Roobet.com | Crypto’s Fastest Growing Casino 🦘

[aysg76]

I asked it on the chat. The minimum amount to tip is $10, and for the maximum, it seems that no one there knows exactly how much or if there any maximum tip. I think this topic hasn't been discussed much often here and even on Roobet chat.
If you want to learn much more about the specifics, maybe you should start asking their live chat support.

Yeah I know that the minimum limit is $10 but support team doesn't know about the same and have inquired about the same from them but was asking here from members if someone has experienced this situation so as to avoid any issue at all.

[1714980365]

1714980365

[Findingnemo]

Snip~
.
.
source: https://roobet.com/aml-policy
The IP check and the address check is somehow overkill.  I for example live in address A while my IP address location is somewhere in address B since most of the connection in our country has a dynamic IP address and changes in location from time to time.  So does this mean that my account will be temporarily blocked if they found out that the IP address does not match my home address?  So in cases that I won a huge amount, the Casino may use this kind of ruling to either nullify my winnings or have me undergo another series of verification.  This is very worrying.

Possibly yes, you maybe asked to verify your identity whenever they feel any changes from the normal behaviour which is like automated thing if I am not wrong and you can claim that its annoying but at the same time it can be a life time saving for someone who lost their account which got funds in the hands of wrong person, right?

If a casino does the verification just for the sake of denying the reward from the bets then sooner or later their reputation will get ruined so its like building their own burial just to save little.

[vv181]

The IP check and the address check is somehow overkill.  I for example live in address A while my IP address location is somewhere in address B since most of the connection in our country has a dynamic IP address and changes in location from time to time.  So does this mean that my account will be temporarily blocked if they found out that the IP address does not match my home address?  ~

I think its overkill to be consider like dynamic IP will gonna subject user account for verification because we all know that most of the router use a dynamic IP as default. I’m assuming that they are pertaining to the country as location described and not the the different IP address on same country. ~

Most of the ISPs are indeed assigning dynamic IP to their customers, there is static IP additional service available, but still, a majority of consumers are not using that. Based on my experience with KYC/AML process, some companies dealing and checking with IP-related information are based on region, because they know the IP-based location can't be pitch-perfect.

[Findingnemo]

The IP check and the address check is somehow overkill.  I for example live in address A while my IP address location is somewhere in address B since most of the connection in our country has a dynamic IP address and changes in location from time to time.  So does this mean that my account will be temporarily blocked if they found out that the IP address does not match my home address?  ~

I think its overkill to be consider like dynamic IP will gonna subject user account for verification because we all know that most of the router use a dynamic IP as default. I’m assuming that they are pertaining to the country as location described and not the the different IP address on same country. ~

Most of the ISPs are indeed assigning dynamic IP to their customers, there is static IP additional service available, but still, a majority of consumers are not using that. Based on my experience with KYC/AML process, some companies dealing and checking with IP-related information are based on region, because they know the IP-based location can't be pitch-perfect.

Since we are talking about things we are doing online then anything can be manipulated with very less knowledge so as an addicitional security these kind of features or we can call it as regulations from the government side to ensure the security for the consumers, so that is what the casinos are following and no crypto casino wants the mandatory KYC or verification process at first but to reduce the risk for users funds this will exist for sure.

[Haunebu]

I’m not sure too about this because I’m not whales but some casino indeed requires KYC to user with huge amount of balance due to AML requirements. Some casino just manage to void it for whatever procedure they do to remove it to there license terms but in general AML policy this is required. You will notice this on ToS of online fiat casino that recently convert to crypto.

It's true that some gambling sites require gamblers to submit their KYC when withdrawing big amounts, but there are many other sites that don't require any form of KYC when withdrawing big amounts unless they found something suspicious.

I know some people who withdrew big amounts in this manner and never submitted KYC so far.

[Juggy777]

I’m not sure too about this because I’m not whales but some casino indeed requires KYC to user with huge amount of balance due to AML requirements. Some casino just manage to void it for whatever procedure they do to remove it to there license terms but in general AML policy this is required. You will notice this on ToS of online fiat casino that recently convert to crypto.

It's true that some gambling sites require gamblers to submit their KYC when withdrawing big amounts, but there are many other sites that don't require any form of KYC when withdrawing big amounts unless they found something suspicious.

I know some people who withdrew big amounts in this manner and never submitted KYC so far.

@Eternad I believe that they can subject anyone to KYC even if he’s just a new player, and to be honest it’s a safe practise as they’re keen to run their business in a legit way. @Haunebu while there’re casino’s that do not follow KYC, but would you be able to trust them when they don’t follow their own country basic laws so what’s to say that they won’t scam their user’s, and thus in Roobet’s case we know that they follow the law and thus they can be trusted.

[aysg76]

I’m not sure too about this because I’m not whales but some casino indeed requires KYC to user with huge amount of balance due to AML requirements. Some casino just manage to void it for whatever procedure they do to remove it to there license terms but in general AML policy this is required. You will notice this on ToS of online fiat casino that recently convert to crypto.

