The KRAKEN rises, meaning the 2020 election fraud is being corrected.

[BADecker]

We are finally seeing the picture. Hillary says that the Rep winning elections were stolen, but of course, the Dem winning elections never brings such a thought from her. So, the politicians 'talk'. But the facts are gradually coming out. Trump should easily be President, not Biden.

Do the Dems think that Trump already won in 2024? Hillary seems to.


Hillary Clinton already denying results of 2024 presidential election

Former Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is already denying the results of the 2024 presidential election.

In a video posted on Twitter by grassroots organization Indivisible Guide, the former First Lady warned that “right-wing extremists already have a plan to literally steal the presidential election” in 2024. Thus, she called on supporters to “take the fight to MAGA Republicans at the the state level.”

Clinton warned that the “right-wing controlled Supreme Court” would ultimately grant state legislatures the power to overturn presidential elections. Incidentally, many state legislatures have a Republican majority – which is on the line in the 2022 midterm elections.

“If that happens, the 2024 presidential election will be decided, not by the popular vote or even by the anachronistic Electoral College, but by state legislatures.”

The former secretary of state during the Obama administration urged supporters to donate to the “crush the coup” campaign “to help defend democracy.” She added: “This could not be more important or more urgent.”

Greg Price, senior digital strategist for conservative PR firm X Strategies, pointed out that Clinton had also denied the results of past elections. He cited examples of the former First Lady doing so in 2000, 2004 and 2016. Incidentally, her prior denials occurred during years when GOP candidates won as president.

She claimed in 2000 that former President George W. Bush was “selected, not elected.” Five years later, she remarked that there were “many legitimate questions” about the 2004 elections that gave Bush his second term. Later, Clinton denounced former President Donald Trump as an “illegitimate president” when the real estate mogul won as president in 2016. (Related: When Hillary Clinton claimed Trump ‘stole’ the election and was ‘illegitimate,’ Dems cheered; now Biden calls election doubters ‘enemies of the state.’)
Brighteon.TV

“She is a dangerous election denier, an insurrectionist and a threat to the very foundations of our democracy,” Price tweeted.

Clinton’s remarks mocked on social media

...

[suchmoon]

Hillary

Republicans love to talk about Hillary so much, maybe they should nominate her. She would win in a landslide against Biden's corpse.

[TwitchySeal]

We are finally seeing the picture. Hillary says that the Rep winning elections were stolen

She only said that in BADeckerville, not the real world.

In the real world, it's Trumptards that are running around claiming the 2020 election was stolen without any evidence.  Just stupid arguments like "Trump had bigger crowds at his rallies. Waaaaaaa!" They even staged an unsuccessful coup attempt and had a bunch of State Representatives try and get their fraudulent electoral votes counted for Trump in states that Biden won.  Sneaky little fuckers.  Stupid, but sneaky.

[BADecker]

We are finally seeing the picture. Hillary says that the Rep winning elections were stolen

She only said that in BADeckerville, not the real world.

In the real world, it's Trumptards that are running around claiming the 2020 election was stolen without any evidence.  Just stupid arguments like "Trump had bigger crowds at his rallies. Waaaaaaa!" They even staged an unsuccessful coup attempt and had a bunch of State Representatives try and get their fraudulent electoral votes counted for Trump in states that Biden won.  Sneaky little fuckers.  Stupid, but sneaky.

Thanks for helping us sneaky little f***ers. Lol. We like it, since you can't seem to find anything that backs up what you say. Makes it a lot easier for us... friend, TwitchySeal.  Lol.

[BADecker]

The Kraken is almost here. A case that made it all the way to the Supreme Court, not for election fraud, but because loads of Congress people, along with Biden, Harris and Pense, would not investigate obvious insecurities regarding the election. If won, these people would be immediately out of office... for treason and breaking their oaths of office. The case is being adjudicated on by SCOTUS right now. Take a look at the Rumble site below.

