AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[macson]

This newbie account just registered and all of its posts were detected as AI-generated. I've reported it to the mods.

User: 0xStorka

You are totally right about the risks and how crazy those losses look, the stats don't lie. But honestly, memecoins are a huge part of crypto culture now and they aren't going anywhere. Sure, it's risky, but that chance to hit a moonshot keeps things exciting. Plus, nobody can ignore how much they actually help major networks like Solana and BNB Chain. They bring massive volume, non-stop on-chain activity, and tons of hype that forces these big blockchain projects to level up. It’s wild, but it keeps the ecosystem pumping

Originality.ai: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 0% Human (AI Detected)

After watching the market for the last few years, I think many people still underestimate one hard truth:

Most altcoins from previous cycles will never reach their old ATH again.

Every bull market creates new narratives:
- DeFi
- NFTs
- AI coins
- Meme coins
- Gaming
- RWA

But when the next cycle starts, money usually moves to NEW projects, not old ones.

A lot of old altcoins still have:
- weak communities
- inactive developers
- low volume
- no real adoption

Meanwhile, newer ecosystems are attracting users and liquidity much faster.

In my opinion, survival in crypto is no longer about hype only.
Projects now need:
- real utility
- active ecosystem
- strong community
- constant development

Personally, I think only a small percentage of altcoins will still be relevant by 2030.

What do you think?

Which altcoins from older cycles still have a future, and which ones are already dead?

Originality.ai: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 0% Human (AI Detected)

Hello,
As we progress through 2026, there's growing interest in moving AI infrastructure from centralized models toward decentralized inference with on-chain verification of outputs.

Two areas stand out technically:
On-chain AI verification: Projects working on proving the integrity of AI inference directly on the blockchain.
Scalability for large data workloads: Handling TB-scale data requirements for next-generation decentralized applications.

From a blockchain scaling perspective, I see "Verifiable Compute" as one of the core challenges this year, ensuring transparency and trustworthiness of AI results through the infrastructure layer.
Which L2 or L3 solutions do you think are currently handling AI-related data loads most effectively? Looking for projects with strong technical progress in this area.

Would appreciate your thoughts.

Originality.ai: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 0% Human (AI Detected)


This newbie is the same; all of his posts were detected as AI-generated. As proof, I've included four of his posts as examples.

User: JigzawMarzipan

Bitcoin offers a type of freedom, but not complete freedom. It gives people control over their own money without needing a bank, and allows sending value anywhere without permission. That’s powerful, especially in places with unstable systems. But it also comes with responsibility and limits. You must secure your own funds, and governments can still regulate exchanges and access. So Bitcoin offers financial freedom at the individual level, but it doesn’t solve every problem or remove all control from systems. 

Originality.ai: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 0% Human (AI Detected)

Bitcoin is compared to gold because both are scarce and not controlled by any government. Like gold, Bitcoin is hard to produce and limited in supply. People use both to store value, especially when they do not trust traditional money. The difference is gold is physical, while Bitcoin is digital and can be sent anywhere quickly.

Originality.ai: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 0% Human (AI Detected)

This isn’t as contradictory as it looks. China banning Bitcoin trading/mining doesn’t mean they ignore it — they study it. Teaching students about Bitcoin is more about understanding the technology and its impact, not necessarily promoting its use. Even central banks analyze crypto deeply:
https://www.bis.org/publ/work1061.htm

Understanding something doesn’t mean endorsing it. 

Originality.ai: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 0% Human (AI Detected)

Most people don’t actually “use” Bitcoin daily, they either hold it (store of value) or use it for specific situations.

Common uses:

sending money across borders
avoiding banking limits
saving in high-inflation countries

You can spend it on hardware (including PC parts), but adoption varies by store.
https://bitcoin.org/en/spend-bitcoin

As for exposure, buying online won’t expose you physically, but your transaction history is public, so privacy depends on how you use it.

Originality.ai: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 0% Human (AI Detected)


This jr.member account from 2018 seems to have grown tired of regular posts, so he's using full AI for his posts. The three posts I've included were detected as AI-generated.

User: morggin

While normies chase red dildos and altcoin hopium, big Euro banks are bolting real-world treasury rails onto Ripple's ledger. ING, UniCredit, BNP Paribas, and crew have formed a consortium (Qivalis) for a MiCA-compliant euro stablecoin launch targeted at H2 2026. Société Générale already dropped its EURCV on XRPL. It's not "decentralized revolution"—it's banks using fast, cheap settlement layers for their own stablecoins and tokenized assets. Think efficiency play, not sound money.

