Premier League Prediction Thread 2024/2025

[Weawant]

I agree with you. I think Pochettino has given his best this season. His performance deserves appreciation and is still worthy of being retained as a coach. Chelsea is building their squad. I think it will take years and have to be consistent. Like what City did by building a squad for years until they finally managed to get the treble winner. Enzo Maresca is a good coach. I can't wait to see his performance in pre-season.

I have always bought into this opinion since I learned pochettino has been sacked, I know it's been the tradition of Chelsea management to sack their coaches at will especially if within the shortest given time you are unable to deliver as they have expected of you, but with pochettino I saw really different and I can't even say for sure why exactly they will let go of him even without a very valid reason enough because I personally don't think there's any.

Chelsea started off poorly this season and it felt like they weren't going to have a decent finish but then pochettino was able to keep fin tuning their tactics and strategy till towards the end of the season when he was able to get series of wins which gave them a productive end and a very decent finish such that even Manchester united that was far ahead of the now had to run behind them and depend on winning the FA cup to be able to participate in another league game aside the premier league by next season but it was really different with Chelsea.

The board just seem not to have that patients enough to give coaches time enough to be able to see if they can get their teams soughted out before letting go, it's not workable with every coach, some Coach needs More than a season to be very productive enough meanwhile some other may be very good In their first season a d turn out terrible in the next just like that which is send in Manchester united.

[Josefjix]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

[Nheer]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

In Chelsea i don’t think its about where they finish rather about winning trophies and instilling a good play in the team. If the overall performance is good then the owners will believe the project is promising and can deliver in a few years. With Pochettino performance this season i don’t think the team looks ready to challenge for the title that why they replaced him.

In Ten Hav situation, if he were to be Chelsea’s coach he will definitely be sacked despite winning the FA cup because the team doesn’t look ready at all and it’s almost as if he is not teaching the players anything or has a specific style of play at all. Pochettino was even better and he got sacked so if Ten Hag was to be a Chelsea coach he would have been sacked mid season.

[TopT3ns]

Normally Chelsea has that long tradition of actually selling their coaches if they don't do well and example would be roman abramovich impatient on coaches with the club but since Roman abramovich was forced to sell this club, the new owner has been somehow lenient with coaches because I believe if it was abramovich by now porchettino case would have been something that isn't even worth discussing because I believe he would have sacked ever since so porchettino being sacked or resigning by himself isn't really the main issue as the issue currently now is for the new coach to be able to cope with the pressure that fans have left for that space in the club for the position of the Chelsea coach.

It seems like the newest Chelsea owner wants to change the character of Chelsea well, so if the Chelsea owner is soft on many coaches then this shows that Chelsea really hopes to get the right new coach who can bring Chelsea to victory in every match they face. It is a normal task for new coaches to adapt quickly and be able to provide good direction. Because what I know is that the coach will get respect and all instructions will be listened to properly when this coach can adapt well.

[BitcoinHunt3r]

Normally Chelsea has that long tradition of actually selling their coaches if they don't do well and example would be roman abramovich impatient on coaches with the club but since Roman abramovich was forced to sell this club, the new owner has been somehow lenient with coaches because I believe if it was abramovich by now porchettino case would have been something that isn't even worth discussing because I believe he would have sacked ever since so porchettino being sacked or resigning by himself isn't really the main issue as the issue currently now is for the new coach to be able to cope with the pressure that fans have left for that space in the club for the position of the Chelsea coach.

It seems like the newest Chelsea owner wants to change the character of Chelsea well, so if the Chelsea owner is soft on many coaches then this shows that Chelsea really hopes to get the right new coach who can bring Chelsea to victory in every match they face. It is a normal task for new coaches to adapt quickly and be able to provide good direction. Because what I know is that the coach will get respect and all instructions will be listened to properly when this coach can adapt well.

The Chelsea owner wants to see the title so any coach who fails to achieve the target will be fired, we know that since Chelsea was taken over, Chelsea has had several coaches and that will happen before Chelsea actually wins the title or at least is in 2nd place in the standings. I understand what the owner expects is normal because he prepared a sufficient budget to bring in players so there is no reason not to achieve the target.