It's true that some gambling sites require gamblers to submit their KYC when withdrawing big amounts, but there are many other sites that don't require any form of KYC when withdrawing big amounts unless they found something suspicious.

I know some people who withdrew big amounts in this manner and never submitted KYC so far.

For sure there are some casino with zero KYC implementation while others have it so those who like complete privacy gamble over those casino withdrawing the big amounts also from there without any documents.But what I feel is in future this will be implemented on all casinos like many have done it under AML policies and other aspects.

[babygun]

It's true that some gambling sites require gamblers to submit their KYC when withdrawing big amounts, but there are many other sites that don't require any form of KYC when withdrawing big amounts unless they found something suspicious.

I know some people who withdrew big amounts in this manner and never submitted KYC so far.

In the past that might be the case but I get the impression that more and more sites are asking KYC even if it is not such a large sum that you want to withdraw. I needed to do full KYC when I tried to withdraw 10 mBTC from a major casino site and it is not that I was doing anything suspicious also.

[n0ne]

It's true that some gambling sites require gamblers to submit their KYC when withdrawing big amounts, but there are many other sites that don't require any form of KYC when withdrawing big amounts unless they found something suspicious.

I know some people who withdrew big amounts in this manner and never submitted KYC so far.

In the past that might be the case but I get the impression that more and more sites are asking KYC even if it is not such a large sum that you want to withdraw. I needed to do full KYC when I tried to withdraw 10 mBTC from a major casino site and it is not that I was doing anything suspicious also.

Almost every platform request KYC, but they don't make it mandatory upto certain fund limits. What you've mentioned is small amount, and I suggest you to have a cross check. There will be access to withdraw funds without KYC.

[serjent05]

It's true that some gambling sites require gamblers to submit their KYC when withdrawing big amounts, but there are many other sites that don't require any form of KYC when withdrawing big amounts unless they found something suspicious.

I know some people who withdrew big amounts in this manner and never submitted KYC so far.

In the past that might be the case but I get the impression that more and more sites are asking KYC even if it is not such a large sum that you want to withdraw. I needed to do full KYC when I tried to withdraw 10 mBTC from a major casino site and it is not that I was doing anything suspicious also.

Almost every platform request KYC, but they don't make it mandatory upto certain fund limits. What you've mentioned is small amount, and I suggest you to have a cross check. There will be access to withdraw funds without KYC.

Yeah, it looks like KYC is the norm in Casino nowadays.  It is kinda let down for the old users since we are used to lvl 1 to no kyc implementation way back when the casino is just starting but then we can't blame the casino because they are just implementing what the authority required them to do.  I think there is no reason to whine if ever the casino that used to be ok with no kyc policy suddenly change to KYC required Casino since we agreed with their TOS that the company has the right to change in parts of the TOS.

[lienfaye]

It cant really be that avoided that people would really be keep on discussing it specially now that they are tending to make it Level 2 KYC as i had heard off which do make things even more worst.

Level 2 mandatory? Never heard of this. If this is actually true, Roobet is seriously screwing themselves in a big way. So many gamblers including me hated the mandatory first level verification itself.

As far as I know it is not mandatory yet. Even you only comply on their level 1 kyc, that will do, you can play and withdraw your earnings without problem (based on my recent experience). But they might ask the users to comply for level 2 verification depending on the situation or if your account is suspicious.

[Haunebu]

@Haunebu while there’re casino’s that do not follow KYC, but would you be able to trust them when they don’t follow their own country basic laws so what’s to say that they won’t scam their user’s, and thus in Roobet’s case we know that they follow the law and thus they can be trusted.

Who gives a crap about the laws of my country? This is crypto gambling where we are supposed to be able to gambler anonymously without any form of interference from a centralised authority.

Also, I already told you that my friends were able to withdraw big amounts from various sites without submitting any form of KYC which proves that they are trustworthy.

[Hhampuz]

@Haunebu while there’re casino’s that do not follow KYC, but would you be able to trust them when they don’t follow their own country basic laws so what’s to say that they won’t scam their user’s, and thus in Roobet’s case we know that they follow the law and thus they can be trusted.

Who gives a crap about the laws of my country? This is crypto gambling where we are supposed to be able to gambler anonymously without any form of interference from a centralised authority.

Also, I already told you that my friends were able to withdraw big amounts from various sites without submitting any form of KYC which proves that they are trustworthy.

Will be fun to see what your friends will do when these sites where they withdrew disappear with all of their coins. Who will they get in touch with?

Stop thinking that no KYC/No licenses = trustworthy - it's dumb as fuck.

[BitcoinPanther]

@Haunebu while there’re casino’s that do not follow KYC, but would you be able to trust them when they don’t follow their own country basic laws so what’s to say that they won’t scam their user’s, and thus in Roobet’s case we know that they follow the law and thus they can be trusted.