XRP itself got the commodity treatment from the SEC/CFTC alongside actual commodities like BTC. The CLARITY Act is grinding through markup. On-chain data shows a fat 1.16B token supply wall sitting at recent break-even levels ($1.44-1.46 cluster), plus ongoing escrow releases and whatever Ripple's $4B+ war chest is funding in infrastructure. Whales accumulate while retail rotates. Total supply dynamics and centralized origins remain the same as always—premine, corporate control, not scarce digital gold. This is banks doing what banks do: integrating useful tech for cross-border rails and compliance theater. Whether it moves the XRP price needle long-term or just props up Ripple's enterprise sales is the real question. Bitcoin doesn't need their permission or their stablecoin experiments. Stack sats.

Originality.ai: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 0% Human (AI Detected)

Bitcoin is king for good reason. It’s the hardest, most decentralized money ever created — digital gold with a fixed 21 million supply, battle-tested security, and growing institutional acceptance as a strategic reserve asset. Most serious people in crypto understand this. I’m not here to dethrone BTC or push tribalism.

That said, Bitcoin has clear limitations for one critical job: efficient global value transfer and settlement. This is where XRP was purpose-built and already delivers today.

Key Differentiators (Not Competition, But Complementary Strengths)

• Use Case Focus
  Bitcoin excels as a store of value. Its block times (10+ minutes) and fees during congestion make it suboptimal for high-frequency cross-border settlements.
  XRP was engineered from day one as a bridge asset / liquidity layer for payments. The XRP Ledger settles in 3-5 seconds with near-zero fees and has already facilitated trillions in cumulative transaction volume through Ripple’s On-Demand Liquidity (ODL).
• Regulatory Clarity
  XRP has achieved clearer regulatory treatment in key areas than most assets (classified as a digital commodity in 2026 guidance, with spot ETFs attracting over $1 billion in inflows quickly). This removes a major friction point for banks and institutions that Bitcoin already enjoys, but which many other projects still lack.
• Real Institutional Infrastructure
  XRP powers RippleNet and ODL corridors used by banks and payment providers. Partnerships and integrations (including work with major financial players) target the $150+ trillion annual cross-border payments market. Bitcoin isn’t optimized for replacing or competing with SWIFT in speed/cost — XRP is actively doing it.
• Tokenomics in Practice
  Yes, 100 billion total supply and pre-mine raise eyebrows (valid Bitcoin maxi critique). But:
• _{Large portions are escrowed/locked institutionally.}
• _{High velocity (reuse for settlements) + massive value transferred means effective circulating supply for price discovery behaves differently.
  Handling trillions in annual flows with a fraction of tokens available requires a higher equilibrium price than simple “muh supply” arguments suggest.}

Bitcoin doesn’t need to “lose” for XRP to succeed. We can have digital gold and digital oil/railroad for the financial system. A multi-asset world is more realistic than one-chain maximalism. Many institutions are already allocating to both.I hold both — heavy BTC for the store-of-value thesis, and meaningful XRP for the payments/liquidity thesis. If global settlement rails modernize and capture even a small slice of SWIFT volume, the utility-driven demand for XRP becomes non-trivial.

Curious to hear counterpoints from the maxis. What am I missing?

Originality.ai: 82%
Sapling.ai: 76%
GPTZero: 92% AI Polished
StealthWriter: 12% Human (AI Detected)

While Bitcoin, Ethereum, Solana, BNB, and KCS are all significant players in the crypto space, they each serve distinct primary roles:

• Bitcoin excels as a decentralized store of value (often called “digital gold”) and has the strongest regulatory clarity in many jurisdictions, but it was not designed for high-speed, low-cost global settlements.
• Ethereum dominates smart contracts, DeFi, and tokenized assets, but it still faces scalability challenges and higher fees for high-volume payment use cases, despite recent improvements.
• Solana offers impressive speed and very low transaction costs, making it excellent for decentralized applications and retail payments, yet it lacks the same level of institutional banking partnerships and regulatory clarity that XRP has secured for cross-border settlement.
• BNB (Binance Coin) is tightly integrated into the Binance ecosystem, offering utility for trading fee discounts, staking, and activity on the Binance Smart Chain. It excels within a centralized exchange environment but is not positioned as a neutral bridge asset for global institutional settlements.
• KCS (KuCoin Shares) functions similarly as an exchange utility token for the KuCoin platform, providing fee reductions and rewards. Like BNB, its value is closely tied to one exchange’s success rather than broad adoption in traditional finance infrastructure.

