Premier League Prediction Thread 2023/2024

[Juggy777]

and Man City really want Harry Kane.
Especially after Sergio Aguero moved, Man City lacked supplies of strikers. If it is true that Harry Kane can move to Manchester City this will
make Manchester City even stronger next season.

Man City will fight to Chelsea again, they want either. Chelsea wants to play with a thirst for goals, Harry Kane is the right figure. The public knows Chelsea doesn't have pure forward, Timo has not shown the best performance. Tuchel has good achievements in this session, the big boss will give Tuchel whatever he wants, Kane, Haaland, or maybe Ronaldo?.

@blue Snow Kane is going to go to Manchester City only, I doubt that he’ll like to go Chelsea as they already have too many strikers there. Furthermore Tuchel won’t get any of the three, but he may get Lukaku with Inter Milan yet keen to sell him.

[hahay]

Aston Villa left wingerJack Grealish, have been a successful player in the team. He have appeared in 95 matches in the club with 15 goals and 16 assists.
Manchester City wants to sign the player whom estimate is at £100m. Pep Guardiola don't want to waste this opportunity by signing Grealish, as other teams also have interest in signing the player.
Although, Harry Kane is known to be Guardiola's number 1 target.

With the extraordinary performance shown by Jack Grealish with Aston Villa, he attracted the interest of several big teams such as Man City
and Man United. But the problem is Aston Villa set the price too high, this is what might make Man City and Man United not make Grealish
a priority in the transfer market. I still believe Grealish will stay at Aston Villa for at least one more season, and Man City really want Harry Kane.
Especially after Sergio Aguero moved, Man City lacked supplies of strikers. If it is true that Harry Kane can move to Manchester City this will
make Manchester City even stronger next season.

This price will not make Pep waver and will keep signing him, because after all Pep has 2 targets to sign Grealish and Kane at least these two players are the main targets in the transfer market this summer. I think nothing is impossible and it looks like Grealish can definitely leave Aston Villa, with his young age Grealish should have a better chance to play in the UCL with City next season.

[ILuckyGuyI]

Aston Villa left wingerJack Grealish, have been a successful player in the team. He have appeared in 95 matches in the club with 15 goals and 16 assists.
Manchester City wants to sign the player whom estimate is at £100m. Pep Guardiola don't want to waste this opportunity by signing Grealish, as other teams also have interest in signing the player.
Although, Harry Kane is known to be Guardiola's number 1 target.

I wonder how much of a budget Manchester City have for the transfers. Because let's say that they will sign Kane and Grealish both, then they will have to spend at least 200m pounds I guess. They would both be great transfers for City that's for sure. But I really wonder whether they can afford them both now.

[MAAManda]

I wonder how much of a budget Manchester City have for the transfers. Because let's say that they will sign Kane and Grealish both, then they will have to spend at least 200m pounds I guess. They would both be great transfers for City that's for sure. But I really wonder whether they can afford them both now.

Why not? They (Manchester City) are the 2nd richest club in the English Premier League (EPL) today.

Harry Kane is very good for them to sign in my opinion, because their current pure striker is not qualified, it can be seen from their last few matches.

Jack Grealish is a good player, but I think Manchester City should think twice about signing him, because they already have a lot of great left-wingers.

[blue Snow]

I wonder how much of a budget Manchester City have for the transfers. Because let's say that they will sign Kane and Grealish both, then they will have to spend at least 200m pounds I guess. They would both be great transfers for City that's for sure. But I really wonder whether they can afford them both now.

According to the budget in 2020, Pep have access to about 300 M Pounds. maybe for this year, it's not exactly like that, will likely range that number I guess. Talking about money, No doubt it doesn't have the serial number, Mansour doesn't hesitate to pay travel fare all fans to watching live match in Porto. I think it even less to buy both.

[LittleBitFunny]

I wonder how much of a budget Manchester City have for the transfers. Because let's say that they will sign Kane and Grealish both, then they will have to spend at least 200m pounds I guess. They would both be great transfers for City that's for sure. But I really wonder whether they can afford them both now.