Also, watch another video at https://rumble.com/v1q1emh-2022.10.25-dcc-meeting-challenging-the-immunity-of-congress.html?fbclid=IwAR0OKVlapmCGMbE4MZqJ78AA4fv2jSpH8LEozBamL_2oFebW8Yjy49-SWWE


Loy Brunson Discusses Supreme Court Case That Could Change Everything:

Loy Brunson Discusses Supreme Court Case That Could Change Everything: Treason! Every Congressman Who Certified the 2020 Election Should Be Removed Now

Get the Brunson Lawsuits at https://7discoveries.com/

If you want to support the show, you can donate here: http://bit.ly/cd-donate

This episode of Conservative Daily is brought to you by DCF Guns. We all see what is happening in America right now. It has never been more important for you to arm yourself, and most importantly, learn how to use your arms safely and effectively...

[TwitchySeal]

The Kraken is almost here. A case that made it all the way to the Supreme Court, not for election fraud, but because loads of Congress people, along with Biden, Harris and Pense, would not investigate obvious insecurities regarding the election. If won, these people would be immediately out of office... for treason and breaking their oaths of office. The case is being adjudicated on by SCOTUS right now. Take a look at the Rumble site below.

Also, watch another video at https://rumble.com/v1q1emh-2022.10.25-dcc-meeting-challenging-the-immunity-of-congress.html?fbclid=IwAR0OKVlapmCGMbE4MZqJ78AA4fv2jSpH8LEozBamL_2oFebW8Yjy49-SWWE


Loy Brunson Discusses Supreme Court Case That Could Change Everything:

Loy Brunson Discusses Supreme Court Case That Could Change Everything: Treason! Every Congressman Who Certified the 2020 Election Should Be Removed Now

Get the Brunson Lawsuits at https://7discoveries.com/

If you want to support the show, you can donate here: http://bit.ly/cd-donate

This episode of Conservative Daily is brought to you by DCF Guns. We all see what is happening in America right now. It has never been more important for you to arm yourself, and most importantly, learn how to use your arms safely and effectively...

Wow I guess it's finally happening.  The Kraken is almost here.  And as soon as it arrives you won't look like a lunatic any more.  How exciting. 

[BADecker]

November 30, 2022
The SCOTUS set the conference date for Jan 6, 2023
(The 9 Justices will meet January 6, 2023 to discuss the case and decide (by vote) if they want to move it to a hearing, where they will oficially judge the case and decide (by vote) if defendants should be removed from office)


Brunson Bros. drain the swamp

Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al.,
(Biden, Harris, Pence & 385 Members of Congress)

Currently, there are two lawsuits identical to each other.
The first One, filed by Loy Brunson is still held up in the Utah Federal Court.
The second one, filed by Raland J. Brunson has made it to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS),
Docket #22-380, where 9 Justices in conference will vote (only 4 needed) to move to a hearing.

THE LAWSUIT
Both lawsuits include defendants Pres. Biden, Harris, former V.P. Pence and 385 members of congress for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election.

BOTH LAWSUITS ARE ABOUT THE DEFENDANTS BREAKING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic..."

THE QUESTION
How can you support, and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign, and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don't believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? You can't. Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.

THE RELIEF THAT LOY AND RALAND ARE SEEKING
That defendants be permanantly removed from office, and not allowed to hold a public office again.

BACKGROUND

Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged. What got their attention was when the proposition to investigate those claims was presented to Congress and put to a vote. What came as a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation.

The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris. He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.

Their brother Gaynor was heavily occupied with his audio/video television business (Rock Canyon Studios) so Deron got together with his other two brothers to plan out the strategy. They decided to have their oldest brother Loy to be the name on the lawsuit, which is called a "Complaint" and because he would be on the Complaint, the Court would refer to him as the Plaintiff. The 388 people being sued will now be called Defendants. Loy filed the complaint, which eventually got stuck in the Federal Court, so they got together and decided to have their brother Raland file the identical lawsuit with his name on it, in the Utah 2nd District Court. While Loy's lawsuit continued to be held hostage in the Federal Court, Raland's lawsuit eventually made it to the SCOTUS. Here are the events of both lawsuits:

EVENTS
(To be updated when a new event occurs)

http://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html

...