XRP differentiates itself by being specifically designed as a bridge currency and liquidity solution for global payments. It already has regulatory progress as a non-security in key jurisdictions, a proven track record of settling trillions in value, and established partnerships with banks and financial institutions (including RippleNet and collaborations with players like JPMorgan and Mastercard). This gives it a unique edge in the race to become the central hub for efficient, always-on international settlements — an area where the others are either not optimized or still developing.

Originality.ai: 100%
Sapling.ai: 78.5%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 0% Human (AI Detected)

[ABCbits]

I believe theymos clarification to my recent question is relevant here. I haven't tried it, but it could be useful to mention it to convince moderator to take action or more serious action if you feel frustrated with certain account that misuse AI for spam purpose.

@nutildah it's more than a year since you last updated OP of this thread. you probably want to add AI guideline, this clarification and other stuff to it.

It is acceptable if someone mention it on their personal text or signature

No, it should be directly in the post, and not formatted to be unreadable.

2. How likely moderator take action (delete reply/thread or lock thread) only because there's no mention of AI usage if someone decide to make report?

I'd be strongly inclined to take some sort of action in all cases of undeclared AI usage, though in some cases the action might just be a warning, if the post is otherwise very constructive.

3. What counts as only occasionally? Below 50% of all created post/thread in last month?

Not many people have been banned for excessive declared AI yet, so I don't have enough experience to formulate more specific, reliable guidelines yet. It's at the moderator's discretion.

What I'd tend to ask is: if you were not using AI, how much less text would you be posting? If it'd be a reduction of more than 5-10% overall, then you're using AI excessively. For example, posting an AI's response to your 1-sentence prompt magnifies the amount of text you post by a lot, so you should do this only very rarely. But if you write a unique and on-topic 500-word post, give it to AI to clean up, and it produces ~500 words, then that counts against you a lot less, in my mind. (Though I wouldn't encourage doing that.)

 

[nutildah]

What is this? is this suppose to be some sort of joke? You think just adding some vague words in your signature space are enough for you to bypass the forum AI guidelines ? What if everyone starts doing this here. This place will become infested with chatbot zombies.
At this point I don't think tagging you will make any difference in your attitude (I will do it anyway).
Just wanted to record my protest against this type of AI guidelines bypass, incase this stupid dishonest thing really works.  
It is like a thief wearing a t-shirt with a fine print, 'theft is occasionally done'.
    

It’s called a disclaimer. They usually aren’t treated as jokes. It’s by no means a bypass, it’s official.
...
My actions and protest shows that despite the futile efforts here it’s inevitable it will all be rendered useless.

Well, turns out it wasn't an "official disclaimer" and his actions showed us exactly what not to do, as KazKaz27 is currently on a 30-day ban. In case you somehow missed it, theymos provided an explanation through introduction of new AI policies. These policies were at least partially developed because of Kaz himself. So in a way, Kaz did affect real change on the system!

It is acceptable if someone mention it on their personal text or signature

No, it should be directly in the post, and not formatted to be unreadable.

2. How likely moderator take action (delete reply/thread or lock thread) only because there's no mention of AI usage if someone decide to make report?

I'd be strongly inclined to take some sort of action in all cases of undeclared AI usage, though in some cases the action might just be a warning, if the post is otherwise very constructive.

3. What counts as only occasionally? Below 50% of all created post/thread in last month?

Not many people have been banned for excessive declared AI yet, so I don't have enough experience to formulate more specific, reliable guidelines yet. It's at the moderator's discretion.

What I'd tend to ask is: if you were not using AI, how much less text would you be posting? If it'd be a reduction of more than 5-10% overall, then you're using AI excessively. For example, posting an AI's response to your 1-sentence prompt magnifies the amount of text you post by a lot, so you should do this only very rarely. But if you write a unique and on-topic 500-word post, give it to AI to clean up, and it produces ~500 words, then that counts against you a lot less, in my mind. (Though I wouldn't encourage doing that.)

[FinneysTrueVision]

User: Antonixx

This newbie is trying to farm merit by creating new threads about the same recycled topics we’ve seen many times already. They are also trying to avoid detection by humanizing their text. Post #2 and #3 below seem to be the exact same post but paraphrased with AI to change the wording slightly.

Honestly, I don’t think early Bitcoin investors succeeded just because they bought cheap coins.... their real advantage was conviction.

Today, buying Bitcoin feels much easier because millions of people already believe in it. There are ETFs, institutions, medias, lots of big companies talking about adoption everywhere… but imagine holding Bitcoin back when most people called it stupid, dangerous, or dead every few months lol. The kind of belief they had takes serious patience mehh.

