AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[seoincorporation]

~snip~
At this point, I am giving him a neutral, until he clears things here (explaination).   I thought he would immediately come here to explain his position after the previous reports.

Perhaps the member in question does not even know that there are accusations against him regarding inappropriate use of AI, or perhaps he has decided to ignore everything. If he doesn't visit this part of the forum or doesn't use one of the notification bots, it's no wonder he hasn't reacted yet.

Great job guys.

As you say i have been experimenting with AI, and is not only on the forum, I'm making telegram bots, WhatsApp bots, chat bots, and AI automatization of everything that i can, i even have done AI agents for phone calls, I'm in the AI madness.

I owe an apologise, but i had to try it by my self to see how the forum will react against AI, because sadly it's a matter of time until we get full of AI spammers.

Personally, i will stop now, the experiment is over, it was fun and i would love to share with the community how i did it, the tools, the process, and all, but I'm almost sure a post like that will get me banned.

I hope to be able tonight to generate a report and share it with the forum staff.

[Jawhead999]

As you say i have been experimenting with AI

Really?

What I know if someone make an experiment, he can also give the evidence where he intentionally making experiment, let's say someone started the experiment in June 6, in June 5 he posted on Archival without edit by saying if he make experiment. This make people know,

If you can't show that, you're taking a big risk here...

[lovesmayfamilis]

I owe an apologise, but i had to try it by my self to see how the forum will react against AI,

Why not open a new account for experiments? A newbie will be beyond suspicion of not knowing the forum rules. Especially since everyone opens a new account in any unclear situation so as not to risk their real one. You were too self-confident. I don't think that's right. We are fighting AI, and at the same time, others just spit on the rules, others seem to understand everything well, but.... Don't confuse confidence with overconfidence, it can be very deceiving sometimes.

[seoincorporation]

As you say i have been experimenting with AI

Really?

What I know if someone make an experiment, he can also give the evidence where he intentionally making experiment, let's say someone started the experiment in June 6, in June 5 he posted on Archival without edit by saying if he make experiment. This make people know,

If you can't show that, you're taking a big risk here...

I know i'm taking a big risk, and i was playing with fire, but if i mentioned before i wouldt be able to see the real result.

I owe an apologise, but i had to try it by my self to see how the forum will react against AI,

Why not open a new account for experiments? A newbie will be beyond suspicion of not knowing the forum rules. Especially since everyone opens a new account in any unclear situation so as not to risk their real one. You were too self-confident. I don't think that's right. We are fighting AI, and at the same time, others just spit on the rules, others seem to understand everything well, but.... Don't confuse confidence with overconfidence, it can be very deceiving sometimes.

I didn't open a new account because i wanted to train the AI with my knowledge to act as me, i mande a promp with my post history and i really enjoy the process, i know this could affect my reputation, but now i want to use this knowledge to help with the AI fight because the fact that some tools detect the AI posting doesn’t mean that we are safe. There are ways to humanize the texts, and i we will need tools to fitght against that.

[memehunter]

User:   Brandon855 : Another new account starting his journey on the back of AI horse. It wont take you far buddy 

Hey everyone,

I'm starting this thread because there's a thought I just can't shake. I vividly remember the days when saying "I invest in Bitcoin" would get you labeled as a crazy visionary or, at best, a geek playing around with fake internet money.

Today, the tune seems to have completely changed.

It's not just niche forums talking about it anymore. You have the very banks that wanted it dead yesterday now discussing it, you have giants like BlackRock getting their hands dirty with ETFs, and even my aunt is asking me if "it's a good time to buy those bit-things."

So, my question is this: have we passed the point of no return?

I mean, have we moved from the "I wonder if it will even survive" phase to the "okay, it's here to stay, now let's see how it fits in" phase?

On one hand, institutional adoption feels like an undeniable sign. On the other hand, the volatility is still like a wild EKG reading, and governments still haven't really made up their minds about what to do with it.

What do you all think? Is it still a massive high-risk gamble, or has it become an established asset, a kind of "digital gold" whose place in the future is all but guaranteed?

Let the debate begin below. I'm curious to read your takes.

Copyleaks: 100%
Origin GPTzero: 100%

The story of the Bitcoin Family is honestly pretty amazing. They sold everything back in 2017 to go all-in on Bitcoin when it was around $900, and that move completely changed their lives. Now, traveling the world with their kids and living off crypto, the security risks they face are very real.