Why not? They (Manchester City) are the 2nd richest club in the English Premier League (EPL) today.

Harry Kane is very good for them to sign in my opinion, because their current pure striker is not qualified, it can be seen from their last few matches.

Jack Grealish is a good player, but I think Manchester City should think twice about signing him, because they already have a lot of great left-wingers.

Manchester City is a rich enough club. As we heard last year, they offered up to 750 million pounds to sign Messi. And this season too, if they get a chance to take Messi to the team, no matter how much it costs, they will not miss the opportunity. With Aguero leaving, their forwards are not as strong as they used to be. Now, they had to take on a skilled striker team for next season. Kane is the perfect choice for Manchester City.

[masulum]

Manchester City is a rich enough club. - snip -

Indeed City can give their coach a lot of money for transfer window, but they need to remember about financial fair play. they almost got punished before. I think they will be more careful in making transfer decisions at this time. So, if Aston Villa asks a club that wants Grealish, with a fantastic transfer value, I agree if Grealish will not become their main target on this transfer season.

[Iranus]

Manchester City is a rich enough club. - snip -

Indeed City can give their coach a lot of money for transfer window, but they need to remember about financial fair play. they almost got punished before. I think they will be more careful in making transfer decisions at this time. So, if Aston Villa asks a club that wants Grealish, with a fantastic transfer value, I agree if Grealish will not become their main target on this transfer season.

Grealish is a good winger. He is very skilled, and his age is low, his fitness is also good. He will be able to serve the team for many years if he goes to Manchester City. But there are already talented players in Manchester City's squad to play in Grealish's position. So I don't think Manchester City will benefit much from Grealish's high price at the moment.

[snipie]

Manchester City is a rich enough club. - snip -

Indeed City can give their coach a lot of money for transfer window, but they need to remember about financial fair play. they almost got punished before. I think they will be more careful in making transfer decisions at this time. So, if Aston Villa asks a club that wants Grealish, with a fantastic transfer value, I agree if Grealish will not become their main target on this transfer season.

City will try to attract a big name imo, yet I don't see signs for an eventual Messi or haaland transfer for example..
I saw that Kevin De Bruyne was named PFA player of the year for the consecutive time. I found some posts in social media clashing that decision since this year there was other players that deserved it more.

[hd49728]

Will Erling Haaland, who scored 41 goals in the past season, join Chelsea in this transfer season?

Erling Haaland wants Chelsea transfer as Marina Granovskaia sets out plan for mega deal.

Chelsea won the Champions League but we see how bad Werner is as a striker. Chelsea need to have a more productive striker. Haaland is perfect because he is so strong, and very productive with goals. Too confident, not like Werner.

With Haaland, Chelsea can use Werner as a winger, not as a striker.

[Swordsoffreedom]

Will Erling Haaland, who scored 41 goals in the past season, join Chelsea in this transfer season?

Erling Haaland wants Chelsea transfer as Marina Granovskaia sets out plan for mega deal.

Chelsea won the Champions League but we see how bad Werner is as a striker. Chelsea need to have a more productive striker. Haaland is perfect because he is so strong, and very productive with goals. Too confident, not like Werner.

With Haaland, Chelsea can use Werner as a winger, not as a striker.

Chelsea plays very fast football and counterattacks a lot. Players like Holland or Mbappe are needed for Chelsea's forward. Because, they are young, and can attack very quickly. If Holland joins Chelsea, it looks like Chelsea will become more unstoppable next season. Let's see if Holland joins Chelsea.

[snipie]

Will Erling Haaland, who scored 41 goals in the past season, join Chelsea in this transfer season?

Erling Haaland wants Chelsea transfer as Marina Granovskaia sets out plan for mega deal.

Chelsea won the Champions League but we see how bad Werner is as a striker. Chelsea need to have a more productive striker. Haaland is perfect because he is so strong, and very productive with goals. Too confident, not like Werner.

