AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Satofan44]

I don't really know what you are saying dude, I'm really surprised you said my post are generated by ai but guess what, you can check the results I got below 👇

You should try understand that most of this ai detectors don't give accurate results because they also make mistakes.

Guess what, in case you don't know, you can check this thread below

You literally did not even read or understand my post when you responded with this shitpost. I have proven that you use AI, there is nothing you can say. No detector will help you anymore. You deserve a sig. ban like 99% of the users in signature campaigns even if this case is not confirmed to be AI, nutildah is not working fast enough. @nutildah work faster, add an extra shift for the first few weeks. Get to it.

[TokenTikas]

User: Mr_Brilliant$

Good catch but I want to mention one more thing. Most of his writing gets detected by chatboard detector. Even after reporting Mr_Brilliant$ and bringing AI-detected posts to attention, he is still not stopping writing with AI. It is suspicious that a user like this suddenly started using AI. For that reason, they should be kept on the target list and their activities should be monitored.

Thoughtful one.. Going into a business because there is actual demand for it, rather than because other people are doing it, is the better approach to business in my opinion too..

Something else I will add is that knowledge is also very important.. Before venturing into any business, it is important to know how it works, the risks involved, the market, and what you are getting yourself into.. because If you go into any business without proper knowledge, there is a high chance that you will end up making costly mistakes that could have been avoided..

Undetectable AI: 99%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%

Running is still consistently posting AI-generated content despite being called out for it.

[nutildah]

No detectors were used or needed for this detection, I was working with the AI during the time when I was reading some responses in this thread and this order of words caught my attention. Then I checked and replicated the output, which is better than a generator -- I find them increasingly unreliable as many have started to sell "humanize" services, because of which they have an incentive to falsely label text as AI. Merit history also confirms this is a farmed account. @nutildah signature ban please.

It would set a terrible precedent to start sigbanning accounts solely based on suspicion without corroborating evidence.

You appear to be right, but its not worth accusing accounts here unless you're willing to put them through the process outlined in the OP. That goes for everybody. The process exists for a reason. If you're not satisfied with the current detectors, find a better one, or make your own.

I don't really know what you are saying dude, I'm really surprised you said my post are generated by ai but guess what, you can check the results I got below 👇

Your posts are almost certainly "AI inspired", at the very least. I recommend you and all other accounts currently doing what you're doing to stop now. If you think you will get away with it forever, you are sorely mistaken.

You are taking AI output and running it through a shittifier. (There's no such thing as a "humanizer" because AI is incapable of outputting human text.)

Here's an example. Original post:

For me, I will say that not every action that happens during or after war means that everything is being planned from the start. You see when the tension reduces even for a little period of time, businesses and countries do usually uses the opportunity protect their own interests. During this time some will strengthens the alliance, some will trade while others will prepare should in case the conflict starts again. Meanwhile it do not automatically mean or prove that whole conflict thing is orchestrated, but it shows that every country is trying to secure the best outcome for itself in a very tense situation.

Sapling: 0.4% Fake

After removing unnecessary filler words, correcting punctuation and spelling, the results are vastly different:

Not every action that happens during or after war means that everything is being planned from the start. When tension reduces even for a little period of time, businesses and countries usually use the opportunity protect their own interests. During this time some will strengthen the alliance, some will trade, while others will prepare should in case the conflict starts again. Meanwhile, it does not automatically mean or prove that whole conflict is orchestrated, but it shows that every country is trying to secure the best outcome for itself in a very tense situation.

Sapling: 99.9% Fake

However, this is not enough on its own to issue any kind of action based on AI use. I am sure there are better detectors out there that recognize shittified AI text right away. We should not confidently label this account as an AI poster until it can be more clearly demonstrated.

[Satofan44]

It would set a terrible precedent to start sigbanning accounts solely based on suspicion without corroborating evidence.

You appear to be right, but its not worth accusing accounts here unless you're willing to put them through the process outlined in the OP. That goes for everybody. The process exists for a reason. If you're not satisfied with the current detectors, find a better one, or make your own.