Didi’s choice to ditch hardware wallets and split their encrypted seed phrases across four continents might sound extreme at first, but with the rise in crypto-related kidnappings and threats, it really makes sense. He even mentioned that he keeps only a small amount of BTC on his phone wallet, so if someone tried to rob him, he literally couldn’t give them access to the rest. That’s actually a clever move because it takes away the pressure in a worst-case scenario.

It’s also understandable why they stopped sharing travel updates and vlogs. Once people can track your location, especially knowing you’re sitting on a serious crypto fortune, you’re basically putting a target on your back.

So yeah, maybe it sounds a bit over the top, but if I were in his shoes with a family and a crypto-heavy lifestyle I’d probably do something similar.

Origin GPTzero: 100%
Sapling AI: 100%

Some big news out of South Korea: they’ve just elected a new president who’s openly supportive of Bitcoin and the whole crypto scene. It sounds like he wants to push for more innovation in the space and make things easier for both investors and blockchain startups.

He’s talked about making crypto regulations more clear and fair, protecting retail investors, and even giving some incentives to blockchain projects. If he follows through, this could be a big boost not just for South Korea’s crypto industry but maybe even for the whole scene in Asia.

Of course, it’s still early days—so hard to tell if it’s real change or just good campaign talk.

Copyleaks: 100%
Origin GPTzero: 100%

Personally, i will stop now, the experiment is over, it was fun and i would love to share with the community how i did it, the tools, the process, and all, but I'm almost sure a post like that will get me banned.

I hope to be able tonight to generate a report and share it with the forum staff.

Can't wait to see what are the results of your daring experiments. Removing the neutral feedback.

[Don Pedro Dinero]

Regarding the case of seoincorporation I think the right thing to do would have been to create a new account and do the experiment with it, making it clear in a neutral tag what he was doing. For my part I am not going to leave him a neutral tag because he contributes very positively to the local section in Spanish and he hasn't hesitated to recognize his fault.

I prefer this to people who are caught red handed and deny the evidence by inventing the most unlikely stories.

[nutildah]

Hello friends.

User : purple_sparkles

You're right about this and this is a good find, however, please remember to report the posts to the moderators next time.

Here's a few more from this account:

#1

Any risk should be justified, and the risk involved in gambling is hardly a reasonable one. In business, risk is based on analysis, experience, and strategic decision-making, whereas in gambling, it mostly relies on luck and chance. There`s little control over the outcome, which makes this kind of risk particularly dangerous.  That`s why it`s important to understand the difference between calculated risk and a game with unpredictable consequences.

Quillbot: 100% likely AI
Sapling: 100% Fake
Stealthwriter: 50% AI detected


#2

In people under the age of 25, the part of the brain responsible for critical thinking and impulse control is not yet fully developed. That’s why this role should be carried out by parents, who can provide guidance and support. Most students fall into this age group, which makes them more prone to risky behavior, such as spending all the money intended for their education at a casino.

ZeroGPT: 100% AI GPT
Sapling: 100% Fake
Stealthwriter: 67% AI detected


#3

Once, people on the fields were also replaced by tractors, and humanity survived. Now, we face a similar situation with AI. I believe that those whose jobs have been partially or fully replaced by AI shouldn't resist it, but rather explore its potential. We are living in a time when, just to maintain our usual standard of living, we must constantly evolve, not to mention striving for something greater. We are in an era of rapid and large-scale change. Today, those who refuse to adapt and grow risk being left behind in this new reality. After all, if a person keeps doing the same thing over and over, they stop growing ,but without growth, there is no future.

Copyleaks: 100% AI-generated
Sapling: 100% Fake
Stealthwriter: 57% AI detected


Also, I noticed that GPTZero now has this feature of detecting "AI edited" text (written by human and edited by AI):



This is kind of interesting. I say for now we also report these posts, because most posts written this way are already borderline spam & using AI to fix them won't make them not spam..

[Free Market Capitalist]

Also, I noticed that GPTZero now has this feature of detecting "AI edited" text (written by human and edited by AI):



This is kind of interesting. I say for now we also report these posts, because most posts written this way are already borderline spam & using AI to fix them won't make them not spam..

Yeah, interesting. Although I understand that you propose to report them whenever the human creation result is less than 30%, which would be consistent with the OP.

[NotATether]

Why not open a new account for experiments? A newbie will be beyond suspicion of not knowing the forum rules.