With Haaland, Chelsea can use Werner as a winger, not as a striker.

Chelsea plays very fast football and counterattacks a lot. Players like Holland or Mbappe are needed for Chelsea's forward. Because, they are young, and can attack very quickly. If Holland joins Chelsea, it looks like Chelsea will become more unstoppable next season. Let's see if Holland joins Chelsea.

Indeed, Haaland's presence with Tuchel's squad will make it a very strong team and make Chelsea the most favourite for the title in the upcoming season! Meanwhile, I still want to know what City is planning, other than letting their players go, at least from what I heard as rumors...

[jaberwock]

This price will not make Pep waver and will keep signing him, because after all Pep has 2 targets to sign Grealish and Kane at least these two players are the main targets in the transfer market this summer. I think nothing is impossible and it looks like Grealish can definitely leave Aston Villa, with his young age Grealish should have a better chance to play in the UCL with City next season.

I would assume that if Jack could lower the price from the club he will do that, otherwise he has a contract and at the end of his contract he knows that he could get 2x offers from another club. I understand that some players have loyalty to their clubs and that is why they keep signing back there and eventually gets sold or retires there without becoming free agents but if Aston Villa insists on way too high price, eventually Jack may want to just tell other clubs "wait until my contract is over and I will come for free" and can get as much as 3x salary somewhere else if he is free agent.

So, I believe right now Kane is a bigger target for Spurs, considering they just let go their best striker for nearly a decade, they will want to get someone good and Kane would be insanely good for City, it would really change the whole club to a new level and they are already at the top, think how great that would be for them.

[Wawa2013]

and Man City really want Harry Kane.
Especially after Sergio Aguero moved, Man City lacked supplies of strikers. If it is true that Harry Kane can move to Manchester City this will
make Manchester City even stronger next season.

Man City will fight to Chelsea again, they want either. Chelsea wants to play with a thirst for goals, Harry Kane is the right figure. The public knows Chelsea doesn't have pure forward, Timo has not shown the best performance. Tuchel has good achievements in this session, the big boss will give Tuchel whatever he wants, Kane, Haaland, or maybe Ronaldo?.

Daniel Levy finally let Harry Kane move from Tottenham, but because Kane still has 3 years left on his contract. So Levy charged a very high price
to be able to make Kane move from Tottenham, and Kane was only interested in playing in the Premier League again. So only Man City and Chelsea
have the money to be able to buy Kane, but according to the news I read, only Man City are most serious about trying to buy Kane. As for Chelsea
strikers are not the main focus in the transfer market, Chelsea does not have a pure forward, but without the pure forward they won the Champions
League trophy, so I'm sure Chelsea won't force themselves to buy strikers.

[DIA7]

This price will not make Pep waver and will keep signing him, because after all Pep has 2 targets to sign Grealish and Kane at least these two players are the main targets in the transfer market this summer. I think nothing is impossible and it looks like Grealish can definitely leave Aston Villa, with his young age Grealish should have a better chance to play in the UCL with City next season.

I would assume that if Jack could lower the price from the club he will do that, otherwise he has a contract and at the end of his contract he knows that he could get 2x offers from another club. I understand that some players have loyalty to their clubs and that is why they keep signing back there and eventually gets sold or retires there without becoming free agents but if Aston Villa insists on way too high price, eventually Jack may want to just tell other clubs "wait until my contract is over and I will come for free" and can get as much as 3x salary somewhere else if he is free agent.

So, I believe right now Kane is a bigger target for Spurs, considering they just let go their best striker for nearly a decade, they will want to get someone good and Kane would be insanely good for City, it would really change the whole club to a new level and they are already at the top, think how great that would be for them.