From several media I see that Chelsea has a new coach, Enzo Maresca will handle Chelsea for next season, is it strange that the contract is only for 2 seasons? I'm not familiar with Enzo Maresca but I'm based on history he has sufficient experience in the Premier League starting as Assistant Manager and Manager. His best achievement was bringing Leicester City back to the Premier League.

[mv1986]

I think this is a public lie or worthy of being called out to give the team an image. They said they didn't fire him but the coach resigned.
I don't believe that and in my opinion if Pochettino is fired and management really can't be patient enough to see better progress if Pochettino is given time. So, in a situation like this, of course the situation in the team will change again with the style of a new coach, which may mean that the new coach also needs time to build a stronger squad.

I think that for a team that often changes coaches, the stability of their game tends to be unstable because under a new coach, of course there will be many changes that will be made again. Pochettino previously made big changes by selling a lot of players and he didn't immediately show any prominent changes at the start of the season but he managed to make the team more consistent in the second half of the season. So of course Chelsea new coach Enzo Maresca will also need time to bring about changes and I think if Chelsea management is not patient they will definitely fire him too.

I have said it elsewhere that I absolutely don't see how you think that Pochettino is a great coach. You say he should be given more time. Ok, I get that point because you are talking about a specific club. But if we look at how much time he spent already in his professional career in football, what are the titles to his name that you can bring up? Zero. He hasn't won anything in years and years as a coach. Yet you claim he needs more time, but I wonder for what? To build a team? How many clubs has he had that won anything? Please don't bring up that he won Ligue 1 with PSG...

[Docnaster]

I think this is a public lie or worthy of being called out to give the team an image. They said they didn't fire him but the coach resigned.
I don't believe that and in my opinion if Pochettino is fired and management really can't be patient enough to see better progress if Pochettino is given time. So, in a situation like this, of course the situation in the team will change again with the style of a new coach, which may mean that the new coach also needs time to build a stronger squad.

I think that for a team that often changes coaches, the stability of their game tends to be unstable because under a new coach, of course there will be many changes that will be made again. Pochettino previously made big changes by selling a lot of players and he didn't immediately show any prominent changes at the start of the season but he managed to make the team more consistent in the second half of the season. So of course Chelsea new coach Enzo Maresca will also need time to bring about changes and I think if Chelsea management is not patient they will definitely fire him too.

I have said it elsewhere that I absolutely don't see how you think that Pochettino is a great coach. You say he should be given more time. Ok, I get that point because you are talking about a specific club. But if we look at how much time he spent already in his professional career in football, what are the titles to his name that you can bring up? Zero. He hasn't won anything in years and years as a coach. Yet you claim he needs more time, but I wonder for what? To build a team? How many clubs has he had that won anything? Please don't bring up that he won Ligue 1 with PSG...

After the UEFA Europa League final, Atalanta manager was asked how he feels now that he's finally won a trophy after several years of trying and he simply told the media that he doesn't buy the idea that a manager's tactical strength should be judged by the number of trophies he's won and in as much as I completely do not buy his idea, i think it's he made some sense with his statement.
There's every possiblity that top manager might be very good but still didn't win a trophy. Mauricio Pochentino haven't won a trophy as we all know but I don't think there's any denying the fact that the Argentine manager is a very tactician that's good as rebuilding and improving the condition of any team he manages. Chelsea have been very poor in their previous two season before Pochentino was appointed and I don't think it's fair for anyone to expect him to instantly improve the team after taking over. Chelsea were beginning to pick up good form in the last games of the season which made me think that Mauricio have finally found the best style for the club so I don't think it was fair to sack him after just one season.

[Publictalk792]

After the UEFA Europa League final, Atalanta manager was asked how he feels now that he's finally won a trophy after several years of trying and he simply told the media that he doesn't buy the idea that a manager's tactical strength should be judged by the number of trophies he's won and in as much as I completely do not buy his idea, i think it's he made some sense with his statement.
There's every possiblity that top manager might be very good but still didn't win a trophy. Mauricio Pochentino haven't won a trophy as we all know but I don't think there's any denying the fact that the Argentine manager is a very tactician that's good as rebuilding and improving the condition of any team he manages. Chelsea have been very poor in their previous two season before Pochentino was appointed and I don't think it's fair for anyone to expect him to instantly improve the team after taking over. Chelsea were beginning to pick up good form in the last games of the season which made me think that Mauricio have finally found the best style for the club so I don't think it was fair to sack him after just one season.