In my opinion, I think a newbie will be more suspected of using AI generated posts. They will appear in Patrol.

[adam.sandler]

You're right about this and this is a good find, however, please remember to report the posts to the moderators next time.

Here's a few more from this account:

Thank you for your attention and guidance.
Yes, I have done this.

[nutildah]

Although I understand that you propose to report them whenever the human creation result is less than 30%, which would be consistent with the OP.

I suppose that makes sense, treating <30% human as the same as >70% AI-generated for GPTZero results. It is only that one detector that does that, at least for now.

Why not open a new account for experiments? A newbie will be beyond suspicion of not knowing the forum rules.

In my opinion, I think a newbie will be more suspected of using AI generated posts. They will appear in Patrol.

Yes it is true that newb accounts that post walls of perfect-English text will be more under scrutiny than more established members that do the same thing.


Just posting this here to remind myself to look more into it later, this guy is removing punctuation from all his posts to evade the detectors, what a maroon:

Before becoming a Bitcoin influencer, prioritize your security and that of your loved ones.Attackers often target influencers' families when they can't reach the individual directly.Many assume crypto influencers have substantial crypto holdings, but often, they're simply sharing knowledge with their audience.As a crypto holder,discretion is key,avoid disclosing your holdings publicly.With the rise in crypto-related physical attacks, safety should be your top priority.Many crypto holders have fallen victim to abduction due to publicly disclosing their holdings.As a holder,it's unsettling when you can't keep your assets private without compromising your safety.

After fixing the punctuation, it comes back as 100% AI according to Copyleaks.

[Free Market Capitalist]

For those of you who have more experience in this I would like to share with you the post I just saw:

Hello everyone,

I'm new to this forum but not new to the Bitcoin spirit.

Like many of you, I discovered Bitcoin not just as a currency — but as something far more foundational.

💡 To me, Bitcoin is digital land.
It’s limited.
It’s sovereign.
It’s something you can own, transfer, inherit, and protect — just like physical property.

Inspired by this vision, I created a symbolic platform:
🔗 btcparcels.com

There, anyone can claim a symbolic digital deed for their Bitcoin holdings.
It’s not about regulation or profit — it’s about meaning.
It’s about making ownership feel real.

Just like Satoshi disappeared and left behind a powerful idea —
I’m here to carry it forward in a new format:
📜 One satoshi at a time, one parcel at a time.

I'd love to hear your thoughts.
Feel free to explore, question, critique, or shape the idea together.

Thanks for reading.
— Terratoshi
Digital Land Visionary

It strikes as AI generated but I've run it through copyleaks and quillbot where it appears as 0% AI generated whereas gptzero says: "We are moderately confident this text was AI generated" with an 81%.

It's his first post, so maybe soon to tag him but I think it is worth keeping an eye on him. I don't know if he's used one of those "humanizers".

[Ultegra134]

Another account using AI in their posts. It's a copper membership which means he has bought it to promote his service but also to spread spam AI gibberish in the forum. Posts reported and user neutral tagged.

User: 96OFFICIAL

Post 1.

The conflict between Israel and Iran has raised global concerns, especially with speculation that the U.S. might enter the war. If that happens, it could trigger involvement from Russia and potentially escalate into a wider conflict. Polymarket currently gives a 45% chance of U.S. entry, reflecting high uncertainty. While the U.S. has strong ties to Israel, it’s also cautious about entering another Middle East war. For now, the situation is tense but not yet a full-scale global conflict—though the risk is clearly rising.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Post 2.

Recency bias is a very real and common phenomenon in sports, especially among newer fans or casual viewers who may not have the full historical context. It leads people to overvalue recent performances while ignoring long-term trends or past achievements. This bias is amplified by social media platform, exciting clips can create misleading impressions of an athlete or team’s true ability.

In sports betting, recency bias can be particularly harmful, as it may cause bettors to make irrational decisions based on hype rather than data. A single good or bad game doesn't define a team’s overall quality true performance should be measured across a longer period, using consistent data and analysis. To combat recency bias, it’s important to step back, review a broader set of statistics, trust long-term patterns, and question emotionally driven narratives. While recent form does matter, a team or athlete is never just as good or bad as their last match.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 100% Probability AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Post 3.

