Premier League Prediction Thread 2023/2024

[SquirrelJulietGarden]

He's good but he's not done anything to justify that tag, but it's getting out of hand with these transfer fees when even average players are fetching silly money. I suppose it depends on their finances and who they've sold, but they surely can't afford both Grealish and Kane. Is the Grealish signing a done deal? If it is I'm betting they're regretting that now Messi is a free agent and City would have been on of the likely teams he was interested in.

English players have overvalued price on transfer market. I don't say Grealish is not a good player but the cost for him is high crazily and it is an overpaid transfer from Manchester City.

Messi is already a free player and Manchester City won't not pay transfer fee. The issue is salary for Messi and how to convince him to join Manchester City. Pep can be a plus point for them to convince Messi. Manchester City can help Messi to win at least one Champions League before he ends his career.

He's definitely good, and has manged to shine in a Aston Villa side which I would describe as overwhelmingly average, however they did over perform last season, which is probably because of the impact that Grealish had, but I don't think hes a huge improvement over Manchester City's existing players.

Grealish is good but the appearance of Jack can put other players in the squad of Manchester City in uncertain positions. De Bruyne has a solid position, Bernado Silva too. Grealish probably takes the position of Phil Foden. It wil be bad for Phil after the last good season.

If Manchester City get Kane or actually any prolific striker, we'll be one step closer to having a one team league, similar to that of the French league. I don't want that, and that's exactly the reason financial fair play was introduced, to prevent this from happening.

Kane is the most desired player of Manchester City now because they need him to replace Kun Aguero. Gabriel has never provided enough goals for the club. Sterling is not a striker and unbelievably misses great opportunities.

[NotATether]

Is the Grealish signing a done deal?

Yeah it is.


Aston Villa release public statement to explain Jack Grealish decision which made Liverpool millions (2million from a sell-on clause after they bought Danny Ings, not something to gloat about at all).

So basically they confirmed that he was sold and then they reinvested the money with more players.

Looks like every time a forward leaves they buy another marquee. So they're just playing with the same strength front line over and over again.

I don't think Kane will go to City, it'll probably be like the Messi drama that started in 2019 when he had a rift with management and just now, two seasons later, left Barca.

[Luzin]

According to report, Lukaku told Inter to accept Chelsea offer. I think he will make Chelsea squad stronger, if transferred to Chelsea.

Looks like Chelsea are really serious this time. They have made transfers of some great players. In some rumors, Lukaku has also officially become a Chelsea player. It costs 130 million euro, which is fantastic. It looks like the Haaland option has been replaced by Lukaku. But officially I haven't seen it on the Transfermarkt site.

[Altryist]

Looks like Chelsea are really serious this time. They have made transfers of some great players. In some rumors, Lukaku has also officially become a Chelsea player. It costs 130 million euro, which is fantastic. It looks like the Haaland option has been replaced by Lukaku. But officially I haven't seen it on the Transfermarkt site.

If Lukaku is officially already a Chelsea player, then they will no longer need Haaland. Or rather, Chelsea would like to get Haaland too, but I doubt they will be able to buy both players. Borussia Dortmund is not focused on keeping Haaland, it is a very good deal for them.

[MAAManda]

Looks like Chelsea are really serious this time. They have made transfers of some great players. In some rumors, Lukaku has also officially become a Chelsea player. It costs 130 million euro, which is fantastic. It looks like the Haaland option has been replaced by Lukaku. But officially I haven't seen it on the Transfermarkt site.

If Lukaku is officially already a Chelsea player, then they will no longer need Haaland. Or rather, Chelsea would like to get Haaland too, but I doubt they will be able to buy both players. Borussia Dortmund is not focused on keeping Haaland, it is a very good deal for them.

From the news I see it looks like Romelu Lukaku has officially become a Chelsea player, but it has not been officially announced, and Haaland, it looks like he will remain at Borussia Dortmund this season, the possibility of him moving next season is to a big EPL Club (Manchester United).

[DU18]

Looks like Chelsea are really serious this time. They have made transfers of some great players. In some rumors, Lukaku has also officially become a Chelsea player. It costs 130 million euro, which is fantastic. It looks like the Haaland option has been replaced by Lukaku. But officially I haven't seen it on the Transfermarkt site.