I don't fully agree with Atalanta manager that winning trophies is not important for manager success. But I see what he means. A manager is more than just their wins. Mauricio Pochettino is great example. He's skilled tactician who has made teams better without winning trophy. He improved Chelsea performance in just one season and set them up for future success. It was unfair to fire him after just one season especially since team was playing better towards end. We can't expect manager to work miracles overnight especially with team that was already struggling. Pochettino has shown he can build and improve teams and that's what matters most.

[Solokan]

If one actually thinks that Manchester United needs to have a great squad,  greater than the one they have right now, they are simply mistaken.  at the same time if someone actually thinks that the problem of Manchester United is actually not the coach I have to say they are really stupid.  and let me tell you there are people like that. I also have heard people say that he should stay the coach of Manchester United for another season.  because that will actually bring Manchester United better results.  I was like,  of course, he is going to get better results in the next season because it can't get any worse compared to what they have done in this season.

Anyway Manchester United has been able to win the FA Cup and I think that is the only positive thing that can take away from the season.  I hope they will be able to realize that having Ten Hag as the coach of United actually is a big mistake. And Manchester United being able to win the FA Cup should not change that fact

Erik ten Hag has really become a hot topic of conversation among Manchester United fans. and I think we have to just wait and see what will happen next. What is certain is that I personally will not be concerned about whether Ten Hag will be fired or not, but what is clear in my opinion is that if Ten Hag is fired then the Manchester United players will definitely get new lessons from their new coach and it could be that in the future it will make Manchester United perform better. When the next season starts, if you look at Manchester United being able to beat the EPL champions this season in the FA Cup, of course Erik ten Hag is really great, he can make a good strategy which ultimately makes Pep's troops lose and fail to become champions in the FA Cup.

Personally, I am more neutral, in the EPL this season, Manchester United has really dropped in ranking compared to last season, when they managed to finish in 3rd place and this season, finishing in 8th place is certainly very far away. but yes, I can only hope that whatever Manchester United's decision regarding Ten Hag is for the best and I also hope that Manchester United next season will be better than this season.

[Sebas.tian]

Normally Chelsea has that long tradition of actually selling their coaches if they don't do well and example would be roman abramovich impatient on coaches with the club but since Roman abramovich was forced to sell this club, the new owner has been somehow lenient with coaches because I believe if it was abramovich by now porchettino case would have been something that isn't even worth discussing because I believe he would have sacked ever since so porchettino being sacked or resigning by himself isn't really the main issue as the issue currently now is for the new coach to be able to cope with the pressure that fans have left for that space in the club for the position of the Chelsea coach.

It seems like the newest Chelsea owner wants to change the character of Chelsea well, so if the Chelsea owner is soft on many coaches then this shows that Chelsea really hopes to get the right new coach who can bring Chelsea to victory in every match they face. It is a normal task for new coaches to adapt quickly and be able to provide good direction. Because what I know is that the coach will get respect and all instructions will be listened to properly when this coach can adapt well.

I don't think, Chelsea owner will adapt that soft mind with his coach because he use to change any coach that is not doing well in the team which are some of the things that is affecting the team since he took over from the team from the formal owner. I have faith on this coach that was sacked before they brought this new coach, because he tried his possible best to make sure he improve the team to get to top six in the premier league tournament which he need to continue the Job next season to see if he will not help the team to win the premier league title, but he was replaced by a new coach few weeks ago. Definitely, I know that this Chelsea new coach will definitely adapt some new players that will help the team to perform well next season to make the coach to stay long in the team which is the wish of every coach in a team.

[Hirose UK]

What is clear is that the fight for the title is the most interesting and I still believe that Manchester City, Arsenal and Liverpool will still be at the top and can show very fierce competition, but Liverpool will have changes because they have new coach and of course we can see changes in real terms significant.
There will be challenges for Liverpool because the players have to be able to adapt to the new coaching style and of course if this can run well and quickly then it is certain that Liverpool performance will not decline, we see how they get through the competition next season.
For Chelsea, it can also be said that there has been an improvement, considering that they also have the option to bring in Enzo Maresca as the new coach next season and of course we can see whether this is the right decision for Chelsea because Todd Boehly himself as owner has done the same thing several times.
Several Premier League teams gave surprises at the end of this season, they tried to improve the team by changing coaches, but this could have good impact but could also have bad impact because the performance of the new coach may not all look good in short time.