Even now, with all the informaton available on and off the internet, many people still panic during corrections, they stop buying when fear enters the market, and keep looking for reassurance from the crowd before making decisions.

it honestly makes me wonder… If people struggle to hold conviction today with all the info, would they really have survived being early investors back then?

Sometimes I feel people admire early Bitcoin holders without realizing how emotionally difficult it actually was to become one. Special respect to them, they deserved their accolades

pangram.com - 100% AI Generated
gowinston.ai - 20% Human, It is highly probable that an AI text generation tool was used.
sapling.ai - 100% Fake

Almost everyone says the same thing about Bitcoin: “I wish I bought earlier.” But when Bitcoin was cheaper, most of those same people were ignoring it, doubting it, or waiting for even lower prices.

People say they want Bitcoin at yesterday’s price, but what they really want is certainty. They want proof first, then they want the old price back lol. The problem is that conviction usualy comes after the opportunity.

When Bitcoin is quiet, people wait. When it runs, people regret. Then they say they are “late” instead of admitting they were just hesitant. This is why DCA makes more sense than prediction. It removes the fantasy of perfect timing and replaces it with consistency.

Sometimes I think people are not late to Bitcoin, they are late to making decisions. And hesitation is often more expensive than a high entry price.

pangram.com - 100% AI Generated
gptzero.me - 100% AI
sapling.ai - 100% Fake

Almost everybody say the same thing during a bull run: “Man, I hope Bitcoin crashes so I can buy more" but when the crash actually comes and their dreams comes true? Fear enters immediately.

Suddenly, the same people who wanted cheaper Bitcoin stop buying, start waiting for confirmation and convince themselves price could still go much lower. I don't really know for sure, do people truly want cheaper Bitcoin, or do they only like the idea of it while prices are still high? cause emotionally wanting lower prices is very different from financially buying them and in my opinion, this is why DCA sounds easy in theory but feels difficult in real life. Consistency becomes uncomfortable when the timeline is full of fear, bad news, and negative sentiment everywhere.

A lot of us are not beating this Allegation, No cap

I have a thought that might actually be true for some.. I feel there are people who are not actually scared of losing money… They’re scared of looking wrong while buying and that fear quietly destroys long term conviction.

Do you think most investors actually want Bitcoin crashes… or do they only think they do until it becomes emotionally real

pangram.com - 100% AI Generated
gptzero.me - 91% AI, 9% Mixed

[memehunter]

So in a way, Kaz did affect real change on the system!

I wonder if he is willing to take credit for this 

Dang I think I merited the wrong post

There is no refund lol. Please double check before meriting in future  . And be careful there are stupid people out there who can make a case against you in a reputation board for inappropriate/careless merit sending   

One could argue that pre-LLM tools like grsmmarly also had some AI features but nobody ever complained about that.

This has been discussed many times in this thread. Nobody is saying that fixing is/am/are is wrong (if you are totally unreadable you should stick to your local board where you can convey your originality/experiences more accurately).

[Kryptonite788]

What's the verdict on Jr. Member Kryptonite788?
He posted this on the Dev board:

This idea makes sense from a systems efficiency perspective but in reality, it conflicts with how bitcoin determines ownership, verification and fairness and I agree with you that running a full node has become noticeably stressful over time but there’s a key part we need to understand , you don’t need to store everything to get the correct benefits of a full node there are practical ways to deal with the whole “blockchain is huge” problem and using pruned nodes is one of them even if it only allows you keep recent blocks ,you will still verify everything and disk usage will drop noticeably while security still remains the same so it’s a win win .

I get the feeling he tries to "shittify" chatbot output by placing dots and commas at the rong side of the space.

I can't even get myself to read this shitpost on the Gambling board:

Looking at this topic closely,I’ve come to realize that both drugs and gambling can affect a person’s life negatively and in similar ways especially when it is an addiction, looking at the financial aspect of it ,most people that are addicted to drugs prefer using their last money to satisfy their cravings for hard substances rather than using it for profitable vices so at the end of the day they become broke because they used up all their money to purchase drugs, same goes for gambling, most gamblers would go as far as borrowing money from people to gamble after using up all of theirs with the hope that they would win when there’s no assurance that they would actually win the gamble ,as far as I’m concerned gambling isn’t sure for anybody ,it’s 50:50 you may win and you may lose ,and most of the time ,the losses tend to be more than the wins. So at the end of the day ,both drugs addiction and gamble addiction can put a person into financial ruin if care is not taken. Drug and gamble addiction are also a major cause of most broken relationships out there because the addiction can cause one to neglect responsibilities. Funds that ought to be used to take of the family and responsibilities are now diverted into satisfying those bad addictions which in turn leads to conflict within the family or even between partners and children . Let’s not forget about the emotional and psychological damage drug and gamble addiction can cause to a person ,low self esteem and social withdrawal can reduce productivity and hinder ability to think outside the box because the only thing in that person mind is how to get the next highness or to play the next gamble looking for a win which is not even guaranteed.