If Lukaku is officially already a Chelsea player, then they will no longer need Haaland. Or rather, Chelsea would like to get Haaland too, but I doubt they will be able to buy both players. Borussia Dortmund is not focused on keeping Haaland, it is a very good deal for them.

Dortmund decision to not sell Halaand this season forced chelsea to look for another striker to fill chelsea front line next season, chelsea decision to recruit Lukaku was indeed quite right, especially since we knew that Lukaku had played for chelsea before, so that Lukaku ould not take time  It took a long time to adapt to the English Premier league, but the news about Lukaku joining Chelsea is bad news for another London team, namely Arsenal, because with Lukaku departure it will automatically make it difficult for Arsenal to get Lautaro Martinez from Inter Milan, because Inter Milan will rely more on Lautaro Martinez as their striker next season  if later Lukaku really will go away.

[EdenHazard]

He's good but he's not done anything to justify that tag, but it's getting out of hand with these transfer fees when even average players are fetching silly money. I suppose it depends on their finances and who they've sold, but they surely can't afford both Grealish and Kane. Is the Grealish signing a done deal? If it is I'm betting they're regretting that now Messi is a free agent and City would have been on of the likely teams he was interested in.

English players have overvalued price on transfer market. I don't say Grealish is not a good player but the cost for him is high crazily and it is an overpaid transfer from Manchester City.

Messi is already a free player and Manchester City won't not pay transfer fee. The issue is salary for Messi and how to convince him to join Manchester City. Pep can be a plus point for them to convince Messi. Manchester City can help Messi to win at least one Champions League before he ends his career.

well its not only in EPL,  the overvalue trend has been there since the oil money involved in football,  nobody can deny this.

the trend getting crazy and crazier year after year, its start from cristiano transfer to madrid with 95m euro in 2009/2010 (not oil money though)
sane , john stones & kyle walker each 52m euro in 2017-2018
rodri, sterling & laporte 60m euro each
cancelo, mahrez & ruben diaz 65m euro each
de bruyne 80m euro and now grealish 117m euro!

all by manchester city oil money!

psg oil monehyside?
neymar himself cost 200m euro!
mbappe 150m euro!
cavani, dimaria & achraf hakimi 65m euro each.

jeez, oil money everywhere now.

financial fairplay isnt really fair though.
now a huge price tag would be a huge burden to bear by grealish to perform and meet that 100m price tag,  wish him luck .

[BITCOIN4X]

Dortmund decision to not sell Halaand this season forced chelsea to look for another striker to fill chelsea front line next season, chelsea decision to recruit Lukaku was indeed quite right, especially since we knew that Lukaku had played for chelsea before, so that Lukaku ould not take time  It took a long time to adapt to the English Premier league, but the news about Lukaku joining Chelsea is bad news for another London team, namely Arsenal, because with Lukaku departure it will automatically make it difficult for Arsenal to get Lautaro Martinez from Inter Milan, because Inter Milan will rely more on Lautaro Martinez as their striker next season  if later Lukaku really will go away.

Without a suitable replacement it will be difficult for Inter to release two of its best players in one season. Lukaku and Martinez are Inter's mainstays and maybe Inter should find a suitable replacement before the two move to other team. If Lukaku is successfully bought by Chelsea while the transfer window is still open, then Martinez will likely not be sold again until Inter find the right replacement. As an Arsenal supporter, it seems Chelsea's interest in Lukaku leaves you a bit disappointed, doesn't it? 

[icopress]

Well, who wants to see Messi at Manchester City? Because if he moves to PSG, then the French will surely win all possible titles for the coming year.



N'much news: Chelsea have joined the race and are looking to strengthen the attacking line. The owner of the London club, Roman Abramovich, asked for an urgent meeting with Leo's entourage through an English intermediary, and is ready to accept any requirements of the Argentine. ^{[By the way, Sportsbet offers a twenty-fold coefficient for this outcome]}

[Welsh]

Well, who wants to see Messi at Manchester City? Because if he moves to PSG, then the French will surely win all possible titles for the coming year.