It would were it not now validated through 2 other methods by both you and me -- how is that not "corroborating evidence"? There is no objective reason that would make the detection tools given here or method the only ways to "corroborate evidence". By explaining how I did it it I provided a means for others to reproduce it. You can try to find a better detector if you want, because from what I can see the detectors that are used here have started to recognize even writing that predates the internet as AI. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't and would fail to detect the post of the user as not AI even when it is clearly AI. That is why I delivered the example user with another method. Query the thread where the reply was written to see what AI would say, and then compare it or subtract things like you did -- both work.

However, this is not enough on its own to issue any kind of action based on AI use. I am sure there are better detectors out there that recognize shittified AI text right away. We should not confidently label this account as an AI poster until it can be more clearly demonstrated.

We can skip the AI labeling since it deserves a sig. ban anyway. You can use suspicions cast on users due to other behaviors (such as this one) to put priority on the account for evaluation for a sig. ban -- you are not supposed to act on anything without investigating it. I should have been clearer initially. The detectors are mostly a waste of time when an user deserves a signature ban, the step can be completely skipped if they check the other boxes.

You deserve a sig. ban like 99% of the users in signature campaigns even if this case is not confirmed to be AI, nutildah is not working fast enough. @nutildah work faster, add an extra shift for the first few weeks. Get to it.

The user Mhizlove has completely generic, AI-padded, pattern-confirmed posts. It does not need an AI tag, it needs a sig. ban. It is just one of the many accounts that are farmed up. Often you can find that they have earned all of their merits in the recent 120 days to rank up by tracking signature campaign applications (while the accounts are still fresh, obviously as time passes this changes), even if they are complete shitposters. Meanwhile you can find other users that have posts that are significantly better but they barely earn any merit. That is the pattern, it is so obvious that the level of enforcement here is a joke.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3726250;sa=showPosts

There's not even 1 post that is not a shitpost.

[nutildah]

Trust me, I will get around to at least some of that in the future. Right now the backlog only includes the most poorly-rounded accounts, which overlaps with some AI users, but not all.

I will likely end up building my own AI detector to better capture the different types of AI posters on the forum:

- template AI (low level)
- shittified AI (medium level)
- Google Translate AI (high level, sometimes hard to tell if thoughts expressed are original)

It is half done already, but not specific enough as it currently stands.

This is the value of the detectors:

A full member who posts using AI.
BattleDog

Shamir backup is basically splitting your seed into pieces, then require a minimum number of pieces to rebuild it. So if you pick 5 shares with a threshold of 3, you can lose up to 2 shares and still recover, but a thief would need to steal 3 of them before they can do anything. It's not multisig and it doesn't change your wallet on-chain, it's just a fancier way of storing the same secret.

People use it when they want redundancy across locations or some light "steal one paper and you get nothing" protection.

The tradeoff is complexity: most losses I've seen over the years came from people getting cute with backups and then not being able to reconstruct them under stress. If you do try it, do a full recovery test once (on a fresh device, with no cameras around) and consider something boring like 2-of-3 with each share stored separately...... otherwise a well-protected standard seed (and maybe a passphrase if you understand it) is honestly fine for most folks.

Cheers

StealthWriter: 100% AI detected
undetectable: 60% AI detected
GPTZero AI: 100% AI detected

This guy fooled absolutely everybody, except for the detectors.

He probably could have had a nice career as an intelligent AI reply guy if he hadn't joined a sig campaign early on. Then his real motivations became much clearer.

Speaking of that, my system was trained (in part) on data from accounts with pre-existing sig bans, which includes BattleDog and a few other AI posters who had already been sigbanned at the time.