[TwitchySeal]

November 30, 2022
The SCOTUS set the conference date for Jan 6, 2023
(The 9 Justices will meet January 6, 2023 to discuss the case and decide (by vote) if they want to move it to a hearing, where they will oficially judge the case and decide (by vote) if defendants should be removed from office)


Brunson Bros. drain the swamp

Brunson v. Alma S. Adams; et al.,
(Biden, Harris, Pence & 385 Members of Congress)

Currently, there are two lawsuits identical to each other.
The first One, filed by Loy Brunson is still held up in the Utah Federal Court.
The second one, filed by Raland J. Brunson has made it to the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS),
Docket #22-380, where 9 Justices in conference will vote (only 4 needed) to move to a hearing.

THE LAWSUIT
Both lawsuits include defendants Pres. Biden, Harris, former V.P. Pence and 385 members of congress for breaking their oath of office by voting AGAINST the proposition (that came from members of congress) to investigate the claims that there were enemies of the constitution who successfully rigged the election.

BOTH LAWSUITS ARE ABOUT THE DEFENDANTS BREAKING THEIR OATH OF OFFICE
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic..."

THE QUESTION
How can you support, and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign, and domestic? Answer: You investigate. If there are claims that there is a threat, even if you don't believe there is a threat, you investigate. How else can you determine if there is a threat unless you investigate? You can't. Were there claims of a threat to the Constitution? Yes. Where did these serious claims come from? 100 members of Congress. What was the threat? That there were enemies of the Constitution who successfully rigged the 2020 election. Is this lawsuit about a rigged election? No, it's about the members of Congress who voted AGAINST the investigation thereby thwarting the investigation. Was this a clear violation of their oath? YES.

THE RELIEF THAT LOY AND RALAND ARE SEEKING
That defendants be permanantly removed from office, and not allowed to hold a public office again.

BACKGROUND

Loy, Raland, Deron and Gaynor Brunson (the brothers) witnessed the 2020 election along with claims from members of congress that the election was rigged. What got their attention was when the proposition to investigate those claims was presented to Congress and put to a vote. What came as a shock to the four brothers is when they discovered that 387 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence actually voted against the proposed investigation, thus thwarting the investigation. Whether the election was rigged or not was no longer their main concern. What now became the concern was when those members of Congress violated their sworn oath by voting to thwart the investigation.

The brothers wanted to do something about this. Their brother Deron had quite a lot of experience in the legal field, which started out when he began suing banks in an attempt to show the corruption in that part of the financial world, so he had enough knowledge to file a lawsuit against the now current 385 members of Congress along with VP Mike Pence, Joe Biden, and Kamala Harris. He already had experience with the SCOTUS by bringing two petitions to them, both of which were denied, but this experience gave him enough success along the way to give him the confidence that maybe, just maybe, he might be able to do something about this thwarted investigation.

Their brother Gaynor was heavily occupied with his audio/video television business (Rock Canyon Studios) so Deron got together with his other two brothers to plan out the strategy. They decided to have their oldest brother Loy to be the name on the lawsuit, which is called a "Complaint" and because he would be on the Complaint, the Court would refer to him as the Plaintiff. The 388 people being sued will now be called Defendants. Loy filed the complaint, which eventually got stuck in the Federal Court, so they got together and decided to have their brother Raland file the identical lawsuit with his name on it, in the Utah 2nd District Court. While Loy's lawsuit continued to be held hostage in the Federal Court, Raland's lawsuit eventually made it to the SCOTUS. Here are the events of both lawsuits:

EVENTS
(To be updated when a new event occurs)

http://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html

...

Ok, finally we get to see is the kraken real or is BADecker a lunatic, it all comes down to this very serious case that, because of how urgent and time sensitive this matter is,  SCOTUS will talk about on Jan 6, more than half way into Bidens first term.  If they decide to take it and then rule in favor of the plaintiff, then plaintiff (who is representing himself) will get 3 billion in damages (tax free!), Joe Biden will be removed from office, the kraken will unleash it's fury and BADecker will no longer be considered a lunatic.  

[BADecker]

November 30, 2022
The SCOTUS set the conference date for Jan 6, 2023
(The 9 Justices will meet January 6, 2023 to discuss the case and decide (by vote) if they want to move it to a hearing, where they will oficially judge the case and decide (by vote) if defendants should be removed from office)

...

Ok, finally we get to see is the kraken real or is BADecker a lunatic, it all comes down to this very serious case that, because of how urgent and time sensitive this matter is,  SCOTUS will talk about on Jan 6, more than half way into Bidens first term.  If they decide to take it and then rule in favor of the plaintiff, then plaintiff (who is representing himself) will get 3 billion in damages (tax free!), Joe Biden will be removed from office, the kraken will unleash it's fury and BADecker will no longer be considered a lunatic.  