I'd prefer to see him move to none of them, and to another club that isn't spending millions upon millions each season. I highly doubt that Manchester City will have the capability of bringing in Messi at least while complying with English league laws. There's also the Kane saga going on. Imagine if Manchester City managed to get Messi, Kane, and Grealish all in one transfer window. It would be ridiculous, and this also applies to PSG who has also had a absolutely ridiculous transfer window.

[icopress]

I'd prefer to see him move to none of them, and to another club that isn't spending millions upon millions each season. I highly doubt that Manchester City will have the capability of bringing in Messi at least while complying with English league laws. There's also the Kane saga going on. Imagine if Manchester City managed to get Messi, Kane, and Grealish all in one transfer window. It would be ridiculous, and this also applies to PSG who has also had a absolutely ridiculous transfer window.

Well noticed, as Messi's transfer to any of these clubs would imply a slap in the direction of Fair Play's ethics. But that doesn't matter ... the main news is that Qatar has offered the Argentine a billion dollars. Just think about this figure ... 1 billion dollars over three years, I just don't have enough words. So stock up on popcorn and watch what kind of dough Messi is really made of, whether he opts for money or fame (in the hope of getting another cup in the Champions League).

[el kaka22]

I honestly do not feel like City made the right choice here with Jack, they should have gotten Kane because he was a better player. They paid 117 million according to transfermarkt, and if that is true I am pretty sure they could have gotten Kane for that money too right? Plus they still need a pure striker, Gabriel Jesus is a great player but he is an overall player and not a pure striker, he doesn't always look at scoring every time, he runs, he passes, he playmakes, and yes he does score as we all know. What City needed was a pure striker in front of him so that this would be a great deal for them.

In any case, I think it is still City and they are still one of the best teams in the league if not the best team as they were for the past few years. What I really want to know is, did they talked about Kane with Spurs? What was the price requested?

[Kusman]

Inter have rejected Chelsea's €100m offer for Romelu Lukaku. But it seems like Chelsea won't be giving up on him soon. They are preparing to make a bigger offer. Inter chairman is already not too eager to sell Lukaku to any club. So this will be a quite hard deal for Chelsea to end successfully. It's also said that Lukaku wouldn't say no to going back to Chelsea. Let's see what the coming days will bring us.

[AndySt]

Well, who wants to see Messi at Manchester City? Because if he moves to PSG, then the French will surely win all possible titles for the coming year.

I'd prefer to see him move to none of them, and to another club that isn't spending millions upon millions each season. I highly doubt that Manchester City will have the capability of bringing in Messi at least while complying with English league laws. There's also the Kane saga going on. Imagine if Manchester City managed to get Messi, Kane, and Grealish all in one transfer window. It would be ridiculous, and this also applies to PSG who has also had a absolutely ridiculous transfer window.

Everything is going to the fact that Messi will go to Paris Saint-Germain. Moreover, the player will get to the club for free and there is no need to pay anything to Barcelona and the whole question is only about the player's salary, which is also a positive side in the issue of compliance with financial fair play. And in this case, the Parisians will refuse to transfer Pogba from Manchester United. Manchester City really has too many transfers in the process of implementation and the transfer of Messi at this point in time no longer fits into these processes. It would be dishonorable for Manchester City to refuse the transfer of Kane, who has announced a boycott for this and is missing Tottenham's training sessions.

[mv1986]

I honestly do not feel like City made the right choice here with Jack, they should have gotten Kane because he was a better player. They paid 117 million according to transfermarkt, and if that is true I am pretty sure they could have gotten Kane for that money too right? Plus they still need a pure striker, Gabriel Jesus is a great player but he is an overall player and not a pure striker, he doesn't always look at scoring every time, he runs, he passes, he playmakes, and yes he does score as we all know. What City needed was a pure striker in front of him so that this would be a great deal for them.

In any case, I think it is still City and they are still one of the best teams in the league if not the best team as they were for the past few years. What I really want to know is, did they talked about Kane with Spurs? What was the price requested?