[Dark.Look]

A full member who posts using AI.
BattleDog

Hey nutildah
Already reported his guy twice
He even received a neutral tag
1- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66630049#msg66630049
2- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66701882#msg66701882


User: Crytohillss
@Hhampuz

Some persons enter crypto expecting instant wealth but markets rarely reward impatience, building wealth usually comes from making sensible decisions staying consistent and giving good investments time to grow. Holding Bitcoin with long term mindset isn't a guarantee of success , but it reflects the discipline that often matters more than chasing quick profits patient may not be exciting but it's one of the most valuable traits an investor can develop.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found
grammarly: 100% AI

Bayern definitely have one of the strongest squads in the Bundesliga and their depth gives them an edge over most teams. Football can still be unpredictable injuries consistency and the form of teams like leverkusen's or Dortmund could make the trophies race more interesting than expected as for the champions league,  Bayern have the quality to go far, but they will need to be at their best because the competition is always hard.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
undetectable: 99% AI

I understand why people see it that way but i think it's better to wait for the final judgment, a case of this size is bound to take longer than the others and whatever the outcome is, it should be based on solid evidence rather than public pressure
I think the main difference is the scale and complexity of the allegations, everton and Nottingham forest's cases were much more straightforward, while manchester City can involves a lot of evidence to review whether people like it or not a thorough process is better than jumping to a verdict

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
undetectable: 99% AI

I think that's a fair observation, in Bitcoin's early decades gambling platforms were definitely among the first businesses to embrace crypto because transactions were fast and there were fewer restrictions but i also think things are changing. Today many people are using crypto for payment and even online shopping in some places gambling is stil a big part of the ecosystem but as adoption grows  i expected that the range of real world used to keep expanding beyond just betting.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
undetectable: 99% AI

I agree with you,  Trying to wait for the right moment can leave people watching from the sideline while the prices keeps going up. For anyone still building their stack consistency usually matters more that perfect timing. Most of the folks tend to overthink the market but sticking to a DCA plan reduces a lot of the emotions if a dip comes, its just a bonus rather than something one is depending on.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
undetectable: 99% AI

Once gambling becomes driven by desperation instead of entertainment it's easy to lose control pursuing losses often leads to even bigger issues because the focus shifts from making smart decisions to trying to recover money at all costs. Knowing when to stop and sticy to limits can make s big difference sometimes the hard part isn't placing the bet it's walking away. Gambling should never replace hard work or becomes a solutions to money problems, desperation can make people ignore every warning sign that's why responsible games is so important.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
undetectable: 99% AI
copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found

Consistency is often over looked when individuals talk about investing but it's truly what builds long time results DCA helps reduce the pressure of trying to time the market and keeps the focus on building a habit over time. The ability to adjust the amount based on one own financial situation also makes it a more realistic strategy for many people. DCA is the discipline it generate instead of stressing over daily price movement and focus on staying consistent and building one position gradually.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
undetectable: 99% AI
sapling: 74.5% AI

[lovesmayfamilis]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3726250;sa=showPosts

There's not even 1 post that is not a shitpost.

By clicking on the link, one can see that he urgently needed a loan. The old and hackneyed insurance scheme is against the fact that the account will be kicked out of the signature company, and in today's version it will be banned altogether.

"Now that the secret is out, the fat is in the fire!"

Loan Amount: 151 USDT

[Satofan44]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3726250;sa=showPosts
There's not even 1 post that is not a shitpost.

By clicking on the link, one can see that he urgently needed a loan. The old and hackneyed insurance scheme is against the fact that the account will be kicked out of the signature company, and in today's version it will be banned altogether.

"Now that the secret is out, the fat is in the fire!"

Loan Amount: 151 USDT

Which provides a 100% confirmation that this is a farmed account. Thanks for pointing it out, but unless one of you acts in time by either giving him a signature ban or giving him a negative rating I believe he may get that loan. Shasan does not care, he is so obsessed with interest that even my fellow Jew bankers would be envious of his personality. By now we have independently confirmed that he does use AI and that he is a farmed account, it should be sufficient. His posts are also the exact kind of pattern shitposting junk, but nutildah has way too many accounts to review in a short amount of time. Some will definitely try to cheat the system and take whatever they can before their downfall.

[Mhizlove]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3726250;sa=showPosts

There's not even 1 post that is not a shitpost.

By clicking on the link, one can see that he urgently needed a loan. The old and hackneyed insurance scheme is against the fact that the account will be kicked out of the signature company, and in today's version it will be banned altogether.

"Now that the secret is out, the fat is in the fire!"

Loan Amount: 151 USDT

What does loan has to do here?
Is it the first time I'm taking a loan?