Nobody knows what the SCOTUS judges will do. They can rule almost any way they want. Their first ruling January 6 - if they don't postpone ruling - will be whether or not to hear the case.

Nobody knows, but IF they decide to rule on the case, they might remove the 387 people from government (including Biden), and place Trump back into the Presidency for the remainder of the term.

Personally, I think that IF they rule this way, it will be carefully done, and might not be completed until the elections of 2024, anyway.

Here is the big point in the whole matter. Members of government, both in the United States, and in the several States, have made laws that seem to protect themselves from being adjudicated against (in their governmental capacity) by anyone, except when their whole local government is against them. Because of the way this case is written, it gives the Supreme Court the ability to judge anybody in government who acts against the Constitution.

Why doesn't SCOTUS have this power already? Two reasons:
1. SCOTUS can't bring a case. They  are only judges. Somebody else has to bring the case.
2. The case has to be brought to them in the correct way. This case has been brought to them in a way that they can throw off the shackles of Congress with regard to judging Congress or the President, etc.

For example. The hanging chad problem in the 2000 election. Gore took the Florida hanging chad problem to SCOTUS, claiming that a re-election needed to be done because of voting machine problems that lost him the presidential race. SCOTUS couldn't hear the case because Gore neglected to bring even one witness who could say, "That is my vote, and the chad is hanging. I have been damaged by that voting machine and require a new election because of it."

So, it depends on how the case is brought. And so far, in this case, it looks like it was put together in a way that meets the requirements for SCOTUS to be able to adjudicate it.

[BADecker]

We are less than a month away from the time that SCOTUS will be considering the Brunson lawsuit that is before them. They are scheduled to make a determination on January 6, as to whether or not they will rule on it. The evidence so far is that they are extremely intrigued by the case, and the opening up of authority that it will give SCOTUS.

Info about the case can be found in my posts directly above this one.

The 388 (or so) members of Congress and government (including Biden), who are named in the case, and who could be immediately removed from government if SCOTUS adjudicates against them, are aware of the case. This means that behind the scenes they are planning to do something to avoid their political demise.

So, what could they be planning? Maybe it is all-out war with Russia, within the next month or so.


NATO Chief Voices Fear Of War With Russia While US Greenlights Drone Strikes On Russian Territory

In an article titled "'I fear a full-blown war between the West and Russia', Nato chief warns," The Telegraph writes the following:

"I fear that the war in Ukraine will get out of control, and spread into a major war between Nato and Russia," said Nato secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg, responding to a question about his greatest fears for the winter in an interview.

He told Norwegian broadcaster NRK on Friday that he was confident such a scenario could be avoided but that the threat was there.

"If things go wrong, they can go horribly wrong," he added.

...

Here it is. Just as I suggested in my previous post. The war that the Dem leaders and Biden want is being pushed into play, right now, before SCOTUS has the chance to rule on this lawsuit already accepted by the SCOTUS... https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf.

If adjudicated on in its entirety, just as it stands, approximately 388 members of government would be immediately removed from office, never to be able to hold office again. The majority of these would be mostly Dems in the House. But Biden and Harris would be included.

To stop this adjudication from happening, Biden and the Dem leaders need to do something drastic. The thing that they are doing is provoking Russia to an all-out war with the US, so that the war will put the adjudication of the above law suit on hold because of the war national emergency.

Don't be mislead into thinking that this is the only thing that Biden might be doing. These leaders don't want to lose power. They could be doing all kinds of things behind the scenes. Just as this lawsuit can't be found at all in the standard media, even so many other "things" can't be found, either.

The point is, we are going into a REAL war with Russia.


Biden’s Pentagon just gave Ukraine the green light to launch drone strikes on Russian territory, which will lead to rapid escalation with NATO

It may appear as though the Biden regime isn’t trying to provoke Russia into a wider conflict with NATO directly, but looks can be deceiving.

Below the surface, in the back rooms and dark hallways of the deep state, the regime has been plotting all along to drag the U.S. and NATO into a major conflict with Russia, so they can justify feeding hundreds of billions more dollars to the military-industrial complex, which provides kickbacks in the form of campaign donations and other perks.