I am actually not still clear on this, if pep guardiola is leaving Manchester city or he is staying, because it's already been speculated that he is leaving this summer, but if truly he is leaving, it's definitely going to reduce the dominance of Manchester city in the English premier league, but if he stays put, then I believe that the dominance of Manchester city will continue, because aside arsenal, I don't see any of the remaining team in the English premier league challenging Manchester city to the title.

If you look at Liverpool and Chelsea, they just recruited a new manager, so they will obviously needs time for them to instill their ideas into the minds of their players, and as for Manchester united, their is nothing special about them since sir Alex Ferguson left the club 12years ago, they are just struggling, so I believe that it's still going to be between Manchester city and Arsenal regardless of if pep guardiola leave or he stays.

Indeed, the truth regarding whether Pep will stay or really leave Manchester City is still question for many people because there are many reports and discussions stating that Pep will leave and what is worse is that several key players will also leave Manchester City.
Pep contract only has one season remaining and this is worrying condition, Manchester City itself actually still needs Pep as their leader in achieving success in every existing competition, Pep has given Manchester City many titles.
Apart from that, what makes it even more difficult for Manchester City in the future is the Haaland clause which explains that he can go to another team outside England if team is willing to pay 175 million to bring Haaland.
Obviously all of this will be a clear threat to Manchester City, I hope is that Manchester City can handle everything well, for example if they extend Pep or Haaland's contract.

Apart from Arsenal, Liverpool and Manchester United actually have great potential to become tough rivals for Manchester City, but considering that the condition of several of these team is not good, only Arsenal can do it.
Next season we will see how they compete and for teams like Chelsea or Manchester United, I actually doubt they can perform optimally.

[tottong]

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

Each management has a different view on changing the club for the better and sometimes it seems like they are forcing business within the club even though football is now inseparable from business for those who own the club.
Chelsea were slightly better than Manchester United when it came to standings at the end of the competition and Mauricio Pochettino's dismissal was carried out because management considered him a failure and not the coach which needed.

Erik Ten Hak received much better support compared to Mauricio Pochettino, even though he failed to bring Manchester United to compete and finish in the Champions League zone. But I don't understand what you mean, that Erik Ten Hak will be successful at Chelsea?

[X-ray]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

Chelsea is not having a great day after roman was leaving from EPL. The fundamental issue is that the coach with a different philo would always be sacked by the owner and this is happening with some of chelsea players. The moment Chelsea fired Pochettino proved it. Considering that Chelsea was not doing so well the previous season and todd once again did the wrong thing, there was a rather poor choice made by the Blues owner like recruit amateur coach to handle the big club that has spent a half of billions last season just to rebuild the club.

Pochettino proved to the world that he was capable, but the owner was not even giving him a chance. Roman, on the other hand was always substituting a world-class coach for another. It's a very different period now. Todd is just bringing chelsea to the low standard with his owning style. 


This is obviously another setback for chelsea following how todd was once again repeat the same mistake like when he recruited potter as a new coach.
Things have not been going so well for the club.

Tod replaced Pochettino with an amateur coach. It's really inappropriate decision from him.

[rendravolt]

De Zerbi has not yet left Brighton, but he will definitely leave soon considering that Brighton this season has been truly chaotic under his guidance. He had an extraordinary season last season, but this season it won't happen again. Now there are rumors that Graham Potter will return to Brighton and will replace De Zerbi's job as coach.

We know that Graham Potter was a good coach when he was at Brighton and everything fell apart when he joined Chelsea. This apparently meant that Graham Potter had to complete the unfinished work at Brighton at that time so that the club management would try to reappoint Graham Potter as head coach if they later decided to fire De Zerbi.

So do you think it's better for De Zerbi to stay or for Graham Potter to return to Brighton?