Kicked out of campaign for what reason?
I'm not a desperate person, after this post I will delete the application immediately.
Well I'm not surprised at all.

What secret are you even talking about?

Go straight to the point lady.


Edit: Satofan44 I have nothing to say to you at all, you are not in anyway among the people I interact with.

[nutildah]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3726250;sa=showPosts

There's not even 1 post that is not a shitpost.

By clicking on the link, one can see that he urgently needed a loan. The old and hackneyed insurance scheme is against the fact that the account will be kicked out of the signature company, and in today's version it will be banned altogether.

What's remarkable is they are continuing on completely undeterred, not attempting to change their writing in any way:

Honestly, I get your point, but the predictions, stats and AI you mentioned are all supposed to serve as a guide, so depending on it completely won't help. Football,you see, has a lot of surprises that most times, even with predictions you will still lose. So without you having an understanding of how the game is going, you will end up misreading the info that is being given to you by AI or stats. So I will say that adding your own understanding with a little bit of research about the game you want to bet on will be better than putting all hopes on mere numbers. Betting has a lot of risk even with all the analysis on ground, and it's not guaranteed that the outcome will be as expected.

This doesn't even fool Sapling as is: 98.6% Fake

But again I can't find another detector that reports the same.

Its like they don't know how to post in any other way.

[Mhizlove]

Honestly, I get your point, but the predictions, stats and AI you mentioned are all supposed to serve as a guide, so depending on it completely won't help. Football,you see, has a lot of surprises that most times, even with predictions you will still lose. So without you having an understanding of how the game is going, you will end up misreading the info that is being given to you by AI or stats. So I will say that adding your own understanding with a little bit of research about the game you want to bet on will be better than putting all hopes on mere numbers. Betting has a lot of risk even with all the analysis on ground, and it's not guaranteed that the outcome will be as expected.

This doesn't even fool Sapling as is: 98.6% Fake

But again I can't find another detector that reports the same.

Its like they don't know how to post in any other way.

Honestly before someone claims that AI is been used on a post, they must used 3 or more detectors to prove their claims, just like I already did previously. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66984699#msg66984699

Sapling is not accurate because it claims that my text is AI, use other AI detectors to confirm that same post.

And talking about my post quality, it's high when I checked with your site, so I don't use AI and I'm a good poster take it or leave it.

[macson]

Gotta run my AI detector again. And the first one I'll report is this newbie account. His posts are most likely AI-generated. I've included three posts as proof.

User: Benhouse

The daily-buy framing is doing a lot of work here. Going from ~7,700 to 7,725 over a month is roughly 25 coins, not 30, so either the buying isn't quite daily or some of it is being reported on a lag. Small point, but "one a day, no matter what" is the part people repeat, and it's worth holding the number to it.

The bigger thing that "changing regulations" glosses over is the IMF agreement. The loan came with conditions that pushed acceptance from mandatory to voluntary and were understood to cap public sector accumulation. The government kept posting purchases anyway. That gap between what was agreed and what the tracker shows is the actual story, and it's a far harder problem for them than an opposition talking point.

Which leads to the part I find most interesting for us. A sovereign treasury turns Bitcoin into an election issue. Those coins sit with whoever holds power, and a future administration can sell them, pledge them, or hand them to a creditor by simple decision. That's the opposite of the property most of us hold it for. Corporate treasuries have the same flaw but at least shareholders choose their board more than once every five years.

So I'd say the risk to that stack isn't the price. It's that its owner is a government, and governments change.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
pangram: 100%

I use unified too, and for the reason you give: one balance, no shuffling funds between wallets before a setup is gone. Hard to go back once you're used to it.

The part that rarely gets mentioned though is what shared collateral actually means when things go wrong. In single asset mode a bad position can only eat what you put behind it. In unified or multi-asset, everything on the account is standing behind that position, so a trade you sized "small" can end up drawing on coins you were holding long term and had no intention of risking. The convenience and the risk come from the exact same feature.

Multi-asset adds a second layer, since your collateral is itself marked to market. In a broad drawdown your collateral value falls at the same moment your position goes against you, so the margin ratio moves faster than most people expect from watching the position alone.