According to The London Times, after nearly a year of conflict, Joe Biden’s handlers have instructed the Pentagon to inform Ukraine’s corrupt leaders they are free to begin conducting drone strikes inside Russian territory, an act that President Vladimir Putin will no doubt define as a direct threat on the homeland and which will lead to massive retaliation, perhaps even with nuclear weapons since Russian forces aren’t having much luck on the ground against a half-baked Ukrainian army using Western weapons.

“The Pentagon has given a tacit endorsement of Ukraine’s long-range attacks on targets inside Russia after President Putin’s multiple missile strikes against Kyiv’s critical infrastructure,” the report, dated December 9, said.

“Since daily assaults on civilians began in October, the Pentagon has revised its threat assessment of the war in Ukraine. Crucially, this includes new judgments about whether arms shipments to Kyiv might lead to a military confrontation between Russia and Nato,” the report continued. “This represents a significant development in the nine-month war between Ukraine and Russia, with Washington now likelier to supply Kyiv with longer-range weapons.”

Russia began targeting Ukrainian civilian centers and infrastructure very early in the war. Regardless of how corrupt the Ukrainian government may be — after all, we know the Bidens were getting rich there — the country’s civilian population has little to do with it or say about it, and yet, they are suffering the most.

A US defense source justified the decision to The Times:

...

[TwitchySeal]

The evidence so far is that they are extremely intrigued by the case, and the opening up of authority that it will give SCOTUS.

What is this evidence?

Seems like a ridiculous lawsuit brought by a clown that has a history of having nonsense cases thrown out.  Wasn't even worth the time for the government to respond.

In BADeckerville the election might have been rigged and it might be possible for SCOTUS to remove members of other branches of government, but in the real world there is no evidence that Biden did not win the election fair and square and there's a constitution that includes separation of powers.  This case will go nowhere just like all of your other idiotic Kraken theories.

The war that the Dem leaders and Biden want

Nobody wants a war.  Putin wanted Ukrain to rollover, not a war.  Ukraine and NATO wants Russia to leave Ukraine and stop acting like Hitler did in the 1930s.

If Biden wanted a war he would have ordered troops to the border of Ukraine last summer.

[suchmoon]

The evidence so far is that they are extremely intrigued by the case, and the opening up of authority that it will give SCOTUS.

What is this evidence?

Seems like a ridiculous lawsuit brought by a clown that has a history of having nonsense cases thrown out.  Wasn't even worth the time for the government to respond.

Seeing how BADecker is heavily shilling this "lawsuit" across multiple threads makes me wonder it he's one of the Brunson brothers.

[TwitchySeal]

The evidence so far is that they are extremely intrigued by the case, and the opening up of authority that it will give SCOTUS.

What is this evidence?

Seems like a ridiculous lawsuit brought by a clown that has a history of having nonsense cases thrown out.  Wasn't even worth the time for the government to respond.

Seeing how BADecker is heavily shilling this "lawsuit" across multiple threads makes me wonder it he's one of the Brunson brothers.

I've always imagined him looking something like Gaynor.

[BADecker]

^^^ Actually, I'm rather glad you jokers couldn't figure this out. But I'll tell you anyway. This law suit shows that done properly, anybody - no matter how goofy they might look, or no matter their "status" in life - can push a case all the way to the Supreme Court.

There might not be a lot of people who will look at the actual wording of the case, but there are plenty of libertarians and patriots who will be able to duplicate it well enough to apply it to all kinds of wrong things Government people do. After all, government people are still only people.


Twitter Files reveal how federal censors made mail-in ballots sacred -- boosting Biden

Elon Musk's Twitter Truth Squad is exposing the FBI's role in suppressing free speech before the 2020 election. But the FBI was practically a bit player in a far greater federal conspiracy to censor any American who cast doubts on the mail-in ballots that made Joe Biden the 46th president.

That conniving doesn't mean the 2020 election was stolen. But the bureaucratic racketeering was a travesty of political fair play.

The FBI pressured Twitter to target an Oct. 26, 2020, tweet from a former Republican official who wrote that "between 2% and 25% of Ballots by Mail are Being Rejected for Errors," journalist Matt Taibbi revealed.