You’re asking a valid question, and you're right — gambling addiction is more common among the poor and working class. For many, gambling feels like a chance to escape hardship, while the rich often gamble just for fun. The poor also face more aggressive gambling ads and have fewer resources to recover from losses. So while rich people can get addicted too, it’s usually less visible and less damaging to their lives. Your observation reflects what’s seen in many societies.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 20% Probability AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

Post 4.

You're right, Revenue Share is a standard model across most platforms. However, many of them have strict criteria for payment eligibility. In our case, we offer a flexible and fair system. We already have affiliates driving global traffic to our platform, and if you can bring in 20–50 users, you’ll be in a great position to earn a solid share of the revenue. It’s a win-win for both sides.

As for your users, we can offer a variety of incentives to keep them engaged, including welcome bonuses, deposit cashback, loss cashback, weekly and monthly bonuses, lucky draws, and more.

Let’s chat more directly and set something up that works for both of us.

Copyleaks: AI Content Detected
GPTZero: 92% Probability AI Generated
Sapling.ai: 100% Fake

[FinneysTrueVision]

For those of you who have more experience in this I would like to share with you the post I just saw:

It strikes as AI generated but I've run it through copyleaks and quillbot where it appears as 0% AI generated whereas gptzero says: "We are moderately confident this text was AI generated" with an 81%.

It's his first post, so maybe soon to tag him but I think it is worth keeping an eye on him. I don't know if he's used one of those "humanizers".

Using too many em dashes and the cliché “It’s not just about X—it's about Y.” are the most obvious signs that this is definitely AI generated.

[NotATether]

Using too many em dashes and the cliché “It’s not just about X—it's about Y.” are the most obvious signs that this is definitely AI generated.

Apple devices and in particular Safari also convert regular dashes into em dashes by default unless you turn this off in Preferences.

[God Of Thunder]

Another account using AI in their posts. It's a copper membership which means he has bought it to promote his service but also to spread spam AI gibberish in the forum. Posts reported and user neutral tagged.

User: 96OFFICIAL

From their history, this is the official account of 96.com Casino. Do they need to post this AI-generated content? What could be the reason for posting content all over the forum? I don't usually see casino representatives, aka official accounts, get engaged in general conversation or even political conversation. They don't have to be in conversation to promote their business. They can do other kinds of promotions that they have tried before. If the person behind the account is interested in conversation, they should write from their account instead of ruining the official account's reputation.

[igebotz]

From their history, this is the official account of 96.com Casino. Do they need to post this AI-generated content? What could be the reason for posting content all over the forum? I don't usually see casino representatives, aka official accounts, get engaged in general conversation or even political conversation. They don't have to be in conversation to promote their business. They can do other kinds of promotions that they have tried before. If the person behind the account is interested in conversation, they should write from their account instead of ruining the official account's reputation.

This is what happens when low budget someone without previous management experience lied on CV to get a job they're not qualified for   - trying to stay relevant by shit posting trying to rank up ( possibly wear signature)

The job was to answer questions related to their service and update running promotions not spamming the gambling board. Shame.

[Shishir99]

Guys, what is your point of view when it comes to fixing grammatical errors using tools? For example, I am writing this post on my own. After writing this content, I will paste it into an AI tool and ask it to find the grammatical errors and fix them. Let me show you what it looks like, and I am interested to know does the community thinks about it.

Here is the prompt - 



Result -

Guys, what is your point of view when it comes to using tools to fix grammatical errors? For example, I’m writing this post on my own. After finishing it, I’ll paste it into an AI tool and ask it to find and correct any grammatical mistakes. Let me show you what it looks like — I’m interested to know what the community thinks about this approach.

[jokers10]

Result

Don't you see that the text is not what you wrote? It is rewritten in other words. It's not about correcting grammatical or punctuational mistakes, it's about style rewriting, so it changes what is written. Why do you need to lose your individuality? One thing is to correct mistakes and totally the different is to rewrite a text in a different style.

[seoincorporation]

Using too many em dashes and the cliché “It’s not just about X—it's about Y.” are the most obvious signs that this is definitely AI generated.

Apple devices and in particular Safari also convert regular dashes into em dashes by default unless you turn this off in Preferences.

I can confirm that — is an AI sign.

In fact, chars like “, ”, ’, and —, can be considered AI character because most humans use ", ', and -, those are the key that we all can easy find in our keyboard 

And i don't understand at all why does IA loves to use —, i ask my self, where does the AI get that training from, maybe there are tons of sites with that character, but for me isn't that common at all.