The other cost is measurement. With everything pooled it's genuinely harder to say what a given strategy returned, because funding, conversions and cross margin blur the lines. I keep a separate record per strategy for that reason, otherwise a month looks fine overall while one approach quietly bleeds.

So unified for execution, but I keep position sizing based on what I'd accept losing, not on what the account lets me open.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
pangram: 100%

Agree on both, though I'd say the second one is usually caused by the first rather than separate from it.

Emotional control gets talked about like a personality trait you either have or you don't. Most of it is position size. Risk 1% and you can sit through four losses in a row and barely feel it. Risk 10% and your hands are shaking by the second one, and that's when you start doing things you'd never do on a demo. Same person, same setup, completely different behaviour.

The part nobody warns beginners about is that the account rarely dies on one bad trade. It dies in the twenty minutes after two or three losses, when you go looking for the money back. I only saw it clearly after going through my own history and checking what I did right after each losing streak. The number wasn't pretty.

Blowing the first account is almost a rite of passage. Blowing the second one means you didn't write anything down.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
pangram: 100%


This newbie is the same. He just registered, but his posts are AI-generated. I've included four posts as proof.

User: Maine22K

I think two separate issues are being mixed together. Saying Bitcoin may not become the dominant everyday payment method isn’t the same as saying it has no future. Many Bitcoin supporters already view the base layer primarily as a secure settlement network, while payment solutions like Lightning aim to handle smaller transactions. Also, the fact that Bitcoin doesn’t produce yield is true, but that alone doesn’t make it a pyramid scheme. Assets can lack yield without fitting the definition of a pyramid scheme. The more interesting question is whether Bitcoin’s long-term value comes from its utility as a scarce, decentralized monetary asset or whether demand alone is sufficient to sustain it.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: AI Polished
StealthWriter: 100%
pangram: 100%

I understand the point you’re trying to make that Bitcoin has characteristics that make it stand out from other cryptocurrencies. However, I think saying “because it’s Bitcoin” doesn’t really answer these questions. Bitcoin’s position today comes from factors like its network effect, decentralization, security, predictable monetary policy, and the trust it has built over many years. Those are the reasons it has remained dominant while many other projects have struggled. In my opinion, explaining why Bitcoin is different makes for a stronger argument than simply saying there’s no other like it.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: AI Polished
StealthWriter: 100%
pangram: 100%

This news also highlights an important distinction between Bitcoin and custodial services. Bitcoin itself is a decentralized network, but many people access it through centralized exchanges or custodians that must comply with the laws and sanctions of the jurisdictions where they operate. As a result, users of those services may be affected even though the Bitcoin network itself continues to function as designed. That’s one reason why many Bitcoin users emphasize self-custody, although it also comes with the responsibility of securely managing your own private keys.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: AI Polished
StealthWriter: 100%
pangram: 100%

I think it’s important to separate the technical question from the legal one. A hardware wallet is designed to protect private keys, but whether someone can be legally compelled to reveal a PIN or passphrase depends on the laws of the jurisdiction and the circumstances of the investigation. The wallet’s security features don’t automatically determine the legal outcome. Before drawing conclusions from one reported case, I’d want to know exactly what charges were filed and whether they were based on refusing to provide access or on some other alleged conduct.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: AI Polished
StealthWriter: 100%
pangram: 100%


Last but not least, this newbie also detected that his post was generated by AI.

User: minic1993

I agree, but I think the hardest part isn't the strategy itself, it's the psychology behind it.

Anyone can say they'll HODL when the market is going up. The real challenge comes during major corrections, when fear and uncertainty make people question their decisions.

Imo, successful HODLing is less about doing nothing and more about having the conviction to stick to your plan despite the market noise.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
pangram: 100%

Lost coins don't threaten Bitcoin itself. They simply reduce the amount of BTC that's actually available, making the remaining supply even scarcer.

The real issue is estate planning. Anyone holding Bitcoin long term should think about how trusted family members could recover it if they're no longer around. Without a plan, those coins are probably gone forever.

