AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[nutildah]

originality.ai - 100% confident that’s AI
gptzero.me - 100% AI
gowinston.ai - 0%

So now we're using AI detector websites as evidence?

We're coming up on the 3rd anniversary of this thread, in just 2 weeks.

Maybe I should stop spending time writing proper replies and just post a few lazy one-liners. Seems like that would attract less attention than actually trying to explain a point.

You can do whatever you want except for copy/paste ChatGPT output and pretend its your own writing. If the forum allowed this, it would quickly be overrun by AI shitposters and there'd be nothing human left.

If you think a post is wrong, then explain why it's wrong. Posting a bunch of percentages from random websites doesn't prove who wrote it.

We don't have to prove who wrote it, we just know you didn't write it.

[FinneysTrueVision]

So now we're using AI detector websites as evidence?

Yes, that’s the purpose of this thread. Human intuition alone is usually enough to discern when something is AI generated. Including AI detector results just makes the case stronger.

If you think a post is wrong, then explain why it's wrong.

Your posts are wrong because they violate the forum’s guidelines on appropriate AI usage.

Posting a bunch of percentages from random websites doesn't prove who wrote it.

AI wrote your posts. It doesn’t matter if you gave it a basic idea to generate an output from.

[memehunter]

So now we're using AI detector websites as evidence?

So you accept that it is right to differentiate between genuine human efforts and AI shit posting, it is just a matter of nature of evidences, right? So please suggest a better way of doing this.

Maybe I should stop spending time writing proper replies and just post a few lazy one-liners.

Please try that if you want to nobody is stopping you. Just like we cant stop someone from tagging you as 'lazy one liner shit poster' 
 

[macson]

What's the verdict on Newbie Azorx? My gut feeling tells me this is chatbot verbal diarrhea:

I just checked that his post was detected as AI generated:

Do you use a VPN, or is it better to set up your own private server in a random location and connect through that? I’m trying to understand how someone can hide their IP address and protect their identity online.

I want to have one dedicated computer used only for crypto-related activity, with the strongest possible privacy and anonymity setup. What would be the safest and most practical way to do that?

Also I know it has do to do with a lot more then just your IP. Internet anonymity depends on many factors including device fingerprinting, browser behavior, account history, payment trails, metadata, and operational mistakes.

If some people on this forum have any input i would gladly hear it.

GPTZero: 77%
Sapling.ai: 80%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

Hi everyone,

I have a question about using Monero with a Trezor hardware wallet.

I currently use a Trezor to store multiple coins, and I’m trying to understand whether it’s possible to safely store Monero (XMR) with it as well.

My main questions are:

Can Monero be stored using a Trezor hardware wallet?
If yes, is it supported directly inside Trezor Suite?

Does Monero still keep its normal privacy features when used with a hardware wallet?
For example, do stealth addresses, ring signatures, and confidential transactions still work the same way when signing transactions through Trezor?

What is the best way to store native Monero securely with Trezor?
Is it stored on the actual Monero network, or are there different versions/wrapped versions I should avoid?

Are there any risks, compatibility issues, or important setup details I should know before using Monero with Trezor?

I’m mainly trying to make sure I do this in the safest way possible without reducing Monero’s privacy or exposing my hardware wallet to unnecessary risks.

Any advice from people who have actually used Monero with Trezor would be appreciated.

Originality.ai: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
Sapling.ai: 99%
StealthWriter: 77% AI Detected

Hi, I was wondering whether it’s a good idea to buy crypto directly through my Trezor hardware wallet.

I have two main concerns:

Cost: Is buying through Trezor usually more expensive compared to using a regular crypto exchange?
Security: Are there any safety risks involved? I want to keep my Trezor as secure as possible and avoid exposing it to any potential vulnerabilities.

What’s your opinion? Would you recommend buying directly through Trezor, or is it better to buy on an exchange and then transfer the crypto to the hardware wallet?

Originality.ai: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%

Okay, so if you were in my position: you have a Trezor with BTC and USDC (held across different networks, such as Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, etc.), and you want to swap the USDC for Bitcoin. Would you use the swap feature inside Trezor, or would you send the USDC to a centralized exchange, sell it, buy Bitcoin, and then send the Bitcoin back to your own wallet?

Originality.ai: 93%
Sapling.ai: 99%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

Great input, thank you so much.

Regarding the paper trail, would you recommend keeping the Wi-Fi card installed but only using the laptop on public Wi-Fi, so it cannot easily be connected to my identity? Or would using Ethernet still be the better option?

Also, if I may ask, what would be a good laptop for running Tails OS?

Originality.ai: 100%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

[khatarnak]

AI wrote your posts. It doesn’t matter if you gave it a basic idea to generate an output from.