As far as I know Tottenham wanted way more than 117 million. I think the 117 million were even in EUR. Didn't Tottenham at one point ask for at least 160 million Pounds?

Guardiola once more confirmed in an interview that he is interested in Kane, but won't further discuss because he signed by another club. I guess they are working hard on making it happen and eventually probably will.

[DIA7]

Now after Man City signed with Jack Grealish he will bring more effectiveness in the last third and creates a lot of chances.
Guardiola gets more creativity and opportunities to create opportunities in his squad, but he is still waiting for the striker who turns these opportunities into goals!
If they get Kane the competition over winning the EPL would end before even it gets started.
With that solid defense and even better midfield a clinical striker is where Pep squad lacks.

[BIT-BENDER]

Am so happy for Jack grealish, I think everything he owed to Aston Villa he had paid in blood, injuries, goals, passes and sweat, Manchester city is exciting for the next chapter in his career, £100 million price for him!!! I think Manchester City lost their bargaining instinct, Jack is exciting, and fantastic but I would not buy Jack grealish for £100 million and he still has to come fight to make it to Manchester city starting eleven, city has the money and they used it, so enough said welcome Jack the number 10 jersey could not have been for any other person.

[blackened515]

Inter have rejected Chelsea's €100m offer for Romelu Lukaku. But it seems like Chelsea won't be giving up on him soon. They are preparing to make a bigger offer. Inter chairman is already not too eager to sell Lukaku to any club. So this will be a quite hard deal for Chelsea to end successfully. It's also said that Lukaku wouldn't say no to going back to Chelsea. Let's see what the coming days will bring us.

Inter probably want something higher from Chelsea. Chelsea offered £85m and one of their player. But Inter rejected the offer. Lukaku wants to play in Chelsea again, he is quite talented and will probably make Chelsea's squad stronger. Chelsea had Haaland as their top target, but Dormund don't want to sell him out. However, they now have their attention on Lukaku, and they won't give up on him.

[gabbie2010]

Am so happy for Jack grealish, I think everything he owed to Aston Villa he had paid in blood, injuries, goals, passes and sweat, Manchester city is exciting for the next chapter in his career, £100 million price for him!!! I think Manchester City lost their bargaining instinct, Jack is exciting, and fantastic but I would not buy Jack grealish for £100 million and he still has to come fight to make it to Manchester city starting eleven, city has the money and they used it, so enough said welcome Jack the number 10 jersey could not have been for any other person.

He will vie for a starting eleven with the likes of  Kevin de Bruyne, Raheem Sterling, Phil Foden, Riyad Mahrez and Bernardo Silva a big competition here those players are equally good players too however according to statistics Grealish was fouled 110 times than any other premier league players last season thus creating opportunities to win freekicks against opponents he is equally a good dribbler as well and can equally create goal scoring chances more options for Pep Guordiola to rotate the team or change tactics if the needs arises and another opportunity for Man City to give UCL another shot this season with the Calibre of the quality players in his team.

[hahay]

Inter have rejected Chelsea's €100m offer for Romelu Lukaku. But it seems like Chelsea won't be giving up on him soon. They are preparing to make a bigger offer. Inter chairman is already not too eager to sell Lukaku to any club. So this will be a quite hard deal for Chelsea to end successfully. It's also said that Lukaku wouldn't say no to going back to Chelsea. Let's see what the coming days will bring us.

Inter probably want something higher from Chelsea. Chelsea offered £85m and one of their player. But Inter rejected the offer. Lukaku wants to play in Chelsea again, he is quite talented and will probably make Chelsea's squad stronger. Chelsea had Haaland as their top target, but Dormund don't want to sell him out. However, they now have their attention on Lukaku, and they won't give up on him.

I don't think Romelu Lukaku is suited to playing in the PL but indeed, I also realize that Lukaku got his prime when he was on loan from Chelsea to Everton. But in my view his performance has declined even after being fully owned by Everton and then Manchester United as well, his performances are less than perfect as when he was on loan at Everton. There are so many players who have returned to their previous clubs and many of them have not been able to give their best, so I'm only worried for Chelsea if they manage to bring back Lukaku but it could be a mistake too.