I don't see lost keys as something that would stop Bitcoin from surviving for generations. The network can keep running even if some coins are never moved again.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
pangram: 100%

I think that's one of the interesting things about Bitcoin. We can see that coins haven't moved for years, but we can't know why. A wallet that has been inactive for 15 years could belong to someone who lost their keys, or it could belong to someone intentionally holding for the long term. The blockchain doesn't tell us the difference.

Even if a large number of dormant coins were to move someday, I think the market would initially react with uncertainty rather than panic. People would speculate about whether those coins are going to be sold, but a transaction alone doesn't mean they're being dumped on the market. They could simply be moving to a new wallet, improving security, or preparing for inheritance.

In the long run, I don't think it changes Bitcoin's fundamentals. The supply cap remains the same, and markets have historically recovered from much larger shocks than the movement of old coins. The initial reaction might be volatile, but I wouldn't expect it to permanently change Bitcoin's value proposition.

Originality.io: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
pangram: 100%

All posts have been reported

[nutildah]

Honestly before someone claims that AI is been used on a post, they must used 3 or more detectors to prove their claims, just like I already did previously. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66984699#msg66984699

Rather than remaining flummoxed by your persistence, I'll explain why that's a poor argument. First of all, you use the same filler words far too often, stuff like:

Honestly,
Actually,
you see, (wow 10x in 20 posts)
I will say,
For me, (9x)

There is no reason to use these phrases as much as you do, especially when you are only using them to talk about endlessly repeated subjects. There's often no reason to have them at all, which is why AI avoids using them. However, these are exactly the kinds of words that would be added by an AI shittifier humanizer, and in the right context, to break more generic AI patterns.

Sapling is not accurate because it claims that my text is AI, use other AI detectors to confirm that same post.

Alright, do what you must I suppose. All I have to say is we'll see about that.

And talking about my post quality, it's high when I checked with your site, so I don't use AI and I'm a good poster take it or leave it.

This is an unintended consequence of the system: being proud of this level of work.

[Mhizlove]

Honestly before someone claims that AI is been used on a post, they must used 3 or more detectors to prove their claims, just like I already did previously. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66984699#msg66984699

Rather than remaining flummoxed by your persistence, I'll explain why that's a poor argument. First of all, you use the same filler words far too often, stuff like:

Honestly,
Actually,
you see, (wow 10x in 20 posts)
I will say,
For me, (9x)

Actually I'm not confused at all because that's my writing pattern/style, the thing is that everyone has their writing style/pattern despite the areas they actually want to post. So does it mean if I use those words frequently then my posts will become AI, I need to know because I'm even surprised to see that Sapling is proving a total wrong answer from what other detectors are saying.

There is no reason to use these phrases as much as you do, especially when you are only using them to talk about endlessly repeated subjects.

There's often no reason to have them at all, which is why AI avoids using them.

If I avoid using those words, does it prove that I'm not using ai?

However, these are exactly the kinds of words that would be added by an AI shittifier humanizer, and in the right context, to break more generic AI patterns.

I don't use humanizer, you of all people should know that even though someone uses humanizer to write in the forum he will be caught.

Sapling is not accurate because it claims that my text is AI, use other AI detectors to confirm that same post.

Alright, do what you must I suppose. All I have to say is we'll see about that.

And talking about my post quality, it's high when I checked with your site, so I don't use AI and I'm a good poster take it or leave it.

This is an unintended consequence of the system: being proud of this level of work.

Should I feel bad?

[nutildah]

Should I feel bad?

You should feel bad for lying and wasting everyone's time, including your own.

Original post:

Honestly for me, one thing that the society is pushing too much is the Idea or fact that everyone must achieve success at same age or follow a particular pathway. As I grow older, I have realized that you see life is not a competition and everyone of us has different journey. Some people can marry early, others can decide to build a business first, some will also decide to focus on career and education. None of these automatically means that one person has passed the other person. I have come to learn that good health, financial stability, peace of mind and genuine relationship is much more valuable than running after milestones just to impress people. At the end, real success is not just you meeting up with society's expectations, but the real success is when you're living a life that gives you fulfilment or satisfaction.