So we went from AI detector scores, to "AI wrote your posts".

That's quite a jump.

How did we get from suspicion to proof? Did I miss a step somewhere?

So you accept that it is right to differentiate between genuine human efforts and AI shit posting.

The problem is that you've jumped straight from "this looks like AI" to " it is AI."

We don't have to prove who wrote it, we just know you didn't write it.

So the standard is:

We don't have to prove it. We just know.
 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

It almost feels like some people see a lower-ranked account and immediately assume any decent post must be AI.

Maybe a brand new user wouldn't care, but I do find it weird.

I honestly don't know how some of you are so confident about something you can't possibly know.

[nutildah]

I honestly don't know how some of you are so confident about something you can't possibly know.

Why are you denying it when it so incredibly obvious that's what you're doing. If you keep doing it, your posts will continue to be deleted by moderators, and you'll eventually be banned. There's no point in arguing. You're not the first to argue, and you won't be the last.

Here is an official statement on AI use policy by the admin:

AI guidelines

Here's the relevant part:

You should not copy/paste text written by an AI into a post, with these exceptions:
 - If you clearly mention that something you're posting is AI-generated, and you only occasionally and appropriately post such AI-generated text, then that's OK.
 - If you have the AI do almost a direct translation of something you wrote, then that's OK. For example, you can tell the AI to "Directly translate this text into Spanish: <something you wrote>" or "Output the following text exactly as-is, except with any clear spelling or grammar mistakes fixed: <something you wrote>". It's not OK to tell an AI, "Improve this text: <something you wrote>", since then it will mostly rewrite it, and it risks becoming AI slop in the process.
 - Non-text AI content such as art is OK (subject to the normal rules).

[khatarnak]

Why are you denying it when it so incredibly obvious that's what you're doing. If you keep doing it, your posts will continue to be deleted by moderators, and you'll eventually be banned. There's no point in arguing. You're not the first to argue, and you won't be the last.

We are not talking rocket science here.

Just because something write clear english not mean is AI.

Most my posts is normal crypto and betting talk. Nothing special or big brain stuff.

And I not here doing $50-$100 signature campaign posting or anything like that. I just talk normal in forum like other people.

If only argument is “it sound too clean”, then this is not proof for anything.

So tell me, with this kind of writing, still not ok or what?

[nutildah]

If only argument is “it sound too clean”, then this is not proof for anything.

Nobody said that. You're doing everything you can to avoid understanding the problem. If you want to understand how this process works, then I encourage you to read the first post in this thread. Then you will understand why we know your posts were written with AI, and why they will be deleted as spam.

[memehunter]

The problem is that you've jumped straight from "this looks like AI" to " it is AI."

Let me repeat the main question again (which you seem to avoid knowingly)?

So you accept that it is right to differentiate between genuine human efforts and AI shit posting, it is just a matter of nature of evidences, right? So please suggest a better way of doing this.

And I not here doing $50-$100 signature campaign posting or anything like that.

Quoting for future references (I am sure the need will arise  ).
 

[khatarnak]

I encourage you to read the first post in this thread.

I read the policy.

I understand the concern.

But I don't think my account is the type that usually ends up in this thread.

[nutildah]

But I don't think my account is the type that usually ends up in this thread.

Why would you think that? You're copy/pasting AI text and pretending its your own writing. You're exactly the type of account that ends up in this thread.

[SmartBusiness001]

User: BlockLegend666

in managing finances. Bitcoin is often considered to maintain its value over the long term, but it still experiences significant price fluctuations. Therefore, investing all your funds in Bitcoin can lead to financial instability when the price drops rapidly. Dividing your funds across multiple assets can help mitigate the stress of a single asset declining in value. The part about keeping cash is also crucial because emergencies often arise without planning. Having readily available funds can help cover medical expenses, job losses, or other pressing needs without having to sell assets during adverse market conditions.

1. GPTZero - 100% AI generated
2. Copyleaks AI Content Detector - 100% AI Content
3. Sapling AI Detector - 100.0 %
4. Undetectable.ai - 99% AI

Financial decisions are often influenced by real life needs, not just investment opportunities. If a car helps with daily activities, saves time, and even increases income, then it has value far beyond mere transportation. Under such circumstances, reducing car use simply to increase investment may not yield better overall results. The important part is recognizing that everyone's circumstances are different. Not everyone has the same needs, jobs, or environments. Therefore, the right choice for one person may not be the right one for another. This way of thinking demonstrates a fairly open and realistic attitude.