If Grealish pressure his team a bit more I think they can go for a lower offer.
Aston Villa values him at  £100 million that's a very big number but I belleive that when they see Dortmund wants about the same for Sancho it's fair to say that Grealish can be more successful at EPL then Sancho as a lot of Dortmund players fail to get the results they do when they join another team in another league.
Anyway with Grealish contract running to summer 2025 it will be very long periods to wait without renew or to be sold with Villa singing Norwich Buendia, its only going to be how much They are going to get for him they can go with £80million +£20m as other differentials and bonuses.

[ILuckyGuyI]

According to the budget in 2020, Pep have access to about 300 M Pounds. maybe for this year, it's not exactly like that, will likely range that number I guess. Talking about money, No doubt it doesn't have the serial number, Mansour doesn't hesitate to pay travel fare all fans to watching live match in Porto. I think it even less to buy both.

Why not? They (Manchester City) are the 2nd richest club in the English Premier League (EPL) today.

Harry Kane is very good for them to sign in my opinion, because their current pure striker is not qualified, it can be seen from their last few matches.

Jack Grealish is a good player, but I think Manchester City should think twice about signing him, because they already have a lot of great left-wingers.

Manchester City is a rich enough club. As we heard last year, they offered up to 750 million pounds to sign Messi. And this season too, if they get a chance to take Messi to the team, no matter how much it costs, they will not miss the opportunity. With Aguero leaving, their forwards are not as strong as they used to be. Now, they had to take on a skilled striker team for next season. Kane is the perfect choice for Manchester City.

I thought that maybe Manchester City also were affected by COVID-19 period. But on the other hand, they became the champions in the EPL that helped them have a lot more money. Then they should be able to afford Kane and Grealish both easily. When it comes to Messi, I wonder whether they will go for him also if they sign Kane and Grealish both.

[masulum]

So I don't think Manchester City will benefit much from Grealish's high price at the moment.

Apart from having other players with the same position, with 100 million, i agree,  I don't think this will be an option for City. apart from the City rumors, I read in several media that Manchester United are also considering this player, even MU legend, Ferdinand said that Grealish might play an important role for MU to win the EPL again. Some players also expect MU can bring Grealish.

[kawetsriyanto]

Apart from having other players with the same position, with 100 million, i agree,  I don't think this will be an option for City.

Yep, it seems not a proper time for Grealish to join Man City. There are already some players with the same position, they also played well in the last season. Moreover, Man City targets a big player like Haaland in this transfer window, so they will spend big money for CF position. 100 million isn't a small amount of money, they probably will have difficulties if they force to sign Grealish.

[AakZaki]

~snip~

Supposedly for matches that are not too crucial, Solskajer should give Bruno Fernandes a chance to rest, so that when important matches are in progress, Fernandes can bring out his best performance.

You are right as in the league game last week, they can play more relaxed because they are safe in second place and in the UCL zone. It seems that Ole doesn't trust other players, that's why he always appears without rest. Even thanks to this he broke many new records. If I look at the transfer market Bruno made 37 appearances in 3108 minutes. He managed to make 18 goals and 11 assists. Not in another cup he has almost played 4500 minutes in a season with Manchester United.

[SquirrelJulietGarden]

So I don't think Manchester City will benefit much from Grealish's high price at the moment.

Grealish is not young and with $100 million, Manchester City can sign with Jadon Sancho. With Foden and Sancho, Manchester City will have a good preparation for the next 5 or 10 years.

Apart from having other players with the same position, with 100 million, i agree,  I don't think this will be an option for City. apart from the City rumors, I read in several media that Manchester United are also considering this player, even MU legend, Ferdinand said that Grealish might play an important role for MU to win the EPL again. Some players also expect MU can bring Grealish.

Will Grealish be able to connect with Bruno Fernadez? Two great players does not mean they can play well together. England have Lampard and Gerrad but in many big tournaments, they never played well in the same squad. The hard thing is coaches can not put one of the two out of the squad because they are top notch box-to-box midfielders.

I think Manchester United will have more wisely transfer strategy if they improve their squad through transfers for three positions: central defender, striker and a wing back.