Sapling: 1.4% Fake
GPTZero: 100% Human

After removing filler words, correcting punctuation & grammar:

One thing society pushes too much is the idea that everyone must achieve success at the same age, or follow a particular pathway. As I grow older, I have realized that life is not a competition and everyone of us has a different journey. Some people marry early, and others decide to build a business first. Some will also decide to focus on career and education. None of these automatically means one person has passed the other person. I have come to learn that good health, financial stability, peace of mind and genuine relationships are much more valuable than running after milestones just to impress people. At the end, real success is not just you meeting society's expectations, but living a life that gives you fulfilment or satisfaction.

Sapling: 99.4% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI

And would you look at this, have you ever seen such a thing before?



I'm willing to bet you have, because if you're not using this, you're using something exactly like it.

There's no need to review any more of your posts because almost all your posts are composed this way. You'll have a year to develop your own style of writing, or figure out how to better fool us. Its your choice how you decide to spend the time.

[FinneysTrueVision]

Honestly before someone claims that AI is been used on a post, they must used 3 or more detectors to prove their claims, just like I already did previously.

Well here is another AI detector that says you are using AI, specifically AI that has been humanized. The newest Pangram 4.0 model, which was released today, is described as having 'Evasion resistance against “humanized” text designed to bypass standard detection’.

Honestly, I get your point, but the predictions, stats and AI you mentioned are all supposed to serve as a guide, so depending on it completely won't help. Football,you see, has a lot of surprises that most times, even with predictions you will still lose. So without you having an understanding of how the game is going, you will end up misreading the info that is being given to you by AI or stats. So I will say that adding your own understanding with a little bit of research about the game you want to bet on will be better than putting all hopes on mere numbers. Betting has a lot of risk even with all the analysis on ground, and it's not guaranteed that the outcome will be as expected.

pangram.com - 100% of this text is AI. This text shows signs of humanization.

Actually, I get why you end up concluding after watching your brother's experience. Also, a lot of people go into gambling with the mindset of making quick money from it, but most times the reverse is the case and at the end of the day they end up losing. The most painful part is that they don't just lose the money they use in gambling but also the time, their mental health and peace of mind, because of the belief that they will recover everything in the next bet. For me, I will say, as someone who wants to gamble, you should see it as entertainment or fun and not a source of making quick money, because once you begin to put all your hope that it will solve your financial issues, the risk of you ending up with more losses will definitely increase.

pangram.com - 66% AI 34% Human. AI generated content appears in the later part.

Personally, for me I don't think AI can replace humans completely, even though they can be seen in a lot of areas. What makes live casino more interesting for people is not the game itself but the real interaction is with humans, the dealers responds will be natural. Even though AI gets to the point of acting like human, as a players I will still prefer real Human dealer because it will feel more genuine to me. What can only happen is that casinos can use AI where it can be used while the Human dealers will stay for people that value real life experience. That don't mean both of them can't work in hand with each other, they can both coexist, but it all depends on what each player wants.

pangram.com - 100% AI. This text shows signs of humanization.

[Mhizlove]

Should I feel bad?

You should feel bad for lying and wasting everyone's time, including your own.

Original post:

If that's what you think, then fine.
Time wasting? Nah! I already know you do what's on your mind so I didn't waste time at all, besides I'm not among the desperate ones.

Honestly for me, one thing that the society is pushing too much is the Idea or fact that everyone must achieve success at same age or follow a particular pathway. As I grow older, I have realized that you see life is not a competition and everyone of us has different journey. Some people can marry early, others can decide to build a business first, some will also decide to focus on career and education. None of these automatically means that one person has passed the other person. I have come to learn that good health, financial stability, peace of mind and genuine relationship is much more valuable than running after milestones just to impress people. At the end, real success is not just you meeting up with society's expectations, but the real success is when you're living a life that gives you fulfilment or satisfaction.

Sapling: 1.4% Fake
GPTZero: 100% Human

After removing filler words, correcting punctuation & grammar:

It does8 prove anything, I have e used 9 different detectors to check this exact post, but guess what, they are not ai.
The reason why you have to edit my comment/post before check is because you are looking for an excuse to ban my account which of Couse you have already done.