But that tweet was more accurate than the "New Truths" federal overseers imposed. When New York City relied on mail-in ballots for a June 2020 primary, up to 20% of ballots were declared invalid. The Daily News labeled the primary snafus a "dumpster fire."

In Wisconsin, more than 20,000 "primary ballots were thrown out because voters missed at least one line on the form, rendering them invalid," McClatchy reported. In Virginia, officials rejected almost 6% of mail-in ballots for primary elections for arriving late. In Nevada, almost a quarter-million ballots sent to voters were returned as undeliverable.

Such problems were no surprise. A decade ago, a New York Times analysis concluded that "fraud in voting by mail is . . . vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention." Similarly, the 2005 Commission on Federal Election Reform, co-chaired by former President Jimmy Carter, warned, "Absentee ballots remain the largest source of potential voter fraud."

Twitter has been constantly pressured by the FBI.

Yet by Election Day 2020, mail-in ballots had become immaculate. This Orwellian triumph was due in part to "censorship by proxy," as law professor Jonathan Turley put it.

The Cybersecurity Infrastructure Security Agency, created in 2018 as part of the Department of Homeland Security, gave grants to several private entities that formed the Election Integrity Project in mid-2020. That project, working closely with the feds, classified 22 million tweets as misinformation and affected "hundreds of millions of individual Facebook posts, YouTube videos, TikToks and tweets," thanks to what it bragged of as "huge regulatory pressure" from government, per a Foundation for Freedom Online report last month.

Almost two-thirds of Biden's votes came from absentee or mail-in ballots, and he won owing to 43,000 votes in three swing states. Democrats exploited the COVID pandemic to push through electoral changes that opened the floodgates to unverified mail-in ballots.

"The censorship focus was always and consistently foremost targeted at speech casting doubt on mail-in ballots," FFO reported. That targeted effort devastated "the ability of concerned citizens to pressure their state representatives to take legal action on changing voting procedures" to prevent fraud. Some states like Michigan sent absentee ballots to all voters, violating the Constitution's election clause (which specifies that state legislatures make the rules for federal elections).

Rather than the traditional scrutiny for mail-in ballots (and a ballot reject rate up to 20%), many locales defaulted to validating practically any piece of paper with a mark as a bona fide ballot. A month after the election, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton complained in a brief to the Supreme Court about the "unconstitutional relaxation of ballot-integrity protections in [Michigan, Georgia, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania] election laws."

US Civil Rights Commissioner Christian Adams noted that "Democrats succeeded in tossing out state laws related to absentee-ballot verification, deadlines and a whole range of laws all in the name of COVID. By and large, GOP efforts in court failed. It was a courtroom bloodbath that created vulnerabilities across the system."

...

[suchmoon]

^^^ Actually, I'm rather glad you jokers couldn't figure this out. But I'll tell you anyway. This law suit shows that done properly, anybody - no matter how goofy they might look, or no matter their "status" in life - can push a case all the way to the Supreme Court.

Let's see how you will spin it what lame excuse you'll copy-paste after the hillbilly lawsuit gets tossed by SCOTUS. Being able to do something doesn't mean you should.

[TwitchySeal]

^^^ Actually, I'm rather glad you jokers couldn't figure this out. But I'll tell you anyway. This law suit shows that done properly, anybody - no matter how goofy they might look, or no matter their "status" in life - can push a case all the way to the Supreme Court.

Where it will die.

[BADecker]

^^^ Actually, I'm rather glad you jokers couldn't figure this out. But I'll tell you anyway. This law suit shows that done properly, anybody - no matter how goofy they might look, or no matter their "status" in life - can push a case all the way to the Supreme Court.

Where it will die.

Just to scare you a little, what happened to Roe v. Wade with this same SCOTUS?

SCOTUS has a duty to choose to adjudicate this lawsuit? Why? If they don't, they will be showing themselves to be part of those who break their oaths of office... the main point of the lawsuit.

If you have some inside info as to what they will do in their adjudication, please share it, and the places where you obtained the info.