Hello @LoyceV, i hope you’re doing well. I’m reaching out concerning the neutral tag that was left on my account by @nutildah and @ABCbits. So after looking back at my previous posts, i understand that i have made mistakes and i fully take responsibility for my actions and i’m also not trying to deny accountability but I feel that those mistakes were made largely due to the fact that I was new on this forum and I didn’t fully understand how important it was to make meaningful contributions to the discussions that are being held here in this forum. And also, I’ve not been active on the forum for a while now and coming back now has made reflect on my mistakes which i have learnt from now. I'm willing to learn from my flaws and improve the quality of my participation in this forum and also do better going forward. And so now I’d like to respectfully ask if you'd be willing to review my situation and i hope that @nutildah and @ABCbits will consider removing the neutral tag if i show genuine understanding and improvement.

Thank you for your time.

[LoyceV]

Hello @LoyceV

Thanks for the notification, I forgot to add a Shitposter tag last time. Sorry for the delay.

I feel that those mistakes were made largely due to the fact that I was new on this forum and I didn’t fully understand how important it was to make meaningful contributions

Let me guess: someone told you you can earn money here.

reflect on my mistakes
willing to learn from my flaws
improve the quality of my participation
if i show genuine understanding and improvement.

All I see is meaningless buzz words.

[Kryptonite788]

Hello @LoyceV

Thanks for the notification, I forgot to add a Shitposter tag last time. Sorry for the delay.

I feel that those mistakes were made largely due to the fact that I was new on this forum and I didn’t fully understand how important it was to make meaningful contributions

Let me guess: someone told you you can earn money here.

reflect on my mistakes
willing to learn from my flaws
improve the quality of my participation
if i show genuine understanding and improvement.

All I see is meaningless buzz words.

There’s no point in going back and forth with you, it’s clear that nothing I say will make any difference to you lots so I’ll let my future actions on this forum speak for itself, Gracias.

[memehunter]

Hello @LoyceV, i hope you’re doing well. I’m reaching out concerning the neutral tag that was left on my account by @nutildah and @ABCbits. So after looking back at my previous posts, i understand that i have made mistakes and i fully take responsibility for my actions and i’m also not trying to deny accountability but I feel that those mistakes were made largely due to the fact that I was new on this forum and I didn’t fully understand how important it was to make meaningful contributions to the discussions that are being held here in this forum. And also, I’ve not been active on the forum for a while now and coming back now has made reflect on my mistakes which i have learnt from now. I'm willing to learn from my flaws and improve the quality of my participation in this forum and also do better going forward. And so now I’d like to respectfully ask if you'd be willing to review my situation and i hope that @nutildah and @ABCbits will consider removing the neutral tag if i show genuine understanding and improvement.

Thank you for your time.

Since this was your apology post, I am not trying to hurt your chances. But I can not resist to ask one question, did you intentionally make capitalization errors in this post to make it 'human'?

[Kryptonite788]

Hello @LoyceV, i hope you’re doing well. I’m reaching out concerning the neutral tag that was left on my account by @nutildah and @ABCbits. So after looking back at my previous posts, i understand that i have made mistakes and i fully take responsibility for my actions and i’m also not trying to deny accountability but I feel that those mistakes were made largely due to the fact that I was new on this forum and I didn’t fully understand how important it was to make meaningful contributions to the discussions that are being held here in this forum. And also, I’ve not been active on the forum for a while now and coming back now has made reflect on my mistakes which i have learnt from now. I'm willing to learn from my flaws and improve the quality of my participation in this forum and also do better going forward. And so now I’d like to respectfully ask if you'd be willing to review my situation and i hope that @nutildah and @ABCbits will consider removing the neutral tag if i show genuine understanding and improvement.

Thank you for your time.

Since this was your apology post, I am not trying to hurt your chances. But I can not resist to ask one question, did you intentionally make capitalization errors in this post to make it 'human'?

I don’t know what you’re driving at but I definitely did not stylize my write up in any way. My post is a normal one, only that it was written very quickly and so in that moment, my focus was not placed on capitalization or what not, I simply typed what I had in mind, we are not in English class fgs.