Edit: actually you are trying to tell me that all this 9 ai detectors are wrong..?

One thing society pushes too much is the idea that everyone must achieve success at the same age, or follow a particular pathway. As I grow older, I have realized that life is not a competition and everyone of us has a different journey. Some people marry early, and others decide to build a business first. Some will also decide to focus on career and education. None of these automatically means one person has passed the other person. I have come to learn that good health, financial stability, peace of mind and genuine relationships are much more valuable than running after milestones just to impress people. At the end, real success is not just you meeting society's expectations, but living a life that gives you fulfilment or satisfaction.

Sapling: 99.4% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI

And would you look at this, have you ever seen such a thing before?



I'm willing to bet you have, because if you're not using this, you're using something exactly like it.

You are looking for a way to justify your actions. I don't use anything of such my dear, and I can keep saying the same thing over and over again.

There's no need to review any more of your posts because almost all your posts are composed this way. You'll have a year to develop your own style of writing, or figure out how to better fool us. Its your choice how you decide to spend the time.

You don't have anything to pin on my, yiu just go straight away to ban me and you have no prove that I'm a shit poster or proof that I use AI or humanizing tool to post.

[nutildah]

It does8 prove anything, I have e used 9 different detectors to check this exact post, but guess what, they are not ai.
The reason why you have to edit my comment/post before check is because you are looking for an excuse to ban my account which of Couse you have already done.

I was trying to give you a warning and a chance to change, but you immediately went back to what you were doing.

I edited your post and turned it into an AI post. Either I'm doing magic, or you're using AI to write your posts for you. Here, I'll do it again. This is a deleted post:

It's a insightful point you got there, you see the concept of scarcity has always been bitcoin's core selling point the idea that something is genuinely limited will naturally grow into worth over time.
You're right because only few people took time to think about what that actually means for fairness. As bitcoin grows more limited in supply, it's risks moving away from its core purpose of financial freedom from all and instead of it becoming an asset that is controlled by those who got it at its early stage. It's reminds us that scarcity can create value but can also make the rich richer and the poor left behind if not balanced with fairness and wider acceptance.

Sapling: 23.7% Fake
GPTZero: 100% AI (oops)

Edited to remove filler words and fix punctuation/grammar:

The concept of scarcity has always been bitcoin's core selling point -- the idea that if something is genuinely limited it will naturally grow in value over time.
Few people take the time to think about what this actually means for fairness. As bitcoin grows more limited in supply, it risks moving away from its core purpose of financial freedom for all and instead risks becoming an asset that is controlled by early adopters. It reminds us that scarcity can create value but also make the rich richer and the poor left behind if not balanced with fairness and wider acceptance.

Sapling: 99.7% Fake
GPTZero: 100% Fake
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT
Quillbot: 58% AI Generated

Edit: actually you are trying to tell me that all this 9 ai detectors are wrong..?

Yes. You can take an AI post and make it junky but its still an AI post. Everything you've ever written on the forum has been a waste of time. To think you're actually getting paid for this. Its a ridiculous world we live in.

You don't have anything to pin on my, yiu just go straight away to ban me and you have no prove that I'm a shit poster or proof that I use AI or humanizing tool to post.

I do, actually. Aside from all the evidence provided so far, you just proved you're using AI because now we get to see what your real writing looks like.

[LoyceV]

What's the verdict on Newbie Solarmesh who's on a posting spree?

your tx must include a valid scriptSig for each input
the script/witness rules have to match what the prevout actually encumbered
the two errors you saw map pretty well to that:

• missingorspent = wrong/unknown prevouts (or spent according to the node’s view)
• scriptsig-not-pushonly = your scriptSig contains non-push operations for a script type that requires push-only elements.

also most push-tx endpoints reject non-standard/malformed txs by policy

There are 2 possible scenarios:

1. If the address is valid but not the intended recipient's address the Bitcoin will be sent to that address and you will lose your funds.
2. If the address does not exist or is invalid (for instance, it does not match the correct format of a Bitcoin address), the transaction will not go through at all. Transaction will simply fail.

Keep in mind that once a Bitcoin transaction is confirmed, it cannot be reversed.