Adjudicating the lawsuit in a way that does approximately what the lawsuit asks is beneficial to SCOTUS. How is it beneficial to them? It gives them authority over Congress and the President that they wouldn't have had otherwise. Judging from past lawsuits that they have adjudicated, none of the others have given them this kind of power and authority, and maybe few will in the future. This is their chance to do what is right, take back their strength, and stand up for America... like MAGA.

Until you can show me what's in their minds and hearts, or how they can be blocked, you are just guessing about what will happen... what they will do. They might not even know, themselves, at this time... stepping out for the Christmas vacation... putting it off for January.


One major point. Biden and Congress don't know what they will do, either. So, you watch Biden and Congress activate the Ukraine war into a World War within the next two or three weeks to a month... just so that SCOTUS will be set aside temporarily in the emergency. At least, Biden will push some immediate emergency into the forefront.

Of course, Biden might elect to hire shooters to destroy the lives of the Justices. Never can tell what that whack-job will do.

[TwitchySeal]

I remember when the Kraken was Sydney Powell, Dominion Conspiracy Theories and the Maricopa recount and BADecker had Tash and Tzupy to make him look like less of a wack job.

Now that Maricopa recount concluded that Biden actually got a few more votes than the official number...


Sydney Powell was kicked to the curb by Trump and Dominion has Fox News conspiratards getting deposed for their billions in defamation suits....


Tash and Tzupy have quietly disappeared...





...all we have a BADecker clinging to this ridiculous lawsuit that has already been ruled against and has no hope of every seeing the light of day.

[BADecker]

While this post is concerned with Arizona, similar is being done at various places around the country. In Arizona however, Kari Lake is bringing a law suit. The people are waking up, and waking up as to what they can do about it.

The neat thing about Lake's lawsuit is, win or lose, it is the first step towards a bill in the Arizona State Legislature regarding what the lawsuit states. Once a bill is introduced, then there can be a referendum, where the people get to decide on the legality of the voting process and operations.

This is all a step towards cleaning up elections in the whole country.


Maricopa Judge: "I have no confidence at all this election was run fairly."

Not the Soros-backed, derivative, propaganda pieces the Left likes to put out in the Main Stream Media that they call journalism, but real, honest investigations of real issues.
Jordan Conradson at the Gateway Pundit revealed something shocking about the elections in Maricopa. She highlighted to the Gateway Pundit  severe election day issues that made having a secure election impossible. I detail some of the biggest issues she highlighted below. This testimony comes from an election judge who revealed this information to the Gateway Pundit, and asked them to redact his name, but will testify in court if necessary.

The Election judge stated:
"The massive lines were real. We had close to 200 people in line at one point, and it was a two-hour wait. And we had people walking off of the line because they just couldn't wait anymore."

This was a result whereby other voting centers were seemingly sending their voters to this one election center despite not having proper check-out procedures.

In particular, many Election Day voters were sent away from their primary Election Center to vote in another Election Center, without being told they needed to "check-out" of the first one in order for their vote to count.

Jordan Conradson highlights a situation where two Democrats were allowed to register to vote immediately before the election, using out-of-state identification.
The Election Judge told these individuals that according to State Law, they were not eligible to cast a ballot, but they could receive a provisional ballot to be possibly reviewed later.

...

Kari Lake files groundbreaking lawsuit, claims she has proof there was a ‘concerted effort’ to stifle Republican votes in Arizona

Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake has filed a major lawsuit after gathering evidence of a “coordinated effort” to stifle Republican votes, thereby costing her a victory nearly every poll before Election Day said she should win.

In a Twitter post containing a video clip of an interview she did with Real America’s News podcaster Steve Bannon, Lake’s campaign wrote: “In areas where the Democrats were voting through mail-in ballots they loosened all of the procedures… to make sure that every vote got through, even the illegal ones. And when it came to election day, when our people were voting, they made it almost impossible.”

----------

Kari Lake War Room
@KariLakeWarRoom
·
Follow
.@KariLake: In areas where the Democrats were voting through mail-in ballots they loosened all of the procedures... to make sure that every vote got through, even the illegal ones. And when it came to election day, when our people were voting, they made it almost impossible."

[TwitchySeal]

While this post is concerned with Arizona, similar is being done at various places around the country.

True.  All over the country they recounted the votes and found that Biden won.  Just like in Arizona.  That's why he's the president and Trump is selling trading cards in Florida while he waits to be indicted.