacked and that do not offer them any type of backup, if this is so, if people do not play more in casinos they would simply fail, so it will become something very complicated, because there will be casinos that go against all KYC, and of all lack of identification, let's not be surprised that casinos with 0 KYC will come out.

Let's not forget that 98% of all crypto casinos have sided with the players but the abuse and manipulation of some gambling users which used casinos to tint stolen crypto are what make the SEC and other government agency to introduce the KYC/AML in the crypto casino setting. Besides, we need to understand the casino is not happy about spending some extra funds on KYC verification and user data protection.

Having said that, if the platform can be easily hacked as you said a lot of issues would have happened before now.

[aysg76]

Yes the level 1 kyc implementation is so sudden. But as you can see many gamblers still comply and chose to stay, not only those who have funds on their account but the gamblers who trusted Roobet as a reliable casino. As you have pointed out the Government have ways to regulate the casinos and it's inevitable for them to continue to operate. Thus it's up to us if we will comply or will stay away.

With level 1 kyc I don't have too much problem but going up and submition of my personal documents is not fine with me and don't need it also being a small gambler over Roobet and like to play over here.Many others also have the the opinion that they want to play over legit casino with KYC also instead of going to some unknown casino that could steal their funds.So we can keep playing or find other options if we are not satisfied nothing else can be done.

[Taskford]

Yes the level 1 kyc implementation is so sudden. But as you can see many gamblers still comply and chose to stay, not only those who have funds on their account but the gamblers who trusted Roobet as a reliable casino. As you have pointed out the Government have ways to regulate the casinos and it's inevitable for them to continue to operate. Thus it's up to us if we will comply or will stay away.

With level 1 kyc I don't have too much problem but going up and submition of my personal documents is not fine with me and don't need it also being a small gambler over Roobet and like to play over here.Many others also have the the opinion that they want to play over legit casino with KYC also instead of going to some unknown casino that could steal their funds.So we can keep playing or find other options if we are not satisfied nothing else can be done.

Many think about staying here even if there's KYC required its because roobet already establish a good reputation here that's why majority trust them and the only people who's skeptical are those complete newbie. They also need to understand that evading this requirements stu no guarantee for them to get comprised since if they go on small casino the risk is so high for them to get scam.

[FanEagle]

Let's not forget that 98% of all crypto casinos have sided with the players but the abuse and manipulation of some gambling users which used casinos to tint stolen crypto are what make the SEC and other government agency to introduce the KYC/AML in the crypto casino setting. Besides, we need to understand the casino is not happy about spending some extra funds on KYC verification and user data protection.

Having said that, if the platform can be easily hacked as you said a lot of issues would have happened before now.

That is true, it's not something that casinos would want, why would they need your KYC for themselves? It is not something that would help them at all. However, we should also realize that after it has already happened, and after KYC was introduced, some of the casinos started to use it to prevent people from doing things against the rules, so nothing government related but purely for casinos sake.

So, it wasn't like purely for government after a while, it was also for the casinos that dealt with it as well. It's definitely a benefit for the whole casino world, either you ask it right away, or ask it when something happens, but they do ask for it.

[Lucasgabd]

KYC is very important because it is the key to their authenticity, the subject is complicated, but both sides must be understood.

That's tough. Majority of the gamblers including me will continue hating on KYC due to various reasons which is why it's very, very difficult for both sides of the KYC debate to reach a mutual consensus.

I'd say bear market will make them get benefit since gamblers will try to gamble more in order to get profit from bear market and the fees is much lower due to the network aren't busy.

That makes zero sense. Gamblers will try to gamble less due to the bear market which will directly cause these gambling sites to earn less in the short-term.

yes, like many cat and mouse games this will be a never ending debate with the probable outcome of KYC policies getting more and more restrict over time, and possible some decentralized alternatives appearing here and there

Whether we do like it or not, there's no other path we would really be seeing or taking but to have those KYC sooner or on later years, considering that regulation and laws becomes even more tighter as the years passing.Good thing we do have here is that we do still have options which other platforms would really be taking the place into those who had fallen into that KYC set-up.
We've seen that there are still lots of platforms or companies that doesnt apply that KYC this is why we do still have choice or option to take.
I do agree that this is really indeed a never ending debate or talks about KYC.

I agree
it's a never ending debate but a really important one

maybe it'd deserve its own topic, in reality.

I don't think roobet or these big websites will change their policy anytime soon either
after you adopt KYC it's no turning back.

[suzanne5223]

Let's not forget that 98% of all crypto casinos have sided with the players but the abuse and manipulation of some gambling users which used casinos to tint stolen crypto are what make the SEC and other government agency to introduce the KYC/AML in the crypto casino setting. Besides, we need to understand the casino is not happy about spending some extra funds on KYC verification and user data protection.

Having said that, if the platform can be easily hacked as you said a lot of issues would have happened before now.

That is true, it's not something that casinos would want, why would they need your KYC for themselves? It is not something that would help them at all. However, we should also realize that after it has already happened, and after KYC was introduced, some of the casinos started to use it to prevent people from doing things against the rules, so nothing government related but purely for casinos sake.

So, it wasn't like purely for government after a while, it was also for the casinos that dealt with it as well. It's definitely a benefit for the whole casino world, either you ask it right away, or ask it when something happens, but they do ask for it.