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/5534660/2024/06/02/brighton-potter-bloom-return/

[TastyChillySauce00]

Normally Chelsea has that long tradition of actually selling their coaches if they don't do well and example would be roman abramovich impatient on coaches with the club but since Roman abramovich was forced to sell this club, the new owner has been somehow lenient with coaches because I believe if it was abramovich by now porchettino case would have been something that isn't even worth discussing because I believe he would have sacked ever since so porchettino being sacked or resigning by himself isn't really the main issue as the issue currently now is for the new coach to be able to cope with the pressure that fans have left for that space in the club for the position of the Chelsea coach.

It seems like the newest Chelsea owner wants to change the character of Chelsea well, so if the Chelsea owner is soft on many coaches then this shows that Chelsea really hopes to get the right new coach who can bring Chelsea to victory in every match they face. It is a normal task for new coaches to adapt quickly and be able to provide good direction. Because what I know is that the coach will get respect and all instructions will be listened to properly when this coach can adapt well.

The Chelsea owner wants to see the title so any coach who fails to achieve the target will be fired, we know that since Chelsea was taken over, Chelsea has had several coaches and that will happen before Chelsea actually wins the title or at least is in 2nd place in the standings. I understand what the owner expects is normal because he prepared a sufficient budget to bring in players so there is no reason not to achieve the target.

The better for you try to research into Tuchel and Pochettino's background about why they being sacked by todd last year and last months. Todd Boehly let these people go for asking for an allowance in the player transfers which is strictly prohibited by the club. Todd Boehly told them no, and the management was acquiring the new players without consulting the coach.
What Pochettino feels is this. With such desperation and he begged Todd to allow him to manage the players transfer but Todd promptly fired him after he asked that question to the club. Todd was willing to use chelsea as a money printing. Targeting top position combined with young talents will be really helpful for chelsea to sell its young talents with very high price and this is what todd has been aimed from acqiiring chelsea. Claarke is here for money not for trophy. The new coach has consistently run into this issue. Certainly, a lot of Blues supporters think Maresca will leave the team in the midst of the season.

Discussing the realities of big six ambitions without obtaining approval to reconstruct your ideal club is like dreaming and todd how have zero knowledge about football never try to understand it. Pochettino made it under extreme circumstances.
Regarding transfer season. Todd is not the same as Abramovich when it comes to the transfer policy as todd is far stricted than abramovich. Abra gave the coach carte blanche to choose the players. Perhaps there will never be a solution to this fundamental issue owner by chelsea since todd is having mental issue. This fucker keep destroy his own club with his unbelievable decision.

[Obim34]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

That is the problem we are having with Chelsea, the idea of always wanting their team to win trophies under the first season management of their new coaches which is never certain to happen. Chelsea started quite wrongly and of course took some time to adapt but later on they improved which they ended their Premier League season on the 6th position but looking back from where they came from, atleast Chelsea should have been considerate to retain Pochettino for a while because everyone believes his going to improve.

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

[$anounimus$]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

Chelsea is not having a great day after roman was leaving from EPL. The fundamental issue is that the coach with a different philo would always be sacked by the owner and this is happening with some of chelsea players. The moment Chelsea fired Pochettino proved it. Considering that Chelsea was not doing so well the previous season and todd once again did the wrong thing, there was a rather poor choice made by the Blues owner like recruit amateur coach to handle the big club that has spent a half of billions last season just to rebuild the club.

Pochettino proved to the world that he was capable, but the owner was not even giving him a chance. Roman, on the other hand was always substituting a world-class coach for another. It's a very different period now. Todd is just bringing chelsea to the low standard with his owning style. 


This is obviously another setback for chelsea following how todd was once again repeat the same mistake like when he recruited potter as a new coach.
Things have not been going so well for the club.

Tod replaced Pochettino with an amateur coach. It's really inappropriate decision from him.

Yes, it is difficult to understand with Boehly's plan, he should learn from his inappropriate decisions like last season. The current management should not adopt the old system like the Roman era which was known as a dictatorship, but there are good sides which must be the main consideration for building a better club. Now coaching has moved to Maresca and he has also been given the best coaching staff. Hopefully Maresca will get full support from the club board and he can work freely without interference.