1. GPTZero - 100% AI generated
2. Copyleaks AI Content Detector - 100% AI Content
3. Sapling AI Detector - 100.0 %
4. Undetectable.ai - 99% AI

The dynamic between financial innovation and government control. Bitcoin's inherently complex system makes oversight efforts often ineffective. Governments typically emphasize the risk of fraud or illegal use as a justification for intervention. Despite this, some people remain attracted to Bitcoin for its benefits, such as the potential for asset value appreciation or ease of transfer. This conflict emphasizes the need for a clear understanding of the risks involved in Bitcoin investment, including potential regulatory changes that could impact its value. Awareness of this helps to strategize more wisely, rather than relying solely on expectations.

1. GPTZero - 100% AI generated
2. Copyleaks AI Content Detector - 100% AI Content
3. Sapling AI Detector - 100.0 %
4. Undetectable.ai - 99% AI

An emergency fund serves as a safeguard against sudden disruptions to investment decisions. When urgent needs arise, using available funds is often better than going into debt or postponing solutions. The idea that Bitcoin can be repurchased once financial conditions improve is also quite plausible. However, it's important to remember that Bitcoin prices don't always move as expected. There's a chance the price will rise when you try to repurchase, or it could fall further. Therefore, maintaining a balance between investments and daily living expenses is a safer bet than relying too heavily on a single asset.

1. GPTZero - 100% AI generated
2. Copyleaks AI Content Detector - 100% AI Content
3. Sapling AI Detector - 100.0 %
4. Undetectable.ai - 99% AI

A short-term decline may seem drastic, but for those who have been following the market for a long time, it's not entirely surprising. The assumption that short-term declines are smaller after a major correction is quite logical, as markets typically take time to stabilize. However, medium-term forecasts, especially leading up to the halving, still leave open the possibility of further declines. Understanding these cycles is crucial for investors to avoid panicking when prices move lower. Understanding key market patterns and periods helps make calmer, more informed investment decisions.

1. GPTZero - 100% AI generated
2. Copyleaks AI Content Detector - 100% AI Content
3. Sapling AI Detector - 100.0 %
4. Undetectable.ai - 99% AI

[macson]

I just checked that this newbie account's posts were AI-generated. I've highlighted three posts that appear to be AI-generated.

User: hypergeometric1231

Every team out there is shipping an AI agent. Trading, compliance, research, support, ops...the application layer is exploding and everyone wants a slice.

But the infrastructure layer doesn't exist. Agents can't coordinate with each other. No one outside the platform can verify what an agent puts out. Agents can't reach users once they leave their home platform. No one is building the infrastructure that ties these three together.

This pattern is not new. Email was fragmented before SMTP. Smart contracts had to rely on centralized oracles before Chainlink. Each time, the connective layer arrived and the ecosystem above it started to function. AI agents are sitting at that exact point right now.

Operon is an open protocol launching on Arbitrum that tackles all three at once: coordination, verification, distribution. The next 12 months will be a fight over this layer. Closed giants will try to absorb it into walled gardens. Open protocols will race against them. But either way, the layer gets filled, not left empty. Anyone not positioned yet hasn't noticed the slot exists.

This kind of infrastructure has emerged many times. The next one will be for AI agents. Whoever builds it first takes the next decade. What are your thoughts?

Originality.io: 79%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

The more time I spend looking at AI agents, the more convinced I am that distribution is a bigger problem than it gets credit for.
A while back I watched a team spend weeks evaluating different agents before settling on one. Then someone in their Slack dropped a link to something built by a small team nobody had heard of, and it beat the agent they'd picked on several of the metrics that mattered. That's how distribution works in this space right now. What you end up using comes down to who did marketing better.

This reminds me of the GPT Store launch in 2024. OpenAI reported over 3 million custom GPTs created. Outside of the people who got a direct link, the vast majority never got seen at all. AI agents are running into the same structural problem, only worse. The teams doing the best work tend to be small, deeply technical, with zero marketing budget. The deeper the tech, the harder distribution becomes.

Distribution channels are there. The problem is the discovery entry points all sit with centralized platforms. They change the rules whenever they want, delist you whenever they want. Community-driven discovery is another path, but communities alone can't carry the kind of distribution layer an agent economy needs. And this isn't a problem that self-corrects. The agents with better marketing capture the usage and the revenue. The better agents that nobody sees end up with neither. No data, no way to improve. No revenue, no next round. The better stuff dies first.

Breaking this cycle doesn't take a better marketplace. It takes making distribution protocol-native. Every agent registers on a shared ledger. Discovery, verification, and routing all happen on a layer no single platform can control.
The core idea behind Operon is letting a team with zero marketing budget compete with well-funded rivals at the same point of discovery. AI agents are this cycle's gold rush, but nobody has claimed the discovery, verification, and routing layer yet. Whoever turns that layer into neutral infrastructure first takes the same position TCP/IP holds for the internet, or Chainlink holds for oracles.