Who gives a crap about the laws of my country? This is crypto gambling where we are supposed to be able to gambler anonymously without any form of interference from a centralised authority.

Also, I already told you that my friends were able to withdraw big amounts from various sites without submitting any form of KYC which proves that they are trustworthy.

The casino need to accept the regulation and implement the required stuff in order for them to continue operating.  This is also to safeguard the availability of the service of the casino.  I am ok with this since I don't want to wake up one day, a casino that holds my funds poof due to illegal operation, or banned by my country because they do not follow the implemented regulation.  

Indeed this is crypto gambling but crypto casino exist in a world where there is rules to follow.

[Eureka_07]

<snip>

From your previous post, you already said that you know people who successfully withdrawn large amount of money without processing a KYC to the site "so far". SO FAR. You also believe that there are big possibilities that for their next transactions, the website where they are playing could ask for them to process it (if  these sites has license, don't forget the possibility of that, though even other casino that doesn't have one has the tendency of asking for KYC documents, which for me, is a shady one.

[Hamphser]

<snip>

From your previous post, you already said that you know people who successfully withdrawn large amount of money without processing a KYC to the site "so far". SO FAR. You also believe that there are big possibilities that for their next transactions, the website where they are playing could ask for them to process it (if  these sites has license, don't forget the possibility of that, though even other casino that doesn't have one has the tendency of asking for KYC documents, which for me, is a shady one.

Its not been a shady one since its been mentioned or been said on terms and conditions most of the time where these platforms or companies does have the right on asking out KYC if its needed.

You would really only say that it is shady if they had made out some claims that they wont really be asking for any KYC on all certain conditions and then suddenly integrate it whenever
there are people who do make out make big wins.
Im not really that surprised that majority of casinos does have these terms and conditions thats why you should really make yourself aware at least.

[LUCKMCFLY]

@Haunebu while there’re casino’s that do not follow KYC, but would you be able to trust them when they don’t follow their own country basic laws so what’s to say that they won’t scam their user’s, and thus in Roobet’s case we know that they follow the law and thus they can be trusted.

Who gives a crap about the laws of my country? This is crypto gambling where we are supposed to be able to gambler anonymously without any form of interference from a centralised authority.

Also, I already told you that my friends were able to withdraw big amounts from various sites without submitting any form of KYC which proves that they are trustworthy.

Well I am also somewhat irreverent when it comes to laws that governments implement against gambling, for me that is something that does not make sense, however I think that one should bypass the system but be careful not to detect it, governments are usually careful sometimes when it comes to things with money, this is where I am, they only regulate mining activity, and those who are caught with mining without registering with their organizations go to jail.

Some casinos tout that they don't need KYC, but at some point, whether it's a withdrawal, they require KYC, which becomes a hassle, that's why sometimes casinos like roobet that require KYC don't radical it is good to do it, in some way they are for the legal basis and one can shield oneself from future problems because of it.

[aysg76]

Will be fun to see what your friends will do when these sites where they withdrew disappear with all of their coins. Who will they get in touch with?

Stop thinking that no KYC/No licenses = trustworthy - it's dumb as fuck.

We should gamble over some reputable casino that has fulfilled the licence requirements and that are legit in the market because we can face many problems if we choose some wrong casino as our funds are involved.There have been many instances where players fund were blocked or even they ran away so who to blame in that case? So if you are having issues with KYC you can choose some other casino but they should be legit and you are right on this part.

[Lucasgabd]

@Haunebu while there’re casino’s that do not follow KYC, but would you be able to trust them when they don’t follow their own country basic laws so what’s to say that they won’t scam their user’s, and thus in Roobet’s case we know that they follow the law and thus they can be trusted.

Who gives a crap about the laws of my country? This is crypto gambling where we are supposed to be able to gambler anonymously without any form of interference from a centralised authority.

Also, I already told you that my friends were able to withdraw big amounts from various sites without submitting any form of KYC which proves that they are trustworthy.

there are several different styles of businnes
some will want to comply with international loss and others will be more anarchic
up to the user to choose where they want to bet

Roobet has KYC so if users want to play there they will have to comply
each owner makes the rules in their houses.

[FanEagle]

As far as I know it is not mandatory yet. Even you only comply on their level 1 kyc, that will do, you can play and withdraw your earnings without problem (based on my recent experience). But they might ask the users to comply for level 2 verification depending on the situation or if your account is suspicious.

I think it is the level 1 that is upfront which upsets people. Yes they do not ask much, but how would I know a place that asks the level 1 before even doing anything, won't ask me level 2 when I win something good? They might, and that is what bothers people. This is why I believe that we shouldn't really be expecting "everyone" to be okay with the laws here.

Yeah, it is not amazing but it is not terrible neither so we play, but some may not and I get that and it's fine. All in all, I just want to make sure that people are happy with what they have and I happy here and I play in other places too, I gamble in like 10 different places based now here I want, but I get people who may not want to.