[CryptoBuds]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

Chelsea is not having a great day after roman was leaving from EPL. The fundamental issue is that the coach with a different philo would always be sacked by the owner and this is happening with some of chelsea players. The moment Chelsea fired Pochettino proved it. Considering that Chelsea was not doing so well the previous season and todd once again did the wrong thing, there was a rather poor choice made by the Blues owner like recruit amateur coach to handle the big club that has spent a half of billions last season just to rebuild the club.
Pochettino proved to the world that he was capable, but the owner was not even giving him a chance. Roman, on the other hand was always substituting a world-class coach for another. It's a very different period now. Todd is just bringing chelsea to the low standard with his owning style. 
This is obviously another setback for chelsea following how todd was once again repeat the same mistake like when he recruited potter as a new coach.
Things have not been going so well for the club.
Tod replaced Pochettino with an amateur coach. It's really inappropriate decision from him.

Yes, it is difficult to understand with Boehly's plan, he should learn from his inappropriate decisions like last season. The current management should not adopt the old system like the Roman era which was known as a dictatorship, but there are good sides which must be the main consideration for building a better club. Now coaching has moved to Maresca and he has also been given the best coaching staff. Hopefully Maresca will get full support from the club board and he can work freely without interference.

I am very upset with several decisions made by the Chelsea management. I don't know what Chelsea management's goals are. Thomas Tuchel was sacked by Chelsea management. Tuchel is a good enough coach. And with the help of Tuchel, the Chelsea team won the Champions League title. Chelsea management took a bad decision to sack such a coach. But Chelsea should have taken appropriate steps to strengthen the squad.

Chelsea's performances have been erratic at the start of this season. However, Chelsea performed very well in the final matches of the season. And Chelsea finished the season sixth in the table. Pochettino has done well enough with Chelsea. Chelsea management should not have let Pochettino go. Now if Chelsea change coach, we will see erratic performance of Chelsea players at the beginning of next season too.

[piebeyb]

I think personally it would be the other way round, Pochettino will be more successful compared to Ten Hag if he managed United because they really fell out by ending below Chelsea.

Every coach will certainly be great if he has a productive main squad, it doesn't matter if it's Pochettino or Tenhag if it is not supported by a productive main squad of players it will also be useless, we can indeed see that Chelsea is much better than Manchester United in the EPL this season but success It's not entirely because of the coach, if Pochettino replaces Ten Hag without financial support it will be useless because Manchester United needs to make a lot of changes because many of their players are really unproductive.

I think we all know that Pochettino being fired by Chelsea was a big mistake, that's why it will be difficult for Chelsea to achieve satisfactory results if management is too quick to make the decision to fire the coach, I don't think Pochettino is too bad for Chelsea because he has brought Chelsea to a high ranking. well in the EPL this season, if only Chelsea gave him the opportunity to stay until next season the results would definitely be satisfactory, Chelsea seems to be working hard again with their new coach and Manchester United has not yet made a decision about whether Ten Hag will be fired or retained.

[pusaka]

You should know that Erik ten Hag was successful in his first season at Manchester United, because Erik ten Hag managed to make Manchester United finish in third place in his first season. Therefore, even if, for example, Erik ten Hag was at Chelsea and was successful like that in his first season, then of course Chelsea would not sack him either.

Chelsea is not like Manchester United, the owners don't give second chance and they're not relenting when the appointed coach in charge looks incompetent. Todd Boehly sack Mauricio Pochettino and was bad news for the Blues because Mauricio Pochettino have sealed the europa spot but couldn't convert his chances. Manchester United hooked up with Erik Ten Hag because he was the man for the job. He deliver quite exceptional tasks for the growth of the Red Devils. Erik Ten Hag would have been successful in Chelsea.

But they will most likely keep Erik Ten Hag despite his poor performance this season. For the first season, it was a good thing that he could show because he was able to bring Manchester United to a top-flight finish, but this season he is in the middle of the table, and actually compared to Chelsea, both of them should have fired their coaches, even Erik Ten. Hag led Manchester United to win the FA Cup.
However, each team's management decisions are different, some make the decision to fire and some don't. This is completely their decision, because maybe on the other hand Manchester United wants to give Erik Ten Hag more opportunities. It's just whether Erik Ten Hag will answer with a good performance or not.