According to my research, KYC activities cause the casino some extra bucks which they ought to have used for other purposes but they have to accept the KYC/AML because they have no option.
 I think is time for people to ask themselves the below question, specifically those that think some casinos are not been fair when they implement KYC.
If KYC somehow limits the level of casino users why would they choose to use it?

[Hamphser]

Let's not forget that 98% of all crypto casinos have sided with the players but the abuse and manipulation of some gambling users which used casinos to tint stolen crypto are what make the SEC and other government agency to introduce the KYC/AML in the crypto casino setting. Besides, we need to understand the casino is not happy about spending some extra funds on KYC verification and user data protection.

Having said that, if the platform can be easily hacked as you said a lot of issues would have happened before now.

That is true, it's not something that casinos would want, why would they need your KYC for themselves? It is not something that would help them at all. However, we should also realize that after it has already happened, and after KYC was introduced, some of the casinos started to use it to prevent people from doing things against the rules, so nothing government related but purely for casinos sake.

So, it wasn't like purely for government after a while, it was also for the casinos that dealt with it as well. It's definitely a benefit for the whole casino world, either you ask it right away, or ask it when something happens, but they do ask for it.

According to my research, KYC activities cause the casino some extra bucks which they ought to have used for other purposes but they have to accept the KYC/AML because they have no option.
 I think is time for people to ask themselves the below question, specifically those that think some casinos are not been fair when they implement KYC.
If KYC somehow limits the level of casino users why would they choose to use it?

When someone do find out that KYC thing is really just something that they cant accept, then its just common sense that you would be finding another one? We do have a good number of casinos which doesnt

really ask out for some KYC.I dont know for high rollers or whales but i wouldnt be surprised that they would really be asked out or into these common conditions considering that they are putting and pulling huge

chunks of money and since these platforms are regulated then they are really that obliged to have those requirements.We might not see on small scale gamblers or rollers but
there are some different situation for those who are whales.

[goaldigger]

I agree
it's a never ending debate but a really important one

maybe it'd deserve its own topic, in reality.

I don't think roobet or these big websites will change their policy anytime soon either
after you adopt KYC it's no turning back.

This has been the issue since Roobet implement KYC without any announcement ahead of time, and until now many gamblers can’t get over it. I agree that once you fill out the KYC, you’re exposed already and commenting here now is already too late. Well, so far there’s no issue with the security of Roobet since it’s secured and there’s no issue yet about the leaks of data base with Roobet so I assume all our personal details are safe with Roobet, I hope this can bring peace of mind to those who are still worried about the KYC in Roobet.

[wiss19]

If you manage to participate in events recently then yeah you need to comply with their KYC as this was strictly implemented earlier last year but if you happen to join or play in the past? nope their KYC requirement is only for those under questioned and not mandatory , I have been playing and joining event for many times even before and yes there are no strict kyc back then.
but about the info of each account? I'm sure that this will remain safe and private as this will only runs from the team and the players involved.

I am not sure if that's the case. I have been gambling here way before KYC was a thing, and as soon as it became a thing they asked for simple stuff. I agree it wasn't like my face or anything, but I was still asked some information. So new or old, you are asked KYC to gamble here. It's understandable since they are multi-million dollar company and want to protect it.

The idea that you would get something amazing out of this is a big deal, and if you want to do that then you have to share some stuff, especially if you end up winning a huge amount since it would actually be required by law, since it's a huge amount, to make sure not a bad person got it.

[Renampun]

I agree
it's a never ending debate but a really important one

maybe it'd deserve its own topic, in reality.

I don't think roobet or these big websites will change their policy anytime soon either
after you adopt KYC it's no turning back.

This has been the issue since Roobet implement KYC without any announcement ahead of time, and until now many gamblers can’t get over it. I agree that once you fill out the KYC, you’re exposed already and commenting here now is already too late. Well, so far there’s no issue with the security of Roobet since it’s secured and there’s no issue yet about the leaks of data base with Roobet so I assume all our personal details are safe with Roobet, I hope this can bring peace of mind to those who are still worried about the KYC in Roobet.

KYC is an issue that is still being discussed in this thread and I also realize that complaining about it will not change the decision taken by roobet dev. the point is if you are not so sure about the security of your personal data if you do KCY on roobet then don't do it, and your only option is to play on other sites.

This fighter is really cool in a roobet shirt, is this going to be sold to the public

https://twitter.com/Roobet/status/1580083004117987330

[Apocollapse]

This fighter is really cool in a roobet shirt, is this going to be sold to the public

https://twitter.com/Roobet/status/1580083004117987330

Although the Roobet t-shirt is really cool, but I doubt there's many people are really want to buy it except the one who promote Roobet maybe if there's no Roobet word in the t-shirt and just a mascot, it would be fine. There's many users are create a merchandise design about Roobet in the past, there's many great design that worth to be created as Roobet's merchandise Roobet.com |Merch Design Contest | $1500 + Set of Merch up for grabs! 3 Winners

Edit:
The long waited art contest I have been waiting for is already happen! Roobet.com | Art Contest "Halloween Special" | $2850 Up for grabs! Ends Oct 31st

But the prize pool is reduced and only top five will win. This will be hard since the previous art contest, there's many good art that still not taking top 10 places.