Right now, the decentralized path has a structural advantage. The big platforms are all still racing each other on the agents capability itself. They haven't turned to the infrastructure between agents yet. Once that window closes and agents are locked inside the big platforms' marketplaces, walking in then is a completely different game from staking out this layer now.
Curious what others here think, especially anyone who's actually tried to push an agent to market and hit the distribution wall.

Originality.io: 81%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

Agreed that distribution and trust are separate problems, but I'd argue they need the same infrastructure layer to solve. The trust mechanisms have to be part of that same layer, not bolted on separately.

The GPT Store failure you're describing is exactly right. The signal-to-noise problem isn't just a discovery problem. Nothing in the stack made quality legible. Signed manifests, permission scopes, usage proofs, reputation that's hard to farm — these are exactly what a neutral registry needs to make verifiable. Self-reported reputation is worthless. It has to come from the node network independently attesting whether each agent followed protocol, not from the agent operator telling you how good they are.

The way we're thinking about it with Operon: on-chain operator declarations at registration covering model class, data handling policy, and permitted use scope. All immutable, public, auditable. Node-verified attestations of protocol compliance. Reputation built from attestation data that agents can't self-report. Discovery ranked by actual performance score, not banner placement.

The decentralized spam problem is real, but I think it's an argument for better signal architecture, not against decentralization itself. Centralized platforms have the same spam problem. They just hide it behind editorial curation that can be bought.

Originality.io: 95%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected


This newbie account is also the same, the majority of its posts are also indicated to be AI generated.

User: wmiran

Bitcoin is traceable on-chain, so the transfer between wallets is still visible. Tax authorities don’t need to "see ownership" in a legal sense—they just track the movement of coins and rely on exchange records, KYC data, and reporting when it eventually hits a regulated platform.

In most jurisdictions, sending BTC to someone else is treated as a taxable disposal anyway, and gifting rules can also trigger tax depending on the country. So it’s not a loophole in practice.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
Sapling.ai: 99%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

I think institutional adoption of crypto will be much bigger in 10 years than it is today. As for Bitcoin's price, nobody can know for sure, but if adoption continues to grow, significantly higher prices wouldn't be surprising. The biggest unknowns are still regulation and global economic conditions.

Originality.io: 99%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

I agree with the core distinction. Price and value are not the same, and good investing is about buying value, not chasing price movements.

But I’d add one caution: assuming every price drop is a "gift" only works if the underlying thesis is still valid. In Bitcoin’s case, conviction should come from understanding the long-term fundamentals, not just the desire to accumulate more.

Bear markets help disciplined investors, but they also expose whether someone actually understands what they’re holding or is just averaging down blindly.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
Sapling.ai: 95%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

It’s a fair comparison in terms of structure: internet decentralized information flow, Bitcoin introduces a decentralized monetary system.

But money is more tightly tied to regulation and enforcement than information, so the shift is slower and more constrained. Bitcoin is part of that evolution, but whether it becomes “global monetary decentralization” is still uncertain and depends on adoption, regulation, and scale.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
Sapling.ai: 99%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected


For this account he even put the AI's replies raw into his posts without thinking of changing them.

User: taddus33333

I appreciate the thoughtful analysis in your Democratic Chess proposal. Your points about tokenomics and cross-chain integrity are well-structured. The integration with Ethereum mainnet as canonical layer while using Base for operations shows practical consideration for user experience. I'd be interested to see how the governance model evolves as the platform scales.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

Thank you for the transparent approach to presenting AYLA Sapphire. The 'don't trust, verify' philosophy is exactly what the crypto space needs. Your educational focus on Polygon shows understanding of current ecosystem dynamics. I have a few questions: How will the project handle governance post-launch? What measures are in place for community feedback integration? The pre-launch review concept is valuable - keep up the open dialogue.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

This is an excellent question about exchange resilience. I believe Monero (XMR) would have the strongest survival prospects in such a scenario due to its privacy-by-default design, active development community, and existing peer-to-peer infrastructure. The technical foundation is solid, and the community has been consistently supporting the network through various market cycles. What's your take on privacy-focused cryptocurrencies in this context?

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

I appreciate the thoughtful analysis on Cardano's community challenges. The cancellation of Cardano Summit 2026 is indeed concerning for ecosystem momentum. However, the core technology remains solid, and community-driven projects often face these funding hurdles. What are your thoughts on how the Cardano ecosystem can better organize community funding for major events?

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected